Log in

Modeling of Ignition and Combustion of a Coflowing Hydrogen Jet in a Supersonic Air Flow

  • Published:
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves Aims and scope

Abstract

Results of a numerical study of mixing, ignition, and combustion of a cold hydrogen jet propagating along the lower wall of a channel parallel to a supersonic (M = 2) flow of an inert gas mixture/humid hot air are reported. The computations are performed with the use of the ANSYS CFD Fluent commercial software by means of solving transient Favre-averaged Navier–Stokes equations supplemented with the \(k\)\(\omega\) SST turbulence model and several kinetic schemes of hydrogen combustion. Two single-step schemes and three detailed kinetic schemes including 16, 38, and 37 forward and backward reactions are considered. The goal of the study is to choose a computation method and kinetic mechanism that ensure good agreement with experimental data on supersonic combustion of a coflowing hydrogen jet. In the case of a non-reacting flow, it is demonstrated that the computational algorithm can accurately predict the parameters of mixing of the hydrogen jet and external flow. In the case of a reacting flow, the flow characteristics are significantly affected by large vortex structures develo** at the interface between the combustion layer and the external flow. If the flow unsteadiness is taken into account and a detailed kinetic scheme with 37 reactions is used, good agreement of the mean characteristics of the flow with experimental data on the distributions of pressure, temperature, Mach number, and species concentrations at the combustor exit is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. W. Bogdanoff, “Advanced Injection and Mixing Techniques for Scramjet Combustors," J. Propul. Power 10 (2), 183–190 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Urzay, “Supersonic Combustion in Air-Breathing Propulsion Systems for Hypersonic Flight," Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50, 593–627 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Huang, L. **, L. Yan, and J. G. Tan, “Influence of Jet-to-Cross Flow Pressure Ratio on Non-Reacting and Reacting Processes in a Scramjet Combustor with Backward-Facing Steps," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 21242–21250 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Huang, Z. B. Du, L. Yan, and R. Moradi, “Flame Propagation and Stabilization in Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustors: A Survey," Prog. Aero Sci. 101, 13–30 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. W. Barnes and C. Segal, “Cavity-Based Flame Holding for Chemically-Reacting Supersonic Flows," Prog. Aero Sci. 76, 24–41 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Zhao, N. Lardjane, and I. Fedioun, “Comparison of Improved Finite-Difference WENO Schemes for the Implicit Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Non-Reacting and Reacting Highspeed Shear Flows," Comput. Fluids 95, 74–87 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Zhao, J. Liang, and Y. Zhao, “Non-Reacting Flow Visualization of Supersonic Combustor Based on Cavity and Cavity-Strut Flameholder," Acta Astronaut. 121, 282–291 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. C. Burrows and A. P. Kurkov, “Analytical and Experimental Study of Supersonic Combustion of Hydrogen in a Vitiated Airstream," NASA TM X-2828 (NASA, 1973).

  9. T. DalBello, “WIND Validation Cases: Computational Study of Thermally-Perfect Gases," AIAA Paper No. 2003–0546 (2003).

  10. X. **ao, H. A. Hassan, and R. A. Baurle, “Modeling Scramjet Flows with Variable Turbulent Prandtl and Schmidt Numbers," AIAA Paper No. 2006-0128 (2006).

  11. O. M. Kolesnikov, “Effect of Unmixedness in Large Eddies on Ignition and Combustion of Turbulent Jets of the Fuel in a Supersonic Flow," Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 42 (1), 49–56 (2006) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 42 (1), 41–47 (2006)].

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. A. Engblom, F. C. Frate, and C. C. Nelson, “Progress in Validation of Wind-US for Ramjet/Scramjet Combustion," AIAA Paper No. 2005-1000 (2005).

  13. Z. Gao, C. Jiang, S. Pan, and C. H. Lee, “Combustion Heat-Release Effects on Supersonic Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers," AIAA J. 53 (7), 1949–1968 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. P. Burke et al., “Comprehensive H2/O2Kinetic Model for High-Pressure Combustion," Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 44 (7), 444–474 (2012); DOI: 10.1002/kin.20603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. P. Drummond, “A Two-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Chemically Reacting Mixing Layer," NASA Tech. Memorandum 4055 (December 1988).

  16. J. S. Evans and C. J. Schexnayder, Jr. “Influence of Chemical Kinetics and Unmixedness on Burning in Supersonic Hydrogen Flames," AIAA J. 18, 188–193 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. B. Gerdroodbary, M. Mokhtari, K. Fallah, and H. Pourmirzaagha, “The Influence of Micro Air Jets on Mixing Augmentation of Transverse Hydrogen Jet in Supersonic Flow," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 (47), 22497–22508 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. B. Gerdroodbary, O. Jahanian, and M. Mokhtari, “Influence of the Angle of Incident Shock Wave on Mixing of Transverse Hydrogen Micro-Jets in Supersonic Cross Flow," Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (30), 9590–9601 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. https://studentcommunity.ansys.com/thread/ansys- fluent-2020-r1-theory-guide-user-guide-full-pdf/.

  20. I. A. Bedarev, A. V. Rylova, and A. V. Fedorov, “Application of Detailed and Reduced Kinetic Schemes for the Description of Detonation of Diluted Hydrogen–Air Mixtures," Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva 51 (5), 22–33 (2015) [Combust., Expl., Shock Waves 51 (5), 528–539 (2015); DOI: 10.1134/S0010508215050032].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Ladeinde, “A Critical Review of Scramjet Combustion Simulation," in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, January 5–8, 2009, Orlando; AIAA Paper No. 2009-127 (2009).

  22. J. H. Tien and R. J. Stalker, “Release of Chemical Energy by Combustion in a Supersonic Mixing Layer of Hydrogen and Air," Combust. Flame 130, 329–348 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. U. Maas and J. Warnatz, “Ignition Processes in Hydrogen–Oxygen Mixtures," Combust. Flame 74, 53–69 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Fedorov, N. N. Fedorova, O. S. Vankova, and D. A. Tropin, “Verification of Kinetic Schemes of Hydrogen Ignition and Combustion in Air," AIP Conf. Proc. 1939, 020019 (2018); DOI: 10.1063/1.5027331.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. N. Fedorova.

Additional information

Translated from Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva, 2021, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 18-28.https://doi.org/10.15372/FGV20210402.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vankova, O.S., Fedorova, N.N. Modeling of Ignition and Combustion of a Coflowing Hydrogen Jet in a Supersonic Air Flow. Combust Explos Shock Waves 57, 398–407 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001050822104002X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001050822104002X

Keywords

Navigation