Log in

Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?

  • Case Series
  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective study.

Objective

To describe pathogens found in SSI during pediatric-instrumented spine surgery, and to assess the relationship between pathogens and the etiology of the spinal deformity.

Summary and background data

Surgical site infection (SSI) after pediatric spine fusion is a well-known complication with incidence rates between 0.5 and 42%, associated with the patient underlying disorder. Pathogens involved in SSI seem to be related to patient characteristics, such as the etiology of the spinal deformity. GNB (gram-negative bacilli) are more frequent in neuropathic, muscular, and syndromic conditions. High-risk pediatric patients with a spine deformity undergoing instrumented surgery might benefit from receiving perioperative intravenous prophylaxis for GNB.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study at our tertiary-care pediatric hospital from January 2010 to January 2017. We reviewed records of all episodes of SSI that occurred in the first 12 months postoperatively. All patients who underwent instrumented spine surgery were included in this study.

Results

We assessed 1410 pediatric-instrumented spine surgeries; we identified 68 patients with deep SSIs, overall rate of 4.8%. Mean age at instrumented spine surgery was 12 years and 9 months. Time elapsed between instrumented surgery and debridement surgery was 28.8 days. Cultures were positive in 48 and negative in 20. Of the 48 positive culture results, 41 (72%) were GNB, 12 (21%) gram-positive cocci (GPC), three (5%) gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC), and one (2%) coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Of the 68 patients with primary SSIs, 46 were considered to have a high risk of infection, which reported GNB in 81%, GPC in 15%, GPAC in 2%, and CoNS in 2%.

Conclusion

Cefazolin prophylaxis covers GPC and CoNS, but GNB with unreliable effectiveness. Gram-negative pathogens are increasingly reported in SSIs in high-risk patients. Adding prophylaxis for GNB in high-risk patients should be taken into account when considering spine surgery.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glotzbecker MP, St Hilaire TA, Vitale MG, et al. (2017) Best practice guidelines for surgical site infection prevention with surgical treatment of early onset scoliosis and children’s spine study group; growing spine study group. J Pediatr Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001079

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vitale MG, Lenke LG, Sponseller PD et al (2013) Building consensus: development of a best practice guideline (BPG) for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention in high-risk pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 33(5):471–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glotzbecker MP, Riedel MD, Saiman L et al (2013) What’s the Evidence? Systematic literature review of risk factors and preventive strategies for surgical site infection following pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 33(5):479–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glotzbecker MP, Akbarnia BA, Joshi A, et al. (2014) Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for growth friendly spinal procedures. J Child Orthop 8:245–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maesani M, Doit C, Dahmani S et al (2016) Comparative microbiology of patients with idiopathic and nonidiopathic etiologies of spine deformity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 35(1):66–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Labbé AC, Demers AM, Moore DL, et al. (2003) Surgical-site infection following spinal fusion: a case-control study in a children’s hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24(8):591–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry JW, Montgomerie JZ, Maeder K, et al. (1997) Wound infections following spinal fusion with posterior segmental spinal instrumentation. Clin Infect Dis 24:558–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milstone AM, Sponseller P, Perl TM et al (2008) Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. a modifiable risk factor for deep surgical site infections after pediatric spinal fusion. Pediatric Infectious Dis J 27(8):704–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vandenberg C, Niswander C, Garg S, et al. (2018) Compliance with a comprehensive antibiotic protocol improves infection incidence in pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 38:287–292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Y, Glotzbecker M, Hedequist D (2012) Surgical site infection after pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 5:111–119

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cahill PJ, Warnick DE, Lee MJ, et al. (2010) Infection after spinal fusion for pediatric spinal deformity: 30 years of experience at a single institution. Spine 35:1211–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vitale MG, Mackenzie WGS, Matsumoto H, et al. (2011) Surgical site infection following spinal instrumentation for scoliosis: lessons learned from a multi-center analysis of 1352 spinal instrumentation procedures for scoliosis. In: Presented at the scoliosis research society 46th annual meeting and course. Louisville, Kentucky

  13. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF, et al. (2010) Infection rate after spine surgery in cerebral palsy is high and impairs results: multicenter analysis of risk factors and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:711–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Linam WM, Margolis PA, Staat MA, et al. (2009) Risk factors associated with surgical site infection after pediatric posterior spinal fusion procedure. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 30:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, et al. (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:556–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sponseller PD, LaPorte DM, Hungerford MW, et al. (2000) Deep wound infections after neuromuscular scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of risk factors and treatment outcomes. Spine 25:2461–2466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aleissa S, Parsons D, Grant J, et al. (2011) Deep wound infection following pediatric scoliosis surgery: incidence and analysis of risk factors. Can J Surg 54:263–269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho C, Skaggs DL, Weiss JM, et al. (2007) Management of infection after instrumented posterior spine fusion in pediatric scoliosis. Spine 32:2739–2744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McLeod LM, Keren R, Dormans JP, et al. (2013) Perioperative antibiotic use for spinal surgery procedures in US children’s hospitals. Spine 38(7):609–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Horan MP, Williams BA, Vitale, MG. (2011) Can infection following scoliosis instrumentation surgery be a ‘never event’?: Dramatic reduction in infection rates at one institution after implementation of a multimodal prevention protocol. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hatlen T, Song K, Shurtleff D, et al. (2010) Contributory factors to postoperative spinal fusion complications for children with myelomeningocele. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:1294–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright ML, Skaggs DL, Vitale MG, et al. (2016) Does the type of metal instrumentation affect the risk of surgical site infection in pediatric scoliosis surgery? Spine Deformity 4:206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Warner SJ, Uppstrom TJ, Perlman SL, et al. (2017) Epidemiology of deep surgical site infections after pediatric spinal fusion surgery. Spine 42(3):E163–E168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdul-Jabbar A, Berven SH, Hu SS, et al. (2013) Surgical site infections in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1425–E1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farley FA, Li Y, Gilsdorf JR, et al. (2014) Postoperative spine and VEPTR infections in children: a case-control study. J Pediatr Orthop 34:14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mackenzie WGS, Matsumoto H, Williams BA, et al. (2013) Surgical site infection following spinal instrumentation for scoliosis: a multi- center analysis of rates, risk factors, and pathogens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:800–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goede WJ, Lovely JK, Thompson RL, et al. (2013) Assessment of prophylactic antibiotic use in patients with surgical site infections. Hosp Pharm 48:560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brook I, Frazier EH (2000) Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of wound infection following spinal fusion in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:20–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hahn F, Zbinden R, Min K (2005) Late implant infections caused by Propionibacterium acnes in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J 14:783–788

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ballard MR, Miller NH, Nyquist A, et al. (2012) A multidisciplinary approach improves infection rates in pediatric spine surgery. J Pediatr Orthop 32:266–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Marks MC, et al. (2013) Deep wound infections after spinal fusion in children with cerebral palsy. A prospective cohort study. Spine 38(23):2023–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Croft LD, Pottinger JM, Herwaldt LA, et al. (2015) Risk factors for surgical site infections after pediatric spine operations. Spine 40(2):E112–E119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gans I, Dormans JP, Baldwin KD, et al. (2013) Adjunctive vancomycin powder in pediatric spine surgery is safe. Spine 38(19):1703–1707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C (2011) Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2084–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Glotzbecker MP, Vitale MG, Flynn JM, et al. (2013) Surgeon practices regarding infection prevention for pediatric spinal surgery. On behalf of the POSNA committee on the quality, safety, value initiative (QSVI). J Pediatr Orthop. 33:694–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM et al. (2016) Pediatric dosage handbook, 16th, Ed. pag 302–315

  38. Vigilancia de la Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos. Red WHONET- Red SIREVA II Argentina: 2010–2018 parcial. Servicio Antimicrobianos. Laboratorio Nacional de Referencia en Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas—ANLIS « Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán » . Buenos Aires. Argentina. 2018

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank the Infections Control Specialists for the retrospective evaluation of SSIs. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to report related to this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Design of study: LP, CAT, RR, MN. Consulting references: LP, IAFW, EG, ESB. Participation in draft manuscript: LP, IAFW, MN, EG, ESB. Revise manuscript: IAFW, CAT, RR, ESB, MN. Approved the final version of the paper: LP, CAT, RR, IAFW, EG, ESB, MN

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Piantoni.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest received during the conduct of this study

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

IRB: The study was approved by the hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB), because of the retrospective observational nature of the study IRB waived the informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piantoni, L., Tello, C.A., Remondino, R.G. et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk pediatric spine surgery: Is cefazolin enough?. Spine Deform 8, 669–676 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00092-7

Keywords

Navigation