Log in

Evaluation of methods to monitor wild mammals on Mediterranean farmland

  • Original investigation
  • Published:
Mammalian Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers have, over the years, searched methods with which to monitor wildlife populations that will have the best cost-performance balance for each case scenario. Monitoring techniques are of particular importance when attempting to attain either population density estimates or species richness values, since they enable management decisions to be made. It is, therefore, imperative to assess the capability of the methods employed to detect a wide range of species as a means to evaluate their cost-efficiency. Seventeen mammal species on Mediterranean farmland were sampled using three monitoring methods: camera trap**, spotlight counts and indirect indices based on track and faeces counts. The method able to detect the greatest number of species with the best cost-performance balance was the indirect index. There were no significant differences among seasons when applying the same sampling methodology. Studies analysing methods with which to monitor wildlife populations are in great demand in Europe, where attempts are gradually being made to standardise protocols, reduce field effort and costs, and maximise data potential and data gathering over the years. Our manuscript contributes towards finding a cost-effective method and a standardised field protocol to be applied in Mediterranean habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, P., Vicente, J., Hofle, U., Cassinello, J., Ruiz-Fons, F., Gortázar, C., 2007. Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epidemiol. Infect 135, 519–527.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acevedo, P., Ruiz-Fons, F., Vicente, J., Reyes-García, A.R., Alzagal, V., Gortázar, C., 2008. Estimating red deer abundance in a wide range of management situations in Mediterranean habitats. J. Zool. 276, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M.A., Nicholls, C.A., No. 6 1999. Ecologically based pest management: a key pathway to achieving agroecosystem health. In: Nicholls, C.I., Garcia, M.A., Altieri, M.A., Comp (Eds.), Curso de agroecologia, vol.2. Workshop sobre agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável, Campinas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battersby, J.E., Greenwood, J.J.D., 2003. Monitoring terrestrial mammals in the UK: past, present and future using lessons from the bird world. Mammal Rev. 34 (1), 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, J.C., 1998. Mamíferos de España. Guia de Campo, vol I y II. Ed. Planeta, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delibes-Mateos, M., Ferreras, P., Villafuerte, R., 2008. Rabbit populations and game management: the situation after 15 years of rabbit haemorrhagic disease in central-southern Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 17 (3), 559–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeman, R.M., Massei, G., Sage, M., Gentle, M.N., 2013. Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20, 8077–8091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Focardi, S., Isotti, R., Tinelli, A., 2002. Line transect estimates of ungulate populations in a Mediterranean forest. J. Wildl. Manage. 66, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J.A., Defries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P.K., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fragoso, J.M.V., Levi, T., Oliveira, L.F.B., Luzar, J.B., Overman, H., Read, J.M., Silvius, K.M., 2016. Line Transect Surveys Underdetect Terrestrial Mammals: Implications for the Sustainability of Subsistence Hunting. PLoS One 11 (4), e0152659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrote, G., Perez de Ayala, R., Pereira, P., Robles, F., Guzman, N., García, F.J., Iglesias, M.C., Hervás, J., Fajardo, I., Simón, M., Barroso, J.L., 2011. Estimation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) population in the Doñana area, SW Spain, using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trap** data. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57 (2), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Navarra, Gobierno, 2013. IDBD., pp. 118–130, Accessed in 20/09/2017. Spain http://www.biodiversidad.navarra.es.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gortázar, C., Acevedo, P., Ruiz-Fons, F., Vicente, J., 2006. Disease risks and overabundance of game species. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 52, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B., Siriwardena, G.M., 1999. The second silent spring? Nature 400 (6745), 611–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyra-Jorge, M.C., Ciocheti, G., Pivello, V.R., Meirelles, S.T., 2008. Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 54, 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, F.F., Buckland, S.T., Goffin, D., Dixon, C.E., Borchers, D.L., Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., 2001. Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 38 (2), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Lachman, G.B., Droege, S., Royle, J.A., Langtimm, C.A., 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83 (8), 2248–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayle, B.A., Peace, A.J., Gill, R., 1999. How many deer? Forestry commission, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomo, L.J., Gisbert, J., Blanco, J.C., 2007. Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Simons, T.R., Farnsworth, G.L., Bailey, L.L., Sauer, J.R., 2002. Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis. Environmetrics 1 (3), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman, R., Watson, P., Langbein, J., 2011. Assessing deer densities and impacts at the appropriate level for management: a review of methodologies for use beyond the site scale. Mammal Rev. 41 (3), 197–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, J.F., Blanchet, F.G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Szoecs, E., Wagner, H., 2013. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version, vol. 2., pp. 0–10 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, L., 2013. Tracks and Signs of the animals and birds of Britain and Europe. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team, 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed in 20/09/2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty, N., Evan, A.T., Monfreda, C., Foley, J.A., 2008. Farming the planet: 1, Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, L.N., Davis, C.L., Farris, Z.J., Miller, D.A.W., Tucker, J.M., Hamel, S., Farhadinia, M.S., Steenweg, R., Di Bitetti, M.S., Thapa, K., Kane, M.D., Sunarto, S., Robinson, N.T., Paviolo, A., Cruz, P., Martins, Q., Gholikhani, N., Taktehrani, A., Whittington, J., Widodo, F.A., Yoccoz, N.G., Wultsch, C., Harmsen, B.J., Kelly, M.J., 2017. Assessing global patterns in mammalian carnivore occupancy and richness by integrating local camera trap surveys. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 00, 1–12, http://dx.doi.org" Key="/10.1111/geb.12600".

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovero, F., Marshall, A.R., 2009. Camera trap** photographic rate as an index of density in forest ungulates. J Appl Ecol. 46, 1011–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowcliffe, J.M., Field, J., Turvey, S.T., Carbone, C., 2008. Estimating animal density using camera traps without the need for individual recognition. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1228–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, L., Jácomo, A.T.A., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., 2003. Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biol. Cons. 114 (3), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellería, J.L.T., 1986. Manual para el censo de los vertebrados terrestres. Raíces, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, M.W., CarrilloPercastegui, S.E., Pitman, R.L., Mares, R., Powell, G., 2008. Further notes on the analysis of mammal inventory data collected with camera traps. Anim Conserv. 11 (3), 187–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugland, K.I., Gray, J.S., Ellingsen, K.E., 2003. The species-accumulation curve and estimation of species richness. J. Anim. Ecol. 72 (5), 888–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N.G., Nichols, J.D., Boulinier, T., 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 16 (8), 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, A.M., Fonseca, C., Marques, T.A., Santos, J.P., Rodrigues, R., Torres, R.T., 2014. Living on the edge: roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) density in the margins of their geographical range. PLOS One 9 (2), e88459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgós, E., Casanovas, J.C., 1999. Enviromental constraints at the edge of a species distribution, the eurasian badger (Meles meles): a biogeographic approach. J. Biogeogr. 26, 559–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G.J., Delahay, R.J., 2001. A review of methods to estimate the abundance of terrestrial carnivores using field signs and observation. Wildl. Res. 28, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana M. Valente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valente, A.M., Binantel, H., Villanua, D. et al. Evaluation of methods to monitor wild mammals on Mediterranean farmland. Mamm Biol 91, 23–29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.03.010

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.03.010

Keywords

Navigation