Log in

A New Rock Mass Cuttability Classification for Roadheaders Used in Coal Mining

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Roadheaders are commonly used in coal mines for roadway excavations. The prediction of roadheader performance is necessary for the planning of roadway projects and the estimation of costs. Recently, a new rock mass cuttability classification (RMCC) system has been introduced for roadheaders used in coal mines. In this study, the validity of the RMCC system was investigated for different types of roadheaders and different coal mines. Four different coal mines were visited, and the performance measurements of different axial and transverse roadheaders were carried out during the excavation of roadways. Uniaxial compressive strength, volumetric joint count, the strike and dip of joints, joint aperture, the Cerchar abrasivity index, and water ingress were determined in field and laboratory studies to calculate the RMCC index. The analysis of the data demonstrated that the correlation coefficients between the net cutting rates and the RMCC indices were higher than 0.94, suggesting that the RMCC system was valid. It was concluded that the RMCC system could be reliably used for the evaluation of roadheader performance in coal mines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bilgin N, Copur H, Balci C (2014) Mechanical excavation in mining and civil industries, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Florida: Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16083

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Gehring KH (1989) A cutting comparison. Tunnels Tunnell 21:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thuro K, Plinninger RJ (1999) Roadheader excavation performance - geological and geotechnical influences. In: Paper presented at The 9th ISRM Congress, Theme 3: Rock dynamics and tectonophysics/ Rock cutting and drilling, Paris, France. Paper Number: ISRM-9CONGRESS-1999-246. https://onepetro.org/isrmcongress/proceedings-abstract/CONGRESS99/All-CONGRESS99/ISRM-9CONGRESS-1999-246/168770

  4. Tumac D, Bilgin N, Feridunoglu C, Ergin H (2007) Estimation of rock cuttability from shore hardness and compressive strength properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40(5):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ocak I, Bilgin N (2010) Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels in Istanbul. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 25:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebrahimabadi A, Goshtasbi K, Shahriar K, CheraghiSeifabad M (2011) A model to predict the performance of roadheadersbased on rock mass brittleness index. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 111:355–364

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abdolreza YC, Yakhchali SH (2013) A new model to predict roadheader performance using rock mass properties. J Coal Sci Eng 19(1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahraman E, Kahraman S (2016) The performance prediction of roadheaders from easy testing methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:585–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahraman S, Aloglu AS, Aydın B, Saygın E (2019) The needle penetration index to estimate the performance of an axial type roadheader used in a coal mine. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-Resour 5:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bilgin N, Seyrek T, Erdinc E, Shahriar K (1990) Roadheaders clean valuable tips for Istanbul Metro. Tunnels Tunnell 22:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rostami J, Ozdemir L, Neil DM (1994) Performance prediction: a key issue in mechanical hard rock mining. Min Eng 11:263–1267

    Google Scholar 

  12. Copur H, Ozdemir L, Rostami J (1998) Roadheader applications in mining and tunneling industries. In: Paper presented at Annual Meeting of American Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME), Preprint Number: 98-185, Orlando, Florida, USA

  13. Bieniawski von Preinl ZT, Caleda Tamames B, Galera Fernandez JM, Alvares Hernandez MH (2006) Rock mass excavability indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bieniawski ZT, Celada B, Galera JM (2007) Predicting TBM excavability. Tunnels and Tunnelling International 7:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kahraman S (2022) A general evaluation of the performance of roadheaders. Research project, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK), Project no. 217M740

  16. Ulusay R, Aydan O, Erguler ZA, Ngan-Tillard DJM, Seiki T, Verwaal W, Sasaki Y, Sato A (2014) ISRM suggested method for the needle penetration test. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1073–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahraman S, Aloglu AS, Aydın B, Saygin E (2017) The needle penetration test for predicting coal strength. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 117:587–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974-2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, international society for rock mechanics. Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey, Kozan Ofset

  19. Palmstrom A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20:362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of PhD thesis of Behnaz Hallaji Dibavar. The authors thank TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for supporting the project (Project No. 217M740). The authors also thank Park Termik Elektrik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş., Hattat Enerji ve Maden Ticaret A.Ş., Polyak Eynez Enerji Üretim Madencilik San. ve Tic. A.Ş., İmbat Madencilik Enerji Turizm San. Tic..A.Ş., Demir Export A.Ş., YS Madencilik San. ve Tic. Ltd. Ş. and Kömür İşletmeleri A.Ş. for allowing the field studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sair Kahraman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dibavar, B., Kahraman, S., Rostami, M. et al. A New Rock Mass Cuttability Classification for Roadheaders Used in Coal Mining. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 40, 1141–1152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00788-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00788-0

Keywords

Navigation