Log in

Effect of quenching and partitioning process to low-alloy wear resistant steel

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To find the optimal Quenching and Partitioning (Q&P) process parameters of low-alloy wear resistant steel, various Q&P processes including quenching temperature, partitioning temperature and partitioning time were designed and tested by using orthogonal experiment method. Through analysis of orthogonal experiment, quenching temperature was the most important influential factor on the impact toughness and hardness, and partitioning time played a critical role on tensile strength. The optimal Q&P heat treatment parameters of low alloy wear resistant steel were partitioning at 350 °C for 10 min immediately after quenching at 100 °C. The microstructure of samples was composed of martensite laths and retained austenite. The relative volume fraction of retained austenite increased with the increase of quenching temperature and decreased gradually with the lengthening of partitioning time. Combining the results of Energy dispersive spectrometer, the reason for decrease of retained austenite was the existence of carbide precipitation and the carbide was (Fe, Cr)3C7. Compared to the traditional heat treatment of quenching and low temperature tempering, the samples under Q&P treatment displayed higher toughness and maintained relatively high tensile strength and wear resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5
FIG. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Lyu, Y. Zhu, and U. Olofsson: Wear between wheel and rail: A pin-on-disc study of environmental conditions and iron oxides. Wear 328–329, 227–285 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y-N. Pan, W-S. Chang, and R-M. Chang: Optimal heat treatment conditions and properties of bimetal (high Cr cast iron alloyed steel) hammers. Int. J. Cast Met. Res. 21, 71–75 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Tao, L. **aoman, and Y. Cuiyan: Influence of rare earth on wear resistance of wear resistant cast iron containing low alloy. J. Rare Earths 22, 139–142 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Matas and R.F. Hehemann: Retained austenite and the tempering of martensite. Nature 87, 685–686 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X.D. Wang, N. Zhong, Y.H. Rong, and Z.Y. Xu: Novel ultrahigh-strength nanolath martensitic steel by quenching-partitioning-tempering process. J. Mater. Res. 24, 260–267 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Speer, D.K. Matlock, B.C. De Cooman, and J.G. Schroth: Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta Mater. 51, 2611–2622 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.D.K. Misra, H. Zheng, K.M. Wu, and L.P. Karjalainen: Niobium-containing quenching and partitioning processed ultrahigh strength martensite–austenite dual phase steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 579, 188–193 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B.V. Rao and G. Thomas: Transmission electron microscopy characterization of dislocated “lath” martensite. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Martensitic Transformations-79 (MIT: Boston, 1979); pp. 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Sarikaya and G. Thomas: Lath martensites in carbon steels are they bainitic. In Proceedings of an International Conference on Solid to Solid Phase Transformations (TMS-AIME: Cambridge, 1982); pp. 999–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. X. Zuyao and L. Xuemin: Diffusion of carbon during the formation of low-carbon martensite. Scr. Mater. 17, 1285–1288 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.G. Speer, D.V. Edmonds, F.C. Rizzo, and D.K. Matlock: Partitioning of carbon from supersaturated plates of ferrite, with application to steel processing and fundamentals of the bainite transformation. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 8, 219–237 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.V. Edmonds, K. He, E.C. Rizzo, B.C. De Cooman, D.K. Matlock, and J. Speer: Quenching and partitioning martensite–A novel steel heat treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 438, 25–34 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Chatterjee, H.-S. Wang, J.R. Yang, and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Mechanical stabilisation of austenite. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, 645 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C.G. Lee, S.J. Kim, T.H. Kim, and S. Lee: Effects of volume fraction and stability of retained austenite on formability in a 0.1C–1.5Si–1.5Mn–0.5Cu TRIP-aided cold-rolled steel sheet. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 371, 16 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Zhang, M. Zhang, Z. Guo, N. Chen, and Y. Rong: A new effect of retained austenite on ductility enhancement in high-strength quenching–partitioning–tempering martensitic steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 8486–8491 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Zhong, X.D. Wang, L. Wang, and Y.H. Rong: Enhancement of the mechanical properties of a Nb-microalloyed advanced high-strength steel treated by quenching–partitioning–tempering process. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 506, 111–116 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Xu, Z. Yan, Y. Liu, and H. Li: Microstructure evolution and martensitic transformation behaviors of 9Cr–1.8W–0.3Mo ferritic heat-resistant steel during quenching and partitioning treatment. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2835–2843 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Mola and B.C. De Cooman: Quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processing of martensitic stainless steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44, 946–967 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Maheswari, S. Ghosh Chowdhury, K.C. Hari Kumar, and S. Sankaran: Influence of alloying elements on the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in quenched and partitioned steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 600, 12–20 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. GB/T 228.1-2010: Metallic Materials-Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature (China Standard Press, Bei**g, 2011).

  21. GB/T 229-2007: Metallic Materials-Charpy Pendulum Impact Test Method (China Standard Press, Bei**g, 2007).

  22. GB/T 230.1-2009: Metallic Materials-Rockwell Hardness Test-Part 1: Test Method (China Standard Press, Bei**g, 2009).

  23. L. Zhao, N.H. Van Dijk, E. Brück, J. Sietsma, and S. Van der Zwaag: Magnetic and X-ray diffraction measurements for the determination of retained austenite in TRIP steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 313, 145–152 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. GB/T 12444-2006: Metallic Materials-Wear Test Method-Block-on-Ring Sliding Wear Test (China Standard Press, Bei**g, 2006).

  25. G. Krauss: Steel: Heat Treatment and Processing Principles (ASM International Metals Park, OH, USA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.S. Nayak, R. Anumolu, R.D.K. Misra, K.H. Kim, and D.L. Lee: Microstructure–hardness relationship in quenched and partitioned medium-carbon and high-carbon steels containing silicon. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 8, 442–456 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yufu Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q. et al. Effect of quenching and partitioning process to low-alloy wear resistant steel. Journal of Materials Research 31, 663–669 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.58

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.58

Navigation