The Paralympic Games: Managerial and Strategic Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing the Paralympics

Abstract

In 2020 it will be 60 years since the first Paralympic Games in Rome (International Paralympic Committee 2015a, b). Over that time the Paralympics have grown into the world’s third largest sporting event behind the Olympic Games and Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup. Each successive Paralympic Games has made contribution to this growth: introducing new sports, encouraging more countries to attend, increased scope of broadcasting, record ticket sales, and alternative media channels to promote the event and its athletes. From 1960 to 2020 this has led to 11-fold increase in athlete participation, “from less than 400 in 1964 to over 4,250 at London 2012 and a projected 4,350 for Rio 2016” (International Paralympic Committee 2015b). Geographically, those countries represented at the Games have grown from 21 to 164 competing for some 500 medal events up from 144. The number of sports has increased 2½ times from 9 to 23, evolving from an event for wheelchair athletes to numerous activities involving nine different impairment types (International Paralympic Committee 2015b). The summer Paralympics now has a cumulative TV audience of 3.8 billion people and has an increasing presence on social media: at London 2012, for example, some 1.3 million tweets mentioned “Paralympic” (International Paralympic Committee 2015b). Like the Olympics, the focus of these statistics has often been on the summer Paralympics, but there has also been important growth in the winter Paralympic Games (Legg and Gilbert 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    US Dollars is used generically for all currencies around the world, including Euros.

References

  • Appleby, L. (2007). Legacy of Sydney paralympics. Paper presented at the Taiwan Olympic Committee Event Management Seminar for Deaf Olympics & World Corporate Games, Taiwan – Cities of Taipei and Kaohsiung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S. (2008). Athlete first: A history of the paralympic movement. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2008). The evolution of the paralympic games. In R. Cashman & S. Darcy (Eds.), Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games (pp. 19–34). Petersham: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2009). The Paralympic Games explained.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2010). The Paralympic Games explained. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2012). From Stoke Mandeville to Stratford: a history of the summer Paralympic Games. Champaign: Common Ground Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. (2008). Chapter 8: Classification and the Games. In The Paralympic Games: Empowerment or side show? (Vol. 1, p. 90). Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, B. (2010). Technology in Paralympic sport: Performance enhancement or essential for performance? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(3), 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R., & Darcy, S. (Eds.). (2008). Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games. Petersham: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R., & Richmond, D. (Eds.). (2011). Sydney Olympic Park 2000 to 2010: History and legacy. Petersham: Walla Walla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2001). A games for everyone?: Planning for disability and access at the Sydney 2000 Games. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2003). The politics of disability and access: The Sydney 2000 Games experience. Disability & Society, 18(6), 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Taylor, T. (2013). Managing Olympic venues. In S. Frawley & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Olympics (pp. 99–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, T., Darcy, S., & Alén, E. (2014). Juegos olímpicos y paralímpicos en Brasil: Aprendiendo de Barcelona y Sidney Olympic and Paralympic Games in brazil: Learning from Barcelona and Sydney. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas Journal of Business Administration (Brazil Portuguese), 54(2), 222–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. (2016). Scopus database. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, S., & Adair, D. (2013). Managing the Olympics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frawley, S., & Adair, D. (2014). Managing the football world cup. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2001). Crippling Paralympics? Media, disability and olympism. Media International Australia, 97(November 2000), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2007). Access for all: The rise of the Paralympic Games. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 127(3), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2010). Olympic cities: City agendas, planning and the world’s games, 1896–2016. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, G., & Horne, J. (2011). Sustainable development, shock and awe? London 2012 and civil society. Sociology, 45(5), 749–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. (1996). 1996 Atlanta Paralympic Games. Link, 5(4), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (2007). The cultural politics of the Paralympic movement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, P. D. (2008a). From inside the newsroom: Paralympic media and the ‘Production’ of elite disability. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, P. D. (2008b). The tail is wagging the dog: Body culture, classification and the Paralympic movement. Ethnography, 9(4), 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, P. D. (2011). Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics technology and the (dis)empowerment of disabled athletes. Sociology, 45(5), 868–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, P. D., & Kitchin, P. J. (2016). Managing paralympic bodies: The technology of classification and its impact on (dis)abled athletes. In S. Darcy, S. Frawley, & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the paralympics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2009). Accessibility guide: An inclusive approach to the Olympic & Paralympic Games. Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Documentation_Centre/

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2013). Accessibility guide: An inclusive approach to the Olympic & Paralympic Games. Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Documentation_Centre/

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2015a). Explanatory guide to Paralympic classification: Paralympic summer sports. Retrieved February 12, 2016, from https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/150915170806821_2015_09_15%2BExplanatory%2Bguide%2BClassification_summer%2BFINAL%2B_3.pdf

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2015b). Tokyo 1964: Develo** one of the world’s best public transport systems. Retrieved August 18, 2015, from http://www.paralympic.org/news/tokyo-1964-develo**-one-world-s-best-transport-systems#!prettyPhoto

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2016a). Classification Retrieved June 5, 2016, from https://www.paralympic.org/classification

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2016b). Explanatory guide to Paralympic classification: Paralympic winter sports. Retrieved February 12, 2016, from https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/document/160211172359750_2016%2B02%2BWinter%2BExplanatory%2BGuide%2B.pdf

  • Jackson, D., Hodges, C. E. M., Molesworth, M., & Scullion, R. (2014). Reframing disability?: Media, (Dis)empowerment, and voice in the 2012 Paralympics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling, A., Jobling, I., & Fitzgerald, H. (2008). Chapter 11: The inclusion and exclusion of athletes with an intellectual disability. In R. Cashman & S. Darcy (Eds.), Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games (pp. 201–216). Petersham: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Howe, P. D. (2005). The conceptual boundaries of sport for the disabled: Classification and athletic performance. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 32(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenck, C., & Gebke, K. (2007). Practical management: Common medical problems in disabled athletes. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 17(1), 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, D., & Gilbert, K. (2011). Paralympic legacies. Champaign: Common Ground Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, D., & Steadward, R. (2011). The Paralympic Games and 60 years of change (1948–2008): Unification and restructuring from a disability and medical model to sport-based competition. Sport in Society, 14(9), 1099–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malfas, M., Theodoraki, E., & Houlihan, B. (2004). Impacts of the Olympic Games as megaevents. Municipal Engineer, 157(3), 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Disability Issues. (2011). London 2012: A legacy for disabled people. London: Office of Disability Issues.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, D. (2009). (Dis)empowering Paralympic histories: Absent athletes and disabling discourses. Disability & Society, 24(5), 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdue, D. E. J., & Howe, P. D. (2012). Empower, inspire, achieve: (Dis)empowerment and the Paralympic Games. Disability & Society, 27(7), 903–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K. J., Adams-Mushett, C., Ferrara, M. S., & McCann, B. C. (1992). llntegrated swimming classification: A faulted system. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, J. (2011). Olympic villages and large-scale urban development: Crises of capitalism, deficits of democracy? Sociology, 45(5), 782–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, J. (1998). Stoke Mandeville road to the Paralympics: Fifty years of history. Brill: Peterhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, C. (1993). Women with disability, Paralympics, and reasoned action contact theory. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 2(2), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweedy, S., & Howe, P. D. (2011). Introduction to the Paralympic movement. In The Paralympic athlete (pp. 1–30). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweedy, S., & Vanlandewijck, Y. C. (2011). International Paralympic Committee position stand—Background and scientific principles of classification in Paralympic sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(4), 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. United Nations General Assembly A/61/611 – 6 December 2006.

  • Weed, M., & Dowse, S. (2009). A missed opportunity waiting to happen? The social legacy potential of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1(2), 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Mansfield, L., Chatziefstathiou, D., & Dowse, S. (2012). Develo** a physical activity legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: A policy-led systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(2), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Darcy, S., Frawley, S., Adair, D. (2017). The Paralympic Games: Managerial and Strategic Directions. In: Darcy, S., Frawley, S., Adair, D. (eds) Managing the Paralympics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43522-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation