SpringerLink
Log in

Biodynamic Modeling Techniques for Rotorcraft Comfort Evaluation

  • Original article
  • Published:
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work shows how different occupant biodynamic modeling techniques are integrated in a rotorcraft design environment and discusses the resulting differences in comfort assessment. Three modeling techniques, that are used for biodynamic characterization, are considered: lumped parameter, finite element and multibody dynamics. These models are identified for the same gender, age, weight and height, and then integrated into a virtual helicopter environment with a seat–cushion interface. A generic helicopter model is used to demonstrate the approach. For each of the three techniques, the vertical acceleration levels at the human–helicopter interface, as required by vibration regulations, and at the head are evaluated up to 30 Hz. At a first glance, it is observed that the lumped parameter is the easiest to implement in terms of model set-up. However, the use of lumped parameter models is limited to the population groups that they are identified from, and thus are not as flexible as the finite element and multibody ones in develo** biodynamic models for individuals of an arbitrary population percentile. Furthermore, through numerical analysis, it is found that the differences are not very significant in terms of accelerations at the human–seat interface. Therefore, for comfort-related issues, the use of more complex models is not justified, unless complicated comfort assessments other than human interface accelerations are required. On the other hand, it is observed that the spine dynamics can play a significant role in estimating the acceleration of head; therefore, the sophisticated finite element and multibody dynamics models redeem their higher modeling cost and computation time when the head–neck health of occupants is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.mbdyn.org/, last retrieved in October 2018.

References

  1. Johnson, W.: Rotorcraft Aeromechanics. Cambridge University Press, New York (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrer, K.L., Yniguez, D., Maria, M.M., Ellenbecker, D., Estrada, N., Geiger, M.: Whole body vibration exposure for MH-60s pilots. In: 43th SAFE, Utah (2005)

  3. Rath, T., Fichter, W.: A closer look at the impact of helicopter vibrations on ride quality. In: AHS 73rd Annual Forum, Forth Worth, May 9–11 (2017)

  4. Law, A.H., Beatty, H.E.W., Keillor, J., Wickramasinghe, V.: Pilot head and neck response to helicopter whole body vibration and head-supported mass. In: AHS 73rd Annual Forum, Forth Worth (2017)

  5. Johnson, W.: A history of rotorcraft comprehensive analyses. In: TP 2012-216012, NASA (2012)

  6. Kumbhar, P.B., Xu, P., Yang, J.: A literature survey of biodynamic models for whole body vibration and vehicle ride comfort. In: 2012 ASME DETC, Chicago, August 12–15 (2012)

  7. Matsumoto, Y., Griffin, M.J.: Comparison of biodynamic responses in standing and seated human bodies. J. Sound Vib. 238(4), 691–704 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffin, M.J.: The validation of biodynamic models. Clin. Biomech. 16, S81–S92 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohajer, N., Abdi, H., Nahavandi, S., Nelson, K.: Directional and sectional ride comfort estimation using an integrated human biomechanical-seat foam model. J. Sound Vib. 403, 38–58 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitazaki, S., Griffin, M.J.: A modal analysis of whole-body vertical vibration, using a finite element model of the human body. J. Sound Vib. 200(1), 83–103 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Masarati, P., Quaranta, G., Zanoni, A.: Dependence of helicopter pilots’ biodynamic feedthrough on upper limbs’ muscular activation patterns. Proc. IMechE Part K: J. Multi-body Dyn. 227(4), 344–362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464419313490680

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masarati, P., Muscarello, V., Quaranta, G.: Linearized aeroservoelastic analysis of rotary-wing aircraft. In: 36th European Rotorcraft Forum, pp. 099.1–10, Paris, September 7–9 (2010)

  13. Masarati, P., Muscarello, V., Quaranta, G., Locatelli, A., Mangone, D., Riviello, L., Viganò, L.: An integrated environment for helicopter aeroservoelastic analysis: the ground resonance case. In: 37th European Rotorcraft Forum, pp. 177.1–12, Gallarate, September 13–15 (2011)

  14. Craig Jr., R.R., Bampton, M.C.C.: Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA J. 6(7), 1313–1319 (1968)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, Y.-T., Wereley, N.: Biodynamic response mitigation to shock loads using magnetorheological helicopter crew seat suspensions. J. Aircr. 42(5), 1288–1295 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai, X.-X., Shi-Xu, X., Cheng, W., Qian, L.-J.: On 4-degree-of-freedom biodynamic models of seated occupants: lumped-parameter modeling. J. Sound Vib. 402, 122–141 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boileau, P.É., Rakheja, S.: Whole-body vertical biodynamic response characteristics of the seated vehicle driver: measurement and model development. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 22(6), 449–472 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitazaki, S., Griffin, M.J.: Resonance behaviour of the seated human body and effects of posture. J. Biomech. 31(2), 143–149 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00126-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Belytschko, T., Privitzer, E.: Refinement and validation of a three dimensional head-spine model. Technical Report Contract AF-33615-76-C-0506, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (1978)

  20. Valentini, P.P., Pennestrì, E.: An improved three-dimensional multibody model of the human spine for vibrational investigations. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 36(4), 363–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-015-9475-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Masarati, P., Morandini, M., Mantegazza, P.: An efficient formulation for general-purpose multibody/multiphysics analysis. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 9(4), 041001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valentini, P.P.: Virtual dummy with spine model for automotive vibrational comfort analysis. Int. J. Veh. Design 51(3–4), 261–277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2009.027956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valentini, P.P.: Modeling human spine using dynamic spline approach for vibrational simulation. J. Sound Vib. 331(26), 5895–5909 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Masarati, P., Quaranta, G., Zanoni, A.: A detailed biomechanical pilot model for multi-axis involuntary rotorcraft-pilot couplings. In: 41st European Rotorcraft Forum, Munich, September 1–4 (2015)

  25. Masarati, P., Quaranta, G., Bernardini, A., Guglieri, G.: Voluntary pilot action through biodynamics for helicopter flight dynamics simulation. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 38(3), 431–441 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pooni, J.S., Hukins, D.W.L., Harris, P.F., Hilton, R.C., Davies, K.E.: Comparison of the structure of human intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 8(3), 175–182 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoganandan, N., Kumaresan, S.C., Voo, L., Pintar, F.A., Larson, S.J.: Finite element modeling of the c4–c6 cervical spine unit. Med. Eng. Phys. 18(7), 569–574 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Subrata, P. (ed.) Design of Artificial Human Joints and Organs. Springer, Berlin (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6255-2

  29. Zheng, Y.-P., Mak, A.F.T.: An ultrasound indentation system for biomechanical properties assessment of soft tissues in-vivo. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43(9), 912–918 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zanoni, A., Masarati, P.: Geometry generation and benchmarking of a complete multibody model of the upper limb. In: Fourth Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics—IMSD 2016, Montréal, May 29–June 2 (2016)

  31. Shi, X., Cao, L., Reed, M., Rupp, J., Hoff, C., Hoff, C., Hu, J.: A statistical human rib cage geometry model account for variations by age, sex, stature and body mass index. J. Biomech. 47, 2277–2285 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. ISO. ISO mechanical vibration and shock—evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration. Technical Report ISO2631-1, ISO (1997)

  33. Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration. Technical Report BS-6841, British Standard Institution (1987)

  34. Griffin, M.J.: A comparison of standardized methods for predicting the hazards of whole-body vibration and repeated shocks. J. Sound Vib. 215(4), 883–914 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mandapuram, S., Rakheja, S., Boileau, P.É., Maeda, S.: Apparent mass and head vibration transmission responses of seated body to three translational axis vibration. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 42(3), 268–277 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Merritt, H.E.: Hydraulic Control Systems. Wiley, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tamer, A., Muscarello, V., Masarati, P., Quaranta, G.: Evaluation of vibration reduction devices for helicopter ride quality improvement. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. (submitted)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work received partial support from Leonardo Helicopter Division. The authors particularly acknowledge LHD for providing part of the data used in the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deptartment of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico Di Milano, Via La Masa, 34, 20156, Milan, Italy

    Aykut Tamer, Andrea Zanoni, Vincenzo Muscarello, Alessandro Cocco, Giuseppe Quaranta & Pierangelo Masarati

Authors
  1. Aykut Tamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Zanoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vincenzo Muscarello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alessandro Cocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Quaranta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pierangelo Masarati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aykut Tamer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presented at the 44th European Rotorcraft Forum, Delft, The Netherlands.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamer, A., Zanoni, A., Muscarello, V. et al. Biodynamic Modeling Techniques for Rotorcraft Comfort Evaluation. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 98, 147–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-019-00014-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42496-019-00014-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation