The Human Rights Framing of Maternal Health: a Strategy for Politicization or a Path to Genuine Empowerment?

  • Chapter
The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Every year, more than half a million women worldwide die from complications arising from pregnancy and childbirth. Most of these deaths are preventable, examples of what Amartya Sen calls “remediable injustices” (2009, p. vii). The urgency of the issue became evident when, in 2000, governments around the globe decided to commit to “reduce maternal mortality” by three-quarters by the year 2015, making it one of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Despite sincere and combined efforts by governments, nongovernmental organizations, and various global agencies, the goal of reducing maternal mortality by three-quarters will not be met by most countries—especially develo** ones—by 2015. The struggle to improve maternal health conditions globally has led many scholars and practitioners to assert that maternal health is not simply a public health or development issue. Rather, maternal health and preventable maternal deaths are human rights issues because such deaths result from a range of factors that include but are not limited to gender inequality and discrimination, lack of adequate recognition of women’s right to health, and insufficient acknowledgment of women’s right to life, as well as various political, economic, social, and cultural barriers that limit women’s access to appropriate interventions (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2008; Dasgupta, 2010; Hunt & Bueno De Mesquita, 2010; Yamin, 2010; Yamin & Maine, 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alzate, M. (2008). “The sexual and reproductive rights of internally displaced women: The embodiment of Colombia’s crisis.” Disasters, 32 (1), 131–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (2006). “New life stirring: Mothering, transformation and aboriginal womanhood.” In D. M. Lavell-Harvard & J. Corbiere Lavell (Eds.), Until our hearts are on the ground: Aboriginal mothering, oppression, resistance and rebirth (pp. 13–24 ). Toronto: Demeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, R. (2008). “Framing disease: An underappreciated mechanism for the social patterning of health.” Social Science & Medicine, 67 (1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashturkar, M., Fernandez, K., & Pandve, H. (2010). “A cross-sectional study of factors influencing sex preference of a child among married women in reproductive age group in a rural area of Pune, Maharashtra.” Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 35 (3), 442–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balarajan, Y., Selvaraj, S., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). “Health care and equity in India.” The Lancet, 377(9764), 505–15. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(10)61894–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béhague, D. P., Cesar G. V., & Barros. F. C. (2002). “Consumer demand for cesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality?” British Medical Journal, 324, 942–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berer, M. (2007). “Maternal mortality and morbidity: Is pregnancy getting safer for women?” Reproductive Health Matters, 15 (30), 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick, N. ( 2011, February 3). “India takes step forward in tackling maternal health.” The Guardian Newspaper [online]. Retrieved on July 11, 2011, from http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2011/feb/03/maternal-mortality-delhi-human-rights.

  • Bonu, S., Bhushan, I., Rani, M., & Anderson, I. (2009). “Incidence and correlates of ‘catastrophic’ maternal health care expenditure in India.” Health Policy & Planning, 24 (6), 445–56. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, J., Ensor, T., Somanathan, A., Lissner, C., & Mills, A. (2006). “Mobilising financial resources for maternal health.” The Lancet, 368(9545), 1457–65. doi: 10. 1016/S0140–6736(06)69383-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, O., Koblinsky, M., & Taylor, P. (1995). “O~to a rapid start: Appraising maternal mortality and services.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 48, S33–S52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). (2004). “Giving birth in Canada: Providers of maternity and infant care.” CIHI.ca [online]. Retrieved on December 24, 2013, from https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/GBC2004_report_ENG.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, D., & Benoit, C. (2004). “Aboriginal midwifery in Canada: Merging traditional practices and modern science.” In I. L. Bourgeault, C. Benoit, & R. Davis-Floyd (Eds.), Reconceiving Midwifery (pp. 263–86 ). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, CDC. ( 2008, February). “Promoting health for women before, during, and after pregnancy.” CDC.gov [online]. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/aag/pdf/ drh.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR). ( 2008, August 22). “Maternal mortality in India: Using international and constitutional law to promote accountability and change.” CCR Online. Retrieved on December 24, 2013, from http://reproductiverights.org/en/document/maternal-mortality-in-india-usinginternational-and-constitutional-law-to-promote-accountab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Reproductive Rights. ( 2011, February 22). “Delhi High Court continues to stand up for pregnant women.” CCR Online. Retrieved on April 18, 2011, from http://reproductiverights.org/en/feature/delhi-high-court-continues-to-stand-upfor-pregnant-women.

  • Center for Reproductive Rights. ( 2011, July 20). “Centre for Health and Resource Management v. State of Bihar and others.” CCR Online. Retrieved on December 24, 2013, from http://reproductiverights.org/en/case/centre-for-health-and-resource-management-v-state-of-bihar-and-others-2011.

  • Cook, R. J., & Dickens, B. M. (2002). “Human rights to safe motherhood.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 76, 225–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curet, L. B., Foster-Rosales, A. R., Hale, E., Kestler, C., Medina, L., Altamirano, C., Reyes, C., & Jarquin, D. (2003). “FIGO ‘Save the Mothers’ initiative: the Central America and USA collaboration.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 80, 213–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, J. (2010). “Building voice, expanding space: Rights strategies and maternal mortality in India.” Gender, Rights & the MDGs: Maternal and Reproductive Health. Amnesty International India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deogaonkar, M. (2004). “Socio-economic inequality and its effect on healthcare delivery in India: Inequality and healthcare.” Electronic Journal of Sociology. Retrieved on July 17, 2011, from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol8.1/deogaonkar.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick-Read, G. (2009). Natural childbirth. London: Pinter and Martin Ltd. (Original work published 1933 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick-Read, G. (2005). Childbirth without fear. London: Pinter and Martin Ltd. (Original work published 1959 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrowolsky, A. (2002). “Rhetoric versus reality: The figure of the child and new labour’s strategic ‘social investment state.’” Studies in Political Economy, 69, 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggal, R. ( 2011, August). “Financing the cost of universal access to healthcare.” MFC Bulletin (Aug. 2011 –Jan. 2012 ), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, C. W. ( 2011, July 29). “Lawsuit over woman’s death to test African government’s duty to provide medical care.” Globe & Mail. Retrieved on July 30, 2011, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/lawsuit-overwomans-death-to-test-african-governments-duty-to-provide-medical-care/ article2115263/.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESCR-NET Caselaw Database. ( 2010, June). Laxmi Mandal v. Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital & Ors, W.P.(C) Nos. 8853 of 2008. ESCR-Net.org [online]. Retrieved on March 8, 2011, from http://www.escr-net.org/docs/i/1370523.

  • Express News Service. ( 2012, January 12). “High Court warns Seven Hills Hospital of action if poor patients ill-treated.” The Indian Express [online]. Retrieved on March 1, 2012, from http://www.indianexpress.com/news/high-courtwarns-seven-hills-hospital-of-action-if-poor-patients-ill-treated/898635/0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, G. (1998). African American midwifery in the south: Dialogues of birth, race, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geronimus, A. T. (2001). “Understanding and eliminating racial inequalities in women’s health in the United States: The role of the weathering conceptual framework.” Journal of American Medical Womens Association, 56 (4), 133–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haussman, M. (2005). Abortion politics in North America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. C., Foreman, K. J., Naghavi, M., Ahn, S. Y., Wang, M., Makela, S. M., Lopez, A. D., Lozano, R., & Murray, C. J. L. (2010). “Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5.” The Lancet, 6736 (10), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins K. (2000). “Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean?” Social Science & Medicine, 51, 725–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyert, D. L. (2007). “Maternal mortality and related concepts.” Vital & Health Statistics, series 3, number 33. Analytical and Epidemiological Studies, US Department of Health and Human Services and the CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1& Bueno De Mesquita, J. ( 2010, March 18). “Reducing maternal mortality: The contribution of the rights to the highest attainable standard health.” UNFPA.org [online]. Retrieved on December 24, 2013, from http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/handle/123456789/27682.

  • Indian Trust for Innovation and Social Change (ITISC). (2007). A study on the socio-economic determinants behind infant mortality and maternal mortality. Retrieved on February 20, 2011, from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ esswpaper/id_3a2283.htm.

  • International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights (IIMMHR). (2010). Human rights-based approaches to maternal mortality reduction efforts. Retrieved on December 20, 2012, from http://righttomaternalhealth.org/ resource/hr-based-approaches.

  • Jenson, J. (2001). “Canada’s shifting citizenship regime: Investing in children.” In T. C. Salmon & M. Keating (Eds.), The dynamics of decentralization (pp. 107–24 ). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2010). “Framing and the politics of public health: An examination of competing health narratives in Honduras.” Global Public Health, 5 (1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice Muralidharan. (2010). Laxmi Mandal vs. Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital & Ors. case [W.P.(C) Nos. 8853/ 2008 and 10700/2009]. High Court of Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koblinsky, M. A., Tinker, A., & Daly, P. (1994). “Programming for safe motherhood: A guide to action.” Health Policy & Planning, 9 (3), 252–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamas, M. (1997). “The feminist movement and the development of political discourse on voluntary motherhood in Mexico.” Reproductive Health Matters, 5 (10), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leboyer, F. (2009). Birth without violence. Rochester, VT: Healing Arts Press. ( Originally published 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2003). “Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: Transformations in citizenship and the state under new labour.” Social Policy & Administration, 37 (5), 427–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine, D., & Rosenfield, A. (1999). “The Safe Motherhood initiative: Why has it stalled?” American Journal of Public Health, 89 (4), 480–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine, D., & Yamin, A. E. (1999). “Maternal mortality as a human rights issue: Measuring compliance with international treaty obligations.” Human Rights Quarterly, 21 (3), 563–607. doi: 10.1353/hrq.1999.0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavalankar, D., Sankara, P. R., & Vora, K. (2010). “Midwives of India: Missing in action.” Midwifery, 1–7. doi: 10. 10 16/j.midw.2010.05. 0 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meertens, D. (2001). “Facing destruction, rebuilding life: Gender and the inter-nally displaced in Colombia.” Latin American Perspectives, 28, 132–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, D. T. (2001). “The rush to motherhood—pronatalist discourse and women’s autonomy.” Signs, 26 (3), 735–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India (MoHFW). (2005) Report of the national commission on macroeconomics and health. New Delhi: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoHFW. (2009). Family welfare statistics in India 2009. New Delhi: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, A. (2006). Rocking the cradle: Thoughts on motherhood, feminism and the possibility of empowered mothering. Toronto: Demeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, K. (2008, July 28). “AMA apologizes for past inequality against black doctors.” American Medical News [online]. Retrieved from www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2008/07/28/prsb0728.htm.

  • Osorio Peréz, F. E. (2008). “Forced displacement among rural women in Colombia.” Latin American Perspectives, 163 (35), 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). (2002). Health in the Americas, vol. 1. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, V. K., Sachdev, H. S., Mavalankar, D., Ramachandran, P., Sankar, M. J., Bhandari, N., Sreenivas, V., Sundararaman, T., Govil, D., Osrin, D., & Kirkwood, B. (2011). “Reproductive health, and child health and nutrition in India: Meeting the challenge.” The Lancet, 377 (9762), 332–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission of the Government of India. (2008). Eleventh Five Year Plan 2007–2012. New Delhi: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jejeebhoy, S. J. (2004). “Looking back, looking forward: A profile of sexual and reproductive health in India.” Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, C. (2010). “Corruption mars India’s healthcare system.” India Rejuvenation Initiative [online]. Retrieved on August 16, 2011, from http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8 &ved=0CC0QF jAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresources.transparency. bg%2Fdownload.html%3Fid%3 D296&ei=UipgU7XINoWZyATz0YHwD Q&usg=AFQjCNFEv8NgFgFt14mgGEv3no9Lb5rJPw&sig2=WZ7dcDaelJ j 1 1OuSfah5dQ&bvm=bv. 65636070,d.aWw.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1& de Carvalho Formiga, M. C. (2001). “Unwanted cesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: Prospective study.” British Medical Journal, 323, 1155–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press Trust of India. ( 2011, September 1). “Private hospitals can’t charge the poor: SC.” Hindustan Times (New Delhi Edition) [online]. Retrieved on February 28, 2012, from http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/private-hospitals-can-t-charge-the-poor-sc/article 1-740430. aspx.

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2007). Healthcare in India: Emerging market report. New Delhi: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, F., Ram, U., & Singh, A. (2006). “Maternal mortality: Is the Indian programme prepared to meet the challenges?” Health & Development: Systematic Review, 2 (1&2), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance, S. (1997). “Safe motherhood, unsafe abortion: A reflection on the impact of discourse.” Reproductive Health Matters, 5 (9), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, M., Rao, K. D., Kumar, K. S., Chatterjee, M., & Sundararaman, T. (2011). “Human resources for health in India.” The Lancet, 377(9765), 587–98. doi:10.1016/S0 140–6736 (10) 6188 8–0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. S., Patel, V., Jha, P., Paul, V. K., Kumar, K. S., & Dandona, L. (2011). “Towards achievement of universal health care in India by 2020: A call to action.” The Lancet, 377 (9767), 760–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, G. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Martin, D. (2007). “From the welfare state to the social investment state: A new paradigm for Canadian social policy?” In M. Orsini & M. Smith (Eds.), Critical policy studies (pp. 279–98 ). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, B. (2005). “The ‘double discourse’ on sexual and reproductive rights in Latin America: The chasm between public policy and private actions.” In S. Gruskin, M. A. Grodin, G. J. Annas, & S. P. Marks (Eds.), Perspectives on health and human rights (pp. 247–70 ). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, J. (2008). “Has donor prioritization of HIV/AIDS displaced aid for other health issues?” Health Policy & Planning, 23, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, J., & Smith, S. (2007). “Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: A framework and case study for maternal morbidity.” The Lancet, 370, 1370–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. (2006). “Birthing as an indigenous resurgence: Decolonizing our pregnancy and birthing ceremonies.” In M. Lavell-Harvard & J. Corbiere Lavell (Eds.), Until our hearts are on the ground: Aboriginal mothering, oppression, resistance and rebirth (pp. 25–33 ). Toronto: Demeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, A. M. (2008). “Gender justice through public interest litigation: Case studies.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 41, 833–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hindu. (2011, January 12). “Out of box solutions needed for remote areas.” The Hindu [online]. Retrieved February 2011 from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1083273.ece.

  • United Nations. (2006). Delivering as one. Report of the Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel. New York: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (n.d.). “Background information on the key international agreements.” UNFPA.org [online]. Retrieved on July 6, 2009, from http://www.unfpa.org/gender/rights.htm.

  • United Nations Population Fund. (2008). “No woman should die giving life.” UNFPA.org [online]. Retrieved on July 6, 2009, from http://web.unfpa.org/safemotherhood/stories.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund. (2006). “Maternal mortality update 2006—expectation and delivery: Investing in midwives and others with midwifery skills.” UNFPA.org [online]. Retrieved July 2011 from http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/publications/2007/mm_update06_eng.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, O., & Fernandez, H. (1999). “Is safe motherhood an orphan initiative?” The Lancet, 354, 940–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty-Rogers, J., Etowa, J., & Evans, J. (2006). “Becoming an aboriginal mother: Childbirth experiences of women from one Mi’kmaq community in Nova Scotia.” In D. M. Lavell-Harvard & J. Corbiere Lavell (Eds.), Until our hearts are on the ground: Aboriginal mothering, oppression, resistance and rebirth (pp. 34–64 ). Toronto: Demeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (2003). Misconceptions: Truth, lies, and the unexpected on the journey to motherhood. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). “Reproductive health.” WHO. org [online]. Retrieved July 2011 from http://www.who.int/topics/reproductive_health/en/.

  • World Health Organization. (2005). The world health report 2005: Make every mother and child count. Geneva: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WHO, ICM, & FIGO. (2004). Making pregnancy safer: The critical role of the skilled attendant. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA & the World Bank. (2007). Maternal mortality in 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/whosis/mme_2005.pdf.

  • World Bank. (1999). Safe motherhood and the World Bank: Lessons from 10 Years of experience. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). “World’s progress on maternal health and family planning is insufficient.” WorldBank.org [online]. Retrieved on July 20, 2009, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, A. (2010). “Toward transformative accountability: Applying a rights-based approach to fulfill maternal health obligations.” International Journal on Human Rights, 7 (12), 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, A. E., & Maine, D. P. (2005). “Maternal mortality as a human rights issue: Measuring compliance with international treaty obligations.” In Sofia Gruskin, Michael A. Grodin, George J. Annas, & Stephen P. Marks (Eds.), Perspectives on health and human rights (pp. 427–68). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 George Andreopoulos and Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, C., Das, S. (2014). The Human Rights Framing of Maternal Health: a Strategy for Politicization or a Path to Genuine Empowerment?. In: Andreopoulos, G., Arat, Z.F.K. (eds) The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137408341_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation