SpringerLink
Log in

Peristance of bacteria in the presence of viable, nonencysting, bacterivorous ciliates

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory studies of the interactions between a bacterial population and a population of bacterivorous ciliates consistently show that the bacteria are able to persist in the presence of viable ciliates. Reproduction of the bacteria, presumably at the expense of substrates produced by death and lysis of the ciliates and/or by their metabolic activity, has been suggested to be a factor involved in the observed bacterial persistence. Rates and extents of growth ofEscherichia coli in broths of mixed cultures of this bacterium and the ciliateTetrahymena pyriformis were determined in order to provide some data necessary to assess the importance of the suggested factor. In addition, an attempt was made to suppress bacterial growth on produced substrates so that feeding of the ciliates could be studied free of this complication. However, the procedure tested—addition of the antibiotic chloramphenicol (CM) at a concentration of 150μg/ml—led to other complications that made it impossible to obtain the desired information about feeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander M (1981) Why microbial predators and parasites do not eliminate their prey and hosts. Ann Rev Microbiol 35:113–133

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allison JL, Hartman RE, Hartman RS, Wolfe AD, Ciak J, Hahn FE (1962) Mode of action of chloramphenicol. VII. Growth and multiplication ofEscherichia coli in the presence of chloramphenicol. J Bacteriol 83:609–615

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashby RE (1976) Long-term variations in a protozoan chemostat culture. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 24:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bader FG, Tsuchiya HM, Fredrickson AG (1976) Grazing of ciliates on blue-green algae: effects of ciliate encystment and related phenomena. Biotech Bioeng 18:311–332

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonomi A, Fredrickson AG (1976) Protozoan feeding and bacterial wall growth. Biotech Bioeng 18:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brock TD (1961) Chloramphenicol. Bacteriol Rev 25:32–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bungay HR III, Bungay ML (1968) Microbial interactions in continuous culture. Adv Appl Microbiol 10:269–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canale RP (1969) Predator-prey relationships in a model for the activated process. Biotech Bioeng 11:887–907

    Google Scholar 

  9. Canale RP (1970) An analysis of models describing predator-prey interaction. Biotech Bioeng 12:353–378

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canale RP, Lustig TD, Kehrberger PM, Salo JE (1973) Experimental and mathematical modeling studies of protozoan predation on bacteria. Biotech Bioeng 15:707–728

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curds CR, Cockburn A (1971) Continuous monoxenic culture ofTetrahymena pyriformis. J Gen Microbiol 66:95–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dive D (1975) Influence de la concentration bacterienne sur la croissance deColpidium campylum. J Protozool 22:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drake JF, Jost JL, Fredrickson AG, Tsuchiya HM (1968) The food chain. In: Saunders JL (ed) Bioregenerative systems. NASA Special Publication 165, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. pp 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drake JF, Tsuchiya HM (1976) Predation onEscherichia coli byColpoda steinii. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:870–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Drake JF, Tsuchiya HM (1977) Growth kinetics ofColpoda steinii onEscherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:18–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  17. Graham JM, Canale RP (1982) Experimental and modeling studies of a four-trophic level predator-prey system. Microb Ecol 8:217–232

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta RS (1975) Killing and lysis ofEscherichia coli in the presence of chloramphenicol: relation to cellular magnesium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 7:748–753

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Habte M, Alexander M (1978) Protozoan density and the coexistence of protozoan predators and bacterial prey. Ecology 59:140–146

    Google Scholar 

  20. Habte M, Alexander M (1978) Mechanisms of persistence of low numbers of bacteria preyed upon by protozoa. Soil Biol Biochem 10:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jost JL, Drake JF, Fredrickson AG, Tsuchiya HM (1973) Interactions ofTetrahymena pyriformis, Escherichia coli, Azotobacter vinelandii, and glucose in a minimal medium. J Bacteriol 113:834–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Luckinbill LS (1973) Coexistence in laboratory populations ofParamecium aurelia and its predatorDidinium nasutum. Ecology 54:1320–1327

