Log in

Diversité spécifique et évolution des groupements végétaux supra forestiers des Pyrenèes centrales

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Calculations of various diversity indices in seral meadow communities from the Central Pyrenees subalpine zone were based on quantitative vegetational analyses by the point quadrat method. Species richness (S) increased rapidly toward a maximum then decreased markedly with increasing maturation of the meadows. In contrast, equitability measured as the Pielou index first inereases gradualy and then remains on more or less the same level, while decreasing a little in older stages, if not accelered by over-grazing. Not surprisingly, Patten's redundancy measure exibits inverse variations. Since it encompasses both the number of species and the distribution of individuals over the species, the Shannon and Weaver index of diversity behaved in a manner intermediate between richness and evenness. In the two toposequences investigated, diversity and equitability variations were highly correlated with the occurence of monopolistic dominant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliographie

  • Braun-Blangquet J. 1948. La végétation alpine des Pyrénées orientales. Etude de phytosociologie comparée. Monog. Est. Piren. Inst. Esp. Edaf., Ecol. Fisiol. Veg., Barcelona. 9: 1–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin L. 1962. Science and information theory. 2ème éd. Academic Press, New York, 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daget, J. 1976. Les modèles mathématiques en écologie. Masson éditeurs, 172 pp.

  • Daget Ph. & J.Poissonnet. 1971. Une méthode d'analyse phytosociologique des prairies. Critères d'application. Ann. Agron. 22 (1): 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner M.R. & W.R.Ashby, 1970. Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values or stability. Nature, 228: 784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godron, M. & al. 1968. Code pour le relevé méthodique de la végétation et du milieu. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. 292 pp.

  • Frontier S. 1977. Réflexions pour une théorie des écosystèmes. Bull. Ecol. 8: 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labroue L. & C.Tosca. 1977. La pédogénèse à l'étage alpín. Relation avec l'évolution des versants. Bull. Ecol. 8: 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks O.L. 1970. Evolution of diversity, efficiency and community stability, Am. Zool. 10: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Arthur R.H. 1955. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a mesure of stability. Ecology 36: 533–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalef R. 1957. La teoria de la informacion en ecologia. Mem. Real Acad. Cien. Arter Barcelona. 32 (13): 373–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negre R. 1969. La végétation du Bassin de l'One (Pyrénées centrales). 2ème note: les pelouses. Port. Act. Biol., B, X, 1–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negre R. 1974. Nouvelle contribution à l'étude des gispetières pyrénéennes. Bol. Soc. Broteriana 48: 209–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson S.A. & C.D.Monk. 1974. Plant species diversity in old field succession on the Georgia Piedmont. Ecology 55: 1075–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum E.P. 1963. Ecology. Holt, Rinehart et Winston, New York, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P. 1976. Ecologie. Doin éditeurs, 254 pp.

  • Patten B.C. 1962. Species diversity in net phytoplankton of Raritan Bay. J. Mar. Res. 20: 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou E.C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey P. 1977. Expression cartographique de modèles dynécologiques en région de montagne. Bull. Ecol. 8: 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager P.E. & A.D.Hasler. 1969. Species diversity in lacustrine phytoplankton. I. The components of the index of diversity from Shannon's formula. Amer. Natur. 103: 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafi M.I. & G.A.Yarranton. 1973. Diversity, floristic richness and species evenness during a secondary (post-fire) succession. Ecology 54: 897–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C.E. & W.Weaver. 1948. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illionois, Press, Urbana, 117 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosca C. 1975. Les pelouses subalpines des Pyrénées centrales. Leur valeur pastorale. Fourrages 61: 45–74.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tosca C., L.Labroue & J.Carles. 1978. Homogénéité floristique, hétérogénéité structurale et dynamique stationnelle dans des groupements végétaux du Pic du Midi de Bigorre. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 125: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R.H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nom des plantes suivant P. Fournier (1961) ‘Les quatre flores de France’.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tosca, C., Labroue, L. Diversité spécifique et évolution des groupements végétaux supra forestiers des Pyrenèes centrales. Vegetatio 39, 161–170 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208766

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208766

Mots-clef

Keywords

Navigation