Log in

Consensus-based three-dimensionalmulti-UAV formation control strategy with high precision

  • Published:
Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a formation control strategy for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (multi-UAV) based on second-order consensus, by introducing position and velocity coordination variables through neighbor-to-neighbor interaction to generate steering commands. A cooperative guidance algorithm and a cooperative control algorithm are proposed together to maintain a specified geometric configuration, managing the position and attitude respectively. With the whole system composed of the six-degree-of-freedom UAV model, the cooperative guidance algorithm, and the cooperative control algorithm, the formation control strategy is a closed-loop one and with full states. The cooperative guidance law is a second-order consensus algorithm, providing the desired acceleration, pitch rate, and heading rate. Longitudinal and lateral motions are jointly considered, and the cooperative control law is designed by deducing state equations. Closed-loop stability of the formation is analyzed, and a necessary and sufficient condition is provided. Measurement errors in position data are suppressed by synchronization technology to improve the control precision. In the simulation, three-dimensional formation flight demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the formation control strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldo, S., Jaimes, B., Jamshidi, M., 2010. Consensus-based and network control of UAVs. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on System of Systems Engineering, p.1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2010.5544106

    Google Scholar 

  • Annamalai, A., Motwani, A., Sharma, S.K., et al., 2015. A robust navigation technique for integration in the guidance and control of an uninhabited surface vehicle. J. Navigat., 68(4): 750–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0373463315000065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Duan, H., Li, C., et al., 2009. Dynamic multi-UAVs formation reconfiguration based on hybrid diversity-PSO and time optimal control. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., p.775–779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2009.5164376

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, D.J., McInnes, C.R., Suzuki, M., et al., 2011. Autonomous three-dimensional formation flight for a swarm of unmanned aerial vehicles. J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., 34(6): 1899–1908. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.53931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Zhang, C., 2013. The method of multi unmanned aerial vehicle cooperative tracking in formation based on the theory of consensus. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, p.148–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC.2013.182

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima, H., Kon, K., Matsuno, F., 2013. Model predictive formation control using branch-and-bound compatible with collision avoidance problems. IEEE Trans. Robot., 29(5): 1308–1317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2013.2262751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, H., Wei, R.X., Liu, Y., et al., 2011. UAV control method studied based on high-order sliding mode control. Flight Dynam., 29(1): 38–41 (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.13645/j.cnki.f.d.2011.01.010

    Google Scholar 

  • **g, Y., Shi, X.P., 2014. NDI formation controller design for UAV based on super twisting algorithm. J. Syst. Eng. Electron., 36(7): 1380–1385 (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2014.07.24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Kim, Y., 2007. Three dimensional optimum controller for multiple UAV formation flight using behaviorbased decentralized approach. Proc. Int. Conf. on Control, Automation and Systems, p.1387–1392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2007.4406555

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Kabamba, P., Hyland, D.C., 2005. Controller design using adaptive random search for close-coupled formation flight. J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., 28(6): 1323–1326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.11377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriki, Y., Namerikawa, T., 2013. Consensus-based cooperative control for geometric configuration of UAVs flying in formation. Proc. SICE Annual Conf., p.1237–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuriki, Y., Namerikawa, T., 2014. Consensus-based cooperative formation control with collision avoidance for a multi-UAV system. Proc. American Control Conf., p.2077–2082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6858777

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Chen, Y., Yang, Z., et al., 2012. Formation fight control of multi-UAVs with communication delay. Inform. Contr., 41(2): 142–146 (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1219.2012.00142

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., Tang, W., 2000. Modern Control Theory. China Machine Press, Bei**g, p.193–199 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, D.A., Castro, R., Lozano, R., 2013. Quadrotors flight formation control using a leader-follower approach. Proc. European Control Conf., p.3858–3863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, W., 2006. Consensus based formation control strategies for multi-vehicle systems. Proc. American Control Conf., p.4237–4242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2006.1657384

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, W., Beard, R., 2002. Virtual structure based spacecraft formation control with formation feedback. Proc. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf. and Exhibit, p.1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4963

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J., Ahn, C., Kim, Y., 2009. Controller design for UAV formation flight using consensus based decentralized approach. Proc. AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conf., p.1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, J., Liu, H., 2005. Close-formation flight control with motion synchronization. J. Guid. Contr. Dynam., 28(6): 1316–1320. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.13953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z.K., 2008. Linear System Theory. Science Press, Bei**g (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wei, R., Dong, Z., et al., 2010. Research on formation flight control of cooperative UAV. Fire Contr. Command Contr., 35(3): 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X.Y., Wang, X.M., **ao, Y.H., et al., 2012. Design of robust H controller for UAVs three-dimensional formation flight. Contr. Dec., 27(12): 1907–1911 (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.13195/j.cd.2012.12.150.wangxy.004

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • **ao, Y.H., Wang, X.M., Wang, X.Y., 2011. An effective controller design of formation flight of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). J. Northwestern Polytech. Univ., 29(6): 834–838 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Zhu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61473229), the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang’an University, China (Nos. 310832163403 and 310832161012), the Key Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2017JQ6060), and the **’an Science and Technology Plan, China (No. CXY1512-3)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Md., Zhu, X., Zhang, Xx. et al. Consensus-based three-dimensionalmulti-UAV formation control strategy with high precision. Frontiers Inf Technol Electronic Eng 18, 968–977 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1600004

Key words

CLC number

Navigation