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luckinbill LS (1974) The effects of space and enrichment on a predator-prey system. Ecology 55:1142–1147

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mallory LM, Yuk C-S, Liang L-N, Alexander M (1983) Alternative prey: a mechanism for elimination of bacterial species by protozoa. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:1073–1079

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson JR (1972) Further studies on vacuole formation inTetrahymena pyriformis GL. Compt Rend Trav Lab Carlsberg 39:83–110

    Google Scholar 

  26. Novick A, Szilard L (1950) Description of the chemostat. Science 112:715–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pavlou S, Fredrickson AG (1983) Effects of the inability of suspension-feeding protozoa to collect all cell sizes of a bacterial population. Biotech Bioeng 25:1747–1772

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ratnam DA, Pavlou S, Fredrickson AG (1982) Effects of attachment of bacteria to chemostat walls in a microbial predator-prey relationship. Biotech Bioeng 24:2675–2694

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sambanis A (1985) Experimental and modeling studies on the dynamics of cultures of the ciliateTetrahymena pyriformis grown on several bacterial species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sambanis A, Pavlou S, Fredrickson AG (1986) Analysis of the dynamics of ciliate-bacterial interactions in a CSTR. Chem Engng Sci 41:1455–1469

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sambanis A, Fredrickson AG (1987) Long-term studies of ciliate-bacterial interactions. J Gen Microbiol 133:1619–1630

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sambanis A, Pavlou S, Fredrickson AG (1987) Coexistence of bacteria and feeding ciliates. Growth of bacteria on autochthonous substrates as a stabilizing factor for coexistence. Biotech Bioeng 29:714–728

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stephanopoulos G, Fredrickson AG (1981) Extinction probabilities in microbial predation: a birth and death approach. Bull Math Biol 43:165–181

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sudo R, Kobayashi K, Aiba S (1975) Some experiments and analysis of a predator-prey model: interaction betweenColpidium campylum andAlcaligenes facealis in continuous and mixed culture. Biotech Bioeng 17:167–184

    Google Scholar 

  35. Swift ST (1981) Some aspects of the Autecology of the ciliated Protozoan,Tetrahymena pyriformis. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  36. Swift ST, Najita IY, Ohtaguchi K, Fredrickson AG (1982) Continuous culture of the ciliateTetrahymena pyriformis onEscherichia coli. Biotech Bioeng 24:1953–1964

    Google Scholar 

  37. Swift ST, Najita IY, Ohtaguchi K, Fredrickson AG (1982) Some physiological aspects of the autecology of the suspension-feeding protozoanTetrahymena pyriformis. Microb Ecol 8:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  38. Topiwala H, Sinclair CG (1971) Temperature relationship in continuous culture. Biotech Bioeng 13:795–813

    Google Scholar 

  39. van den Ende P (1973) Predator-prey interactions in continuous culture. Science 181:562–564

    Google Scholar 

  40. Villarreal E, Canale RP, Akcasu Z (1975) A multigroup model for predator-prey interactions. Biotech Bioeng 17:1269–1290

    Google Scholar 

  41. Watson PJ (1980) Growth and feeding kinetics ofTetrahymena pyriformis preying on nongrowingEscherichia coli. MS Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  42. Watson PJ, Ohtaguchi K, Fredrickson AG (1981) Kinetics of growth of the ciliateTetrahymena pyriformis onEscherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 122:323–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams FM (1980) On understanding predator-prey interactions. In: Ellwood DC, Hedgar JN, Latham MJ, Lynch JM, Slater JH (eds) Contemporary microbial ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 349–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. A. Sambanis

    Present address: Biotechnology Process Engineering Center Room 20A-207, Massachusetts Intitule of Technology, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 55455, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

    A. Sambanis & A. G. Fredrickson

Authors
  1. A. Sambanis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. G. Fredrickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sambanis, A., Fredrickson, A.G. Peristance of bacteria in the presence of viable, nonencysting, bacterivorous ciliates. Microb Ecol 16, 197–211 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018914

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018914

Keywords

Search

Navigation