Log in

Predictions of Pathological Features and Recurrence Based on FDG-PET Findings of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Trimodal Therapy

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The degree of metabolic activity in tumor cells can be determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Associations between FDG uptake by primary tumors of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) under trimodal therapy and the pathological features of such tumors have not been fully investigated.

Patients and Methods

We evaluated relationships between the maximal standardized uptake (SUVmax) in primary tumors on preoperative PET images and pathological features as well as cancer recurrence in 143 patients with ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery.

Results

The post-SUVmax significantly differed after NCRT for ypT and ypN status, lymphatic invasion (LI), venous invasion (VI), and recurrence. Furthermore, the %ΔSUVmax (rate of decrease between before and after NCRT) for LI, VI, and recurrence significantly differed. Univariate and multivariate analyses selected post-SUVmax and %ΔSUVmax as independent preoperative predictors of recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–1.72 and HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96–0.99, respectively; p < 0.001 for both]. Recurrence-free and overall survival were significantly stratified according to optimal SUVmax cutoffs for predicting recurrence (post- and %ΔSUVmax: 2.8 and 70, respectively).

Conclusions

The post- and %ΔSUVmax of primary tumors were significantly associated with the pathological features and recurrence of ESCC under trimodal therapy. Therefore, FDG-PET can preoperatively predict the degree of aggressive tumor behavior in ESCC under trimodal therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al; Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 681–692.

  2. Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017; 390: 2383–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. CROSS Group: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 2074–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Phase III trial of trimodal therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1086–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sepesi B, Schmidt HE, Lada M, et al. Survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy is independent of regional lymph node location. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101:1075–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akutsu Y, Shuto K, Kono T, et al. The number of pathologic lymph nodes involved is still a significant prognostic factor even after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2012; 105: 756–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. World J Surg. 2018; 42: 1496–1505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamai Y, Emi M, Ibuki Y, et al. Early recurrence and cancer death after trimodal therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2019; 39: 1433–1440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen WH, Huang YL, Chao YK, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Taomoto J, Yamakita I, Ibuki Y, Okada M. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2015; 28: 358–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt T, Lordick F, Herrmann K, Ott K. Value of functional imaging by PET in esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015; 13: 239–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Ability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to predict outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1132–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cong L, Wang S, Gao T, Hu L. The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET for pathological response of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016; 46:1118–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C, eds. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumours (7th edition). Wiley: New York, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy to treat locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99: 1887–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Emi M, Hihara J, Hamai Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for esophageal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012; 69: 1499–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, et al. Effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on pathological TNM Stage and their prognostic significance for surgically-treated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2017; 37: 5639–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murakami Y, Hamai Y, Emi M, et al. Long-term results of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by esophagectomy for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Radiat Res. 2018; 59: 616–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JR, Madsen MT, Bushnel D, Menda Y. A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility. Nucl Med Commun. 2000; 21: 685–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Beseth BD, Bedford R, Isacoff WH, Holmes EC, Cameron RB. Endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately assess pathologic stage of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Am Surg. 2000; 66: 827–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schneider PM, Metzger R, Schaefer H, et al. Response evaluation by endoscopy, rebiopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately predict histopathologic regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brücher BL, Stein HJ, Werner M, Siewert JR. Lymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor in patients with a primary resected tumor with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2001; 92: 2228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu CM, Ling YH, ** SY, et al. Prognostic significance of the pN classification supplemented by vascular invasion for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e96129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeon JH, Lee JM, Moon DH, et al. Prognostic significance of venous invasion and maximum standardized uptake value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgically resected T1N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43: 471–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O JH, Jacene H, Luber B, Wang H, et al. Quantitation of cancer treatment response by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Multicenter assessment of measurement variability. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58: 1429–1434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoichi Hamai MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamai, Y., Emi, M., Ibuki, Y. et al. Predictions of Pathological Features and Recurrence Based on FDG-PET Findings of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Trimodal Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 4422–4430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08609-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08609-0

Navigation