Log in

Nonlinear Degradation Analysis of Arch-Dam Blocks by Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Input

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to define the non-linear response for concrete arch gravity dams, considering seismic actions as main external destabilizing actions.

Methods

The plastic degradation theory has been used to define the reduction of the elasto-plastic modulus during the hysteretic cycles. The parameters to apply the model are obtained from the literature and numerical analysis. In this sense, working with a reduction of the elasto-plastic modulus is useful to define the displacement of the structure. The seismic input has been obtained from probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard analyses. For that, a series of several earthquakes have been chosen to perform the time–history analysis. The response of the structure blocks under four earthquakes has been made using a step-by-step direct integration. An application to Rules Dam has been made to test the method.

Results and conclusions

Results of the seismic analysis provide several specific accelerations for concrete arch gravity dams. Results of the structural show that in 2D analysis the maximum non-linear dam displacements reach value up to 27 cm, whereas for 3D analysis they reach up to 7 cm. Moreover, these cyclic displacements produce several accumulations of plastic deformations and cracks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Omidi O, Lofti V (2017) Seismic plastic-damage analysis of mass concrete blocks in arch dams including contraction and peripheral joints. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 95:118–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang QL, Wang F, Gan XQ, Li B (2015) A field investigation into penetration cracks close to dam-to-pier interfaces and numerical analysis. Eng Fail Anal 57:188–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alembagheri M (2016) Earthquake damage estimation of concrete gravity dams using linear analysis and empirical failure criteria. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 90:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Omidi O, Lotfi V, Valliappan S (2012) Plastic-damage analysis of Koyna dam in different dam** mechanisms with dam–water interaction. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, WCEE 2012, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 24–28

  5. Guanglun W, Pekau OA, Chuhan Z, Shaomin W (2000) Seismic fracture analysis of concrete gravity dams based on nonlinear fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 65:67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang JT, ** AY, Du XL, Wu M (2016) X, Scatter of dynamic response and damage of an arch dam subjected to artificial earthquake accelerograms. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 87:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zacchei E, Molina JL, Brasil MLRF (2017) Seismic hazard assessment of arch dams via dynamic modelling: an application to the Rules Dam in Granada, SE Spain. Int J Civ Eng 17:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337–352

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaspar-Escribano JM, Navarro M, Benito B, García-Jerez A, Vidal F (2010) From regional- to local-scale seismic hazard assessment: examples from Southern Spain. Bull Earthq Eng 8:1547–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benito MB, Navarro M, Vidal F, Gaspar-Escribano J, García-Rodríguez MJ, Martínez-Solares JM (2010) A new seismic hazard assessment in the region of Andalusia (Southern Spain). Bull Earthq Eng 8:739–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fenves G, Chopra AK (1983) Effects of reservoir bottom absorption on earthquake response of concrete gravity dams. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 11:809–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Demirel E (2015) Numerical simulation of earthquake excited dam–reservoirs with irregular geometries using an immersed boundary method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 73:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirzabozorg H, Varmazyari M, Ghaemian M (2010) Dam–reservoir-massed foundation system and travelling wave along reservoir bottom. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:746–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chakrabarti P, Chopra AK (1973) Earthquake analysis of gravity dams including hydrodynamic interaction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Seyedpoor SM, Salajegheh J, Salajegheh E (2010) Shape optimal design of arch dams including dam–water–foundation rock interaction using a grading strategy and approximation concepts. Appl Math Model 34:1149–1163

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E (1989) A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct 25:299–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oñate E, Oller S, Oliver J, Lubliner J (1988) A constitutive model for cracking of concrete based on the incremental theory of plasticity. Eng Comput 5:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen HH, Su RKL (2013) Tension softening curves of plain concrete. Constr Build Mater 44:440–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1994) Arch dam design, Manual No. 1110-2-2201

  22. Guan J, Li Q, Wu Z, Zhao S, Dong W, Zhou S (2015) Minimum specimen size for fracture parameters of site-casting dam concrete. Constr Build Mater 93:973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Q, Guan J, Wu Z, Dong W, Zhou S (2016) Equivalent maturity for ambient temperature effect on fracture parameters of site-casting dam concrete. Constr Build Mater 120:293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hariri-Ardebili MA, Seyed-Kolbadi SM, Kianoush MR (2016) FEM-based parametric analysis of a typical gravity dam considering input excitation mechanism. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 84:22–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hariri-Ardebili MA, Saouma V (2015) Quantitative failure metric for gravity dams. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44:461–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the Servicios Informáticos CPD of the University of Salamanca for the Mathematica software license. The third author acknowledges support by CNPq, a Brazilian research funding agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Zacchei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zacchei, E., Molina, J.L. & Brasil, R.M.L.R.F. Nonlinear Degradation Analysis of Arch-Dam Blocks by Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Input. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 7, 301–309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00112-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00112-5

Keywords

Navigation