Abstract
Gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulates in plants following exposure to heavy metals. To investigate the role of GABA in cadmium (Cd) tolerance and elucidate the underlying mechanisms, GABA (0, 25 and 50 µM) was applied to Cd-treated maize plants. Vegetative growth parameters were improved in both Cd-treated and control plants due to GABA application. Cd uptake and translocation were considerably inhibited by GABA. Antioxidant enzyme activity was enhanced in plants subjected to Cd. Concurrently GABA caused further increases in catalase and superoxide dismutase activities, which led to a significant reduction in hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion and malondealdehyde contents under stress conditions. Polyamine biosynthesis-responsive genes, namely ornithine decarboxylase and spermidine synthase, were induced by GABA in plants grown under Cd shock. GABA suppressed polyamine oxidase, a gene related to polyamine catabolism, when plants were exposed to Cd. Consequently, different forms of polyamines were elevated in Cd-exposed plants following GABA application. The maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was decreased by Cd-exposed plants, but was completely restored by GABA to the same value in the control. These results suggest a multifaceted contribution of GABA, through regulation of Cd uptake, production of reactive oxygen species and polyamine metabolism, in response to Cd stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Heavy metal (HM) toxicity is considered a major threat to living organisms. HM-polluted soils derived from increasing geologic and anthropogenic activities have significantly impacted the production of high-quality agricultural crops in certain regions of the world. Plants growing on these soils exhibit reduced growth, photosynthetic performance, and yield1. As a naturally occurring HM pollutant, Cd exposure has been documented in most organisms, particularly plants and humans2.
World fertilizer consumption is increasing and will eventually reach a point where the drawbacks outweigh the benefits3. The same mechanisms that drive improved plant productivity often create side effects such as environmental contamination. Furthermore, some components of fertilizers, especially Cd, accumulate in both body and food chain, where they remain for an extended period and causes adverse health effects4. Therefore, fertilizers containing very high levels of Cd (417 mg/kg) threaten human health by accumulation in important crop such as maize5. Maize, as one of the most popular cereal grain, is widely cultivated across the world. Maize is also produced at an industrial scale as a key input in various products such as syrups, soft drinks and charcoals6,7. Therefore, there is a strong incentive to minimize the toxic effects of Cd in maize.
The mechanism of Cd toxicity in plants is still under investigation though it has been proposed to disturb photosynthetic function via inhibition of oxygen evolution and reduced chlorophyll content8,9,10. Plants exposed to high Cd concentrations exhibit reduced photosynthesis and root cellular metabolism11,12,13,14. Investigation on PSII function during the photo-activation process confirms that Cd possesses an inhibitory effect through active competition with Ca2+ ions in the catalytic center15.
During evolution plants have evolved diverse adaptive strategies to alleviate the negative effects of high Cd concentrations. These adaptations are associated with the production of Cd-sequestering compounds such as phytochelatins or with active Cd export from the cell16. Recent studies have revealed a link between low molecular weight thiol (–SH) compound in most plant and Cd toxicity17. In different studies, increase in glutathione (GSH) content, as one of the main thiol compound; have been reported after Cd exposure; as it is the precursor for the synthesis of phytochelatins18. Detoxification is another general mechanism developed in plants to cope with highly toxic metals and to maintain physiological tolerance. Under stress condition endogenous regulating networks set in motion to maintain a delicate balance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and ROS-scavenging pathways. Antioxidants enzymes comprising superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase are commonly present in all intracellular regions and mainly responsible for oxidative burst. Alternatively, chelation of metals by ligands is a possible strategy by which compartmentalization of the ligand-metal into a limited area prevents the free circulation of ions in the cytosol12. Notably, in response to HM stresses, plants accumulate signaling molecules that maintain their capacity for growth and development19,39,40,41. GABA accumulation has been reported as a result of exposure to different stress conditions such as high temperature42, osmotic pressure19,43, cold shock44, salinity stress39, cold tolerance in peach fruits (Amygdalus persica)45, salt tolerance in Nicotiana sylvestris46 and Lactuca sativa41 and drought tolerance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne)47 have been previously reported. The beneficial role of GABA against stress-induced oxidative damage in various plant species has been often reported41,48,39. Earlier studies reported the increased photosynthetic capacity by exogenous application of PAs in different plant species under various stress conditions28,73,74. Previous study conducted in maize and rice plants have revealed that cd-responsive orthologous are conserved in both plants. Among which ZmGAD1 gene, responsible for glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) enzyme (a key enzyme in GABA biosynthesis) has been introduced as a novel Cd-responsive gene and successfully conferred with Cd tolerance in yeast75. Here we have focused on GABA modulatory effect on PAs as different line of the tolerance pathway in maize plants. The biological link between GABA and PAs is established by the fact that GABA is interconverted through PAs catabolism34. In our study, IBP levels remained constant when both concentrations of GABA were applied to non-stressed plants (Fig. 9B). This can imply that GABA inter-relation with Put formation is mainly due to the stress-induced signals in plant76. Higher GABA concentrations (50 µM) reduced final IBP level. These results are indicative of higher GABA concentration having a negative feedback effect on IBP biosynthesis. A similar trend was also obtained for FP in Cd-exposed plants (Fig. 9A). Results obtained from SCP measurement indicated a sharp induction from 25 µM GABA application on Cd-exposed plants (Fig. 9C). This result is consistent with a study from Liu and colleagues (2004) reporting higher FP level in drought-sensitive wheat plants versus induced SCP form in tolerant cultivars77. In light of these results, a possible hypothesis could be the conversion of FP to SCP forms modulated by 25 µM exogenous GABA application. Enhanced level of SCP has also been correlated with improved drought tolerance in rice plants78,79. However, reduced SCP content has been detected by Yong and colleagues in GABA + PEG-treated white clover plants80. This conflict can be explained by dynamic strategies employed by different plant species in response to various stressors. Drought stress mainly refers to curtailed water status in plants while in Cd-stressed conditions plants have the challenge of actively removing excess Cd from the cytoplasm and compartmentalizing it to the vacuoles. In both distinct strategies, elevated Put level has been addressed80,81. Moreover, elevated expression of ORDC gene by GABA in this study (Fig. 12A) substantiates the notion of GABA-induced Put accumulation. However, there are limited studies establishing Put as a major cause of such effects. This led us to speculate that plants have potential to address an array of variable responses by using the same metabolic resources. However, there is a gap of sufficient information as how the various forms of similar PAs (Put) are being modulated under different stress-related conditions. GABA-treated plants, particularly at the 25 µM concentration, exhibited an observable enhancement in both FS and SCS contents under Cd stress (Fig. 10A,C), while IBS showed dramatic increase at 50 µM GABA and no significant differences at exposure to 25 µM GABA (Fig. 10B). These data indicate that higher FS and SCS levels are not required to cope with Cd stress. PA biosynthesis and degradation by exogenous GABA has been reported in other plant species under stressful conditions82,83. However, in our study increased levels of SCS were observed in both Cd-exposed and control plants. In Cd-exposed plants, SPDS gene expression was elevated (Fig. 12C) and more interestingly, PAO gene expression was inhibited by GABA application (Fig. 12B). This tempts us to speculate that the two effects of GABA–induction of Spd formation and inhibition of self-degradation–are different sides of the same coin. In an opposite sense, reduced Spm content by GABA application could be attributed to the degradation of Spm to produce Spd. Increased level of Spm in GABA-treated plants can be explained by inhibited degradation of Spm by reduced PAO gene expression. These results imply a multifunctional role for GABA under dynamic plant cell responses.
Several lines of evidence concluded that Cd exposure results in accumulation of thiol compounds in living organisms. Sulphydryl groups of thiols (e.g. GSH) potentially bind to the HMs like Cd and lead to efficient metal sequestration84. However our finding is in disagreement with the assumption that Cd tolerance involves an increase of GSH. Our data showed that in maize plants GSH content does not change by Cd exposure and GABA also manifested null effect on GSH level. Previous findings have also shown that the activity of γ-glutamyl-cysteine synthase, a rate limiting enzyme in GSH metabolism, in tolerant plants is lower than its activity in susceptible ones18. In a same fashion, transgenic Arabidopsis plants harboring bacterial γ-glutamyl-cysteine synthetase resulted in Cd sensitivity85. These findings combined with our result let us to speculate that Cd tolerance in different plants may rely on various mechanisms. GSH can “transiently” increase by abiotic stresses such as Cd shock86. Alternatively, plants employ largely variable strategy to commit excessive Cd level. One example can be the mechanism that inhibits Cd absorption or translocation in plants. At the cellular level, Cd enters plants mostly through root epidermal cells. This entrance is associated with three well-known steps including, (i) Cd exchange with H2CO3−-released H+, (ii) recruitment of the Fe2+, Zn2+ (belong to ZIP family transporters) such as Yellow Stripe 1-Lik (YSL) protein and Ca2+ channels and iii) formation of metal ligand complexes with mugineic acids (MA) in soil and being authorized for entrance1 (Fig. 13). Upon entry, long distance translocation of Cd is governed by the xylem loading process mediated by HM P1B-type ATPases enzymes87,88. In our current study, Cd uptake by maize plants was significantly reduced by application of GABA, particularly at the 50 µM concentration (Fig. 4). GABA alleviated the Cd level in two district steps comprising uptake from soil and transfer to the shoot. Although, it is hard to determine specific function for GABA in Cd uptake and translocation processes. In this regard, one possible mechanism could be GABA-mediated Cd chelation, which would distance the Cd from the root system. Alternatively, GABA may change the osmotic pressure by regulation of cytosolic pH50,89,90, leading to lower Cd absorption at cellular level, and ultimately reduced Cd concentration in the cell. GABA may regulate enzymatic activities to inhibit intra-plant Cd transfer, thereby limited concentration in shoot. This is consistent with our finding as evident from shoot to root ratio that implies higher inhibitory effect of Cd in root growth. To date, knowledge about GABA interaction with certain receptors has been limited to the plasma membrane localized aluminum-activated malate transporter, ALMT, which functions as a GABA receptor51. Although this study suggested an inhibitory effect of GABA on Cd uptake by maize plant, a more defined mechanism/s of Cd uptake regulated by GABA still remains to be discovered.
Our results indicate that from early stage, Cd in the rhizosphere can negatively influence growth and development. However, positive effects of GABA on growth parameters in both control and Cd-treated plants are conclusive. Current results manifested a generic role for GABA in improvement of the Cd-borne defects in plants ranging from early growth to cell metabolism ultimately resulting in the protection of photosynthetic functionality. Multifaceted role of GABA was defined by concerted regulation upon ROS production and Cd uptake. Along with Cd stress, GABA conferred positive effects on PA biosynthesis, conversion and gene expression, though in this respect the intermediary role of GABA or its direct effect are still under debate. In light of GABA exposure, stress-related metabolite, ion hemostasis and maintenance of plant cell membrane integrity addressed dynamic responses induced by GABA and imply an impressive function for that (Fig. 1). However, our results illustrate a wide range of roles, which strongly implies a central role for GABA, in plant programmed responses to Cd toxicity. A broader view will be provided by analyzing the role of GABA associated with Cd perception, reverse genetic studies on GABA related pathways, fundamental studies on GABA/phyohormone crosstalk and a closer examination on the effect of GABA on cell membrane ion channels.
Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Maize (Zea mays) seeds were sterilized with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes and soaked for 6 hours in distilled water at room temperature. Seeds were sown in pots (20 × 30 cm) filled with equal volumes of perlite and cocopite and grown under controlled conditions (light/dark regime of 16/8 hour at 25/20 °C of day/night cycles and relative humidity of 50%). Uniformly germinated seeds were selected for chemical treatment in the greenhouse. Seven day-old seedlings were irrigated with half strength Hoagland solution containing 0, 250 µM Cd; and 0, 25 and 50 µM GABA for three weeks. Irrigation was performed two times per week; once with solution contained Cd and GABA the rest with the half strength Hoagland solution. Every other week, root medium was washed off to preclude any additive effects of Cd accumulation.
Determination of plant growth parameters
To determinate fresh weight, root and shoot samples were washed off with water to remove soil and blotted gently with soft paper towel to remove any free surface moisture. Fresh weights were determined immediately and dry weights were measured after drying in an oven at 60 °C for 72 h.
Maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)
Youngest fully developed leaves were used for measuring Fv/Fm in a chlorophyll fluorescence imaging system (Handy FluorCam FC 1000-H; Photon System Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic.(Intact, attached leaves to the plants were dark-adapted for 20 minutes and immediately were used to measure Fv/Fm. Fv/Fm was calculated using a custom-made protocol91,92,93. Leaf samples were exposed to short flashes in darkness followed by a saturating light pulse (3900 µmol m−2 s−1) causing reduction of primary quinone acceptor of photosystem II. The fluorescence data obtained during short flashes in darkness (F0) and during the saturating light flash (Fm) were used to achieve the variable fluorescence (Fv = Fm − F0). The Fv/Fm value was calculated using version 7 of FluorCam software.
Determination of antioxidant enzyme activity
To extract and measure the activity of antioxidant enzymes, the leaf tissues were powdered by liquid nitrogen and enzyme extraction was performed according to Sariam et al.94. To measure CAT enzyme activity, 0.5 g of leaf powder was mixed in 10 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH:7.5) containing 0.5 ml of EDTA. To extract APX, 0.5 g of powdered leaf was mixed in 10 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH:7) containing 0.5 mg of ascorbic acid. The mixture was filtered using soft cloth and the solution was strained and transferred to the centrifuge tubes. The solutions were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4 °C with 20,000 g. Transparent extractions (supernatant) were used to evaluate the enzyme activity. The activity of CAT enzyme was measured according to the modified method described by Díaz-Vivancos et al.95. The reaction was started by adding 100 μl of enzyme extraction and decrease in the absorbance of H2O2 during 1 minute at 240 nm. One CAT unit was considered as the amount of enzyme needed to oxidize 1 mM H2O2 per minute.
APX enzyme activity was measured according to Nakano et al.96. APX reaction consisted of 50 mg phosphate buffer (pH:7), 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, 0.1 mM H2O2 and 100 μl enzyme extraction. APX activity was calculated based on the reduction of ascorbic acid absorption per minute at 290 nm wavelength. One unit of activity of APX was considered as the amount of enzyme necessary for the oxidation of 1 ml of ascorbic acid per minute. The activity of the enzymes was expressed as a specific activity by mg of enzyme unit/fresh leaf weight.
The activity of the SOD enzyme was measured by Giannopolitis et al.97. The reaction solution contained 13 mM methionine, 75 mM Nitroblue-tetrazolium (NBT), 2 mM riboflavin, 50 mM phosphate buffer (7.8 ppm). The solution was placed under a 15-watt fluorescent lamp with a light intensity of 1000 lux and reaction started by the turning on the fluorescent lamp and left for 10 minutes. The reaction was terminated by turning off the lamps. The reaction solution was coated with black cloth to measure absorbance. The absorbance was measured at 560 nm. One of the samples was not exposed to light and considered as a control. SOD activity was considered according to the amount of enzyme required to 50% inhibition of the photochemical recovery of nitroblute tetrazolium chloride and was calculated based on Asado et al.98.
Measurement of EL percentage
EL percentage was measured by using 0.5 cm leaf discs. Leaf discs placed in tubes containing 10 ml of deionized water and incubated for 24 hours at 25 °C on a rotary shaker; first electrical conductivity of the solution was recorded as C1. Second electrical conductivity was determined in 20 minutes autoclaved samples after equilibration at 25 °C and labeled as C2. The EL was calculated based on the ratio between C1and C299.
Determination of H2O2 level
Leaf samples homogenized in the reaction mixture containing 0.5 ml of TCA (0.1%), 0.5 ml of K-phosphate buffer (100 mM) and 2 ml reagent (1 M KI w/v in fresh double-distilled water). The standard reaction was prepared by the same solution in the absence of leaf sample. The reaction was developed for 1 hour in darkness and the absorbance was measured at 390 nm. H2O2 level was determined according to the standard curve prepared with known concentrations of H2O2 levels base on the method described by Patterson et al.100.
