Abstract
In this chapter, we analyse the United States’ (11,8,) reactions to international initiatives in education policy. While the country has participated in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) study since its beginning in 2000, the U.S. does not participate in the European Bologna initiative due to its geographical distance. However, the U.S. has assumed observer status in this process since 2005. Overall, the PISA Study and Bologna Process have not triggered any far-reaching reforms in the U.S. In fact, many political actors have only recently noticed these international initiatives. Key policy elements such as output orientation, evidence-based policy-making, an economic understanding of education, and quality assurance were already widespread in the American education system. Hence, the U.S. has shown limited tangible response to PISA, although it continuously has ranked below average. Only recently have policy-makers and stakeholders started to incorporate PISA findings into their decision-making processes. Conversely, Bologna has become a more prominently discussed topic in the higher education policy community mainly for reasons of compatibility with the new European systems. Along these lines, the scattered introduction of European-style, three-year bachelor’s programmes at individual U.S. universities provide evidence of the increasing indirect influence of Bologna.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACE (2011) House Subcommittee Holds Healing on College Costs. American Council on Education., http://www.acenei.edii/news~room/Pages/Iïouse—Iïearing—on—College-Costs.aspx, retrieved 4 September 2013.
Adeìman, Clifford (2008) 1 ‘he Bologna Club: What U.S. Hìghei’ Education Can Learn from a Decade of European Reconstruction, Washington D.C.: IHEP.
Adeìman. Clifford (2009) The Bologna Process for U.S. Eyes: Re-learning Higher Education in the Age of Co mergence. Report for the Institute for Higher Education Policy with the Support of the Lumina Foundation, Washington D.C.: IHEP.
Adeìman, Clifford (2010) “The US Response to Bologna: Expanding Knowledge, Firsi Steps of Convergence’’, European Journal of Education, 45(4), 612–23.
Bell, Jeannlne E. arid Robert A. Waikins (2006) “Strategies in Dealing with the Bologna Process”, international Educator, 15(5), 70–5.
Bieber, Tonia and Kerstin Martens (2012) “Transatlantic Convergence in Higher Education? Comparing Current Trends of Policy Change in Germany and the U.S.”, Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress, Madrid.
BMBF (2008) Deutschlands Rolle in der globalen Wissensgcscllschaft stärken. Strategie der Bundesregierung zur Intemationalisierung von Wissenschaft und Forschung, Berlin: BM BE
Bologna Press Briefing (2012) The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna Process Implementation Report, http://www.ehea.mfo/Uploads/(l)/Bologna%20Process%20Implementation%20Report.pdf, retrieved 3 December 2013.
Busemeyer, Marius R. (2007) “Bildungspolitik in den USA. Eine historisch-institutionalistisdie Perspektive auf das Verhältnis von öffentlichen und privaten Biidungsinstitutionen”, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 53(1), 57–78.
CGS 2009. Institutional Strategies for Addressing Three-Year Degrees: Bologna and Beyond. Council of Graduate Schools, http://www.cgsnct.org/ckfinder/useriìles/files/am09Bermett.pdf, retrieved 30 August 2013.
Dobbins, Michael (201.2) “How Market-oriented Is French Higher Education?”, French Politics 10(2), 134–59.
Dobbins, Michael and Kerstin Martens (2010) “A Contrasting Case the U.S.A. and Its Weak Response to Internationalization Processes in Education Policy”, in Kerstin Martens, Alexander-Kenneth Nagel, Michael Windzio and Ansgar Weymann, eds., ‘Transformation of Education Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 179 98.
Dobbins, Michael, Christoph Knill and Eva Maria Vögtle (2010) “To What Extent Does Transnational Communìcation Drive Cross-national Policy Convergence? The Impact of the Bologna Process on Domestic Higher Education Policies’’, Higher Education, 61(1), 77–94.
Douglass, John A. (2008) Universities, the US High Tech Advantage, and the Process of Globalization, Berkeley: University of California.
Heraentaryand Secondary Education Act (1965) PuWic Law 89-ïO-ApriM J 1965.
Fuìge, Timm and Toni a Rieber (201 3) “Atlantic Crossings of the Bologna Process-Analyzing the Diffusion of Higher Education Policies to the US and Germany”, Paper prepared for the ISA Annual Convention, San Francisco, April 3–6.
Gaston, Paul L. (2010) The Challenge of Bologna: What United States Higher Education Has to Learn from Europe, and Why It Matters That We Learn It, Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
Hirschman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IEBC (2013) Timing American Higher Education: The Process. Institute for Evidence-Based Change, http://tunirigiisa.org/Llbrary/Newsletters-(l)/Turiing-Higher-Education-The-Proccss.aspx, retrieved 7 July 2013.
IIE (2012) Open Doors Report. Report ors International Educational Exchange. Institute for International Education, www.iie.org/operidoors, retrieved 5 August 2013.
Inside Indiana Business (2009) Lumina Foundation Launches Tuning USA Project, http://wxvw.iiisideindiaiiabusiiiess.com/iiewsiteni.asp? ID=34943, retrieved 3 September 2013.
Karakas, Scott L. (2012) “Bologna and Beyond: The Future of Higher Education in the United States?’”, Synesis:A journal of Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy, 3(1), 1–3.
Kosar, Kevin (2005) Failing Grades. The Federal Politics of Education Standards, Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
Martens, Kerstin and Dennis Niemann (2013) “When Do Numbers Count? The Differential impact of the PISA Rating and Ranking on Education Policy in Germany and the US”, German Politics, 22(3), 314–32.
McGuinn, Patrick]. (2006) No Child Left Behind and the Transformation of Federal Education Policy, 1965–2005, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
NAFSA (2013) The Bologna Process, http://www.nafsa.org/uploadedKles/NAFSA_Home/Resou rce_Libra ry_ Ass els/Bologn a /bologna pro ce ss_ie_supp.pdf, retrieved 30 August 2013.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) “A Nation at Risk: Imperatives for Educational Reforms”, http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index. html, retrieved 13 July 2013.
OECD (2011) Lessons from PISA for the United States. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2012) Education at a Glance 2012, Paris: OECD.
Ravitch, Diane (1983) The Troubled Crusade: Arne-ncan Education, 1945–1980, New York: BasieBooks.
Robertson, Susan I.. (2010) “The EU, ‘Regulatory State Regionalism’ and New-Modes of Higher Education Governance”, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 23–37.
Robertson, Susan L. and Ruih Keeling (2008) “Stirring the Lions: Strategy and Tactics in Global Higher Education”, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(3). 221 40.
Scliimank, Uwe and. Stefan Lange (2009) “Germany: A Latecomer to New Public Management”, in Catherine Paradiese, Emanuela Reale, Ivar Bleiklie and Ewan Feilie, eds., University Governance — Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, 51–75.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education (2011) Academic Ranking of World Universities 201 ]., http://www.arwu.org”/#, retrieved 3 September 2013.
Slaughter, Sheila and Brendan Cantwell (2012) “Transatlantic Moves to the Market: The United States and the European Union”, Higher Education, ó3(5), 583–606.
Spellings, Margaret (2006) A Test of Leadership: Charting the Future of US Higher Education: A Report of the Commission. Appointed by Secretary of Education, Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
Strauss, Valerie (2009) “Colleges Consider 3-Year Degrees to Save Under grads Time, Money”, Washington Post, 23 May 2009.
U.S. Department of Education (2008) Summary of the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA), http://www.tgslc.org/pdi7HEOA_summarypdf, retrieved 3August 2013.
Vogtle, Eva Maria (2010) “Beyond Bologna. The Bologna Process as a Global Template for Higher Education Reform Efforts”, TranState Working Papers 129, Bremen University.
Weingarten, Randi (2011),4 Quality Agenda: Ihm’ To Build Enduring Reform. Speech delivered at the TEACH Conference in New York, 11 July 2011.
Wiarda, Tan Martin (2009) “Die Bologna-Kopie”, DIE ZEIT 64 (16).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Tonia Bieber, Michael Dobbins, Timm Fulge and Kerstin Martens
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bieber, T., Dobbins, M., Fulge, T., Martens, K. (2014). A New Internationalization Trend? The PISA Study, the Bologna Process, and U.S. Education Policy. In: Martens, K., Knodel, P., Windzio, M. (eds) Internationalization of Education Policy. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401694_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137401694_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48648-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40169-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)