Abstract
Lim and Seok Chai clearly follow the pragmatist research ideology. They expose many of the controversies in classifying the action research method, and then they apply it in two case studies (in Singapore and South Korea). As they cite from the literature, some writers position action research method under the pragmativist ideology, but as advocated in chapter 1, a pragmatic method can come under either the pragmativistic or constructivistic ideologies, according to how it is applied, because it requires the researcher to involve the participants in the process of the problem that they are trying to solve. There is agreement in the literature that action research uses an organizational problem as the unit of analysis to develop a solution for a deductive-inductive theory-building purpose. It starts as deductive so as to review any a priori best practices that may exist, but usually existing procedures require modification (inductively develo** a new process model). Otherwise why would an action research project be needed? The generalization is often organization specific although the implications apply to the industry or more broadly. As the authors of this chapter clarify, action research requires the researcher to participate with and within the target community. This is similar to the continuous improvement paradigm of total quality management in the post-positivist ideology where operations research methods are applied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and complexity theories: Back to the future? Journal of Change Management, 4(4), 309–325.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Deutsch, M. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In G Lindzey & E Aronson (Eds), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1 (2nd ed). (pp. 412–487). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (2002). Action research. In D Partington (Ed.). Essential skills for management research (pp. 193–209). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fine, M. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance; A textbook for critical research. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 83–108.
French, W. L., & Bell Jr. C. H. (1995). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for organizational improvement (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Giroux, H. A. (1982). Theory and resistance in education. Boston: Bergin & Garvey.
Greenwood, D. J. & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gustavsen, B. (2003). New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action Research, 1(2), 153–164.
Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A., & Jick, T. D. (1992). The challenge of organizational change. New York: Free Press.
Kilgore, D. W. (2001). Critical and postmodern perspectives on adult learning. In S Merriam (Ed.), The new update of adult learning theory: New directions in adult and continuing education (pp. 53–61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). (pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marrow, A. J. (1969). The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.
Rescher, N. (1995). Pragmatism. In T. Honderich (Ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (pp. 710–713). Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
Roll-Hansen, N. (2009). Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science, Centre for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Science Contingency and Dissent in Science Technical Report 04/09. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/CPNSS/research/concludedResearchProjects/ContingencyDissentlnScience/DP/DPRoll-HansenOnline0409.pdf. (accessed March 30, 2014).
Schein, E. H. (1996). Kurt Lewin’s change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes towards a model of management learning. Systems Practice, 9(1), 27–47.
Schmuck, R. A. (ed.) (2009). Practical action research: A collection of articles (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seashore, S. E. (1976). The design of action research. In A. W. Clark (Ed.). Experimenting with organizational life (pp. 103–117). New York: Plenum.
Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–12.
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Yorks, L. (2005). Action research methods. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. (pp. 375–398). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Kenneth D. Strang
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, A., Chai, D.S. (2015). Action Research Applied with Two Single Case Studies. In: Strang, K.D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Research Design in Business and Management. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484956_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484956_20
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47906-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48495-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)