Abstract
The World Health Organisation classified the COVID-19 virus as a worldwide pandemic. It has had a profound impact on individuals’ lives, job patterns, and educational establishments worldwide. After offline and classroom learning were discontinued, a new learning platform (an e-learning platform) evolved to continue teaching and learning. The present study focuses on examining the associations among content (including websites and e-learning), the quality of e-learning, user happiness, and perceived damage during the epidemic. The study’s data were obtained using an online questionnaire that was produced using Google Forms and completed by the participants themselves. A total of 388 participants, hailing from various regions of India, participated in the study. The hypothesis is examined by the application of PLS-SEM (partial least squares structural equation modelling), and the data are processed using Smart-PLS 3.2.4. Consequently, the acquisition of knowledge from both website content and e-content greatly enhances the quality of e-learning. Similarly, both the website and the e-learning material significantly influence user satisfaction. Furthermore, the perceived negative consequences associated with this pandemic have overshadowed the beneficial effects of website and e-learning materials and their quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.
References
Abdellatief M, Sultan ABM, Jabar MA, Abdullah R (2011) A technique for quality evaluation of e-learning from developers’ perspective. Am J Econ Bus Adm 3(1):157–164
Adedoyin OB, Soykan E (2020) Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interact Learn Environ, 1–13. https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/nile20
Adel R (2017) Manage perceived e-learning quality in Egyptian context. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence 28(5–6):600–613
Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Masa’deh R, Sinclair J (2020) Evaluating E-learning systems success: an empirical study. Comput Human Behav 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Al-khresheh MH (2022) Revisiting the effectiveness of Blackboard learning management system in teaching english in the era of COVID-19. World 12(1):1–14
Allen IE, Seaman J (2011) Going the distance: online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950
Al-Mawee W, Kwayu KM, Gharaibeh T (2021) Student’s perspective on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of Western Michigan University, United States. Int J Educational Res Open 2:100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100080
Arturo MAR (2021) How COVID-19 quarantine(s) can generate poverty? Contemporary Econ 15(3):332–338
Bell BS, Federman JE (2013) E-learning in postsecondary education. The future of children 165–185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23409493.pdf
Bouhnik D, Marcus T (2006) Interaction in distance-learning courses. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(3):299–305
Capece G, Campisi D (2013) User satisfaction affecting the acceptance of an e-learning platform as a mean for the development of the human capital. Behav Inform Technol 32(4):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.630417
Chandra Y (2020) Online education during COVID-19: perception of academic stress and emotional intelligence co** strategies among college students. Asian education and development studies. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2046-3162.htm
Chea S, Kieng S, Leng P, Water T (2020) Pedagogy of online learning in Cambodia: revisiting ideas of connection, engagement, attendance, and assessment. AVI Policy Brief 19:1–9
Chen T, Peng L, Yin X, Rong J, Yang J, Cong G (2020) Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 2020(8), 200
Cidral WA, Oliveira T, Di Felice M, Aparicio M (2018) E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Comput Educ 122:273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
Constantin AA, Cuadrado I (2019) Perceived intergroup competition and adolescents’ behavioural intentions toward minorities: the role of threat, stereotypes and emotions. Curr Psychol 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00297-8
Ehlers UD (2004) Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective. Eur J Open Distance e-learning 7(1). https://old.eurodl.org/?p=archives&sp=full&2004&halfyear=2..&article=101&sp=full&year=2004&halfyear=2.&article=101
Elyassi H (2021) Economics of the financial crisis: any lessons for the pandemic downturn and beyond? Contemporary Econ 15(1):100–121
Favale T, Soro F, Trevisan M, Drago I, Mellia M (2020) Campus traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Comput Netw 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107290
Fazlollahtabar H, Muhammadzadeh A (2012) A knowledge-based user interface to optimise curriculum utility in an e-learning system. Int J Enterp Inform Syst (IJEIS) 8(3):34–53
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Algebra and statistics
Ghaeni E, Abdehagh B (2010) A model for implementing e-learning in Iranian organisations. Educational Technol, 47–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429806
Ghilay Y (2019) Effectiveness of learning management systems in higher education: views of lecturers with different levels of activity in LMSs. J Online High Educ 3(2):29–50
Guri-Rosenblit S (2018) E-teaching in higher education: an essential prerequisite for e-learning. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.298
Hair J.F., Risher J.J., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hasley JP, Gregg DG (2010) An exploratory study of website information content. J Theoretical Appl Electron Commer Res 5(3):27–38. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762010000300004
Hayat AA, Keshavarzi MH, Zare S, Bazrafcan L, Rezaee R, Faghihi SA, Kojuri J (2021) Challenges and opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic in medical education: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 21(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02682-z
Heng K, Sol K (2020) Online learning during COVID-19: key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness. In Cambodian Education Forum
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hodges CB, Moore S, Lockee BB, Trust T, Bond MA (2020) The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jalli N (2020) Lack of internet access in Southeast Asia poses challenges for students to study online amid COVID-19 pandemic. Conversation 17
Jung I (2011) The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4):445–464. https://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1007/s11423-010-9171-4
Kelly AP, Columbus R (2020) College in the time of coronavirus. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/College-in-the-Time-of-Coronavirus.pdf
Keržič D, Alex JK, Balbontín P, Alvarado R, Bezerra DDS, Cheraghi M, Dobrowolska B, Aristovnik A (2021) Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence across ten countries. PLoS ONE, 16(10):e0258807
Khtere AR, Yousef AMF (2021) The professionalism of online teaching in arab universities: validation of Faculty Readiness. Educational Technol Soc 24(3):1–12
Kinsella R (2020) Universities in the Post-COVID-19 era: crisis or catharsis? studies: Ir Q Rev 109(435):252–266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.35939/studiesirishrev.109.435.0252
Kong SC (2019) Partnership among schools in e-Learning implementation: implications on elements for sustainable development. J Educational Technol Soc 22(1):28–43. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26558826
Kumar Dharamdasani D, Ajmera R (2014) E-learning quality criteria and aspects. Int J Comput Trends Technol (IJCTT), 12(2). https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.7744.pdf
Kumar P, Saxena C, Baber H (2021) Learner-content interaction in e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learn Environ 8(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8
Laato S, Islam AN, Laine TH (2020) Did location-based games motivate players to socialise during COVID-19? Telematics Inform 54:101458
Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H (2021) The COVID-19 pandemic and e-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J Comput High Educ 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2
Mahyoob M (2020) Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World Engl J (AWEJ) 11(4). https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23
Marshall DT, Shannon DM, Love SM (2020) How teachers experienced the COVID-19 transition to remote instruction. Phi Delta Kappan 102(3):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720970702
Mthalane PP, Agbenyegah AT, Dlamini BI (2021) Reflection on student dropout against the backdrop of COVID-19 in the South African educational context amongst marginalised groups of students. Afr Sociol Review/Revue Africaine De Sociologie 25(1):194–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48630986
Murray DR, Schaller M (2016) The behavioral immune system: implications for social cognition, social interaction, and social influence. Advances in experimental social psychology 53. Academic, 75–129
Nguyen NT (2021) A study on satisfaction of users towards learning management system at International University–Vietnam National University HCMC. Asia Pacific Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.02.001
Peltier JW, Schibrowsky JA, Drago W (2007) The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: a causal model. J Mark Educ 29(2):140–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302016
Pham L, Limbu YB, Bui TK, Nguyen HT, Pham HT (2019) Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? evidence from vietnam. Int J Educational Technol High Educ 16(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
Phelan JE (2015) The use of e-learning in social work education. Soc Work 60(3):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swv010
Pokhrel S, Chhetri R (2021) A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. High Educ Future 8(1):133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Prasetya TA, Harjanto CT, Setiyawan A (2020), December Analysis of student satisfaction of e-learning using the end-user computing satisfaction method during the Covid-19 pandemic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1700(1):012012. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1700/1/012012
Puriwat W, Tripopsakul S (2021) The impact of e-learning quality on student satisfaction and continuance usage intentions during covid-19. Int J Inform Educ Technol 11(8):368–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1961348
Ramadiani A, Haryaka U, Agus F, Kridalaksana AH (2017) User satisfaction model fore-learning using smartphone. Procedia Comput Sci 116:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.070
Ramadiani et al (2015) Integrated acceptance model for e-learning. International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Development (ICET4SD) 11–12 Nov, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 105(12016)
Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA (2020) Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Comput Educ 144:103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Reisetter M, LaPointe L, Korcuska J (2007) The impact of altered realties: implications of online delivery for learners’ interactions, expectations, and learning skills. Int J E-learning 6(1):55–80
Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Sinkovics N, Sinkovics RR (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data Brief 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074
Saxena C, Baber H, Kumar P (2020) Examining the moderating effect of perceived benefits of maintaining social distance on e-learning quality during COVID-19 pandemic. J Educational Technol Syst 49(4):532–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520977798
Saxena C, Baber H, Kumar P (2021) Examining the moderating effect of perceived benefits of maintaining social distance on e-learning quality during COVID-19 pandemic. J Educational Technol Syst 49(4):532–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520977798
Seta HB, Hidayanto AN, Abidin Z (2020) Variables affecting e-learning services quality in indonesian higher education: students’perspectives. J Inform Technol Educ 19. https://doi.org/10.28945/4489
Shahzad A, Hassan R, Aremu AY, Hussain A, Lodhi RN (2021) Effects of COVID-19 in e-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Qual Quant 55(3):805–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
She L, Ma L, Jan A, Nia S, H., Rahmatpour P (2021) Online learning satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese University students: the serial mediation model. Front Psychol 4395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936
Smalley A (2020), July higher education responses to coronavirus (COVID-19). In National Conference of State Legislatures (Vol. 6, p. 15)
Sotiriou SA, Lazoudis A, Bogner FX (2020) Inquiry-based learning and E-learning: how to serve high and low achievers. Smart Learn Environ 7(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00130-x
Sumi RS, Kabir G (2021) Satisfaction of e-learners with electronic learning service quality using the SERVQUAL model. J Open Innovation: Technol Market Complex 7(4):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7040227
Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, Chen YY, Yeh D (2008) What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput Educ 50(4):1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Sun S (2020) Rural primary education in Cambodia during the pandemic: challenges and solutions. In Cambodian Education Forum
Szopiński T, Bachnik K (2022) Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 174:121203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121203
Tabassum S (2010) E-learning: issues and recommendations. Indian J Political Sci 71(2):511–518
Tsai S, Machado P (2002) E-Learning basics: essay: e-learning, online learning, web-based learning, or distance learning: unveiling the ambiguity in current terminology. eLearn 2002(7):3
Udo GJ, Bagchi KK, Kirs PJ (2011) Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Comput Hum Behav 27(3):1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009
Udo GJ, Marquis GP (2002) Factors affecting e-commerce web site effectiveness. J Comput Inform Syst 42(2):10–16
Ehlers UD, Pawlowski JM (eds) (2006) Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. Springer Science & Business Media
Uppal MA, Ali S, Gulliver SR (2018) Factors determining e-learning service quality. Br J Educ Technol 49(3): 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552
Weerasinghe IS, Fernando RL (2017) Students’ satisfaction in higher education. Am J Educational Res 5(5):533–539. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-5-9
World Bank (2020) Remote Learning, EdTech & COVID-19. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/edutech/brief/edtech-covid-19. retrieved as on January 23, 2020.
Zaheer M, Babar ME, Gondal UH, Qadri MM (2015) E-learning and student satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities: New frontiers in ODL (pp. 275–285)
Funding
No funding was received for the present research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation: AN, SA. Analysis: SA, AN, AN. Writing-draft: AN, AF, SA. Writing-Review and editing: SA, AN, AF. Supervision: SA, AN, AN.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Because the aggregate data of the respondents were presented, no personal data were presented and due to the urgency of providing feedback to educational institutes and institutes of higher education ethical committee approval was not obtained. The study has not highlighted any individual information of the respondents therefore, ethical committee approval is not required in such studies.
Informed consent
The participants were informed about the research through questionnaires and informed consent was obtained online. It was clearly mentioned in the questionnaire that the data collected will be kept strictly confidential and will be used solely for academic purposes.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The present study was performed in accordance with ethical standards.
Animal participation
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The author of the present manuscript declares that there are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, N., Ahmad, N., Shakeel, A. et al. An application of the PLS-SEM model for evaluating e-learning user satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. SN Soc Sci 4, 106 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00912-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00912-x