Log in

Absolute frequency discrimination in the barn owl

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Barn owls (Tyto alba) could discriminate sound frequency by memory. Frequency differences as small as 0.7–0.5% were easily detected. The same acuity was obtained when two frequencies had to be remembered simultaneously and distinguished from other frequencies. The response latency was proportional to the difference between the reference and test frequencies and served as a sensitive criterion for discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachem, A.: Time factors in relative and absolute pitch determination. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.26, 751–753 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, R. J., Saunders, J. C.: Absolute and differential frequency sensitivity in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus). Abstract TT9, 86th Meet. Acoust. Soc. Amer. (1973)

  • Gourevitch, G.: Detectability of tones in quiet and in noise by rats and monkeys. In: Animal psychophysics (Stebbins, W. C. ed.), p. 67–97. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, R., Heffner, H., Masterton, B.: Behavioral measurements of absolute and frequency—difference thresholds in Guinea Pig. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.49, 1888–1895 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, M.: Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Z. vergl. Physiol.66, 257–272 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, M.: How the owl tracks its prey. Amer. Sci.61, 414–424 (1973a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, M.: Locatable and nonlocatable acoustic signals for barn owls. Amer. Nat.107, 775–785 (1973b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, G. A.: A review of some current concepts of the functional evolution of the ear in terrestrial vertebrates. Evolution26, 608–621 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Murray, F. S.: Guinea-Pig's immobility response to sound: Threshold and habituation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.61, 227–233 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, D. B.: Reaction time as an index of sensory function. In: Animal psychophysics (Stebbins, W. C. ed.), p. 277–302. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. S.: Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J. exp. Biol.56, 533–573 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S.: Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, I. B., Dinicola, P. D., Elia, M. P., Pasierbiak, C. S.: Auditory memory in a pitchdiscrimination task. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.48, 1383–1386 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB 12729.

We thank Martha Hughes and Dorothee Goldman for their assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quine, D.B., Konishi, M. Absolute frequency discrimination in the barn owl. J. Comp. Physiol. 93, 347–360 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606802

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606802

Keywords

Navigation