Abstract
Since early models of wave propagation in both stationary and moving media during the nineteenth century, the Lorentz transformation (LT) has played a key role in describing characteristic wave phenomena, e.g., the Doppler shift effect. In these models LT connects two different events generated by wave propagations, as observed in two reference systems and the synchronism is absolute. In relativistic physics LT implements the relativity principle. As a consequence, it connects two space-time event coordinates that both correspond to the same physical event and “absolute synchronization” is not allowed. The relativistic interpretation started from Einstein’s early criticism of the notion of “simultaneity” and Minkowski’s invariance of the space-time interval. In this paper, the two different roles of LT, i.e., in classical wave propagation theories and in relativistic physics, are discussed. Einstein’s early criticism is also re-examined with respect to LT in view of its significance for the notion of simultaneity. Indeed, that early criticism is found to be defective. Our analysis is also useful for general readers in view of its impact on modern speculations about the existence of a preferred system of reference Σ, where light propagation is isotropic, and related implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolós V.J., Liern V., and Olivert J. 2002.Relativistic Simultaneity and Causality, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 41, No. 6, June: 1007–1018.
Bridgman P.M.A. 1927.The logic of modern Physics, N.Y. the Macmillan Company: 164–165.
Consoli M., Pagano A. and Pappalardo L. 2003.Vacuum condensates and ether-drift experiments, Phys. Lett. A 318: 292–299.
Consoli M. and Pluchino A. 2018.Cosmic Microwave Background and the issue of a fundamental preferred frame, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133: 295.
Consoli M. and Pluchino A. 2019.Michelson-Morley Experiments-An Enigma for Physics and the History of Science, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte.Ltd. and references therein.
Di Mauro P., Notarrigo S, and Pagano A. 1997.Riesame della teoria di Augusto Righi sull’ apparato dell’esperimento di Michelson e Morley, Quaderni di Storiadella Fisica, 2, Ed. Compositori Bologna, SIF: 101–110.
Einstein A. 1905.Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper, Ann. Phys. 17: 891–921.
Ernstt A. and Jong-** Hsu. 2001.First Proposal of the Universal Speed of Light by Voigt in 1887, Chin. J. Phys. 39, 3: 211–230.
Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., and Sands M. 1966.The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, : Chap. 15–6.
Grünbaum A. 2010.David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply, Found. Phys., 40: 1285–1297.
Hirosige T. 1968.Theory of Relativity and the Ether, Jap. Studies in the History of Science, 7: 37–53.
Jammer M. 2006Concepts of Simultaneity From Antiquity to Einstein and Beyond, Edited by The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Klein F.C. 1927.Vorlesungen üuber die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19, Jahrhundert, Teil II, Springer.
Kostro L. 2000.Einstein and the Ether, First Pub. by Apeiron. Canada.
La Rosa M. 1923.Le concept de temps dans la Théorie d’Einstein, II partie: Le Postulat de la constance de la vitesse de la lumière, Scientia, July–August, Vol. XXXIV: 293–306.
Landau L.D. and Lifshitz E.M. 2000.The classical theory of Fields, 2, Butterworth-, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford.
Leighton R.B. 1959.Principles of Modern Physics, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York Toronto London.
Lorentz H.A. 1909.The Theory of Electrons, The New York, The Columbia University Press, Macmillan Company, LTD.
Mamone-Caprio M. 2012.Simultaneity as an Invariant Equivalence Relation, Found. Phys. 42: 1365–1383.
Mann R.A. 1974.The classical Dynamics of Particles, Academic Press, Inc ., New York London.
Michelson A.A. and Morley E.W. 1887. Am. J. Sci. 34: 333.
Minkowski H. 1908.Die Grundgleichungen fü r die elektromagnetischen Vorgänge in bewegter Körper, Gött. Nachr. 53.
Minkowski H. 1909Raum und Zeit, Phys. Zeits. 10: 104. English trans. 1923: Space and time, Lorentz H.A., Einstein, A., Minkowski H., Weyl H., The Principle of Relativity, Methuen, London. 08540: Chap. 11.
Mittelstaedt P. 2011.The Problem of Interpretation of Modern Physics, Found. Phys. 41: 1667–1676.
Morse P.M. and Ingard K.U. 1986.Theoretical Acostics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Pauli W. 1921.Theory of Relativity, translated from German by G. Field, Pergamon Press, London, 1958.
Poincaré H. 1905.The principles of Mathemathical Physics, English Translation by G.B. Halsted, The Monist XV: 1–24.
Prokhovnik S.J. 1993.The Physical Interpretation of Special Relativity - a Vindication of Hendrik Lorentz, Z. Naturforschung, 48a: 925–931.
Shanahan D. 2014.A Case for Lorentzian Relativity, Found. Phys. 44: 349–367.
Synge J.L. 1956.Relativity: The Special Theory, North-Holland Pub. Comp., Amsterdam.
Somigliana C. 1922.Sulla trasformazione di Lorentz, Rend. Mat. Acc. dei Lincei, s.5, 31: 409–414.
Van Camp W. 2011.On Kinematic versus Dynamic Approaches to Special Relativity, Philosophy of Science, 78, No. 5, The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association: 1097–1107.
Voigt W. 1887.Über das Doppler’sche Prinzip, Nachirichten der Konigliche Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagano, A., Pagano, E.V. A note on Lorentz transformations and simultaneity in classical physics and special relativity. EPJ H 44, 321–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2019-90058-4