Log in

Religion works in different ways: an intersectional approach to Muslims’ noninstitutionalized participation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Politica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although a growing body of research addresses the role of religion in the political engagement of Muslims, a dearth of studies scrutinizes whether intersecting power dynamics (i.e., gender and religion) shape Muslims’ political participation. In this study, we apply an intersectional approach to study whether religious indicators (mosque attendance, religious salience, and religious discrimination) shape the (gendered) participatory patterns of Muslims. Drawing on ESS data of six countries (Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands, Italy, UK, and France), we find religious attendance to dampen and religious salience to heighten Muslims’ nonelectoral participation. Religious discrimination seems to have no effect. Although Muslims’ religiosity is gendered, our study finds no effects hereof on political participation. Further research unraveling the motivations of Muslims’ noninstitutionalized forms of participation is encouraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Religious beliefs are measured by “How religious are you?”.

  2. The used weighting variable corrects for differential selection probabilities within each country as specified by sample design, for nonresponse, for noncoverage, and for sampling error related to the four post-stratification variables, and takes into account differences in population size across countries.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. 2013. Do Muslim women need saving? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, L. 1992. Women and gender in Islam. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, J.W., and R.C. Hofstetter. 2008. American Muslim political participation following 9/11: religious belief, political resources, social structures, and political awareness. Politics and Religion 1 (1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S.H., et al. 1979. Political action. Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrakli, E. and Hafez, F. (2019). European Islamophobia Report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.islamophobiaeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/EIR_2019.pdf

  • Brady, H.E., S. Verba, and K.L. Schlozman. 1995. Beyond Ses: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun-Brown, A. 1996. African American Churches and political mobilization: the psychological impact of organizational resources. The Journal of Politics 58 (4): 935–953. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., and K. Winters. 2008. Understanding men’s and women’s political interests: evidence from a study of gendered political attitudes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18 (1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. 2013. Why the west fears Islam. An exploration of Muslims in Liberal democracies. US: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. 2014. Political participation among Muslims in Europe and the United States. In Engaging the other, ed. K.H. Karim and M. Eid. New York: Palgrave Macmillion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P.H. 2019. Intersectionality as critical social theory. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167

  • Dana, K., M. Baretto, and K.A.R. Oskooii. 2011. Religiosity and integration into the political system among American Muslims. Religions 2: 504–524. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2040504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, K., N. Lajevardi, K. Oskooii, and H. Walker. 2019. Veiled politics: experiences with discrimination among Muslim Americans. Politics and Religion 12 (4): 629–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, K., B. Wilcox-Archuleta, and M. Barreto. 2017. The political incorporation of Muslims in the United States: the mobilizing role of religiosity in Islam. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 2 (2): 170–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancygier, R. 2014. Electoral rules or electoral leverage? Explaining Muslim representation in England. World Politics 66 (2): 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancygier, R. 2017. Dilemmas of inclusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Koning,. 2016. You need to present a counter-message. The racialization of Dutch Muslims and anti-Islamophobia initiatives. Journal of Muslims in Europe 5: 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmer, Y., and T. Pettersson. 2007. The effects of religion and religiosity on voting behavior. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior, ed. R.J. Dalton and H.D. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUFRA. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2017. Fundamental Right Report 2017. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2017-fundamental-rights-report-2017_en.pdf

  • Fadil, N., F. El Asri, and S. Bracke. 2015. Islam in Belgium: map** an emerging interdisciplinary field of study. In The Oxford handbook of European Islam, ed. J. Cesari. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrín, M., M. Fraile, G.M. García-Albacete, and R. Gómez. 2020. The gender gap in political interest revisited. International Political Science Review 41 (4): 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119860260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, R., and P. Hopkins. 2020. Resistance and marginalisation: Islamophobia and the political participation of young Muslims in Scotland. Social and Cultural Geography 21 (4): 546–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1573436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, F. 2022. Researching religion and migration 20 years after 9/11: taking stock and looking ahead. Zeitschrift Für Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik 6: 347–372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, F., K. Phalet, and O. Klein. 2011. Religious identification and politicization in the face of discrimination: support for political Islam and political action among the Turkish and Moroccan second generation in Europe. The British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (4): 628–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, B.L. 2018. The turnout gap. Race, ethnicity and political inequality in a diversifying America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fraile, M., and R. Gómez. 2017. Bridging the enduring gender gap in political interest in Europe: the relevance of promoting gender equality. European Journal of Political Research 56 (3): 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraile, M., and I. Sánchez-Vítores. 2019. Tracing the gender gap in political interest: a panel analysis. Political Psychology 41 (1): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glas, S. 2022. What gender values do Muslims resist? How religiosity and acculturation over time shape Muslims’ public-sphere equality, family role divisions, and sexual liberalization values differently. Social Forces 101 (3): 1199–1229. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliat-Ray, S. 2010. Muslims in Britain. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gündüz, Z.Y. 2010. The European Union at 50-Xenophobia, islamophobia, and the rise of the radical right. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 1: 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., and J. Roose. 2014. DIY citizenship amongst Young Muslims: experiences of the ‘ordinary.’ Journal of Youth Studies 17: 794–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., and S. Marien. 2013. A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies 15 (1): 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabarkhail, S. 2020. Servant leadership in the context of mosque: A qualitative case study of Muslim Women’s perspectives. Administrative Sciences 10 (3): 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. 2005. The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans Mosque involvement and group consciousness. American Politics Research 33 (4): 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly, D. 2017. Muslim women’s political engagement in British and French Society. Revue Européenne Des Migrations Internationales 33 (2): 157–181.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Just, A. (2017). Race, Ethnicity and political behavior. Oxford Research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press Online

  • Just, A., M.E. Sandovici, and O. Listhaug. 2014. Islam, religiosity, and immigrant political action in Western Europe. Social Science Research 43: 127–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kittilson, M. 2016. Gender and political behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-71

  • Kittilson, M.C., and L.A. Schwindt-Bayer. 2012. The gendered effects of electoral institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J.E., and A. Vedlitz. 1999. Race, ethnicity, and political participation: competing models and contrasting explanations. The Journal of Politics 61 (4): 1092–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maliepaard, M., and M. Verkuyten. 2018. National disidentification and minority identity: a study among Muslims in Western Europe. Self and Identity 17 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1323792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, A. 2009. Islam and liberal citizenship. The search for an overlap** consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and social class: and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew, S., and M. Sobolewska. 2015. Mosques and political engagement in Britain: participation or segregation? In Muslims and political participation in Britain, ed. T. Peace. London: Routhledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, J., C.C. Vaughan, and M.G. Venus. 2021. Methods of intersectional research. Sociological Spectrum 41 (1): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najib, K., and P. Hopkins. 2019. Veiled Muslim women’s strategies in response to Islamophobia in Paris. Political Geography 73: 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2008. Draft chapter for Social Science Research Council conference on Religion & International Affairs, New York, Feb. 15–16, 2008. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/SSRC%20The%20gender%20gap%20in%20religiosity%20Norris%20and%20Inglehart%20%233.pdf

  • Norris, P., Walgrave, S. and Van Aelst, P. (2005). Who demonstrates? Antistate rebels, conventional participants, or everyone? Comparative Politics, 189–205

  • Nyhagen, L. 2008. Religion, citizenship and participation. A case study of Immigrant Muslim women in Norwegian mosques. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(3), 241–260

  • Nyhagen, L. 2019. Mosques as gendered spaces: the complexity of women’s compliance with, and resistance to, dominant gender norms and the importance of male allies. Religions 10 (5): 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10050321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskooii, K.A.R. 2016. How discrimination impacts sociopolitical behavior: a multidimensional perspective. Political Psychology 37 (5): 613–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskooii, K.A.R., and K. Dana. 2018. Muslims in Great Britain: the impact of mosque attendance on political behavior and civic engagement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (9): 1479–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. 2014. Gendered Islamophobia: hate crime against Muslim women. Social Identities 20 (1): 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2013.864467.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peucker, M. 2018. On the (in)compatibility of Islamic religiosity and citizenship in western democracies: the role of religion for Muslims’ civic and political engagement. Politics and Religion 11 (3): 553–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2016a). Theories explaining gender differences in religion. Retrieved from https://www.pewforum.org/2016a/03/22/theories-explaining-gender-differences-in-religion/

  • Pew Research Center (2016b). The gender gap in religion around the world. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2016b/03/22/the-gender-gap-in-religion-around-the-world/

  • Phalet, K., G. Baysu, and M. Verkuyten. 2010. Political mobilization of Dutch Muslims: religious identity salience, goal framing, and normative constraints. Journal of Social Issues 66 (4): 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01674.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadan, T. 2013. To be a European Muslim. A study of Islamic sources in the European context. London: Kube Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J.G. 2007. More of a bridge than a gap: gender differences in Arab-American political engagement. Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1072–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoettmer, P. 2015. Mobilization and the Masjid: Muslim political engagement in Post-9/11 America. Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selod, S. 2018. Islamophobia and Racism in America. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 47 (5): 607–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severs, E., K. Celis, and L. Mugge. 2016. Power, privilege and disadvantage: intersectionality theory and political representation. Politics 36 (4): 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheed, A. (2021). Countering Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred to eliminate discrimination and intolerance based on religion or belief. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/HatredAndDiscrimination.aspx

  • Sinno, A.H. 2009. Muslim underrepresentation in American politics. In Muslims in western politics, ed. A.H. Sinno. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolewska, M., S. Fisher, A.F. Heath, and D. Sanders. 2015. Understanding the effects of religious attendance. European Journal of Political Research 54 (2): 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierings, N. 2012. The inclusion of quantitative techniques and diversity in the mainstream feminist research. European Journal of Women’s Studies 19 (3): 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierings, N. 2016. Multilevel analysis as a tool to understand the spatio-temporality of gender. Politics and Gender 12: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockemer, D. 2014. What drives unconventional political participation? A two-level study. The Social Science Journal 51: 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tony, W., and G. Davie. 1998. The religion of women in the modern West. British Journal of Sociology 49 (4): 640–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzebiatowska, M., and S. Bruce. 2012. Why are women more religious than men? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. 1990. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built Environment 16 (4): 288–303.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J.W. 2014. A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica 49 (3): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J.W. 2016. What is political participation? Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.68.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Klingeren, M., and N. Spierings. 2020. Acculturation, decoupling, or both? Migration’s impact on the linkage between religiosity and gender equality attitudes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (15): 3079–3100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1733947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman, H. Brady, and N.H. Nie. 1993. Race, ethnicity and political resources: participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 453–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D., and F. Fleischmann. 2012. Islam moves west: religion change in the first and second generations. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D., S. McAndrew, and I. Storm. 2013. Modernization and the Gender gap in religiosity: evidence from cross-national European Surveys. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 65: 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichelselbaumer, D. 2019. Multiple discrimination against female immigrants wearing headscarves. ILR Review 73 (3): 600–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The development of this article has greatly benefited from comments and assistance provided by the discussants of the ECPR 2021 and of the Politicologenetmaal 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Azabar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 4 shows how (gendered) religious indicators and socio-demographical variables influence non-Muslims’ noninstitutionalized participation. First, the interaction Religious attendance x Gender indicates a small significant effect on participation, albeit at the 0.1 level whereas the religious attendance seems to slightly heighten the participation of non-Muslim men (B = 0.10, p < 0.01). The more salient religion is for men, the lower the likelihood to engage with nonelectoral participatory activities; however, again, the effect is small (B = − 0.06, p < 0.001). Interestingly, with regard to the socio-demographical variables, these variables all show the expected results according to Verba et al. (1993): the higher the resources (education and income) and political interest, the more likely to participate. Moreover, we find women and citizens born in the country to be more likely to participate in political activities. Lastly, again, we find country effects: non-Muslims in Germany (B = 0.28, p < 0.001) and France (B = 0.36, p < 0.001) participate more in nonelectoral activities compared with non-Muslims in Belgium whereas Italy shows a negative effect compared with Belgium (B = 0.84, p < 0.001).

Table 4 Logistic regression to explain non-Muslims’ gendered noninstitutionalized participation (N = 12,247)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azabar, S., Van Aelst, P. Religion works in different ways: an intersectional approach to Muslims’ noninstitutionalized participation. Acta Polit 59, 416–438 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-023-00300-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-023-00300-y

Keywords

Navigation