Measurement of superoxide anion and lipid peroxidation
Superoxide anion (\({{{\rm{O}}}_{2}}^{-\cdot }\)) content was measured following the method of Elstner et al.101. To measure the lipid peroxidation, a testosterone (TBA) test, which identifies MDA as the final product of lipid peroxidation was conducted according to Heath et al.102. To do so, 0.1 g of fresh leaf tissue was homogenized in 2 ml TCA 0.1% (w/v). The resulting solution was centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 min, 0.5 ml of supernatant were added to 1 ml of 20% TCA solution containing 0.5% TBA. The solution was placed in boiling water for 30 minutes and the reaction was stopped by placing the samples in the ice. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 532 nm and the absorption of other non-specific pigments was also read at a wavelength of 600 nm. Determination of MDA concentration from a shutter ratio of 155 nM−1cm−1 in terms of nanomol per gram of fresh tissue was calculated using the following equation.
Measurement of proline content
Proline content was measured according to Bates et al.103. In this method, a ninhydrin solution was prepared and 1.25 g of ninhydrin were weighed and combined with 30 ml of glacialacetic acid and 20 ml of phosphoric acid 6 M. After dissolution, it incubated at 4 °C for 24 hours. To measure proline, 0.1 g fresh weight sample was weighed and centrifuged in 2 ml of sulfosalicylic acid 3%. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min with 8000 g. 400 microliters of ninhydrin was added to equal volume of the extract and ultimately combined with 400 μl of glacial acetic acid (100%). The solutions were incubated at 100 °C for 1 hour and were transferred to the ice. After cooling down, 800 μl of toluene was added to the sample and vortex vigorously to separate the distinct phases. Finally supernatant (red solution) was removed and read on a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 520 nm. The amount of proline was calculated according to the following equation:
Measurement of GHS content
Fresh leaf samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in 2 ml of 5% sulphosalicylic acid at 4 °C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. 600 µl of 100 mM Phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 40 µl of 5′5′ dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) were added to 500 µl of supernatant. The absorbance was read after 2 minutes at 412 nm17.
HPLC analysis of Pas
Extraction of PAs was carried out with a few modifications according to Hassannejad et al.104. All steps were carried for three replicates and three samples per replicate. 0.2 g of the fresh root tissue was homogenized with 1 μl of perchloric acid (PCA) at 5% volumetric concentration and centrifuged for 35 min at 4 °C with 15000 g. Precipitates were used for insoluble bound PAs extraction and supernatants were separated for extraction of soluble conjugated and free PAs. To retrieve all soluble conjugated PAs, the precipitates were washed three times with PCA. Final sediment were supplemented by 1000 μl of PCA and centrifuged for 35 minutes with 15000 g. Since bound PAs are insoluble in PCA, 1 ml of NaOH (1N) was added to the residual sediment and centrifuged with 21000 g for 30 minutes. Subsequently, 100 μl of the last solution (for analyzing the insoluble bound PAs) and 100 μl of the primary supernatant (for the analysis of the conjugated PAs) was placed into the separate test tubes and 200 μl of HCl (6 Normal) were added to start hydrolysis process. Tubes were closed by a flame and placed in an oven at 110 °C for 18 hours. In order to evaporate the acid, the flamed lids were broken and again placed in an oven for 18 hours at 80 °C. Further, the same procedure was applied to extract all types of PAs. To do so, 100 μl of each solutions containing free, soluble conjugated and the insoluble bound PAs was placed in a separate test tubes and covered with foil. 200 μl Na2CO saturated solution was added to each tube. 400 μl of dansyl chloride (concentration of 5 mg/ml) was added to all tubes and incubated for 90 minutes in 60 °C. Subsequently dansyl chloride was removed from the solution and 200 μl of proline (concentration of 0.1 g/ml) was added to each tube and left at 60 °C for 45 minutes. Later, 500 μl of toluene was added to each tube and vortex for 30 seconds. After few minutes different phases performed and the PAs phase was slowly removed and placed in −20 °C. The concentration of all PAs was measured by HPTLC (CAMAG, Switzerland) and winCATS software 1.2.2. The blotting was done on the Merck (60 F254 TLC) papers covered with silica gel. Length of 4 mm and a gap of 10 mm were considered for each band. Ultimately measurement was performed using phase containing cyclohexane and ethyl acetate (V/V 5:4; in which 4 units of cyclohexane with 5 units of ethyl acetate was mixed). Chromatogram scanning was done at two wavelengths of 245 nm and 366 nm.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from maize roots and treated with DNAse I using Qiagen plant RNAeasy kit (Qiagen; according to the manufacture’s instruction). RNA concentration was quantified by NanoDrop spectrophotometer. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using an i-script cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR green based detection (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Experimental setup and execution was conducted using a MyIQ optical cycler, according to protocol provided by the manufacturer (Biorad, Hercules, USA). Data analysis was performed using BioRad iQ5 software (BioRad). Baselines were set at 100 RFU to calculate Ct values. Refrence primer sequnece was obtained from membrane protein PB1A10.07c acording to Manoli et al.105. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1.
Effects of exogenous GABA (0, 25 and 50 µM) applications on different forms of spermine (Spm) [free (A) insoluble bound (B) and soluble conjugated (C)] contents in maize plants exposed to 0 (control) and 250 µM cadmium (Cd). Values are the means of three biological and three technical replicates and bars indicate means ± SEM.
