Abstract
Background
Rectal duplication is a rare congenital disease which is mostly diagnosed during childhood. Diagnosis in adulthood could be obscured as the presenting symptoms including difficult defecation, bloating, and abdominal distension would lead to other diagnosis. Constipation is common in female adult and conservative treatment is usually successful. Refractory constipation requires further work-up. However, rectal duplication is a rare cause of adult constipation.
Methods
We reported a 42-year-female who presented with chronic constipation which became intractable after total abdominal hysterectomy. Barium enema, CT scan, and colonoscopy revealed an additional rectal pouch connecting to the native rectum containing large fecaloma. Anorectal manometry showed dyssynergic defecation, rectal hyposensitivity but presence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex.
Results
Transabdominal resection of the rectal duplication pouch and protective colostomy was performed. After a course of biofeedback, the colostomy was reversed. The patient remains healthy at 4 years of follow up.
Conclusion
Rectal duplication could be a cause of refractory constipation in adulthood. A collection of fecal material via a connection with the native rectum led to a large symptomatic fecaloma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Duplication of the gastrointestinal tract could occur anywhere along the entire gut [1]. The condition is uncommon with the incidence of 1:10,000 to 1:4500 births [1, 2]. Most patients were symptomatic during infantile or childhood, which 70% occurred before 2 years old [1]. Presentation could be abdominal pain, vomiting, hematochezia or palpable abdominal mass [3]. Rectal duplication was found in 5.5% of gastrointestinal duplication in children [4]. This condition is rarely presented in adult. We described an adult patient who had a duplicated rectum and review the related literature. The objective of this study was to emphasize the possibility of late presentation of congenital gastrointestinal defect, describe the diagnostic process and the operation.
2 Material and methods
2.1 Case presentation
A 42-year-female presented in 2015 with a 3-year-history of constipation. She explained that she had always felt bloated with frequent desires to defecate. However, the stool could not freely flow out. Occasionally, she got diarrhea of liquid stool. Sometimes only mucous and gas were produced. Her abdomen slowly enlarged. She reported that these symptoms started after the operation to remove her uterus a year before. At that time, an 8-cm myoma uteri was removed by total abdominal hysterectomy via low transverse incision. After the operation, she felt that the bowel had “no function”. Her constipation had been treated since 2012 with multiple laxatives including senna, bisacodyl, mebeverin, milk of magnesia, and prucalopride. Without improvement and increased abdominal bloating, she had limited her eating. Colonoscopy was considered, by a doctor in her primary hospital, in 2014 and could be performed up to transverse colon. This revealed normal colon with suspected colonic pouch near the rectum with impacted feces, and erythematous mucosa. Biopsy of the erythematous area revealed focal active colitis without specific organism, granuloma, dysplasia, or malignancy. She was diagnosed with impact feces and had been treated with rectal enema and combination of various laxatives. In 2018, her symptoms persisted that she visited our hospital which is a tertiary care center. Her timeline is shown in Fig. 1. Physical examination revealed a thin female with palpable large lobulated mass in lower abdomen. This mass was soft, bowel-loop-like and contained moldable fecal-like material.
The initial plain abdomen was obtained revealing a huge area of soft tissue containing fecal shadow in the mid abdomen and pelvic cavity (Fig. 2). Further barium enema reveals a huge lobulated outpouching of left anterolateral wall of rectum, occupying almost entire abdominal cavity (Fig. 3). A diagnosis of duplicate rectum was made. Abdominal CT scan was performed to assess the surrounding structure as shown in Fig. 4. The chronic progressively enlarged duplication part causing the perineal bulging and posterior displacement of the anus (Fig. 5) could be demonstrated by physical examination. Anorectal manometry revealed normal resting and squeeze pressure, dyssynergic defecation type I (paradoxical contraction of anal sphincter during attempted defecation), rectal hyposensitivity, and delayed rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Balloon expulsion time was more than 5 min (Table 1). Her laboratory test including thyroid function test were normal (Table 2). After sequential fecal disimpaction under sedation and a few attempts of bowel preparation, colonoscopy was successfully performed up to terminal ileum. This revealed a normal colon with a second rectal pouch of 30-cm long which connected to the so-called native rectum. Mucosa was mildly inflamed without area of suspicion of malignancy (Fig. 6). The operation was performed via low midline incision which exposed an enlarged rectal duplication (Fig. 7a, b). After dissection and mobilization of the duplication part from the native rectum and surrounding tissue, controlled enterotomy to remove the fecaloma (Fig. 7c) was carried out. Division and closure of the neck of the duplication using linear cutter was performed (Fig. 7d). Leakage was checked. After pelvic irrigation, Jackson-Pratt drain was placed, and protective loop sigmoid colostomy was created. The patient recovered uneventfully. The pathology of the removed pouch revealed a 20 × 14x9 cm unilocular cystic lesion lined with colonic mucosa with mucosal ulceration, acute and chronic inflammation, inflammatory polyps, and crypts distortion. Complete colonic muscular layers and serosa were demonstrated. There was no granuloma, organism, dysplasia or malignancy. Ganglion cells were presented.
To correct the dyssynergic defecation, a course of biofeedback was successfully administered in a period of 1 month. Three months later, loopography was obtained (Fig. 8). Complete evacuation of barium was confirmed. Thus, the sigmoid colostomy was reversed. The patient has been doing well with occasional use of osmotic laxative. Currently, it is the 8th year after surgery.
3 Results and discussions
Rectal duplication is a congenital abnormality and is likely symptomatic during childhood. The accepted etiology was proposed by Lewis and Thynge that the diverticular usually presented in fetal gastrointestinal tract and some of them might not regress [5]. The second possibility is a failure to completely vacuolize the gastrointestinal lumen during the solid phase [3, 6].Other explanations could be the detachment of epithelial lining of the elementary tract during development, split notochord syndrome, or intrauterine events resulting in a cyst or diverticulum [1, 5]. According to development, the duplication could be a part of caudal duplication syndrome with hindgut twinning [6, 7] which associated abnormalities of urogenital organs and spinal cords could be seen. With these explanations, two types of duplication could be found; tubular type and cystic type [3]. The tubular type usually communicates with the gastrointestinal lumen while the cystic type usually completely separate from the lumen [3]. There are 3 characteristics of gastrointestinal duplication which Ladd had described; (1) there is continuity or close adherence to some part of native gastrointestinal tract (2) the duplicated part has a smooth muscle coat, usually of two layers, and (3) the internal lining is the gastrointestinal mucosa [8].
In adult, rectal duplication could be asymptomatic and found incidentally during screening colonoscopy [9] or imaging for unrelated problem [10]. Presentation as asymptomatic buttock mass or perineal hernia had been reported [11, 12]. It could cause chronic abdominal pain [13] pelvic pain [14,15,16], and/or perianal pain [14, 17]. Some patients presented with rectal bleeding [16, 18, 19]. Many presented with recurrent anorectal infection [17, 19, 20] which was intractable to multiple surgical drainage. Some patients complained of abnormal anorectal function, including intractable diarrhea [6], symptoms of constipation, i.e. obstructed defecation [21], feeling of incomplete evacuation [22, 23], and colonic obstruction [24]. Some patient presented with nonspecific intrarectal discomfort [18]. Age at presentation ranged from 26 years old to 79 years old. Most patients did not have associated anomalies but a few had concomitant imperforated anus [25], renal agenesis and congenital hip dislocation [17], and sacral agenesis [20]. Most of the rectal duplication had no communication with the so-called native rectum. However, 20% of the cases, the communication presented [26]. In these cases, symptoms of obstructed defecation [21] and fecal impaction [23] could occur. In our case, the connecting channel was as wide and thus the fecal material had entered the pouch. This might lead to feeling of incomplete evacuation and later on the enlarged pouch containing “large fecaloma” had cause external compression to the rectum itself. Prior to hysterectomy, the enlarged myoma might occupy the pelvic cavity and squeeze the duplicated rectal pouch narrowing its space. This could explain the worsening of constipation after total hysterectomy.
Diagnosis of rectal duplication is usually confirmed by radiological imaging. Plain abdomen may demonstrate abnormal bowel gas pattern. Contrast enema is useful for demonstration of connection to the main rectum and determine the anatomy of the so-called native rectum and colon. In cases with palpable mass, CT scan or MRI is likely obtained. This would show the smooth, fluid-filled round or tubular structure and relation with the surrounding structures and possible presence of multiple duplication [1]. MRI is particularly useful if the rectal duplication is in the retrorectal space and needs to be differentiated from other retrorectal tumor [27, 28]. Transabdominal or transanal or endoscopic ultrasound could demonstrate the uniloculate/multiloculate cyst with presence of inner hyperechoic and outer hypoechoicmuscular wall [9, 26]. There were reports of adenocarcinoma occurring in the rectal duplication [29,30,31,32,33]. Colonoscopy was used to evaluate the gastrointestinal symptoms and to rule out associated malignancy.
Surgical removal of the duplication is recommended to get rid of the symptoms, prevent complications, and avoid the risk of malignancy. Surgical treatment is needed to relieve the patient’s symptoms, reduce the risk of malignant degeneration [34] and prevent additional complications [1]. Complete excision of the cyst could be performed transanally [16, 18], transperineally [13, 17, 20], laparotomy [6, 14], posterior sacral approach [12, 22], combination of anterior laparotomy and posterior approaches [11], or combination of anterior laparotomy and transperineal approach [24]. Laparoscopy could be used to confirm the diagnosis and subsequently removal of the cystic mass [25, 35]. During the cyst removal, care should be taken to preserve the blood supply to native rectum [1]. Due to the proximity of the wall of the duplication part to the wall of native rectum, removal of both may be warranted [19, 21]. Robotic surgery could be applied in these cases [10]. Partial removal of the cyst could lead to recurrence [14]. In our patient, removal of only the duplicate pouch was considered in order to preserve the function of the native rectum and there was no evidence of malignancy. However, the connection channel was large and there was concerned of leakage so that the protective sigmoid colostomy was performed. Associated dyssynergic defecation could be corrected before the closure of ostomy. After re-continuation of the colorectal tract, the patient could return to normal bowel habit again.
4 Conclusion
Duplication of rectum in adulthood is uncommon. A large duplication with connection to native rectum could lead to complaint of constipation and fecal impaction. Multi-disciplinary approach to assess both anatomical and physiological functions would bring the patient to appropriate outcomes.
Data availability
Data in this study are available upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- RAIR:
-
Rectoanal inhibitory reflex
- CT:
-
Computerized tomography
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- AST:
-
Aspartate transaminase
- ALT:
-
Alanine aminotransferase
- FT4:
-
Free thyroxine
- FT3:
-
Free triiodothyronine
- TSH:
-
Thyroid stimulating hormone
References
Jeziorczak PM, Warner BW. Enteric duplication. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018;31:127–31.
Simsek A, Zeybek N, Yagci G, Kaymakcioglu N, Tas H, Saglam M, et al. Enteric and rectal duplications and duplication cysts in the adult. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:174–6.
Ramakrishna HK. Intestinal duplication. Indian J Surg. 2008;70:270–3.
Puligandla PS, Nguyen LT, St-Vil D, Flageole H, Bensoussan AL, Nguyen VH, et al. Gastrointestinal duplications. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:740–4.
Cogswell HD, Thompson HC Jr. Duplication of the rectum (enterogenous cyst or diverticulum). Am J Dis Child. 1911;1947(73):167–74.
Kraft RO. Duplication anomalies of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1962;155:230–2.
Wang K, Yang L, Peng C, Pang W, Wang Z, Zhang D, et al. Caudal duplication syndrome: 10-year experiences with a comprehensive literature review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022;38:1283–9.
Ladd WEGR. Abdominal surgery of infancy and childhood. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1941.
Castro-Poças FM, Araújo TP, Silva JD, Gonçalves VS. Endoscopic ultrasonography and rectal duplication cyst in an adult. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6:336–9.
Kitazono M, Fujita M, Oyama T, Ikeda N, Eguchi M, Kamimura G, et al. Robot-assisted excision of rectal duplication cysts: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10: e05457.
Monek O, Martin L, Heyd B, Mantion G. Rectal duplication in an adult: unusual cause of a buttock mass. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:816–8.
Bhat R, Choudhari RR, Prabhu S, Thejeswi P. Rare presentation of rectal duplication cyst as perineal hernia in an adult. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14: e239879.
Alavanja G, Kaderabek DJ, Habegger ED. Rectal duplication in an adult. Am Surg. 1995;61:997–1000.
Ceriotti M, Saccomani G, Lacelli F, Saccomani GE. Wide rectal duplication cyst in an adult resected by anterior approach: efficacy and recurrence. J Surg Case Rep. 2017;2017:rjx115.
Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Olpin JD, Kennedy AM, Gaballah AH, Foster BR, et al. Nongynecologic findings seen at pelvic US. Radiographics. 2017;37:2045–62.
Mege D, Manceau G, Guedj N, Panis Y. Anterior rectal duplication treated with transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:471–3.
Flint R, Strang J, Bissett I, Clark M, Neill M, Parry B. Rectal duplication cyst presenting as perianal sepsis: report of two cases and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2208–10.
Jackson KL, Peche WJ, Rollins MD. An unusual presentation of a rectal duplication cyst. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3:314–5.
Tominaga T, Nonaka T, Fukuda A, Moriyama M, Oyama S, Hidaka S, et al. A case report of adult rectal duplication cyst resected by synchronous trans-abdominal and trans-anal total mesorectal excision. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;73:360–4.
Kelly MJ, Everett WG. Duplication of the rectum. Postgrad Med J. 1978;54:357–60.
McLeod RS, Cohen Z. Congenital duplication of the rectum: endoscopic and radiologic appearance of an unusual condition. Surgery. 2001;130:895–6.
Hackam DJ, Zalev A, Burnstein M, Rotstein OD, Koo J. Enteric duplication in the adult, derived from the foregut, midgut and hindgut: presentation, patterns and literature review. Can J Surg. 1997;40:129–33.
Ray JJ, Venkatesh PP, Dane B, Remzi F. Doubly communicating rectal duplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:1345–6.
Sarkar K, Kabiraj P, Deoghuria D, Bardhan J. A case of symptomatic tailgut duplication cyst(retro-rectal cystic hamartoma) in an adult male. BJR Case Rep. 2017;3:20150422.
Cavadas S, Gonçalves E, Costa-Pereira C, Costa-Pereira J. Rectal duplication cyst in an adult with a history of imperforate anus: a diagnostic challenge. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15: e248791.
Hur J, Yoon CS, Kim MJ, Kim OH. Imaging features of gastrointestinal tract duplications in infants and children: from oesophagus to rectum. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:691–9.
Yan J, Chen Y, Gu Y, Chen Y, Zhang T. Surgical management strategy of alimentary tract duplication involving the rectum in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022;39:31.
Hosseini-Nik H, Hosseinzadeh K, Bhayana R, Jhaveri KS. MR imaging of the retrorectal-presacral tumors: an algorithmic approach. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2630–44.
Michael D, Cohen CR, Northover JM. Adenocarcinoma within a rectal duplication cyst: case report and literature review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:205–6.
Springall RG, Griffiths JD. Malignant change in rectal duplication. J R Soc Med. 1990;83:185–7.
Parvaiz A, Stevens RJ, Lamparelli MJ, Jeffery PJ. A rare case of adenocarcinoma arising within a duplication cyst of the rectum: curative excision with 9-year follow-up. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:W8-10.
Colin JF, Branfoot AC. Malignant change in rectal duplication. J R Soc Med. 1979;72:935–7.
Stringer MD. Adenocarcinoma within a rectal duplication: case report and literature review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:146.
Vaos G, Misiakos EP. Congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract diagnosed in adulthood–diagnosis and management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:916–25.
Salameh JR, Votanopoulos KI, Hilal RE, Essien FA, Williams MD, Barroso AO, et al. Rectal duplication cyst in an adult: the laparoscopic approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002;12:453–6.
Tantiphlachiva K. Comprehensive clinical approach to fecal incontinence. Current topics in faecal incontinence. IntechOpen; 2019.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Mana Taweevisit, M.D., PhD, for his review of the pathological specimen.
Funding
No funding was obtained for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Kasaya Tantiphlachiva: Collect data, wrote the main manuscript text. Jarongkorn Sirimongkolkasem: Collect data, prepare the abstract, review the manuscript. Tanisa Patcharatrakul: Collect data, review the manuscript. Sutep Gonlachanvit: Review the manuscript. Sopark Manasayakorn: Review the manuscript. Mawin Vongsaisuwan: Review the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Scientific and Ethical approval: • This study has been approved by the director of King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital and the Institutional Review Board of Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, which the waived of the informed consent from the subjects had been applied IRB no. 0883/66. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. • Informed consent was obtained from the participant in the study after thorough discussion. • Informed consent for publication had been obtained from the participant in the study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tantiphlachiva, K., Sirimongkolkasem, J., Patcharatrakul, T. et al. Rectal duplication in adult presented with constipation: a case report and literature review. Discov Med 1, 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-024-00007-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44337-024-00007-9