SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptions of ideology: An exegesis and critique

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conceptions of ideology exhibit an awesome diversity. From an exegesis of nine different conceptions, this paper argues that it is the historical materialist view of ideology that reflects its specificity as a critical concept. From exegesis, the paper moves to diagnosis, using the critical idea that it is the systematic concealment of social contradictions that defines the ideological dis-ease. Thus, the positivist hard systems approach is found to suffer from the ideology of economic individualism. The structuralist hard systems approach suffers from the ideology of sociological unitarism. The soft systems approach suffers from the ideology of naturalism, thereby laying itself open, by default, to ideological penetration, especially of the sociological unitarist type. In programmatic terms, this unmasking of ideologies in the interest of enlightenment is one of the necessary functions for the liberation of systems theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts.Manage. Sci. 17, 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974a). The systems revolution.Long Range Plan. 7, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974b).Redesigning the Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974c). The social responsibility of O.K.Operat. Res. Q. 25(3), 361–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979a). The future of operational research is past.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 30(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979b). Resurrecting the future of operational research.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 30(3), 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981a).Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981b). The art and science of mess management.Interfaces 11, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (1973).Negative Dialectics (translated by Ashton, E. B.), Seabury Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., and Horkheimer, M. (1973).Dialectic of Enlightenment, Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1969).For Marx, Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1971).Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1975).Reading Capital (translated by Brewster, B.), New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L., and Balibar, E. (1970).Reading Capital, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baburoglu, O. (1990). Critical systems thinking and sociotechnical systems. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward A Just Society For Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1967).Elements of Semiology (translated by Lavers, A., and Smith, C.), Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1972).Mythologies, (translated by Lavers, A.), Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti, E. (1955). In Giuffre, D. A. (ed.),Teoria Generatte della Interpretazione, Instituto di Teoria della Interpretazione, Milan. [Translated (1967) asAllgemeine Auslegungslehre als Methodik der Geistewissenschaften, Mohr, Tubingen, JCB.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti, E. (1962).Die Hermeneutik Als allgemeine Methode der Geistewissenschaften, Mohr, Tubingen, JCB. [Translated (1980) in Bleicher, J. (1980), asHermeneutics as the general methodology of the Geistewissenschaften, pp. 51–94.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyleveld, D. (1975).Epistemological Foundations of Sociological Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, University of East Anglia.

  • Blau, P. M., and Scott, W. R. (1963).Formal Organizations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, J. (1980).Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hemeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving.J. Syst. Eng.3(2).

  • Checkland, P. B. (1978). The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1985). From optimising to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990s.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36, 757–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1968).The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession.Manage. Sci. 17(2), B37-B53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971).The Design of Inquiring Systems, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W.0 (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1990). Critical systems thinking and the future generations. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1940).An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1976). In Rickman, H. P. (ed.),Selected Writings, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1964).The Rules of Sociological Method (translated by Solvay, S. A., and Mueller, J. H.), Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1976).The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (translated by Swain, J. W.), Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, B. (1987).Critical Social Science, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1989a). Six scenarios for the future of systems “problem solving.”Syst. Pract.2, 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1989b). Archaeology of (systems) inquiry.Syst. Pract. 2, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1989c). Liberating systems theory: A summary.Revista Int. Sist. 1(1), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990a). Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking.Hum. Relat. 43(1), 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990b).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990c). Critical systems thinking and the systems sciences. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward A Just Society For Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991b).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners.Syst. Pract. 3, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1985).The Ontology and Epistemology of a Systems Approach, Ph.D. thesis, University of Lancaster, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1990a). The boundaries between critical systems thinking and interpretive systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 3, 585–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1990b). Critical and interpretive systems thinking. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991). Between systems thinking and systems practice. In Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1975a). Hermeneutics and social science.Cult. Hermeneut.2(4).

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1975b).Truth and Method, Seabury, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1980). The universitality of the hermeneutical problem. [Translated Linge, D. (1980). In Bleicher, J. (ed.),Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 128–140.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984).The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann, L. (1964).The Hidden God (translated by Thody, P.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann, L. (1973).The Human Sciences and Philosophy (translated by White, H., and Anchor, R.), Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971).Prison Notebooks (translated by Hoare, Q.), Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. (1990). Critical systems thinking and LST: How “liberating” are contemporary critical and liberating systems approaches? In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward A Just Society For Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971).Towards a Rational Society (translated by McCarthy, T.), Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962).Being and Time, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1966).Discourse on Thinking, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoos, I. R. (1972).Systems Analysis in Public Policy, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoos, I. R. (1979). Engineers as analysts of social systems: A critical enquiry.J. Syst. Eng. 4, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1974).Eclipse of Reason, Seabury Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, K. (1990). Critical systems thinking and information technology: Some summary reflections, doubts, and hopes through critical thinking critically considered, and through hypersystems. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1983). The nature of soft systems thinking: Comments on the three replies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1984). O.R. in systems: The alternative perspective.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35(2), 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985a). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach.Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985b). Systems inquiring competence and organisational analysis. InProceedings of the 1985 Meeting of the Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, KY.

