Abstract
This chapter examines changing tensions between housing and urban policy in the USA, where restrictive local planning systems emerged as a mechanism for suburban “exclusion” over the early- and mid-twentieth century, exacerbating socio-spatial divides. Proceeding from this overview, the chapter explains contemporary different housing roles of the Federal government, states and local authorities in the US and the key forms of housing assistance through rental vouchers, public housing and tax credits to incentivize low-cost rental housing development and provision. It then outlines a range of planning system approaches for affordable housing, proceeding from “anti-snob” policies in states such as Massachusetts, where the original laws to overcome local resistance to affordable housing development in suburban neighbourhoods were passed in 1969 (known as section 40B). Other approaches explained include voluntary and mandatory inclusionary zoning schemes, which require a proportion of housing be set aside for affordable rental or home purchase; density bonuses for affordable housing provision, protective mechanisms and impact fees to preserve affordable housing or offset its loss. These provisions have evolved over time and are now used in conjunction with new policies to encourage “smart growth” and renewal through densification around public transit. The concluding section of the chapter considers recent directions in US housing policy since the sub-prime mortgage market collapse and the GFC, including questions about the sustainability of home ownership for low-income households and the potential for a new housing crisis as ageing baby boomers abandon car-dependent suburbia for high-amenity inner city and lifestyle regions.
This chapter is authored by Kirk McClure, Nicole Gurran, Glen Bramley.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basolo, V., & Scally, C. P. (2008). State innovations in affordable housing policy: Lessons from California and New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 741–774.
Bennefield, R., & Bonnette, R. (2003). Structural and occupancy characteristics of housing: 2000 census 2000 brief. Washington: US Census Bureau.
Bratt, R. G. (2008). Nonprofit and for‐profit developers of subsidized rental housing: Comparative attributes and collaborative opportunities. Housing Policy Debate, 19(2), 323–365.
Bratt, R. G., & Vladeck, A. (2014). Addressing restrictive zoning for affordable housing: Experiences in four states. Housing Policy Debate, 24(3), 594–636.
Calavita, N., Grimes, K., & Mallach, A. (1997). Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), 109–142.
Calavita, N., Mallach, A., & Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Centre for Housing Policy. (2014). National Inventory of Inclusionary Housing Programs. Cambridge: Centre for Housing Policy.
Center for Transit Oriented Development. (2009). Mixed-income housing near transit. Oakland: US Department of Transportation.
Chevan, A. (1989). The growth of home ownership: 1940–1980. Demography, 26, 249–266.
Cowan, S. M. (2006). Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion, and housing opportunity. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 295–313.
Cullingworth, B., & Caves, R. (2014). Planning in the USA, policies, issues and processes (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Department of Housing and Community Development. (2014). DHCD chapter 40B subsidized housing inventory. Boston: Department of Housing and Community Development.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2015). Worst Case Housing Needs 2015 Report to Congress. Washington: HUD.
Fischel, W. A. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41(2), 317–340.
Fulton, W. (1991). Guide to California planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano.
Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. E. (2005). Why have housing prices gone up? American Economic Review, 95(2), 329–333.
Gurran, N. (2011). Australian urban land use planning: Principles, systems and practice. Sydney: University Press.
Hall, P. (1996). Cities of tomorrow. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hanlon, J. (2010). Success by design: HOPE VI, new urbanism, and the neoliberal transformation of public housing in the US. Environment and Planning A, 42(1), 80–98.
Hersey, J., & Spotts, M. A. (2015). Promoting Opportunity through Equitable Transit-Oriented Development. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Congress for the New Urbanism Conference: Meeting the Demand for Walkable Places, Dallas.
Hickey, R. (2013). After the downturn: New challenges and opportunities for inclusionary housing. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy.
Karki, T. K. (2015). Mandatory versus incentive-based state zoning reform policies for affordable housing in the United States: A comparative assessment. Housing Policy Debate, 25(2), 234–262.
Kneteiz, S. P. (1979). Low- and moderate-income housing in the suburbs: The Massachusetts “anti-snob” law experience. Policy Studies Journal, 8(2), 288–299. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1979.tb01580.
Krigman, Y. (2010). The Role of Community Development Corporations in Affordable Housing. Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 19(2), 231–253.
Landis, J. D., & Mcclure, K. (2010). Rethinking federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 319–348.
Marcuse, P. (1980). Housing in early city planning. Journal of Urban History, 6(2), 153.
McCann, J. (2006). Pushing growth share: Can inclusionary zoning fix what is broken with New Jersey’s Mount Laurel doctrine? Rutgers Law Review, 59(1), 191–219.
Micallef, J. (2011). Affordable Housing Impact Fee (internal minute). Berkeley: City of Berkeley.
Nelson, A. C. (2013). Resha** metropolitan America: Development trends and opportunities to 2030. Washington: Island Press.
Pendall, R. (1999). Opposition to housing - NIMBY and beyond. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 112–136.
Ryan, S., & Enderle, B. E. (2012). Examining spatial patters in affordable housing: The case of California density bonus implementation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27, 413–425. doi:10.1007/s10901-011-9259-0.
Schill, M. C., & Wachter, S. M. (1995). Housing market constraints and spatial stratification by income and race. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 141–167. doi:10.1080/10511482.1995.9521184.
Schively, C. (2007). Understanding the NIMBY and LULU phenomena: Reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 21(3), 255–266.
Schuetz, J. (2009). No renters in my suburban backyard: Land use regulation and rental housing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(2), 296–320.
Schwartz, A. (2015). Housing policy in the US. New York: Routledge.
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
von Hoffman, A. (2009). Housing and planning: A century of social reform and local power. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 231–244. doi:10.1080/01944360902774087.
Verrilli, A., & Raitt, J. (2009). The Use of Chapter 40R in Massachusetts as a Tool for Smart Growth and Affordable Housing Production. Boston: Citizens’ Housing and Planning Association and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council Retrieved from http://www.mass.gov/hed/docs/dhcd/cd/ch40r/theuseofch40rin-ma.pdf.
Wiener, R. J., & Barton, S. E. (2014). The underpinnings of inclusionary housing in California: Current practice and emerging market and legal challenges. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 403–422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McClure, K., Gurran, N., Bramley, G. (2017). Planning, Housing Supply and Affordable Development in the USA. In: Urban Planning and the Housing Market. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46403-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46403-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46402-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46403-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)