Log in

Nationwide Use and Outcome of Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several international high-volume centers have reported good outcomes after resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) following chemo(radio)therapy, but it is unclear how this translates to nationwide clinical practice and outcome. This study aims to assess the nationwide use and outcome of resection of LAPC following induction chemo(radio)therapy.

Patients and Methods

A multicenter retrospective study including all patients who underwent resection for LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy in all 16 Dutch pancreatic surgery centers (2014–2020), registered in the mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. LAPC is defined as arterial involvement > 90° and/or portomesenteric venous > 270° involvement or occlusion.

Results

Overall, 142 patients underwent resection for LAPC, of whom 34.5% met the 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. FOLFIRINOX was the most commonly (93.7%) used chemotherapy [median 5 cycles (IQR 4–8)]. Venous and arterial resections were performed in 51.4% and 14.8% of patients. Most resections (73.9%) were performed in high-volume centers (i.e., ≥ 60 pancreatoduodenectomies/year). Overall median volume of LAPC resections/center was 4 (IQR 1–7). In-hospital/30-day major morbidity was 37.3% and 90-day mortality was 4.2%. Median OS from diagnosis was 26 months (95% CI 23–28) and 5-year OS 18%. Surgery in high-volume centers [HR = 0.542 (95% CI 0.318–0.923)], ypN1-2 [HR = 3.141 (95% CI 1.886–5.234)], and major morbidity [HR = 2.031 (95% CI 1.272–3.244)] were associated with OS.

Conclusions

Resection of LAPC following chemo(radio)therapy is infrequently performed in the Netherlands, albeit with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and OS. Given these findings, a structured nationwide approach involving international centers of excellence would be needed to improve selection of patients with LAPC for surgical resection following induction therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoop TF, Theijse RT, Seelen LWF, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-023-00856-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown ZJ, Heh V, Labiner HE, et al. Surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2022;110(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Doppenberg D, et al. FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis by the trans-Atlantic pancreatic surgery (TAPS) consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(5):695–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Eshmuminov D, Aminjonov B, Palm RF, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multi-institutional, patient-level, meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(7):4417–28. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13353-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Seelen LWF, van Oosten AF, Brada LJH, et al. Early recurrence after resection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following induction therapy: an international multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2023;278(1):118–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oba A, Del Chiaro M, Satoi S, et al. New criteria of resectability for pancreatic cancer: a position paper by the Japanese Society of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery (JSHBPS). J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci. 2022;29(7):725–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bratlie SO, Wennerblom J, Vilhav C, Persson J, Rangelova E. Resectable, borderline, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: “the good, the bad, and the ugly” candidates for surgery? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(5):2450–60. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-2020-slapc.04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Oba A, Del Chiaro M, Fujii T, et al. “Conversion surgery” for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a position paper by the study group at the joint meeting of the International association of pancreatology (IAP) & Japan pancreas society (JPS) 2022. Pancreatology. 2023;23(6):712–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2023.06.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider M, Hackert T, Strobel O, Büchler MW. Technical advances in surgery for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2021;108(7):777–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rangelova E, Wefer A, Persson S, et al. Surgery improves survival after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single institution experience. Ann Surg. 2021;273(3):579–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Truty MJ, Kendrick ML, Nagorney DM, et al. Factors predicting response, perioperative outcomes, and survival following total neoadjuvant therapy for borderline/locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2021;273(2):341–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hackert T, Sachsenmaier M, Hinz U, et al. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX results in resectability in 60% of the patients. Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):457–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gemenetzis G, Groot VP, Blair AB, et al. Survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2019;270(2):340–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garnier J, Ewald J, Marchese U, et al. Borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a single center experience on the FOLFIRINOX induction regimen. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(8):1510–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maggino L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, et al. Outcomes of primary chemotherapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):932–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ushida Y, Inoue Y, Oba A, et al. Optimizing Indications for conversion surgery based on analysis of 454 consecutive Japanese cases with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(8):5038–50. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11503-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michelakos T, Pergolini I, Castillo CF, et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):733–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walma MS, Brada LJ, Patuleia SIS, et al. Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;20:699–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amini A, Jones BL, Stumpf P, et al. Patterns of care for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma using the national cancer database. Pancreas. 2017;46(7):904–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. David JM, Kim S, Placencio-Hickok VR, Torosian A, Hendifar A, Tuli R. Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;4(2):302–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.10.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Auclin E, Marthey L, Abdallah R, et al. Role of FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update of the AGEO cohort. Br J Cancer. 2021;124(12):1941–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01341-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsumoto I, Kamei K, Omae K, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results and prognostic factors of subset analysis from a nation-wide multicenter observational study in Japan. Pancreatology. 2019;19(2):296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2019.01.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hochster HS, Alexander HR. Bias and pancreatic cancer reporting. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(5):641–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Reames BN, Blair AB, Krell RW, et al. Management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: results of an international survey of current practice. Ann Surg. 2021;273(6):1173–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Rijssen LB, Groot Koerkamp B, Zwart MJ, et al. Nationwide prospective audit of pancreatic surgery: design, accuracy, and outcomes of the Dutch pancreatic cancer audit. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(10):919–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Strijker M, Mackay TM, Bonsing BA, et al. Establishing and coordinating a nationwide multidisciplinary study group: lessons learned by the Dutch pancreatic cancer group. Ann Surg. 2020;271(4):e102–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2012). DPCG-definities resectabiliteit pancreascarcinoom. https://dpcg.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Criteria_resectabiliteit.pdf. Accessed Nov 10 2022.

