Abstract
The problematic of European integration has come to occupy a privileged position in the discussion of Self-Other relations in International Relations theory.1 The experience of the ‘European project’ is held to demonstrate the possibility for political identity to be constituted in the absence of any spatial delimitation of otherness. Instead, the Other of today’s Europe is found in its own past, that is the Europe of sovereign nation-states, founded on the principle of territorial exclusivity. Casting its own past of fragmentation and conflict as the Other, from which it must delimit itself, contemporary Europe defines itself as an open and non-exclusive ‘peace project’ of self-transcendence that no longer requires a concrete figure of the territorial Other to constitute a positive entity. Thus, while the project of European integration remains territorially limited, it nonetheless allegedly succeeds in suspending the operation of the logic of sovereign territoriality by reconstructing the figure of the Other, logically necessary for se If-identification, in a reflexive manner that converts the antagonistic process of othering into a drive for self-transcendence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Cameron Thies, ‘Progress, history and identity in International Relations theory: The case of the idealist-realist debate,’ European Journal of International Relations, 8 (2002): 147–185
Stefano Guzzini, ‘The enduring dilemmas of realism in International Relations,’ European Journal of International Relations, 10 (2004): 533–568
R.B. J. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Jacques Derrida, Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International (London: Routledge, 1994), 82
David Campbell, National Deconstruction: Violence, Justice and Identity in Bosnia (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), 80–81.
Alexander Murphy, ‘The sovereign state system as a political-territorial ideal: Historical and contemporary considerations,’ in State Sovereignty as Social Construct, eds. Thomas Biersteker and Cynthia Weber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 81–120.
See John Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998), 191–195
Georg Sörensen, ‘Sovereignty: Change and continuity in a fundamental institution,’ Political Studies 47 (1999): 590–604.
Wæver, Ole (1998) ‘Insecurity security and asecurity in the West European non-war community’ in Security Communities, eds. Emmanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 90.
Thomas Diez, ‘Europe’s Others and the return of geopolitics,’ Review of International Studies, 17 (2004): 320.
Alexander Wendt, ‘Why a world state is inevitable,’ European Journal of International Relations, 9 (2004): 527.
Christopher Browning, ‘The internal/external security paradox and the reconstruction of boundaries in the Baltic: The case of Kaliningrad,’ Alternatives, 28 (2003): 545–581.
Bahar Rumelili, ‘Constructing identity and relating to difference: understanding the EU’s mode of differentiation,’ Review of International Studies, 30 (2004): 46.
Pertti Joenniemi, ‘Re-negotiating Europe’s identity: The European neighbourhood policy as a form of differentiation’ Journal of Borderlands Studies, 23(3) (2008): 85.
Alexandre Kojève, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969), 23.
Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).
Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra (New York: J.M. Dent, 1961), 9.
Giorgio Agamben, Language and Death: The Place of Negativity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991), 49–53
See Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 60–62
Stefano Franchi, ‘Passive Politics,’ Contretemps 5 (2004): 30–41.
Agamben, Idea of Prose (New York: SUNY Press, 1995), 87.
Sergei Prozorov, ‘Giorgio Agamben and the end of history: Inoperative praxis and the interruption of the dialectic,’ European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (2009): 523–542.
See Giorgio Agamben, Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive (New York: Zone Books, 1999), 20–24
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Sergei Prozorov
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prozorov, S. (2014). What Is the Other of Europe?. In: Lindberg, S., Ojakangas, M., Prozorov, S. (eds) Europe Beyond Universalism and Particularism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361820_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361820_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47242-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36182-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)