Introduction

The current situation of leishmaniasis and difficulties for its control1, requires integral explorations of various aspects of the vector and parasite lifestyle, nutrient sources, diversity and interplay between insect, feeding regimes and resources, microbiomes, niches, modes of transmission, urban adaptation and influence of human built environments, among others2. One initial step to tackle this issue is to describe the microbial diversity associated with the intestine of insect vectors recognized for the transmission of parasites3,4,5,6. Such knowledge may contribute to understand and to design new alternative control methods, as the ones currently available are evidently insufficient7. In Colombia, there are around 14 species of Lutzomyia (Lu.) reported as vectors of Leishmania sp8,9,10. Only the intestinal microbiota of a wild population of Lu. longipalpis, and Lu. evansi from caribbean coast have been recently reported in other studies8,11.

Lu. evansi, is recognized because to the vectorial competence that has to transmit parasites causing visceral leishmaniasis in rural and urban environments of the Caribbean coast of Colombia11,12,13,14. Its abundance and epidemiological importance also makes it an attractive biological model for studies exploring the influence of intestinal microbiota on the fitness, survival, reproduction, parasite transmission and infection establishment in the mammalian host15. Therefore, microbiome-based approaches to control vector transmission of Leishmania infantum could provide new alternatives and solutions.

Given the environmental plasticity of Lu. evansi, the corresponding intestinal microbial communities of this species may require further characterization to see if a similar complex, shifting and diverse composition is observed or if there is a core microbiome with patterns stably maintained between individual specimens. In this context, microbiome studies of insect vectors largely relied on culture techniques used for microbial growth of species aerobic mainly and use to identify associations symbiotic, pathogenic and vectoring. Nevertheless, this approach addresses a limited proportion of the bacterial representation that can be grown on standard conditions, restricting our current knowledge about the microbial communities in insect guts3,16,17.

Bacterial diversity analysis by culture-independent means in wild Lutzomyia spp. are still scarce. In America, there are reports for sand flies phlebotomine, considering sequences of the 16S rRNA gene, DGGE and NGS with 16S rDNA amplicons8,18,19. Gut bacterial types detected on these species are mainly belonging to Serratia, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas genera8,18,19, probably representing a partial or modified microbiome diversity of the original wild insect population, as studies referred were made in laboratory colonies.

The bacterial diversity of Lu. intermedia sand fly from an endemic area in Brazil using metagenomics sequencing was also studied by Monteiro et al. 2016, indicating the presence of genera as Ochrobactrum and Bradyrhizobium across all the groups5. Recently, the bacterial gut composition from Lu. evansi using cultured and uncultured approaches was described, being similar to the reported above11. Ochrobactrum, Shinella, Paenibacillus, Lysobacter, Microbacterium, Streptomyces, Bacillus, Rummeliibacillus, Staphylococcus, Brevibacterium, and Pantoea were also reported, including microbiota analyses immature states11.

Recently, alternative options to the chemical control of insect vectors as sand flies include advances in insect genomics and transformation technology providing new strategies for the control of insect-borne pathogen transmission and insect pest management19,20 such as the genetic modification of insects with genes that block pathogen development. Another strategy consist of suppressing insect populations by releasing either sterile males or males carrying female-specific dominant lethal genes into the environment. Considering that arthropods harbor a rich microbiota, its potential egestion after bites may be a shared mechanism that contributes to severity of vector-borne disease, thus, in-depth knowledge of sand flies gut microbiota could help to design new strategies for disease transmission21.

Recent studies have highlighted the capacity of endogenous bacteria to modulate viral and parasitic infections in mosquito (Ae. Aegypti, An. gambiae) and sand flies vectors (Lu. longipalpis, P. papatasi) by activating their immune responses (Toll pathway) or directly inhibiting pathogen development22,

Figure 7
figure 7

β-diversity analysis of microbial communities associated with the groups of guts established of Lu. evansi. (a) Constrained Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) of 16S rRNA data (b) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of 16S rRNA data. Statistical significance of the CAP and PCoA was assessed by Permanova (P < 0.005).

The principal components analysis (PCA) showed the composing the core microbiome (Figs 4, 8). Fed and unfed females of Lu. evansi from peri-urban and forest biotypes has closer associations mainly with S. marcenscens, M. organiphilum (Three different OTUs), Unclassified renibacterium, Unclassified intrasporangiaceae. Unlike the samples of Lu. evansi appearing closely related to OTUs of Unclassified Bacillus, Unclassified EC94, Unclassified Pseudomonadaceae y Unclassified Enterobacteriaceae (Fig. 8).

Figure 8
figure 8

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showing the distribution of the core microbiome (B) associated with the groups of guts established of Lu. evansi. The PCA revealed mainly a cluster matching with fed and unfed females of both locations. Also revealed a cluster with samples of males and unfed. Nomenclature of gut pools: COM: males from Colosó; COFF: fed females from Coloso; COUF: Unfed females from Coloso; OVM: males from Ovejas; OVFF: fed females from Ovejas; OVUF: unfed females from Ovejas.