  29. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. April 11, 2022. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1455. Accessed April 11 2022.

  30. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weniger M, Moir J, Damm M, et al. Respect: a multicenter retrospective study on preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2020;20(6):1131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2020.06.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi YH, Lee SH, You MS, et al. Prognostic factors for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer receiving neoajuvant FOLFIRINOX. Gut Liver. 2021;15(2):315–23. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McIntyre CA, Cohen NA, Goldman DA, et al. Induction FOLFIRINOX for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2022;125(3):425–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wijetunga AR, Chua TC, Nahm CB, et al. Survival in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is determined by the duration and response of neoadjuvant therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(10):2543–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walma MS, Rombouts SJ, Brada LJH, et al. Radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PELICAN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Oba A, Croce C, Hosokawa P, et al. Prognosis based definition of resectability in pancreatic cancer: a road map to new guidelines. Ann Surg. 2022;275(1):175–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Klaiber U, Schnaidt ES, Hinz U, et al. Prognostic factors of survival after neoadjuvant treatment and resection for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmocker RK, Delitto D, Wright MJ, et al. Impact of margin status on survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;232(4):405–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoo C, Hwang I, Song TJ, et al. FOLFIRINOX in borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920953294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Tuli R, David J, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, O’Reilly EM. Duration of therapy for locally pancreatic advanced cancer: does it matter? Cancer Med. 2020;9(13):4572–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. van Veldhuisen E, Klompmaker S, Janssen QP, et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes after preoperative FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer: an international multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;30(3):1463–73. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12387-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Seelen LWF, Doppenberg D, Stoop TF, et al. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response after 2 months induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a nationwide multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Reni M, Zanon S, Balzano G, et al. Selecting patients for resection after primary chemotherapy for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(11):2786–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hartlapp I, Valta-Seufzer D, Siveke JT, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of CA19-9 in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multi-agent induction chemotherapy: results from a prospective, multicenter phase II trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113). ESMO Open. 2022;7(4):100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vreeland TJ, McAllister F, Javadi S, et al. Benefit of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel rescue of patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma after early failure of FOLFIRINOX. Pancreas. 2019;48(6):837–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Alva-Ruiz R, Yohanathan L, Yonkus JA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy switch in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(3):1579–91. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10991-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kunzmann V, Siveke JT, Algül H, et al. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(2):128–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30330-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hartwig W, Gluth A, Hinz U, et al. Outcomes after extended pancreatectomy in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2016;103(12):1683–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stoop TF, Seelen LWF, van 't Land FR, et al. PREOPANC4 implementation program for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-4). Clinical Trials. 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05524090?term=PREOPANC4&draw=2&rank=1. Accessed Sept 3 2022.

  50. Griffioen IPM, Rietjens JAC, Melles M, et al. The bigger picture of shared decision making: a service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case. Cancer Med. 2021;10(17):5907–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group collaborators: Anniek Vlijm, MD, PhD; Bert A. Bonsing, MD, PhD; C. Yung Nio, MD, PhD; Derik-Jan de Groot, MD, PhD; Elske Gootjes, MD, PhD; Eran van Veldhuisen, MD, PhD; Eric Manusama, MD, PhD; Fenny Wit, MD, PhD; Freek Daams, MD, PhD; Geert Cirkel, MD, PhD; Geertjan van Tienhoven, MD, PhD; Irene van Hellemond, MD, PhD; Johanna W. Wilmink, MD, PhD; Judith de Vos-Geelen, MD, PhD; Koop Bosscha, MD, PhD; Leonie J. Mekenkamp, MD, PhD; Maarten W. Nijkamp, MD, PhD; Maartje Los, MD, PhD; Marion B. van der Kolk, MD, PhD; Marjolein Homs, MD, PhD; Mark Ramaekers, MD; Mike S. Liem, MD, PhD; Miriam Wumkes, MD, PhD; Nynke Michiels, MD; Ronald van Dam, MD, PhD; Rutger T. Theijse, BSc; Saskia Luelmo, MD, PhD; Thomas L. Bollen, MD, PhD; Ulf Neumann, MD, PhD; Vincent Nieuwenhuijs, MD, PhD; Werner Draaisma, MD, PhD

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thomas F. Stoop MD or Marc G. Besselink MD, MSc, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Thomas F. Stoop, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, and Marc G. Besselink received two grants from Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) and Deltaplan Alvleesklierkanker for the Dutch PREOPANC-4 project on the multidisciplinary management of LAPC. Furthermore, Thomas F. Stoop is granted by Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds (Jan de Ruijsscher/Pia Huisman Fonds).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 221 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stoop, T.F., Seelen, L.W.F., van ’t Land, F.R. et al. Nationwide Use and Outcome of Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Following Induction Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 31, 2640–2653 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14650-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14650-6

Keywords

Navigation