Abstract
The elastic scattering differential cross-section (\(d\sigma/d\Omega\)) and the vector analyzing power (\(A_{y}\)) are reanalyzed simultaneously for the \(p+^{9}\)Be system. This analysis was performed using microscopic optical model potential (OMP) based on the Jeukenne, Lejeune, and Mahaux (JLM) effective nucleon-nucleon (\(NN\)) interaction for the central parts. For the spin–orbit (\(SO\)) part, the Scheerbaum potential was used. For comparison, the Woods–Saxon (WS) phenomenological OMP is used for the central real and central imaginary parts, and Thomas form for \(SO\)-potential. The present calculations showed that the phenomenological potential reproduces the elastic scattering data for all the considered energies. The JLM microscopic potential gives satisfactory reproduction for all the considered data. Moreover, JLM-based microscopic potential successfully reproduces the \(d\sigma/d\Omega\) and \(A_{y}\) at energies above 6 MeV on equal footing with the phenomenological one. The potential parameters for phenomenological and microscopic OMPs show a systematic energy behavior above 6 MeV. Additionally, the renormalized data have a noticeable effect on the OMP parameters.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1063778821050100/MediaObjects/11450_2021_2321_Fig8_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
G. D. Alkhazov, S. L. Belostotsky, and A. A. Vorobyov, Phys. Rep. 42, 89 (1978).
Yu. A. Berezhnoy and V. P. Mikhailyuk, Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 1448 (2004).
D. J. Baugh, J. A. R. Griffith, and S. Roman, Nucl. Phys. 83, 481 (1966).
Yong-Li Xu, Yin-Lu Han, Hai-Ying Liang, Zhen-Dong Wu, Hai-Rui Guo, and Chong-Hai Cai, Chin. Phys. C 43, 094102 (2019).
T. A. D. Brown, P. Papka, B. R. Fulton, D. L. Watson, S. P. Fox, D. Groombridge, M. Freer, N. M. Clarke, N. I. Ashwood, N. Curtis, V. Ziman, P. McEwan, S. Ahmed, W. N. Catford, D. Mahboub, C. N. Timis, et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 054605 (2007).
P. Papka, T. A. D. Brown, B. R. Fulton, D. L. Watson, S. P. Fox, D. Groombridge, M. Freer, N. M. Clarke, N. I. Ashwood, N. Curtis, V. Ziman, P. McEwan, S. Ahmed, W. N. Catford, D. Mahboub, C. N. Timis, et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 045803 (2007).
O. Bayakhmetov, Zh. Seksembayev, A. Azamatov, V. Kukulin, A. Pukhov, and S. Sakhiyev, Phys. Scr. 94, 085301 (2019).
A. M. Kabyshev, K. A. Kuterbekov, A. K. Azhibekov, K. Zh. Bekmyrza, A. M. Mukhambetzhan, M. K. Kenzhebek, Ye. K. Sovetkhanov, and Zh. A. Yeltay, Euras. J. Phys. Funct. Mater. 3, 319 (2019).
F. W. Bingham, M. K. Brussel, and J. D. Steben, Nucl. Phys. 55, 265 (1964).
N. Keeley, A. Pakou, V. Soukeras, F. Cappuzzello, L. Acosta, C. Agodi, A. Boiano, S. Calabrese, D. Carbone, M. Cavallaro, N. Deshmukh, A. Foti, A. Hacisalihoglu, M. La Commara, I. Martel, M. Mazzocco, et al., Phys. Rev. C 99, 014615 (2019).
M. Y. H. Farag, E. H. Esmael, and H. M. Maridi, Phys. Rev. C 90, 034615 (2014).
A. Pakou et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 50, 1547 (2019).
M. F. Werby, S. Edwards, and W. J. Thompson, Nucl. Phys. A 169, 81 (1971).
E. Bauge, J. P. Delaroche, and M. Girod, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1118 (1998).
J.-P. Jeukenne, A. Lejeune, and C. Mahaux, Phys. Rev. C 16, 80 (1977).
N. Alamanos and P. Roussel-Chomaz, Ann. Phys. (France) 21, 601 (1996).
K. O. Behairy, Zakaria M. M. Mahmoud, and M. El-Azab Farid, Phys. At. Nucl. 77, 869 (2014).
Zakaria M. M. Mahmoud and Mahmoud A. Hassanien, Phys. At. Nucl. 82, 599 (2019).
Zakaria M. M. Mahmoud, A. Hemmdan, and Kassem O. Behairy, Res. Phys. 16, 102892 (2020).
R. R. Scheerbaum, Nucl. Phys. A 257, 77 (1976).
T. Uesaka, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Iseri, K. Amos, N. Aoi, Y. Hashimoto, E. Hiyama, M. Ichikawa, Y. Ichikawa, S. Ishikawa, K. Itoh, M. Itoh, H. Iwasaki, S. Karataglidis, T. Kawabata, et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 021602 (2010).
A. J. Sierk and T. A. Tombrello, Nucl. Phys. A 210, 341 (1973).
J. Cook, Comput. Phys. Commun. 31, 363 (1984).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the General Research Project under the grant no. G.R.P-57-42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmoud, Z.M., Qandil, O.S. Microscopic Spin–Orbit Potential for Proton + \({}^{9}\)Be Scattering. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 84, 711–723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821050100
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821050100