Log in

Branding in Higher Education: A Case Study from Turkey

  • Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing upon the brand-building experience of a young and successful Turkish foundation university, this case study attempts to broaden our understanding of branding in Higher Education (HE). Focusing on the diverse brand conceptualizations, brand management principles and brand strategies that are deployed to circumvent barriers to successful university branding, the study’s results are expected to offer some valuable insights to the leaders of young universities in establishing and sustaining strong university brands. In order to illustrate how a young university creates, demonstrates and delivers its brand ‘promises’ to its target audience in a real-life context, some members of the board of trustees, including the founder, the president, vice presidents and advisors to the president were interviewed by the use of a semi-structured interview guideline. The data was analysed using content analysis method. The findings are grouped under three main themes: brand conceptualization, brand strategies and brand management principles. Findings revealed that how the leaders interpret ‘being a brand’ in HE shapes and drives brand management principles and brand strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to 2,547 Higher Education Law, Article 5, foundation universities are founded by foundations that use their profits only for educational purposes. They are dependent on the higher education principles and legislations of the country except for administrative and financial matters.

References

  • Ali-Choudhury, R., Bennett, R. and Savani, S. (2009) ‘University marketing directors’ views on the components of a university brand’, International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 6 (1): 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asalıoğlu, İ. (2009) ‘Private universities would advance higher education in Turkey’, Today’s Zaman, retrieved from, http://www.todayszaman.com/.

  • Aysen, E., Yaylı, A. and Helvacı, E. (2013) ‘Research on the determination of brand personality perception of universities’, Proceedings of 6th International Business and Social Sciences Research Conference; 3–4 January, Dubai.

  • Azoury, N.M., Daou, L.E. and El Khoury, C.M. (2013) ‘University image and its relationship to student satisfaction: Case of the Holy Spirit university of Kaslik, Lebanon’, Journal Of Executive Education 12 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J. and Gray, E. (2003) ‘Corporate brands: What are they? What of them?’ European Journal of Marketing 37 (7/8): 972–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. and Ali-Choudhury, R. (2009) ‘Prospective students’ perceptions of university brands: An empirical study’, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 19 (1): 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binsardi, A. and Ekwulugo, F. (2003) ‘International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration’, Marketing Intellegence and Planning 21 (5): 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.M. and Mazzarol, T.W. (2009) ‘The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education’, Higher Education 58 (1): 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C. (2007) ‘Barriers to brand building in UK universities?’ International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 12 (1): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapleo, C., Duran, M.V.C. and Diaz, A.C. (2011) ‘Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites?’ Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 21 (1): 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Chernatony, L. and Segal-Horn, S. (2003) ‘The criteria for successful service brands’, European Journal of Marketing 37 (7/8): 1095–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit [EIU] (2014) ‘Higher education in the 21st century: Meeting real-world demands’, The Economist, retrieved from, http://www.economistinsights.com.

  • Erguvan, D. (2013) ‘Perception of academics towards the impact of foundation universities on Turkish Higher Education’, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice 13 (1): 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 3rd edn., London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemsley-Brown, J. and Oplatka, I. (2006) ‘Universities in a competitive marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 19 (4): 316–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, A.J. and Knight, P.T. (1999) ‘Postgraduates’ choice of programme: hel** universities to market and postgraduates choose’, Studies in Higher Education 24 (2): 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B.T. (2011) ‘Brand heritage and the renaissance of Cunard’, European Journal of Marketing 45 (9/10): 1538–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judson, K.M., Aurand, T.W., Gorchels, L. and Gordon, G.L. (2009) ‘Building a university brand from within: University administrators’ perspectives of internal branding’, Services Marketing Quarterly 30 (1): 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J. (2008) New Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long-Term, 4th edn., London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, R., Turrisi, R. and Harless, C. (1998) ‘University image: the benefits of assessment and modeling’, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 9 (1): 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (2015) UX Strategy: How to Devise Innovative Digital Products that People Want, California: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006) ‘Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education’, Higher Education 52 (1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. and Schapiro, M. (1998) The Student Aid Game, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., Gosling, J., Bolden, R., O'Brien, A. and Hawkins, B. (2014) ‘Leadership and branding in business schools: A bourdieusian analysis’, Higher Education Research and Development 33 (1): 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé, P. and Ivy, J. (1999) ‘The marketing strategies of universities in the United Kingdom’, International Journal of Educational Management 13 (3): 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parameswaran, R. and Glowacka, A. (1995) ‘University image: an information processing perspective’, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 6 (2): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D.E. and Schultz, H. (2000) ‘How to build a billion dollar business-to-business brand’, Marketing Management 9 (2): 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, I. (1998) Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences, New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şenses, F. (2007) ‘Uluslararası gelişmeler ışığında Türkiye yükseköğretim sistemi: Temel eğilimler, sorunlar, çelişkiler ve öneriler’, Economic Research Center, Working Paper 07/05, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, retrieved from, http://www.erc.metu.edu.tr/.

  • Simon, H. (1997) A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations: Administrative Behavior, 4th edn., New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, K. (2008) ‘Classifying universities: Institutional brands from the marketing perspective’, Academica Group, Institutional Positioning White Paper, Ontario, retrieved from eduvation.ca/wp-content/uploads/classifying-universities.

  • Turkish Higher Education Council (2007) Türkiye’nin Yüksekögretim Stratejisi, Ankara: YÖK.

  • Wæraas, A. and Solbakk, M.N. (2009) ‘Defining the essence of a university: Lessons from higher education branding’, Higher Education 57 (4): 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garipağaoğlu, B. Branding in Higher Education: A Case Study from Turkey. High Educ Policy 29, 254–271 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.24

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.24

Keywords

Navigation