Log in

Consumer co-ops: Alternative economic and social units

  • Articles
  • Published:
Alternative Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional cooperatives which arose in the 1930s as alternative institutions became hierarchical, full-service supermarkets selling a full range of products. In the 1960s New Wave co-ops arose to meet the needs of a young constituency interested in ecology and nutrition. The New Wave co-ops tended to be non-hierarchical, participatory, and selective in their merchandising. Reality demands of the marketplace have contributed to the evolution of a Third Wave of cooperatives which combined the full product selection and defined organizational structure of the traditional co-ops with the natural food orientation and the volunteerism of the New Wave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, R.G., & Gump, P.V. (Eds.).Big school, small school. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, O.E.The consumers' cooperative as a distributive agency. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Co-op Handbook Collective.The food co-op handbook. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1975, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, R. Declining competition in food retailing: An opportunity for consumer food cooperatives?Journal of Consumer Affairs 1978,12 250–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curhan, R.C., & Wertheim, E.G. Consumer food buying cooperatives revisited.Journal of Retailing 1975,51 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, K.M. The nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and concerns of food cooperative shoppers in Lincoln, Nebraska. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB, May 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. Top grocers.New West, June 30, 1980, pp. 78–80.

  • Kreitner, P. Research: Who shops co-op, and why?The New Harbinger 1976,3 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neptune, R.California's uncommon markets. Richmond, CA: Associated Cooperatives, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noller, J. Storefront co-ops: Size, strategy, and structure.Taproot Newsletter 1979,1(5), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, K. Food for people. InA guide to cooperative alternatives. P. Freudlich, C. Collins, & M. Wenig (Eds.). New Haven, CT: Community Publications Cooperative, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, F.E.The first 125 years. Superior, WI: Cooperative Publishing Association, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodale, R. Rodale's environment action bulletin, March 22, 1975,6(6), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronco, W.Food co-ops. An alternative to shop** in supermarkets. Boston: Beacon Press, 1974, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, B. The new cooperatives.New Harbinger 1976,3 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R., Hohn, W., & Tyburczy, J. Motivation of food cooperative members.Journal of Retailing 1981, 57, 114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R., & Horner, M. Social interaction in co-ops and supermarkets.Communities 1981,49 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A.W. Undermanning theory and research.Representative Research in Social Psychology 1973,4 185–206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sommer, R. Consumer co-ops: Alternative economic and social units. J Fam Econ Iss 5, 109–117 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083248

Keywords

Navigation