Log in

The effect of aeration on xylose fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus

A comparative study

  • Applied Microbiology
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ability of a Candida shehatae and a Pachysolen tannophilus strain to ferment D-xylose to ethanol was evaluated in defined and complex media under different levels of aeration. Aeration enhanced the ethanol productivity of both yeasts considerably. C. shehatae maintained a higher fermentation rate and ethanol yield than P. tannophilus over a wide range of aeration levels. Ethanol production by C. shehatae commenced during the early stage of the fermentation, whereas with P. tannophilus there was a considerable lag between the initiation of growth and ethanol production. Both yeasts produced appreciable quantities of xylitol late in the fermentation. P. tannophilus failed to grow under anoxic conditions, producing a maximum of only 0.5 g · l-1 ethanol. In comparison, C. shehatae exhibited limited growth in anoxic cultures, and produced ethanol much more rapidly. Under the condition of aeration where C. shehatae exhibited the highest ethanol productivity, the fermentation parameters were: maximum specific growth rate, 0.15 h-1; maximum volumetric and specific rates of ethanol production, 0.7 g (l · h)-1 and 0.34 g ethanol (g cells · h)-1 respectively; ethanol yield, 0.36 g (g xylose)-1. The best values obtained with P. tannophilus were: maximum specific growth rate, 0.14 h-1; maximum volumetric and specific rates of ethanol production, 0.22 g (l · h)-1 and 0.07 h-1 respectively; ethanol yield coefficient, 0.28. Because of its higher ethanol productivity at various levels of aeration, C. shehatae has a greater potential for ethanol production from xylose than P. tannophilus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baillargeon MW, Jansen NB, Gong C-S, Tsao GT (1983) Effect of oxygen uptake rate on ethanol production by a xylose-fermenting yeast mutant, Candida sp. XF217. Biotechnol Lett 5:339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett JA (1976) The utilization of sugars by yeasts. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 32:125–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Du Preez JC, Van der Walt JP (1983) Fermentation of D-xylose to ethanol by a strain of Candida shehatae. Biotechnol Lett 5:357–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong C-S, Ladisch MR, Tsao GT (1981a) Production of ethanol from wood hemicellulose hydrolysates. Biotechnol Lett 3:657–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong C-S, McCracken LD, Tsao GT (1981b) Direct fermentation of D-xylose to ethanol by a xylose-fermenting yeast mutant. Candida sp. XF217. Biotechnol Lett 3:245–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong C-S, Claypool TA, McCracken LD, Maun CM, Ueng PP, Tsao GT (1983) Conversion of pentoses by yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:85–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries TW (1981) Conversion of xylose to ethanol under aerobic conditions by Candida tropicalis. Biotechnol Lett 3:213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries TW (1982) A comparison of Candida tropicalis and Pachysolen tannophilus for conversion of xylose to ethanol. Paper presented at the 4th Symposium on Biotechnology in Energy Production and Conservation, May 11–14, Catlinburg, Tennessee

  • Jones RP, Pamment N, Greenfield PF (1981) Alcohol fermentation by yeasts — the effect of environmental and other variables. Process Biochem 16 (3):42–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maleszka R, Schneider H (1982) Fermentation of D-xylose, xylitol, and D-xylulose by yeasts. Can J Microbiol 28:360–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maleszka R, Wang PY, Schneider H (1982) Yeasts that ferment D-cellobiose as well as D-xylose. Biotechnol Lett 4:133–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margaritis A, Bajpai P (1982) Direct fermentation of D-xylose to ethanol by Kluyveromyces marxianus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1039–1041

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Phaff HJ, Miller MW, Mrak EW (1978) The life of yeasts. 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., p 142

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (1982) The production of ethanol from D-xylose by yeasts. National Research Council of Canada Publication No. 20788

  • Schneider H, Wang PY, Chan YK, Maleszka R (1981) Conversion of D-xylose into ethanol by the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus. Biotechnol Lett 3:89–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slininger PJ, Bothast RJ, Van Cauwenberge JE, Kurtzman CP (1982) Conversion of D-xylose to ethanol by the yeast Pachysolen tannophilus. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:371–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suihko M-L, Dražić M (1983) Pentose fermentation by yeasts. Biotechnol Lett 5:107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao GT, Ladisch MR, Voloch M, Bienkowski P (1982) Production of ethanol and chemicals from cellulosic materials. Process Biochem 17(5):34–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson NE, Prior BA, Potgieter HJ, Du Preez JC (1982) Ethanol production by Pachysolen tannophilus from xylose. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Congress of the South African Society for Microbiology, September 15–17, Pretoria

  • Wickerham LJ (1951) Taxonomy of yeasts. Techn Bull No 1029, US Dept of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

du Preez, J.C., Prior, B.A. & Monteiro, A.M.T. The effect of aeration on xylose fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 19, 261–266 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251848

Keywords

Navigation