Relative expression levels of ornithine decarboxylase (ORDC) (A), PA oxidase (PAO) (B) and Spd synthase (SPDS) (C) genes in the root of maize plants exposed to different concentrations of GABA (0, 25 and 50 µM) and cadmium (Cd) [0 (control) and 250 µM]. Expression levels are based on the average of three biological replicates that included three technical replicates in maize roots.
Schematic representation of GABA regulatory role in plant cells under Cd stress. Cd induces PAs and GABA induction in the cell and initiates downstream signaling cues. GABA is involved in different metabolic and molecular processes (black arrows and lines) and in return GABA content in the cell is influenced by diverse pathways (red arrows). PA levels in this scheme have been drawn based on the results obtained from currents experiment in which blue, red and purple boxes representing free, soluble conjugated insoluble bound forms, respectively. Question marks indicate unknown processes. ALTM: Aluminum-activated malate transporter, Arg: Arginine, Cd: Cadmium, CM: Cell membrane, GABA: Gama amino butyric acid, MA: Mugineic acids, ORDC: Ornithine decarboxylase, PAO: Polyamine oxidase, Put: Putrescine, Spd: Spermidine, Spm: Spermine, SPDS: Spermidine synthase, YSL: Yellow Stripe 1-Lik protein.
Measurement of Cd concentration
Dried root and shoot samples were weighed and overheated by 700–500 °C for 3 hours and digested in 5 ml of nitric acid and left for 18 hours. The solutions were filtered by Whatman filter paper and diluted with distilled water up to volume of 10 ml. The Cd absorption was measured by Schimadzu atomic absorption/flame emission. In every sample Cd concentration was calculated based on the standard curve creating by a range of defined Cd concentrations. The following equation was used to calculate the Cd content (mg/kg dry weight) of each sample106.
Cd translocation factor was calculated according to Rezvani et al.107.
References
Song, Y., **, L. & Wang, X. Cadmium absorption and transportation pathways in plants. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 19, 133–141 (2017).
Chibuike, G. & Obiora, S. Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2014 (2014).
Basak, J. K., Titumir, R. A. M. & Alam, K. Future fertiliser demand and role of organic fertiliser for sustainable rice production in Bangladesh. Agric. For. Fish. 4, 200–208 (2015).
Friberg, L. Cadmium in the Environment. CRC press (2017)
Roberts, T. L. Cadmium and phosphorous fertilizers: the issues and the science. Procedia Eng. 83, 52–59 (2014).
Shukla, R. & Cheryan, M. Zein: the industrial protein from corn. Ind. Crop. Prod. 13, 171–192 (2001).
Kwiatkowski, J. R., McAloon, A. J., Taylor, F. & Johnston, D. B. Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process. Ind. Crop. Prod. 23, 288–296 (2006).
Faller, P., Kienzler, K. & Krieger-Liszkay, A. Mechanism of Cd2+ toxicity: Cd2+ inhibits photoactivation of Photosystem II by competitive binding to the essential Ca2+ site. BBA-Bioenergetics 1706, 158–164 (2005).
Xue, Z., Gao, H. & Zhao, S. Effects of cadmium on the photosynthetic activity in mature and young leaves of soybean plants. Env. Sci. Pollut. 21, 4656–4664 (2014).
Xue, Z.-C., Gao, H.-Y. & Zhang, L.-T. Effects of cadmium on growth, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content in leaves of soybean seedlings. Biol. Plant. 57, 587–590 (2013).
Chatterjee, J. & Chatterjee, C. Phytotoxicity of cobalt, chromium and copper in cauliflower. Env. Pollut. 109, 69–74 (2000).
Benavides, M. P., Gallego, S. M. & Tomaro, M. L. Cadmium toxicity in plants. Braz. J. Plant. Physiol. 17, 21–34 (2005).
Öncel, I., Keleş, Y. & Üstün, A. Interactive effects of temperature and heavy metal stress on the growth and some biochemical compounds in wheat seedlings. Env. Pollut. 107, 315–320 (2000).
Oancea, S., Foca, N. & Airinei, A. Effects of heavy metals on plant growth and photosynthetic activity. Analele Univ.“Al. I. Cuza 1, 107–110 (2005).
Bartlett, J. E., Baranov, S. V., Ananyev, G. M. & Dismukes, G. C. Calcium controls the assembly of the photosynthetic water-oxidizing complex: a cadmium (II) inorganic mutant of the Mn4Ca core. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1253–1261 (2008).
Yadav, S. Heavy metals toxicity in plants: an overview on the role of glutathione and phytochelatins in heavy metal stress tolerance of plants. S Afr. J. Bot. 76, 167–179 (2010).
Anjum, N. A., Umar, S., Ahmad, A., Iqbal, M. & Khan, N. A. Sulphur protects mustard (Brassica campestris L.) from cadmium toxicity by improving leaf ascorbate and glutathione. Plant. Growth Regul. 54, 271–279 (2008).
Zagorchev, L., Seal, C. E., Kranner, I. & Odjakova, M. A central role for thiols in plant tolerance to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 7405–7432 (2013).
Bor, M. et al. Comparative effects of drought, salt, heavy metal and heat stresses on gamma-aminobutryric acid levels of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Acta Physiol. Plant. 31, 655–659 (2009).
Emamverdian, A., Ding, Y., Mokhberdoran, F. & **e, Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci World J l 2015 (2015).
Crisp, P. A., Ganguly, D., Eichten, S. R., Borevitz, J. O. & Pogson, B. J. Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501340 (2016).
**ng, S. G., Jun, Y. B., Hau, Z. W. & Liang, L. Y. Higher accumulation of γ-aminobutyric acid induced by salt stress through stimulating the activity of diamine oxidases in Glycine max (L.) Merr. roots. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 45, 560–566 (2007).
Jalmi, S. K. et al. Traversing the Links between Heavy Metal Stress and Plant Signaling. Front. plant. sci. 9, 12 (2018).
Liu, J.-H., Wang, W., Wu, H., Gong, X. & Moriguchi, T. Polyamines function in stress tolerance: from synthesis to regulation. Front. plant. sci. 6, 1–10 (2015).
Alet, A. I. et al. New insights into the role of spermine in Arabidopsis thaliana under long-term salt stress. Plant. Sci. 182, 94–100 (2012).
Shi, H. & Chan, Z. Improvement of plant abiotic stress tolerance through modulation of the polyamine pathway. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 56, 114–121 (2014).
Alcázar, R. et al. Polyamine metabolic canalization in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis and the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant. Signal. Behav. 6, 243–250 (2011).
Farooq, M., Wahid, A. & Lee, D.-J. Exogenously applied polyamines increase drought tolerance of rice by improving leaf water status, photosynthesis and membrane properties. Acta Physiol. Plant. 31, 937–945 (2009).
Roychoudhury, A., Basu, S. & Sengupta, D. N. Amelioration of salinity stress by exogenously applied spermidine or spermine in three varieties of indica rice differing in their level of salt tolerance. J. Plant. Physiol. 168, 317–328 (2011).
Shi, H., Ye, T. & Chan, Z. Comparative proteomic and physiological analyses reveal the protective effect of exogenous polyamines in the bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) response to salt and drought stresses. J. Proteome Res. 12, 4951–4964 (2013).
Mattoo, A. K., Minocha, S. C., Minocha, R. & Handa, A. K. Polyamines and cellular metabolism in plants: transgenic approaches reveal different responses to diamine putrescine versus higher polyamines spermidine and spermine. Amino acids 38, 405–413 (2010).
Rangan, P., Subramani, R., Kumar, R., Singh, A. K. & Singh, R. Recent advances in polyamine metabolism and abiotic stress tolerance. Biomed Res Int 2014 (2014).
Cervelli, M. et al. Isolation and characterization of three polyamine oxidase genes from Zea mays L. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 38, 667–677 (2000).
Yang, R., Guo, Q. & Gu, Z. GABA shunt and polyamine degradation pathway on γ-aminobutyric acid accumulation in germinating fava bean (Vicia faba L.) under hypoxia. Food Chem. 136, 152–159 (2013).
Scholz, S. S. et al. Evidence for GABA-Induced Systemic GABA Accumulation in Arabidopsis upon Wounding. Front plant sci 8 (2017).
Nonaka, S., Arai, C., Takayama, M., Matsukura, C. & Ezura, H. Efficient increase of ɣ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis. Sci. rep. 7, 7057 (2017).
Li, Y. et al. Effects of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on photosynthesis and antioxidant system in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seedlings under low light stress. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 36, 436–449 (2017).
**ang, L. et al. Exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid improves the structure and function of photosystem II in muskmelon seedlings exposed to salinity-alkalinity stress. PLoS one 11, e0164847 (2016).
Li, Z., Yu, J., Peng, Y. & Huang, B. Metabolic pathways regulated by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contributing to heat tolerance in cree** bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Sci Rep 6 (2016).
Li, W. et al. Exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) application improved early growth, net photosynthesis, and associated physio-biochemical events in maize. Front. plant. sci. 7, 919 (2016).
Kalhor, M. S. et al. Enhanced salt tolerance and photosynthetic performance: Implication of ɤ-amino butyric acid application in salt-exposed lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plants. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 130, 157–172 (2018).
Allan, W. L., Simpson, J. P., Clark, S. M. & Shelp, B. J. γ-Hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants is a general response to abiotic stress: putative regulation by redox balance and glyoxylate reductase isoforms. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2555–2564 (2008).
Renault, H. et al. GABA accumulation causes cell elongation defects and a decrease in expression of genes encoding secreted and cell wall-related proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. Cell Physiol. 52, 894–908 (2011).
Kaplan, F. et al. Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant. physiol. 136, 4159–4168 (2004).
Shang, H., Cao, S., Yang, Z., Cai, Y. & Zheng, Y. Effect of exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid treatment on proline accumulation and chilling injury in peach fruit after long-term cold storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 1264–1268 (2011).
Akçay, N., Bor, M., Karabudak, T., Özdemir, F. & Türkan, İ. Contribution of Gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) to salt stress responses of Nicotiana sylvestris CMSII mutant and wild type plants. J. Plant. Physiol. 169, 452–458 (2012).
Krishnan, S., Laskowski, K., Shukla, V. & Merewitz, E. B. Mitigation of drought stress damage by exogenous application of a non-protein amino acid γ–aminobutyric acid on perennial ryegrass. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 138, 358–366 (2013).
AL-Quraan, N. A. GABA shunt deficiencies and accumulation of reactive oxygen species under UV treatments: insight from Arabidopsis thaliana calmodulin mutants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37, 1–11 (2015).
**ang, L., Hu, L., Hu, X., Pan, X. & Ren, W. Response of reactive oxygen metabolism in melon chloroplasts to short-term salinity-alkalinity stress regulated by exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 26, 3746–3752 (2015).
Shelp, B. J., Bown, A. W. & McLean, M. D. Metabolism and functions of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Trends Plant. Sci. 4, 446–452 (1999).
Ramesh, S. A. et al. GABA signalling modulates plant growth by directly regulating the activity of plant-specific anion transporters. Nat Commun 6 (2015).
Seifikalhor, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Hassani, B., Niknam, V. & Lastochkina, O. Diverse role of γ-aminobutyric acid in dynamic plant cell responses. Plant. Cell Rep. 38, 847–867 (2019).
Shelp, B. J., Bown, A. W. & Zarei, A. 4-Aminobutyrate (GABA): a metabolite and signal with practical significance. Botany 95, 1015–1032 (2017).
Stuart, K. Recent advances in γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) properties in pulses: an overview. J Sci Food Agric (2017).
Dias, M. C. et al. Cadmium toxicity affects photosynthesis and plant growth at different levels. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35, 1281–1289 (2013).
Liu, L. et al. Effects of cadmium (Cd) on seedling growth traits and photosynthesis parameters in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant. Omics 7, 284 (2014).
Weigel, H. J. & Jäger, H. J. Subcellular distribution and chemical form of cadmium in bean plants. Plant. physiol. 65, 480–482 (1980).
Moya, J., Ros, R. & Picazo, I. Influence of cadmium and nickel on growth, net photosynthesis and carbohydrate distribution in rice plants. Photosynth. Res. 36, 75–80 (1993).
Hasan, M. et al. Responses of plant proteins to heavy metal stress—a review. Front. plant. scie 8, 1492 (2017).
Pérez‐Chaca, M. V. et al. Cadmium induces two waves of reactive oxygen species in Glycine max (L.) roots. Plant. Cell Env. 37, 1672–1687 (2014).
Rascio, N. & Navari-Izzo, F. Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant. sci. 180, 169–181 (2011).
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S. & Pessarakli, M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 2012 (2012).
Wang, Y. et al. γ-Aminobutyric Acid Imparts Partial Protection from Salt Stress Injury to Maize Seedlings by Improving Photosynthesis and Upregulating Osmoprotectants and Antioxidants. Sci Rep 7 (2017).
Li, M., Guo, S., Yang, X., Meng, Q. & Wei, X. Exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid increases salt tolerance of wheat by improving photosynthesis and enhancing activities of antioxidant enzymes. Biol. Plant. 60, 123–131 (2016).
Shi, S. Q. et al. Effects of exogenous GABA on gene expression of Caragana intermedia roots under NaCl stress: regulatory roles for H2O2 and ethylene production. Plant. Cell Env. 33, 149–162 (2010).
Kaul, S., Sharma, S. & Mehta, I. Free radical scavenging potential of L-proline: evidence from in vitro assays. Amino acids 34, 315–320 (2008).
Signorelli, S., Dans, P. D., Coitiño, E. L., Borsani, O. & Monza, J. Connecting proline and γ-aminobutyric acid in stressed plants through non-enzymatic reactions. PLoS One 10, e0115349 (2015).
Hare, P. & Cress, W. Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants. Plant. Growth Regul. 21, 79–102 (1997).
Kohl, D. H., Schubert, K. R., Carter, M. B., Hagedorn, C. H. & Shearer, G. Proline metabolism in N2-fixing root nodules: energy transfer and regulation of purine synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2036–2040 (1988).
Strizhov, N. et al. Differential expression of two P5CS genes controlling proline accumulation during salt‐stress requires ABA and is regulated by ABA1, ABI1 and AXR2 in Arabidopsis. Plant. J. 12, 557–569 (1997).
Liang, X., Zhang, L., Natarajan, S. K. & Becker, D. F. Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid Redox. Sign 19, 998–1011 (2013).
Ben-Rouina, B., Ben-Ahmed, C. & Boukhriss, M. Water relations, proline accumulation and photosynthetic activity in olive tree (Olea europaea L. Cv “Chemlali”) in response to salt stress. FAO (2006).
Iqbal, M. & Ashraf, M. Changes in growth, photosynthetic capacity and ionic relations in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) due to pre-sowing seed treatment with polyamines. Plant. Growth Regul. 46, 19–30 (2005).
Demetriou, G., Neonaki, C., Navakoudis, E. & Kotzabasis, K. Salt stress impact on the molecular structure and function of the photosynthetic apparatus—the protective role of polyamines. BBA-Bioenergetics 1767, 272–280 (2007).
Cheng, D. et al. Comparative analysis of Cd-responsive maize and rice transcriptomes highlights Cd co-modulated orthologs. BMC Genomics 19, 709 (2018).
Alcázar, R. et al. Putrescine accumulation confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants over-expressing the homologous Arginine decarboxylase 2 gene. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 48, 547–552 (2010).
Liu, H., Dong, B., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z. & Liu, Y. Relationship between osmotic stress and the levels of free, conjugated and bound polyamines in leaves of wheat seedlings. Plant. Sci. 166, 1261–1267 (2004).
Yang, J., Zhang, J., Liu, K., Wang, Z. & Liu, L. Involvement of polyamines in the drought resistance of rice. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1545–1555 (2007).
Farooq, M., Kobayashi, N., Wahid, A., Ito, O. & Basra, S. M. Elsevier (2009).
Yong, B. et al. Exogenous application of GABA improves PEG-induced drought tolerance positively associated with GABA-shunt, polyamines, and proline metabolism in white clover. Front. physiol. 8, 1107 (2017).
Qadir, S. et al. Modulation of plant growth and metabolism in cadmium-enriched environments.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 51–88, Springer (2014).
Wang, C. et al. Polyamine biosynthesis and degradation are modulated by exogenous gamma-aminobutyric acid in root-zone hypoxia-stressed melon roots. Plant. physiol. Biochem. 82, 17–26 (2014).
Hu, X. et al. Application of γ-aminobutyric acid demonstrates a protective role of polyamine and GABA metabolism in muskmelon seedlings under Ca(NO3)2 stress. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 92, 1–10 (2015).
Kovářová, J. & Svobodová, Z. Can thiol compounds be used as biomarkers of aquatic ecosystem contamination by cadmium? Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2, 177–183 (2009).
**ang, C., Werner, B. L., E’Lise, M. C. & Oliver, D. J. The biological functions of glutathione revisited in Arabidopsis transgenic plants with altered glutathione levels. Plant. Physiol. 126, 564–574 (2001).
Gill, S. S., Khan, N. A. & Tuteja, N. Cadmium at high dose perturbs growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism while at low dose it up regulates sulfur assimilation and antioxidant machinery in garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.). Plant. Sci. 182, 112–120 (2012).
Takahashi, R. et al. The OsHMA2 transporter is involved in root‐to‐shoot translocation of Zn and Cd in rice. Plant. Cell Env. 35, 1948–1957 (2012).
Satoh-Nagasawa, N. et al. Mutations in rice (Oryza sativa) heavy metal ATPase 2 (OsHMA2) restrict the translocation of zinc and cadmium. Plant. Cell Physiol. 53, 213–224 (2011).
Snedden, W. A., Arazi, T., Fromm, H. & Shelp, B. J. Calcium/calmodulin activation of soybean glutamate decarboxylase. Plant. Physiol. 108, 543–549 (1995).
Snedden, W. A., Koutsia, N., Baum, G. & Fromm, H. Activation of a recombinant petunia glutamate decarboxylase by calcium/calmodulin or by a monoclonal antibody which recognizes the calmodulin binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4148–4153 (1996).
Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M. & Baker, N. R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. BBA-Bioenergetics 990, 87–92 (1989).
Aliniaeifard, S. & van Meeteren, U. Natural variation in stomatal response to closing stimuli among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions after exposure to low VPD as a tool to recognize the mechanism of disturbed stomatal functioning. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 6529–6542 (2014).
Aliniaeifard, S., Malcolm Matamoros, P. & van Meeteren, U. Stomatal malfunctioning under low Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD) conditions: Induced by alterations in stomatal morphology and leaf anatomy or in the ABA signaling? Physiol Plant 152, 688–699.
Sairam, R., Deshmukh, P. & Saxena, D. Role of antioxidant systems in wheat genotypes tolerance to water stress. Biol. Plant. 41, 387–394 (1998).
Díaz-Vivancos, P. et al. Alteration in the chloroplastic metabolism leads to ROS accumulation in pea plants in response to plum pox virus. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2147–2160 (2008).
Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant. Cell Physiol. 22, 867–880 (1981).
Giannopolitis, C. N. & Ries, S. K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant. physiol. 59, 309–314 (1977).
Asada, K., Takahashi, M.-a & Nagate, M. Assay and inhibitors of spinach superoxide dismutase. Agric. Biol. Chem. 38, 471–473 (1974).
Tuna, A. L. et al. The effects of calcium sulphate on growth, membrane stability and nutrient uptake of tomato plants grown under salt stress. Env. Exp. Bot. 59, 173–178 (2007).
Patterson, B. D., MacRae, E. A. & Ferguson, I. B. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Anal. Biochem. 139, 487–492 (1984).
Elstner, E. F. & Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 70, 616–620 (1976).
Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 850–857 (1968).
Bates, L., Waldren, R. & Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant. Soil. 39, 205–207 (1973).
Hassannejad, S., Bernard, F., Mirzajani, F. & Gholami, M. SA improvement of hyperhydricity reversion in Thymus daenensis shoots culture may be associated with polyamines changes. Plant. physiol. Biochem. 51, 40–46 (2012).
Manoli, A., Sturaro, A., Trevisan, S., Quaggiotti, S. & Nonis, A. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for qPCR in maize. J. Plant. Physiol. 169, 807–815 (2012).
Woodis, T. Jr., Hunter, G. & Johnson, F. Statistical studies of matrix effects on the determination of cadmium and lead in fertilizer materials and plant tissue by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 90, 127–136 (1977).
Rezvani, M. & Zaefarian, F. Bioaccumulation and translocation factors of cadmium and lead in’Aeluropus littoralis’. Aust. J. Soil. 2, 114 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We like to thank the Iran’s National Science Foundation for financial support of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.S.K. and S.A. made substantial contributions to conception and design, also performed statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript and critically revised the final version. M.S., M.L., B.H. and F.D. carried out the experiments, collected and critically analyzed the data. F.B. and H.R. took part in preparation of materials and equipment for the experiment and contributed to scientific discussion of the obtained results. T.L. and M.B. contributed to conception and design of experiment, preparation of materials, scientific discussion and critical revision of the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Seifikalhor, M., Aliniaeifard, S., Bernard, F. et al. γ-Aminobutyric acid confers cadmium tolerance in maize plants by concerted regulation of polyamine metabolism and antioxidant defense systems. Sci Rep 10, 3356 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59592-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59592-1
- Springer Nature Limited