A New Internationalization Trend? The PISA Study, the Bologna Process, and U.S. Education Policy

  • Chapter
Internationalization of Education Policy

Part of the book series: Transformations of the State ((TRST))

  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyse the United States’ (11,8,) reactions to international initiatives in education policy. While the country has participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) study since its beginning in 2000, the U.S. does not participate in the European Bologna initiative due to its geographical distance. However, the U.S. has assumed observer status in this process since 2005. Overall, the PISA Study and Bologna Process have not triggered any far-reaching reforms in the U.S. In fact, many political actors have only recently noticed these international initiatives. Key policy elements such as output orientation, evidence-based policy-making, an economic understanding of education, and quality assurance were already widespread in the American education system. Hence, the U.S. has shown limited tangible response to PISA, although it continuously has ranked below average. Only recently have policy-makers and stakeholders started to incorporate PISA findings into their decision-making processes. Conversely, Bologna has become a more prominently discussed topic in the higher education policy community mainly for reasons of compatibility with the new European systems. Along these lines, the scattered introduction of European-style, three-year bachelor’s programmes at individual U.S. universities provide evidence of the increasing indirect influence of Bologna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACE (2011) House Subcommittee Holds Healing on College Costs. American Council on Education., http://www.acenei.edii/news~room/Pages/Iïouse—Iïearing—on—College-Costs.aspx, retrieved 4 September 2013.

  • Adeìman, Clifford (2008) 1 ‘he Bologna Club: What U.S. Hìghei’ Education Can Learn from a Decade of European Reconstruction, Washington D.C.: IHEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeìman. Clifford (2009) The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Co mergence. Report for the Institute for Higher Education Policy with the Support of the Lumina Foundation, Washington D.C.: IHEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeìman, Clifford (2010) “The US Response to Bologna: Expanding Knowledge, Firsi Steps of Convergence’’, European Journal of Education, 45(4), 612–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Jeannlne E. arid Robert A. Waikins (2006) “Strategies in Dealing with the Bologna Process”, international Educator, 15(5), 70–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, Tonia and Kerstin Martens (2012) “Transatlantic Convergence in Higher Education? Comparing Current Trends of Policy Change in Germany and the U.S.”, Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (2008) Deutschlands Rolle in der globalen Wissensgcscllschaft stärken. Strategie der Bundesregierung zur Intemationalisierung von Wissenschaft und Forschung, Berlin: BM BE

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna Press Briefing (2012) The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna Process Implementation Report, http://www.ehea.mfo/Uploads/(l)/Bologna%20Process%20Implementation%20Report.pdf, retrieved 3 December 2013.

  • Busemeyer, Marius R. (2007) “Bildungspolitik in den USA. Eine historisch-institutionalistisdie Perspektive auf das Verhältnis von öffentlichen und privaten Biidungsinstitutionen”, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 53(1), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • CGS 2009. Institutional Strategies for Addressing Three-Year Degrees: Bologna and Beyond. Council of Graduate Schools, http://www.cgsnct.org/ckfinder/useriìles/files/am09Bermett.pdf, retrieved 30 August 2013.

  • Dobbins, Michael (201.2) “How Market-oriented Is French Higher Education?”, French Politics 10(2), 134–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, Michael and Kerstin Martens (2010) “A Contrasting Case the U.S.A. and Its Weak Response to Internationalization Processes in Education Policy”, in Kerstin Martens, Alexander-Kenneth Nagel, Michael Windzio and Ansgar Weymann, eds., ‘Transformation of Education Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 179 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, Michael, Christoph Knill and Eva Maria Vögtle (2010) “To What Extent Does Transnational Communìcation Drive Cross-national Policy Convergence? The Impact of the Bologna Process on Domestic Higher Education Policies’’, Higher Education, 61(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, John A. (2008) Universities, the US High Tech Advantage, and the Process of Globalization, Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heraentaryand Secondary Education Act (1965) PuWic Law 89-ïO-ApriM J 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuìge, Timm and Toni a Rieber (201 3) “Atlantic Crossings of the Bologna Process-Analyzing the Diffusion of Higher Education Policies to the US and Germany”, Paper prepared for the ISA Annual Convention, San Francisco, April 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, Paul L. (2010) The Challenge of Bologna: What United States Higher Education Has to Learn from Europe, and Why It Matters That We Learn It, Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEBC (2013) Timing American Higher Education: The Process. Institute for Evidence-Based Change, http://tunirigiisa.org/Llbrary/Newsletters-(l)/Turiing-Higher-Education-The-Proccss.aspx, retrieved 7 July 2013.

  • IIE (2012) Open Doors Report. Report ors International Educational Exchange. Institute for International Education, www.iie.org/operidoors, retrieved 5 August 2013.

  • Inside Indiana Business (2009) Lumina Foundation Launches Tuning USA Project, http://wxvw.iiisideindiaiiabusiiiess.com/iiewsiteni.asp? ID=34943, retrieved 3 September 2013.

  • Karakas, Scott L. (2012) “Bologna and Beyond: The Future of Higher Education in the United States?’”, Synesis:A journal of Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy, 3(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosar, Kevin (2005) Failing Grades. The Federal Politics of Education Standards, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, Kerstin and Dennis Niemann (2013) “When Do Numbers Count? The Differential impact of the PISA Rating and Ranking on Education Policy in Germany and the US”, German Politics, 22(3), 314–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuinn, Patrick]. (2006) No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965–2005, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAFSA (2013) The Bologna Process, http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedKles/NAFSA_Home/Resou rce_Libra ry_ Ass els/Bologn a /bologna pro ce ss_ie_supp.pdf, retrieved 30 August 2013.

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) “A Nation at Risk: Imperatives for Educational Reforms”, http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index. html, retrieved 13 July 2013.

  • OECD (2011) Lessons from PISA for the United States. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012) Education at a Glance 2012, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, Diane (1983) The Troubled Crusade: Arne-ncan Education, 1945–1980, New York: BasieBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Susan I.. (2010) “The EU, ‘Regulatory State Regionalism’ and New-Modes of Higher Education Governance”, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Susan L. and Ruih Keeling (2008) “Stirring the Lions: Strategy and Tactics in Global Higher Education”, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(3). 221 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scliimank, Uwe and. Stefan Lange (2009) “Germany: A Latecomer to New Public Management”, in Catherine Paradiese, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie and Ewan Feilie, eds., University Governance — Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education (2011) Academic Ranking of World Universities 201 ]., http://www.arwu.org”/#, retrieved 3 September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Sheila and Brendan Cantwell (2012) “Transatlantic Moves to the Market: The United States and the European Union”, Higher Education, ó3(5), 583–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellings, Margaret (2006) A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of US Higher Education: A Report of the Commission. Appointed by Secretary of Education, Washington: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Valerie (2009) “Colleges Consider 3-Year Degrees to Save Under grads Time, Money”, Washington Post, 23 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (2008) Summary of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), http://www.tgslc.org/pdi7HEOA_summarypdf, retrieved 3August 2013.

  • Vogtle, Eva Maria (2010) “Beyond Bologna. The Bologna Process as a Global Template for Higher Education Reform Efforts”, TranState Working Papers 129, Bremen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, Randi (2011),4 Quality Agenda: Ihm’ To Build Enduring Reform. Speech delivered at the TEACH Conference in New York, 11 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiarda, Tan Martin (2009) “Die Bologna-Kopie”, DIE ZEIT 64 (16).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Tonia Bieber, Michael Dobbins, Timm Fulge and Kerstin Martens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bieber, T., Dobbins, M., Fulge, T., Martens, K. (2014). A New Internationalization Trend? The PISA Study, the Bologna Process, and U.S. Education Policy. In: Martens, K., Knodel, P., Windzio, M. (eds) Internationalization of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401694_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation