Log in

The role of ethylene in the control of cell division in cultured pea root tips: a mechanism to explain the excision effect

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A transitory cell division block, or excision effect, occurs in the meristem of roots after excision and transfer to culture medium. This block can be induced, in intact seedling roots, by exogenous treatment with ethylene gas. With continuous treatment, the block is longer and the recovery less than after a 4 hour pulse. In excised roots the excision effect can be eliminated by treatment with an inhibitor of ethylene synthesis (aminoethoxyvinylglycine) or action (silver thiosulfate). These experiments provide evidence to support the hypothesis that ethylene from the wounded end of an excised root is involved in a process resulting in a transitory block in cell cycle progression in the meristem. The implications of this hypothesis are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeles, F. B., 1973: Ethylene in Plant Biology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apelbaum, A., Burg, S. P., 1972: Effect of ethylene on cell division and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis inPisum sativum. Plant Physiol.50, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, P., 1976: The effect of ethylene on root meristems ofPisum sativum andZea mays. Planta131, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, A. D., Fairchild, L. M., 1953: A quick freeze method for making smear slides permanent. Stain Tech.28, 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constabel, F., Kurz, W. G. W., Chatson, K. B., Kirkpatrick, J. W., 1977: Partial synchrony in soybean cell suspension cultures induced by ethylene. Exp. Cell Res.105, 263–268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Y., Lieberman, M., 1968: Effects of kinetin, IAA, and gibberellin on ethylene production, and their interactions in growth of seedlings. Plant Physiol.43, 2029–2036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, N. E., Yang, S. F., 1982: Enhancement of wound induced ethylene synthesis by ethylene in preclimacteric cantaloupeCucumis melo cv. Gusto. Plant Physiol.69, 317–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W. A., 1962: Botanical Histochemistry. San Francisco, Calif.: W. H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. J., 1978: Target cells—New concepts for plant regulation in horticulture. Sci. Hort.30, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. N., Grant, C. J., Robinson, S. M., Radford, S. G., 1973: A comparison with halothane of the hormonal and anaesthetic properties of ethylene in plants. Brit. J. Anaesth.45, 682–690.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. S., Pratt, H. K., 1972: Effects of ethylene on potato tuber respiration. Plant Physiol.49, 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J., Reid, M. R., Paul, J., Rost, T., 1985: The effect of ethylene on adventitious root formation in mung bean (Vigna radiata) cuttings. J. Plant Growth Reg.4, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, T. L., Rowland, L, DeWees, C., 1982: Cell division heterogeneity in the primary meristems ofPisum sativum root tips after excision. J. exp. Bot.33, 1312–1318.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Sammut, M., 1982: Regulation of cell division in pea root tips after wounding: A possible role for ethylene. Protoplasma111, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltveit, M. E., Jr., Dilley, D. R., 1978: Rapidly induced wound ethylene form excised segments of etiolatedPisum sativum L., cv. Alaska. I. Characterization of the response. Plant Physiol.61, 447–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, A. M.,Davies, E., 1983: Synthesis of different proteins in response to auxin and wounding treatments. Plant Physiol.69, (Abstr. 574).

  • Stebbins, G. L., Shah, S. S., Jamin, D., Jura, P., 1967: Changed orientation of the mitotic spindle on stomatal guard cell divisions inHordeum vulgare. Amer. J. Bot.54, 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. N., Lieberman, M., Kunishi, A. T., 1974: Effects of ethylene and gibberellic acid on cellular growth and development in apical and subapical regions of etiolated pea seedlings. Plant Physiol.54, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van't Hof, J., 1974: The regulation of cell division in higher plants. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology25, 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen, H., 1983: Silver thiosulfate: An experimental tool in plant sciences. Sci. Hort.20, 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. R., 1943: A Handbook of Plant Tissue Culture. Lancaster, Pa.: Catell and Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. B., Morrison, J. H., Knobloch, N., 1959: Studies on the control of mitotic activity in excised roots. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol.5, 411–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Yang, S. F., 1980: Biosynthesis of wound ethylene. Plant Physiol.66, 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rost, T.L., Jones, T. & Robbins, J.A. The role of ethylene in the control of cell division in cultured pea root tips: a mechanism to explain the excision effect. Protoplasma 130, 68–72 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283332

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01283332

Keywords

Navigation