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987a). Present positions and future prospects in management science.Omega 15(6), 455–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987b). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower Press, Aldershot, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1989). The critical kernel in modern systems thinking. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Systems Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Jackson, M. C. (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologiesJ. Opl. Res. Soc. 41, 657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991).Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaratna, N. (1986). Normative information model-based systems analysis and design (NIM-SAD): A framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain, J. (1979).The Concept of Ideology, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrain, J. (1983).Marxism and Ideology, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1975).What Is to Be Done? Foreign Languages Press, Peking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1972).Structural Anthropology (translated by Jacobson, C.), Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1973).Totemism (translated by Needham, R.), Penguin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1974).The Savage Mind, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, G. (1971).History and Class Consciousness, Merlin Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1973).Individualism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1968). In Kecskemeti, P. (ed.),Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. (1972).Ideology and Utopia (translated by Wirth, L., and Shils, E.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964).One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Societies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1970).Selected Works, Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1975).Selected Correspondence, Progress, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1990). Critical systems thinking and methodological pluralism. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1982). Cybernetics and organization theory: Epistemology or technique.Hum. Relat.35(7).

  • Morita, K., and Oliga, J. C. (1990). Critical systems thinking and the state. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G. (1990). Critical and creative systems thinking and systems education. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1966). On the genealogy of morals. In Kaufmann, W. (ed. and trans.),The Basic Writings of Nietzsche, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968).The-Will-to-Power, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1986a). Methodology in systems research: The need for a self-reflective commitment. In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1986b). Accounting and cybernetic control in human activity systems: Contradictions or a coherent system of values and images of social order? In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Society for Systems Research, Louisville, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1986c). Unitarism in accounting thought: A critical view.Proceedings, South East Asian University Accounting Teachers' Conference, Singapore, pp. 511–530.

  • Oliga, J. C. (1986d). Individualism in accounting thought: A critical view.Proceedings, South East Asian University Accounting Teachers' Conference, Singapore, pp. 531–555.

  • Oliga, J. C. (1988). Methodological foundations of systems methodologies.Syst. Pract. 1, 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1989a). Ideology and systems emancipation. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Systems Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Oliga, J. C. (1989b). Power and interests in organizations: A contingent, relational view.Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Systems Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Oliga, J. C. (1990a). Power-ideology matrix in social systems control.Syst. Pract. 3, 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1990b). Critical systems thinking and politics. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1990c). Power in organizations: A contingent, relational view.Syst. Pract. 3, 453–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1991). Methodology in systems research: The need for a self-reflective commitment. In Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1976).Treatise on General Sociology, Sociological Writings (translated by Mirfin, D.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1961). Two dogmas of empiricism. In Quine, W. V. O. (ed.),From a Logical Point of View, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1978). Operational research in health services planning.Eur. J. Operat. Res. 2, 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (1981). O. R. in urban planning.Omega 9(4).

  • Schecter, D. (1989). For whom and to do what? Questions for a liberating systems approach. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Systems Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.

  • Schecter, D. (1990). Critical systems thinking and democratic organization structure. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecter, D. (1991). The emerging framework of critical management science, In Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1981).Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, R. (1987). Towards a critical systems approach. InProceedings (Supplement) of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary.

  • Therborn, G. (1980).The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology, Verso and New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1981). A critique of pure cybernetic reason: The Chilean experience with cybernetics.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 8, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning, Paul Haupt, Berne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design.Eur. J. Operat. Res. 31, 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988a). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research.Syst. Pract. 1, 137–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988b). Churchman's “process of unfolding”-its significance for policy analysis and evaluation.Syst. Pract. 1, 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1990a). What is called “critical systems thinking”? In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1990b). Critical systems thinking and ethics. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1991). Toward emancipatory systems practice. In Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1970).Freedom in a Rocking Boat, Allen Lane, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (1984). Nietzsche's concept of ideology.Theory Soc. 13, 541–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949).The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. (1958).The Idea of a Social Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooliston, G. (1990). Extremities enriching mainstream critical systems theory. In Banathy, H., and Banathy, A. (eds.),Toward a Just Society for Future Generations, International Society for the Systems Sciences, Pomona, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Accountancy & Business, Nanyang Technological Institute, Nanyang Avenue, 2263, Singapore

    John C. Oliga

Authors
  1. John C. Oliga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliga, J.C. Conceptions of ideology: An exegesis and critique. Systems Practice 4, 101–129 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068245

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068245

Key words

Search

Navigation