Log in

Uptake and retention of morpholinyl anthracyclines by adriamycin-sensitive and-resistant P388 cells

  • Original Articles
  • Anthracyclines
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

3′-Deamino-3′-(4-morpholinyl)adriamycin (MRA) and 3′-deamino-3′(3-cyano-4-morpholinyl)adriamycin (MRA-CN) were compared with adriamycin (ADR) in ADR-sensitive (P388/S) and-resistant (P388/ADR) murine leukemia cell lines with respect to cytotoxicity and cellular accumulation. MRA is only two- to threefold more cytotoxic to P388/S in culture than ADR, whereas MRA-CN is 500-fold more cytotoxic than ADR to this cell line. Yet both MRA and MRA-CN retain their potency against P388/ADR in spite of a 150-fold decrease in potency for ADR. The observed noncross-resistance of both MRA and MRA-CN in P388/ADR correlates with their increased cellular uptake and retention relative to ADR and the inability of P388/ADR to exclude these analogs as readily as it does ADR. The decreased uptake of MRA and MRA-CN in P388/ADR relative to P388/S (1.5 to 2.0-fold), the increased efflux, and the ability of verapamil to enhance cellular uptake of these analogs in P388/ADR, as it does with ADR, all indicate that the mechanism of ADR-resistance effects ADR and the morpholino analogs in a similar manner but to far different extents. The potent cytotoxicity of MRA-CN appears to be related to strong cellular interactions of the drug with macromolecules that are characterized by its nonextraction from cells by chloroform: methanol or 10 M urea and may therefore represent covalent binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acton EM, Jensen RA, Peters JH (1982) Factors in the selection of new anthracyclines. In: Anthracycline antibiotics in chemotherapy. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, p 205

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acton EM, Tong GL, Mosher GW, Wolgemuth RL (1984) Intensely potent morpholinyl anthracyclines. J Med Chem 27: 638

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bachur NR, Moor AL, Bernstein JG, Liu A (1970) Tissue distribution and disposition of daunomycin (NSC-82151) in mice: fluorometric and isotopic methods. Cancer Chemother Rep 54: 89

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter SK (1980) The clinical evaluations of analogs. III. Anthracyclines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 4: 5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inaba M, Johnson RK (1978) Uptake and retention of adriamycin and daunorubicin by sensitive and anthracycline-resistant sublines of P388 leukemia. Biochem Pharmacol 27: 2123

    Google Scholar 

  6. Inaba M, Kobayashi H, Sakurai Y, Johnson RK (1979) Active efflux of daunorubicin and adriamycin in sensitive and resistant sublines of P388 leukemia. Cancer Res 39: 2200

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston JB, Glazer RI (1983) Cellular pharmacology of 3′-(4-morpholinyl) and 3′-(4-methoxy-1-piperidinyl) derivatives of 3′-deaminodaunorubicin in human colon carcinoma cells in vitro. Cancer Res 43: 1606

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston JB, Habernicht B, Acton EM, Glazer RI (1983) 3′-(3-cyano-4-morpholinyl)-3′-deaminoadriamycin: a new anthracycline with intense potency. Biochem Pharmacol 32: 3255

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lown JW, Joshua AV, Lee JS (1982) Molecular mechanisms of binding and single-strand scission of deoxyribonucleic acid by the antitumor antibiotics saframycins A and C. Biochemistry 21: 419

    Google Scholar 

  10. Menozzi M, Valentini L, Vannini E, Penco S, Arcamone F (1984) The interaction with DNA of a new class of anthracycline derivatives. 1st European Conference on Advances in Antitumor Agents, Milan, Italy

  11. Mosher CW, Wu HY, Fujiwara AN, Acton EM (1982) Enhanced antitumor properties of 3′-(4-morpholinyl) and 3′-(4-methoxyl-1-piperidinyl) derivatives of 3′-deaminodaunorubicin. J Med Chem 25: 18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozols RF, Wilson JKV, Grotzinger KR, Young RC (1980) Cloning of human ovarian cancer cells in sofl agar from malignant effusions and peritoneal washings. Cancer Res 40: 2743

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peters JH, Gordon GR, Acton EM (1984) In vitro studies of a new intensely potent anthracycline. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 25: 293

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramu A, Spanier R, Rahaminoff H, Fuks Z (1984) Restoration of doxorubicin responsiveness in doxorubicin-resistant P388 murine leukemia cells. Br J Cancer 50: 501

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siegfried JM, Burke TG, Tritton TR (1985) Cellular transport of anthracyclines by passive diffusion. Biochem Pharmacol 34: 593

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sikic BI, Eksam MN, Harker WG, Friend NF, Brown BW, Newman RA, Hacker MP, Acton EM (1985) Dissociation of antitumor potency from anthracycline cardiotoxicity and resistance in a doxorubicin analog. Science 228: 1544

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streeter DG, Acton EM, Filppi JA, Wolgemuth RL (1985) Structure-activity relationships for non-cross-resistance (NXR) of 3′-deamino-3′-(3-cyano-4-morpholinyl)doxorubicin (MRA-CN) and new analogs. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 26: 220

    Google Scholar 

  18. Streeter DG, Taylor DL, Peters JH, Acton EM (1984) Comparative cytotoxicities of various morpholinyl anthracyclines. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 25: 301

    Google Scholar 

  19. Streeter DG, Taylor DL, Peters JH, Acton EM (1985) Comparative cytotoxicities of various morpholinyl anthracyclines. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 14: 160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsuruo T, Iida I, Yamashiro M, Tsukagoshi S, Sakurai Y (1982) Enhancement of vincristine- and adriamycin-induced cytotoxicity by verapamil in P388 leukemia and its sublines resistant to vincristine and adriamycin. Biochem Pharmacol 31: 3138

    Google Scholar 

  21. Westendorf J, Groth G, Steinheider G, Marquardt H (1985) Formation of DNA-adducts and induction of DNA-crosslinks and chromosomal aberrations by the new potent anthracycline antitumor antibiotics: morpholinodaunomycin, cyanomorpholinodaunomycin, and cyanomorpholinoadriamycin. Cell Biol Toxicol 1: 87

    Google Scholar 

  22. Westendorf J, Marquardt H, Marquardt H (1984) Structure-activity relationship of anthracycline-induced genotoxicity in vitro. Cancer Res 44: 5599

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yanovich S, Taub RN (1983) Differences in daunomycin retention in sensitive and resistant P388 leukemia cells as determined by digitized video fluorescence microscopy. Cancer Res 43: 4167

    Google Scholar 

  24. Young RC, Ozols RF, Meyers CE (1981) The anthracycline anticancer drugs. N Engl J Med 305: 135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Streeter, D.G., Johl, J.S., Gordon, G.R. et al. Uptake and retention of morpholinyl anthracyclines by adriamycin-sensitive and-resistant P388 cells. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 16, 247–252 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293986

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293986

Keywords

Navigation