Herbert Somerton Foxwell (1849–1936)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of Herbert Somerton Foxwell’s contribution to economics. First, it provides some biographical notes on his academic and book-collecting activities, with an emphasis on his assembling of what became known as the Goldsmiths’ Library. It also reviews Foxwell’s association with the historicist movement and his opposition to classical economics. Three sections then provide an assessment of Foxwell’s intellectual contributions to the economics of banking, industrial fluctuations, and the history of economic thought. The chapter ends with some final remarks on the strengths and limitations of Foxwell’s participation in the economic controversies of his time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Maynard Keynes described Foxwell’s lecturing style as being always directed to practical problems from a realistic perspective: ‘But he held that the reasoning must be applied, if it is to be fruitful, to a wide range of facts furnished by historical and contemporary experience, and not to simplified and artificial hypotheses’ (Keynes 1936: 592).

  2. 2.

    The British Economic Association’s plea appeared in the 25 June 1901 issue of The Times in quite convincing terms: ‘No such library of economic literature has ever been formed before, and it is doubtful whether any future collector, however learned, leisured and wealthy, will be able to rival it’ (The Times 1901: 8).

  3. 3.

    Alternatively, as argued by Cliffe Leslie in his Essays in Political Economy: ‘The main questions respecting the influence alike of the “desire of wealth” and of expenditure and consumption are: To what kinds of wealth, what modes of acquisition, and what actual uses do they lead in different states of society, and under different institutions, and other surrounding conditions? To what laws of social evolution are they subject in the foregoing respects? On these points we learn nothing from abstract political economy’ (Leslie 1888: 171).

  4. 4.

    When reviewing and reporting on Pigou’s successful King’s College Fellowship thesis (Pigou 1901), which was a Marshallian economic history of relative agricultural prices in the second half of the nineteenth century, Foxwell reported that Pigou was ‘too much of a Ricardian; too much enamoured of his technical apparatus’ (Foxwell quoted in McLure 2013: 275).

  5. 5.

    After the episode, Foxwell acquired a distaste for Pigou which lasted all the way through the First World War and beyond. During Pigou’s trials for exemption from military service, Foxwell, in a less-than-noble attitude, offered himself to fill Pigou’s place at Cambridge in case the exemption that had been granted at the first trial was reversed (Aslanbeigui 1992). Also, Pigou’s application for membership of the British Academy was denied until 1927 due, to a great extent, to Foxwell’s opposition (Winch 2014).

  6. 6.

    Marshall was not only content to express his sympathy for the historicist movement but also for the evolutionary approach to economics that draws upon biological analogy (Hodgson 2005).

  7. 7.

    Or still, when commenting on Mr George Goschen’s proposals to increase the Bank of England’s gold holdings: ‘The most conclusive proof that our present reserve is inadequate is to be found in the nervous state of the money market in ordinary times, and in the fact that comparatively small withdrawals of gold, of a kind to which the London market is constantly liable, will produce unforeseen and mischievous advances in the current rate of discount’ (Foxwell 1892: 142).

  8. 8.

    As expressed by Ricardo: ‘What security has the public creditor that the interest on the public debt, which is now paid in a medium depreciated fifteen per cent, may not hereafter be paid in one degraded fifty per cent?’ (Ricardo 1809 [2005]: 96). The same position, of stressing the need for restraint by the Bank in order to keep the exchanges stable, would be reinforced in 1810 by the report of the Bullion Committee (Fetter 1965: 39–43, 49–54).

  9. 9.

    See Foxwell’s observations on the history of Barclays Bank for a conspicuous case of a successful banking amalgamation (Foxwell 1908b).

  10. 10.

    The once curator of the Kress Library, Ruth Rogers, wrote the following about this second collection put together by Foxwell: ‘The major categories of the collection are political economy, commerce, finance, taxation, money and banking, trades and manufactures, transportation, labor, socialism, and the economic aspects of agriculture. The published materials span the years from 1474 to 1850 and includes works in all Western European languages’ (Rogers 1986: 282).

  11. 11.

    Modern studies, though, have shown that much of the nineteenth-century literature on socialism was influenced by the works of Smith (Thompson 2002: 82–110) and Owen (Claeys 1987: 130–165). Foxwell here does not take into account how difficult it was, even for the most loyal Ricardian, to master the complex intricacies of Ricardo’s labour theory of value (see Peach 2009: 145–240), while Smith’s and Owen’s theories were distinctly simpler than Ricardo’s and, therefore, easier to assimilate and diffuse.

References

Selected Writings of Herbert Somerton Foxwell

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1884). ‘Introduction’. In H.S. Foxwell (ed.) Investigations in Currency and Finance, by W.S. Jevons. London: Macmillan: xix-xliv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1886). Irregularity of Employment and Fluctuations of Prices. Edinburgh: Co-operative Printing Company Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1887). ‘The Economic Movement in England’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2(1): 84–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1888) [1919]. ‘The Growth of Monopoly, and its Bearing on the Functions of the State’. Appendix I in Papers on Current Finance. London: Macmillan: 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1892). ‘Mr. Goschen’s Currency Proposals’. Economic Journal, 2(5): 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1895). A Criticism of Lord Farrer on the Monetary Standard. London: Effingham Wilson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1896). ‘Review of Select Tracts and Documents Illustrative of British Monetary History, 1626–1730 (by various authors)’. Economic Journal, 6(22): 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1899). ‘Introduction’. In A. Menger, The Right to the Whole Produce of Labour. Translated by M.E. Tanner. London: Macmillan: v–cx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1908a). ‘The Goldsmiths’ Company’s Library of Economic Literature’. In H. Higgs (ed.) Palgrave’s Dictionary of Political Economy. Three volumes. London: Macmillan: 720–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1908b). ‘Review of A History of Barclays Bank, compiled by P.W. Matthews and edited by A.W. Tuke’. Economic Journal, 37(147): 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1909). ‘Preface’. In A.M. Andréades, History of the Bank of England. Translated by C. Meredith. London: P.S. King & Son: vii–xxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1909) [1919]. ‘The Banking Reserve’. Paper V in Papers on Current Finance. London: Macmillan: 135–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1913). ‘Review of Indian Currency and Finance, by J.M. Keynes’. Economic Journal, 23(92): 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1917) [1919a]. ‘The Financing of Industry and Trade’. Paper IV in Papers on Current Finance. London: Macmillan: 97–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1917) [1919b]. ‘The Nature of the Industrial Struggle’. Paper III in Papers on Current Finance. London: Macmillan: 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxwell, H.S. (1919). ‘Obituary: Archdeacon Cunningham’. Economic Journal, 29(115): 382–390.

    Google Scholar 

Other References

  • Aslanbeigui, N. (1992). ‘Foxwell’s Aims and Pigou’s Military Service: A Malicious Episode?’. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14(1): 96109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonar, J. (1936). ‘H.S. Foxwell’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 99(4): 837–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley, A.L. and R.D. Freeman (2004). ‘Foxwell, Herbert Somerton (1849–1936)’. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/33239.

  • Claeys, G. (1987). Machinery, Money and the Millennium: From Moral Economy to Socialism, 1815–1860. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R.H. (1972). ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor’. Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2): 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A.W. (1954). ‘The Historic Reaction in English Political Economy 1870–1890’. Economica, New Series, 21(82): 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, A.W. (1972). ‘The Appointment of Pigou as Marshall’s Successor: Comment’. Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2): 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. (1878). ‘Political Economy as a Moral Science’. Mind, 3(11): 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. (1892). ‘The Perversion of Economic History’. Economic Journal, 2(7): 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, F.W. (1965). Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy 1797–1875. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen, P.D. (1995). A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (2005). ‘Alfred Marshall Versus the Historical School?’. Journal of Economic Studies, 32(4): 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, L.J. (1970). ‘The Gold Standard and Deflation: Issues and Attitudes in the 1920s’. Chapter 5 in S. Pollard (ed.) The Gold Standard and Employment Policies between the Wars. London: Methuen: 122–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W.S. (1871). The Theory of Political Economy. Third edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936). ‘Herbert Somerton Foxwell’. Economic Journal, 46(184): 589–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.N. (1897). The Scope and Method of Political Economy. Second edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koot, G.M. (1977). ‘H.S. Foxwell and English Historical Economics’. Journal of Economic Issues, 11(3): 561–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koot, G.M. (1987). ‘Foxwell, Herbert Somerton (1849–1936)’. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. First edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 3,672–3,674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, T.E.C. (1888). Essays in Political Economy. Second edition. London: Longmans, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLure, M. (2013). ‘Assessments of A.C. Pigou’s Fellowship Theses’. History of Political Economy, 45(2): 255–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mints, L.W. (1945). A History of Banking Theory in Great Britain and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moggridge, D.E. (1972). British Monetary Policy, 1924–1931: The Norman Conquest of $4.86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, J.S. (1919). ‘Review of Papers on Current Finance, by H.S. Foxwell’. Economic Journal, 29(115): 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peach, T. (2009). Interpreting Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. (1901). The Causes and Effects of Changes in the Relative Values of Agricultural Produce in the United Kingdom during the Last Fifty Years. King’s College Fellowship Thesis, King’s College Archive Centre, Cambridge University: Coll. KCAC/4/11/1/Pigou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. (1912). Wealth and Welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1809) [2005]. ‘The High Price of Bullion’. In P. Sraffa (ed.) The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Volume III, Pamphlets and Papers 1809–1811. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund: 47–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R.R. (1986). ‘The Kress Library of Business and Economics’. Business History Review, 60(2): 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1963). History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, G.F. (1942). ‘The Place of Marshall’s Principles in the Development of Economic Theory’. Economic Journal, 52(208): 294–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times (1901). ‘Professor Foxwell’s Library of Economic Literature’. 25 June: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times (1936). Professor Foxwell: The Bibliography of Economics. 4 August: 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N.W. (2002). The People’s Science: The Popular Political Economy of Exploitation and Crisis 1816–1834. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, D. (2014). ‘Keynes and the British Academy’. The Historical Journal, 57(3): 751–771.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rogério Arthmar or Michael McLure .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arthmar, R., McLure, M. (2017). Herbert Somerton Foxwell (1849–1936). In: Cord, R. (eds) The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41233-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41233-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41232-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41233-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation