Reverse Innovation in Emerging Markets

  • Chapter
Innovation in Emerging Markets

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The locus of innovation in the global economy appears to be changing because of the rise of emerging economies, such as China and India, and the “flattening” of the world. Poor emerging markets no longer just borrow innovations from developed countries; from time to time they also contribute innovations to the rest of the world, including developed countries.2 We refer to this as reverse innovation, that is, the case where an innovation is adopted first in a poor country before being adopted in rich ones. Instances of reverse innovation still appear to be rare, and it is hard to tell if this will change materially in the future. Therefore, this chapter is about a nascent phenomenon whose future potential is uncertain. Nevertheless, reverse innovation is a promising area for research by international business and strategy scholars because it provides the opportunity to enrich and extend mainstream theories in a number of areas. At the same time it raises the level of awareness necessary for governments trying to foster innovation, the role facilitating institutions might play (NGOs, R&D labs around the world), and finally the potential benefits that multinational companies might gain to sustain a competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 42.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 74.89
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C. M. (2001). “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Innovations.” Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6–7): 521–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos, B., Asakawa, K., and Ambos, T. (2010). “A Dynamic Perspective on Subsidiary Autonomy.” Paper presented at the Global Strategy Journal launch conference, Oak Brook, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (1992). Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (2009). “Does Firm Ownership Matter? POEs vs. FOEs in the Develo** World.” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. and Noland, M. (1988). Japan in the World Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J. and Mudambi, R. (2005). “MNE Competence-Creating Subsidiary Mandates.” Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1109–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. (2007). Economic Analysis and Multinational Enterprise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. and Bower, J. L. (1996). “Customer Power, Strategic Investment, and the Failure of Leading Firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 17 (3): 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. and Genc, M. (2008). “Transforming Disadvantages into Advantages: Develo**-Country MNEs in the Least Developed Countries.” Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (6): 957–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2001). “Distance Still Matters.” Harvard Business Review, 79 (8): 137–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining Global Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2005a). “Building Breakthrough Businesses within Established Organizations.” Harvard Business Review, 83 (5): 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2005b). Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2010). The Other Side of Innovation: Solving the Execution Challenge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F. and Garcia-Canal, E. (2009). “The American Model of the Multinational Firm and the ‘New Multinationals’ from Emerging Markets.” Academy of Management Perspectives, 23 (2): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. and Govindarajan, V. (2000). “Knowledge Flows within Multinational Organizations.” Strategic Management Journal, 21 (4): 473–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. and Howell, S. (1985). “The Experience Curve from the Economist’s Perspective.” Strategic Management Journal, 6 (3): 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immelt, J., Govindarajan, V., and Trimble, C. (2009). “How GE Is Disrupting Itself.” Harvard Business Review, 87 (10): 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2010). “World Economic Outlook Database.” IMF. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/02/weodata/index.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2005). “Strategies that Fit Emerging Markets.” Harvard Business Review, 83 (6): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W. (1997). “Building Effective Ramp;D Capabilities Abroad.” Harvard Business Review, 75 (2): 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, D. R. and Lucea, R. (2009). “Mexican Multinationals: Insights from CEMEX.” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 280–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. (1993). “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (4): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (2010). “Acquisitions as Entrepreneurship: Inter-Nationalization and Emerging Market Multinationals.” Paper presented at Global Strategy Journal launch conference, Oak Brook, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science, 2 (1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Jerez, F. A., Narayanan, V. G. and Jurgens, M. (2006). Strategic Outsourcing at Bharti Airtel. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A. and Tushman, M. L. (2004). “The Ambidextrous Organization.” Harvard Business Review, 4 (4): 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. L. (1987). The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2009a). “What Have We Learned about Emerging-Market MNEs?” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 399–426.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2009b). “Impact of the Crisis on New FDI Players.” Paper presented at the Columbia University conference on FDI, the Global Crisis, and Sustainable Recovery. Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds). (2009a). Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (2009b). “Indian Multinationals: Generic Internationalization Strategies.” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 110–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2009). “Theoretical Aspects of MNEs from Emerging Markets.” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 42–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2010). “New Masters of Management: Special Report on Innovation in Emerging Markets.” The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/15894358

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M. and Gavetti, G. (2000). “Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging.” Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10–11): 1147–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, N. H. (2010). “Behind China’s Surge in Patents.” Fortune. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/14/news/international/china_patents_innovation.fortune/

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi, Y. (1976). The Japanese Are Coming: A Multinational Interaction of Firms and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2005). Globalization of Ramp;D and Develo** Countries: Proceedings of an Expert Meeting. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966). “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1979). “The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41 (4): 255–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1986). “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.” Management Science, 32 (7): 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. and Zeng, M. (2009). “Chinese Multinationals: Emerging through New Gateways.” In Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. V. (eds) Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. and Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with the BRICs: A Path to 2050. Global Economics Paper No. 99. New York: Goldman Sachs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, G. (1989). “Global Strategy… in a World of Nations?” Sloan Management Review, 31 (1): 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Vijay Govindarajan and Ravi Ramamurti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Govindarajan, V., Ramamurti, R. (2016). Reverse Innovation in Emerging Markets. In: Haar, J., Ernst, R. (eds) Innovation in Emerging Markets. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137480293_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation