The Family Members Interrelating Questionnaire (FMIQ): A Measure of Interrelating Between Young Adults and Their Parents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Relating Theory – Clinical and Forensic Applications

Abstract

The Family Members Interrelating Questionnaire (FMIQ; Kalaitzaki et al., Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16(3), 199–215, 2009; and Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17, 463–481, 2010) comprises a set of 16 eight-scale questionnaires of 96 items each, to measure negative forms of both self and other relating within families. The rationale for its development and its advantages over existing measures are discussed and its research applications and psychometric properties are presented. Example diagrams of interrelating within a three- and a four-member family are presented. The FMIQ has been used in two studies in Greece, the results of which are summarised. To save time and for ease of administration, a shortened version of half the items has also been developed (Kalaitzaki and Birtchnell, The shortened family members’ Interrelating Questionnaire–Version 3 (FMIQ3), Unpublished instrument. Crete, Greece, 2008). This has been used in another Greek study pertaining to parenting (Kalaitzaki, submitted).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birtchnell, J. (1993/1996). How Humans Relate: A New Interpersonal Theory. Westport, CT.: Praeger; paperback, Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J. (1994). The interpersonal octagon: An alternative to the interpersonal circle. Human Relations, 47, 511–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J. (2001). Relating therapy with individuals, couples and families. Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J. (2014). The interpersonal circle and the interpersonal octagon: A confluence of ideas. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 21(1), 62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J., Falkowski, J., & Steffert, B. (1992). The negative relating of depressed patients: A new approach. Journal of Affective Disorders, 24, 165–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J., Hammond, S., Horn, E., De Jong, C., & Kalaitzaki, A. E. (2013). A cross-national comparison of a shorter version of the Person's Relating to Others Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20(1), 36–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birtchnell, J., Voortman, S., DeJong, C., & Gordon, D. (2006). Measuring interrelating within couples: The Couples’ Relating to Each Other Questionnaires (CREOQ). Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79, 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullerton-Sen, C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Understanding the effects of physical and relational victimization: The utility of multiple perspectives in predicting social-emotional adjustment. School Psychology Review, 34, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E. (2000). The impact of integrative psychotherapy in intrafamilial relationships of individuals with paranoid type schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Crete, Greece [in Greek].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E. (2005). Schizophrenia and family relationships. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Department of Psychology, School of Health, Natural and Social Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E. (submitted). The pathway to involvement in mutual violence in college students’ dating relationships: A multivariate mediation model.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., & Birtchnell, J. (2008). The shortened Family Members’ Interrelating Questionnaire–Version 3 (FMIQ3). Unpublished instrument. Crete, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., & Hammond, S. (2014). Measuring change in relating and interrelating during the early stages of psychotherapy: Comparison with a non-patients’ sample. Psychotherapy Research, 30, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., Hammond, S., & De Jong, C. (2015). The shortened Person’s Relating to Others Questionnaire (PROQ3): Comparison of the Internet-administered format with the standard-written one across four national samples. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 513–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., & Nestoros, J. N. (2002/2012). The Family Members’ Interrelating Questionnaires (FMIQ). In A. Stalikas, S. Triliva, & P. Roussi (Eds.), The psychometric instruments in Greece: A comprehensive collection and presentation of questionnaires, tests, instruments and assessment kits in Greece (2nd edn., pp. 650–651). Athens, Greece: Topos Publications [in Greek].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., & Nestoros, J. N. (1999, March). Development of a new questionnaire for the assessment of the familial relationships. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the Greek Psychological Association (p. 96). University of Cyprus, Nicosia [in Greek].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., & Nestoros, J. N. (2009). Interrelating within the families of young psychotherapy outpatients. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16(3), 199–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., Birtchnell, J., & Nestoros, J. N. (2010). Does family interrelating change over the course of individual treatment? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 463–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., & Nestoros, J. N. (2006). Ameliorating interrelating within families of psychotic persons: An integrative approach. In E. O’Leary & M. Murphy (Eds.), New approaches to integration in psychotherapy (pp. 141–154). London: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzaki, A. E., & Nestoros, J. N. (2002). The intrafamilial relationships of persons with psychotic symptoms: Description and assessment based on the interpersonal octagon theory. In N. Polemikos, M. Kaila, & F. Kalavasis (Eds.), Educational, familial, and political psychopathology: Vol. B. Deviant dimensions in the family (pp. 140–163). Athens: Atrapos [in Greek].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T., & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(1), 15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J. E., & Sherker, J. L. (2003). Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self–other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71(1), 21–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leising, D., Erbs, J., & Fritz, U. (2010). The letter of recommendation effect in informant ratings of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 668–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melby, J. N., & Conger, R. D. (2001). The Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales: Instrument summary. In P. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems (pp. 33–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R., & Moos, B. (1994). Family Environment Scale (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2006). FACES IV and the circumplex model. Unpublished manuscript. Life Innovations. Retrieved from www.facesiv.com/pdf/3.innovations.pdf

  • Schludermann, S., & Schludermann, E. (1988). Questionnaire for children and youth (CRPBI-30). Unpublished manuscript. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2000). Family Assessment Measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 190–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C., & McHale, S. M. (1992). The nature and family correlates of preadolescents’ perceptions of their sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., Strauss, M. A., & Holden, G. W. (2001). Handbook of family measurement techniques (Vols 1–3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Bill Birtchnell for designing the software used for the scoring and graphic representation of the FMIQ scores.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalaitzaki, A. (2016). The Family Members Interrelating Questionnaire (FMIQ): A Measure of Interrelating Between Young Adults and Their Parents. In: Birtchnell, J., Newberry, M., Kalaitzaki, A. (eds) Relating Theory – Clinical and Forensic Applications. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50459-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation