Brands and Models of Brand Equity

  • Chapter
Globalization, Culture, and Branding
  • 1110 Accesses

Abstract

When I started writing this book in January of 2013, a Google search for the word brand yielded 2.91 billion (yes, with a b!) results. Although an exhaustive analysis of the content of these results was out of the scope of my inquiry, browsing through the results allows us to quickly identify key stakeholders concerning brands. A cursory glance shows page after page of links to brand consultants with recipes for hel** companies create strong brands, as well as links to company websites promoting their own brands. The next category of links includes public news about brands, such as new product introductions, product recalls, and brand stories. Finally, blogs and forums also exist, in which consumers discuss issues related to the brands they use. These findings support the idea that brands matter to three different groups of stakeholders: companies, consumers, and society. Why are brands of interest for these different groups? Let us answer this question by focusing on the functions that brands perform for each group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. Managing Brand Equity. (The Free Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. IASB. http://www.ifrs.org,retrieved on January 13, 2013.

  3. AMA. http://www.marketingpower.com/_layouts/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B, retrieved on February 13, 2013.

  4. Sinclair, R. A. New Class of Asset.http://www.prophet.com/thinking/view/335-a-new-class-of-asset (2009).

  5. Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. Price, Brand Name, and Product Composition Characteristics as Determinants of Perceived Quality. Journal of Applied Psychology 55, 570–579 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Cass, A. & Frost, H. Status Brands: Examining the Effects of Non-Product-Related Brand Associations on Status and Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management 11, 67–88 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Torelli, C. J., Keh, H. T., & Chiu, C.-Y. in Brands and Brand Management: Contemporary Research Perspectives (eds Barbara Loken, Rohini Ahluwalia, & Michael J. Houston) 113–132 (Routledge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellin, A. Seattle Woman Vows to Eat, Drink Only Starbucks Items for a Year. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2013/01/seattle-womanvows-to-eat-drink-only-starbucks-items-for-a-year. (2013).

  9. McCracken, G. Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 71–84 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keller, K. L. Branding Shortcuts. Marketing Management 14, 18–23 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. A Framework for Marketing Management. 4th. edn, (Prentice Hall, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. apple-history.com. (retrieved on March 1, 2013.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stamper, J. Steve Jobs: A Modern Leonardo da Vinci or Einstein?http://www.newstatesman.com. (October 7, 2011).

  14. Keller, K. L. Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research 29, 595–600 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnes and Noble. We Proudly Brew Starbucks Coffee.http://www.barnesandnoble.com/u/Starbucks-Coffee-at-Barnes-and-Noble/379001239/retrieved on March 3, 2013.

  16. Holt, D. B. How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding. (Harvard Business School Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suqrue, T. J. Driving While Black: The Car and Race Relations in Modern America. http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Race/R_Casestudy/R_Casestudy3.htm, retrieved on March 3, 2013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, T. Timeless Toys: Classic Toys and the Playmakers Who Created Them. (Andrews McMeel Publishing, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aaker, D. A. Building Strong Brands. (The Free Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keller, K. L. Conceptualizing, Measuring, Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing 57, 1–22 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keller, K. L. Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. 3rd. edn, (Prentice Hall, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rao, A. R. & Monroe, K. B. The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 351–357, doi:10.2307/3172907 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garvin, D. A. Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 101–109 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zeithaml, V. A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing 52, 2–22 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Madu, C. N. Reliability and Quality Interface. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 16, 691–698 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & Maclnnis, D. J. Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing 50, 135–145 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Torelli, C. J., Ozsomer, A., Carvalho, S., Keh, H. T., & Maehle, N. Brand Concepts as Representations of Human Values: Do Cultural Congruity and Compatibility between Values Matter? Journal of Marketing 76, 92–108 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fournier, S. Consumers and Their Brands: Develo** Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 24, 343–373 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rook, D. W. The Ritual Dimension of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 12, 251–264 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aaker, J. L. Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 347–356 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera, J. Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constucts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 492–508 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sung, Y. & Tinkham, S. F. Brand Personality Structures in the United States and Korea: Common and Culture-Specific Factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15, 334–350 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Durgee, J. F., O’Connor, G. C., & Veryzer, R. W. Observations: Translating Values into Product Wants. Journal of Advertising Research 36, 90–102 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gutman, J. A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing 46, 60–72 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reynolds, T. J. & Gutman, J. Laddering, Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research 28, 11–31 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schwartz, S. H. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 25 (ed Mark P. Zanna) 1–65 (Academic Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schwartz, S. H. & Boehnke, K. Evaluating the Structure of Human Values with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 38, 230–255 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Torelli, C. J., Basu-Monga, A., & Kaikati, A. M. Doing Poorly by Doing Good: Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Concepts. Journal of Consumer Research 38, 948–963 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Holbrook, M. B. & Batra, R. Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 404–420, doi:10.2307/2489501 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Nowlis, S. M. The Many Shades of Rose-Colored Glasses: An Evolutionary Approach to the Influence of Different Positive Emotions. Journal of Consumer Research 37, 238–250 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Edell, J. A. & Burke, M. C. The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects. Journal of Consumer Research 14, 421–433, doi:10.2307/2489502 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T. & Fabrigar, L. R. Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology 48, 609–647 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S. J. in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (eds Richard M Sorrentino& Edward Tory Higgins) (Guilford Press, 503–549, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huffman, C., Ratneshwar, S., & Mick, D. G. in The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (eds S. Ratneshwar, David Glen Mick, & Cynthia Huffman) (Routledge, 9–35, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Srull, T. K. in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising (eds Patricia Cafferata & Alice M. Tybout) (Lexington Books, 121–134, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Levy, S. J. Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review 37, 117–124 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  47. http://www.blingh2o.com/store/ retrieved on March 14, 2013.

  48. Wan, C., Torelli, C. J., & Chiu, C.-Y. Intersubjective Consensus and the Maintenance of Normative Shared Reality. Social Cognition 28, 422–446 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fischer, M., Völckner, F., & Sattler, H. How Important Are Brands? A Cross-Category, Cross-Country Study. Journal of Marketing Research 47, 823–839, doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.5.823 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Escalas, J. E. & Bettman, J. R. Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32, 378–389 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Aaker, J. L. The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 36, 45–57 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Morling, B. & Lamoreaux, M. Measuring Culture outside the Head: A Meta-Analysis of Individualism-Collectivism in Cultural Products. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12, 199–221 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stayman, D. M. & Deshpande, R. Situational Ethnicity and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 16, 361–371 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Oyserman, D. Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Action-Readiness, Procedural-Readiness, and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19, 250–260 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J., & Wong, J. Identity-Based Motivation: Constraints and Opportunities in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19, 261–266 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Keller, K. L. Building Customer-Based Brand Equity. Marketing Management 10, 14–19 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers. Journal of Marketing 74, 1–17, doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Why Do Customers Tattoo Themselves with the Brands They Love? http://www.cult-branding.com/, retrieved on March 15, 2013).

  59. Muniz, A. M. & O’Guinn, T. C. Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research 27, 412–432 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Apple’s Profit Compared to Its Competitors Is Enormous. http://www.todaysiphone.com/2012/11/apples-profit-compared-to-its-competitors-is-enormous, retrieved on March 15, 2013).

  61. Monga, A. B. & John, D. R. What Makes Brands Elastic? The Influence of Brand Concept and Styles of Thinking on Brand Extension Evaluation. Journal of Marketing 74, 80–92 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Clark, S. How the iPhone Changed the Smartphone Industry. http://www.webpronews.com/how-the-iphone-changed-the-smartphone-industry-2012–06, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Barrett, P. M. Apple vs. Samsung: The Longer View. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-08-30/apple-vs-dot-samsung-the-longer-view, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2012).

  64. Williams, A. iPhone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S3—Design, Screen and Power. http://http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/iphone-5-vs-samsunggalaxy-s3, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2013).

  65. Beats Galaxy S3 as Top Seller, Says Report. http://news.cnet.com/8301–13579_3–57570235–37/iphone-5-beats-galaxy-s3-as-top-seller-says-report/, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2013).

  66. Sanderson, R. Apple Has Biggest Impact on World Consumers: Survey. http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/03/31/us-brand-pollidUSL2850164020080331, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2008).

  67. Bhagat, P. Apple Is a Cultural Phenomenon. http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2011/01/apple-is-cultural-phenomenon.html, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wolonick, J. Apple as Status Symbol: Pretending to Have an iPhone in China. http://www.minyanville.com/sectors/consumer/articles/Appleas-Status-Symbol-Apple2527s-iPhone/1/4/2013/id/47166,retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Elmer-DeWitt, P. Chart of the Day: Samsung’s Galactic Marketing Budget. http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/29/samsung-galaxyapple-marketing/, retrieved on March 16, 2013 (2012).

  70. Laurent, G., Kapferer, J.-N., & Roussel, F. The Underlying Structure of Brand Awareness Scores. Marketing Science 14, G170–G179 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Romaniuk, J. & Sharp, B. Conceptualizing and Measuring Brand Salience. Marketing Theory 4, 327–342 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Fricker, R. D. & Schonlau, M. Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature. Field Methods 14, 347–367, doi:10.1177/152582202237725 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. John, D. R., Loken, B., Kim, K., & Monga, A. B. Brand Concept Maps: A Methodology for Identifying Brand Association Networks. Journal of Marketing Research 43, 549–563, doi:10.2307/30162430 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zaltman, G. & Coulter, R. H. Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research. Journal of Advertising Research 35, 35–51 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rao, A. R., Bergen, M. E., & Davis, S. How to Fight a Price War. Harvard Business Review 78, 107–120 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  76. https://www.yr.com/about#content=1 retrieved on April 9, 2013.

  77. http://www.brandassetvaluator.be/en/methodology, retrieved on April 9, 2013.

  78. http://www.interbrand.com. http://www.interbrand.com/en/Default.aspx retrieved on April 9, 2013.

  79. Rocha, M. Brand Valuation: A Versatile Strategic Tool for Business. http://www.interbrand.com/en/knowledge/papers-and-articles.aspx, retrieved April 9, 2013 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Carlos J. Torelli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torelli, C.J. (2013). Brands and Models of Brand Equity. In: Globalization, Culture, and Branding. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331953_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation