Abstract
Introduction
Asymmetry in pedicle anatomy is most distinctly noted around the apex of the curve. The correlation of pedicle dysmorphia with apical vertebral rotation (AVR) and coronal Cobb angle (CCA) has not been studied.
Objective
To establish whether pedicle dysmorphism is linked to curve magnitude CCA and the AVR in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methodology
Preoperative plain whole spine standing radiographs and non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans of 25 AIS patients that were operated at a single centre from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed by 3 independent co-investigators. CCA was noted on the standing radiograph, whereas the AVR was measured on the axial cuts of CT scan. Pedicle morphometric measurements were performed for apical and periapical pedicles. These included apical vertebra (when present), 2 vertebrae above (U1 and U2) and below (B1 and B2) the apex vertebra/disc. The pedicle morphometric measurements were performed on CT scans. We assessed the transverse pedicle diameter, transverse cancellous channel diameter, sagittal pedicle diameter, pedicle length and pedicle axis length. Correlation tests between various pedicle morphometric measurements, AVR and the curve magnitude (Cobb angle) was performed by the Pearson correlation test.
Results
The apex of the major curve was in the thoracic spine in 20 patients, thoracolumbar in three patients and in the lumbar spine in two patients. The mean Cobb angle was 61.5 ± 9.3° and the mean AVR was 28.4 ± 17.8°. A positive correlation was noted with the AVR for U1 concave pedicle length (r = 0.45, p = 0.03), pedicle axis length of the U2 concave pedicle (r = 0.6, p = 0.04), transverse pedicle diameter of the convex apical vertebrae (r = 0.82, p = 0.00009) and the convex apical transverse pedicle diameter (r = 0.80, p = 0.002). A negative correlation with the AVR was noted for U2 convex pedicle length (r = − 0.51, p = 0009), transverse cancellous channel diameter of the U2 concave pedicle (r = − 0.42, p = 0.04) and apical concave pedicle (r = − 0.78, p = 0.002) and the sagittal pedicle diameter for the convex pedicle of U2 (r = − 0.45, p = 0.03) and apex(r = − 0.59, p = 0.04). The Cobb angle did not show a significant correlation with any of the pedicle measurements at any of the levels on the convex and the concave sides.
Conclusion
Pedicle asymmetry and dysmorphism demonstrate a morphometric association with the apical vertebral rotation than the curve magnitude. The pedicle length and the pedicle axis length increase on the concave apical and periapical region with increase in AVR. The transverse cancellous channel diameter significantly decreases on the concave apical region with the increase in AVR. The sagittal pedicle diameter decreases on the convex side with the increase in AVR.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43390-023-00773-z/MediaObjects/43390_2023_773_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43390-023-00773-z/MediaObjects/43390_2023_773_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs43390-023-00773-z/MediaObjects/43390_2023_773_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Available.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Weiss HR, Karavidas N, Moramarco M, Moramarco K (2016) Long-term effects of untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of the literature. Asian Spine J 10(6):1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1163
Chen Z, Rong L (2016) Comparison of combined anterior–posterior approach versus posterior-only approach in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25(2):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3968-0
Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ, Clark CE (2004) The posterior approach for lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior shortening and pedicle screws. Spine 29(3):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000109881.63411.48
Gao B, Gao W, Chen C et al (2017) What is the difference in morphologic features of the thoracic pedicle between patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy subjects? A CT-based case-control study. Clin Orthop 475(11):2765–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5448-9
Liljenqvist UR, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, Link TM, Steinbeck J, Halm HFH (2002) Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84(3):359–368. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200203000-00005
Aaro S, Dahlborn M, Svensson L (1978) Estimation of vertebral rotation in structural scoliosis by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19(6):990–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418517801900614
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77(8):1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199508000-00008
Akazawa T, Kotani T, Sakuma T, Minami S, Tsukamoto S, Ishige M (2015) Evaluation of pedicle screw placement by pedicle channel grade in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: should we challenge narrow pedicles? J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 20(5):818–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0746-0
Akoglu H (2018) User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 18(3):91–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Davis CM, Grant CA, Pearcy MJ et al (2017) Is there asymmetry between the concave and convex pedicles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A CT investigation. Clin Orthop 475(3):884–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5188-2
Sarwahi V, Sugarman EP, Wollowick AL, Amaral TD, Lo Y, Thornhill B (2014) Prevalence, distribution, and surgical relevance of abnormal pedicles in spines with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis vs. no deformity: a CT-based study. JBJS 96(11):e92. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01058
Davis CM, Grant CA, Izatt MT et al (2020) Characterization of progressive changes in pedicle morphometry and neurovascular anatomy during growth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis versus adolescents without scoliosis. Spine Deform 8(6):1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00160-y
Vavruch L, Forsberg D, Dahlström N, Tropp H (2018) Vertebral axial asymmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 6(2):112-120.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.001
Tarrant RC, Queally JM, O’Loughlin PF, Sheeran P, Moore DP, Kiely PJ (2016) Preoperative curves of greater magnitude (>70°) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are associated with increased surgical complexity, higher cost of surgical treatment and a delayed return to function. Ir J Med Sci 1971 185(2):463–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-015-1391-5
Labaki C, Otayek J, Massaad A et al (2019) Is the apical vertebra the most rotated vertebra in the scoliotic curve? J Neurosurg Spine 31(6):873–879. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19203
Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Matsumoto M et al (2010) A novel pedicle channel classification describing osseous anatomy: how many thoracic scoliotic pedicles have cancellous channels? Spine 35(20):1836–1842. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d3cfde
Funding
There is no funding source for this publication/study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: BG, TB, NM, JM. Data acquisition: BG, TB, JM. Data analysis: BG, TB, NM. Manuscript preparation: TB, JM. Manuscript editing: BG, TB, NM, JM. Approval of final version of manuscript: BG, TB, NM, JM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Garg, B., Bansal, T., Mehta, N. et al. Is the morphology of the apical pedicles influenced by apical rotation or the coronal curve magnitude in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?: a radiographic assessment. Spine Deform 12, 341–348 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00773-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-023-00773-z