SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Day Reconstruction Method - Same Results when Used at the End of the Day or on the Next Day?

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Community Well-Being Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The day reconstruction method (DRM; Kahneman et al. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780, 2004) constitutes a frequently used method aiming to capture everyday life and everyday feelings. Especially in the field of community well-being research this method can bring meaningful insights. In its original version and in most subsequent studies, respondents are asked to complete the DRM with respect to their previous day on the next day. Yet when asked, respondents prefer to work on the DRM in the evening of the same day, particularly in longitudinal studies where the motivation to complete the DRM proactively on one’s own is crucial. Consequently, it is important to consider respondents’ preferences about their favoured point in time to fill in the DRM. Thus, the question whether a flexible DRM usage that offers the freedom to work on the DRM in the evening of the same day or on the next day should arise. Reluctance in doing so is reasonable since research on differences in answering patterns between these two points in time is pending. The current study sheds light on this research question by comparing respondents’ happiness during the reconstructed episodes in both settings (same day vs. next day). A DRM smartphone application was used with a group collected from the Innovation Sample of the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP-IS). The results reveal that the point in time during which people fill in the DRM has no significant effect on respondent’s happiness ratings. In sum, although an experiment is needed to replicate our findings, our research suggests that researchers might consider (especially for longitudinal studies) to give participants free choice to do the DRM on the evening of the same day or on the next day if they want to reduce response burden in order to increase participation rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Free website access: http://www.happinessindicator.com (lastly retrieved on: 2017-07-31)

References

  • Anusic, I., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2016). The validity of the day reconstruction method in the German socio-economic panel study. Social Indicators Research, 1–20.

  • Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Miret, M., Caballero, F. F., Olaya, B., Haro, J. M., Kowal, P., & Chatterji, S. (2013). Multi-country evaluation of affective experience: validation of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method in seven countries. PLoS One, 8(4), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Oerlemans, W., & Sonnentag, S. (2013). Workaholism and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study of leisure activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout, J. J., Helmich, E., Teunissen, P. W., Berg, J. W., Vleuten, C. P., & Jaarsma, A. D. C. (2015). Exploring the factors influencing clinical students’ self-regulated learning. Medical Education, 49(6), 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylsma, L. M., Taylor-Clift, A., & Rottenberg, J. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(1), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Bernston, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (2001). Sensory-perceptual episodic memory and its context: Autobiographical memory. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 356(1413), 1375–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: The uses of experience sampling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In: M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (Chapter 3, pp. 35–54). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., & Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 6(3), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., Delaney, L., Doran, P. P., & MacLachlan, M. (2011). The role of awakening cortisol and psychological distress in diurnal variations in affect: A day reconstruction study. Emotion, 11(3), 524–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekelmann, S., & Born, J. (2010). The memory function of sleep. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2014). Review of the day reconstruction method (DRM). Social Indicators Research, 116, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A. A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, O., Delaney, L., O'Farrelly, C., Fitzpatrick, N., & Daly, M. (2015). Can early intervention improve maternal well-being? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial (Working Paper, No. 2015–015). Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/hka/wpaper/2015-015.html (lastly retrieved on: 2016-03-30).

  • Egloff, B., Tausch, A., Kohlmann, C. W., & Krohne, H. W. (1995). Relationships between time of day, day of the week, and positive mood: Exploring the role of the mood measure. Motivation and Emotion, 19(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galin, D. (1994). The structure of awareness: Contemporary applications of William James' forgotten concept of 'the fringe. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 15(4), 375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Psychometrics of ESM data. In: J. M. Hektner, J. A. Schmidt, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life (chapter 6, pp. 103–122). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Hendriks, M., Ludwigs, K., & Veenhoven, R. (2016). Why are locals happier than internal migrants? The role of daily life. Social Indicators Research, 125(2), 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, P., Stylos-Allan, M., & Walker, M. P. (2006). Sleep facilitates consolidation of emotional declarative memory. Psychological Science, 17(10), 891–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, D., & Lang, F. R. (2015). Subjective acceleration of time experience in everyday life across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1824–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In: D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, &. N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (Chapter 1, pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Ludwigs, K. (2017). Measuring community well-being and individual well-being for public policy: The case of the community well-being atlas. In Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 423-433). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Knabe, A., Rätzel, S., Schöb, R., & Weimann, J. (2010). Dissatisfied with life but having a good day: Time-use and well-being of the unemployed. The Economic Journal, 120(547), 867–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe, A., Schöb, R., & Weimann, J. (2015). Partnership, gender, and the well-being cost of unemployment. Social Indicators Research, 1–21.

  • Kroenke, C. H., Seeman, T., Matthews, K., Adler, N., & Epel, E. (2012). Mood patterns based on momentary assessment of positive and negative moods over a day and coronary artery calcification in the CARDIA study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74(5), 526–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A. & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In: P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of Survey Research (2nd ed.; Chapter 9, pp. 263–314). Bingley, United Kingdom: Emerald.

  • Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8), 1833–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwigs, K. & Erdtmann, S. (2017). The happiness analyzer – A new technique for measuring subjective well-being (working paper). Provided by K. Ludwigs.

  • MacKerron, G. (2012). Happiness economics from 35 000 feet. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(4), 705–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalcea, R. & Liu, H. (2006, March). A corpus-based approach to finding happiness. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs (pp. 139–144).

  • Nishida, M., Pearsall, J., Buckner, R. L., & Walker, M. P. (2009). REM sleep, prefrontal theta, and the consolidation of human emo tional memory. Cerebral Cortex, 19(5), 1158–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyanedel, C. N., Binder, S., Kelemen, E., Petersen, K., Born, J., & Inostroza, M. (2014). Role of slow oscillatory activity and slow wave sleep in consolidation of episodic-like memory in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 27, 5126-5130.

  • Richter, D., & Schupp, J. (2015). The SOEP innovation sample (SOEPIS). Schmollers Jahrbuch, 135(3), 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002a). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002b). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103(4), 734–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakawa, H., Ohtake, F., & Tsutsui, Y. (2015). Activity, time, and subjective happiness: An analysis based on an hourly web survey (Discussion Paper No. 926). Retrieved from: http://www.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/dp/2015/DP0926.pdf (lastly retrieved on: 2016-04-01).

  • Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2016). Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 25, 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., Krueger, A., & Kahneman, D. (2006). A population approach to the study of emotion: Diurnal rhythms of a working day examined with the day reconstruction method. Emotion, 6(1), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Helm, E., Gujar, N., Nishida, M., & Walker, M. P. (2011). Sleep-dependent facilitation of episodic memory details. PLoS One, 6(11), e27421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being (WIDER Discussion Papers No. 2004/07). Retrieved from: http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/52848 (lastly retrieved on: 2016-03-29).

  • Weber, F. D., Wang, J., Born, J., & Inostroza, M. (2014). Sleep benefits in parallel implicit and explicit measures of episodic memory. Learning & Memory, 21(4), 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, I., Diekelmann, S., Molzow, I., Ayoub, A., Mölle, M., & Born, J. (2011). Sleep selectively enhances memory expected to be of future relevance. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(5), 1563–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Happiness Research Organisation, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Kai Ludwigs & Lena Henning

  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Lidia R. Arends

Authors
  1. Kai Ludwigs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lena Henning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lidia R. Arends
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Ludwigs.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

We hereby confirm that no one of the authors has any conflict of interest with this publication. Additionally, we declare that this research was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki which explains all main rules for human research ethics.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ludwigs, K., Henning, L. & Arends, L.R. Using the Day Reconstruction Method - Same Results when Used at the End of the Day or on the Next Day?. Int. Journal of Com. WB 2, 61–73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00017-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-019-00017-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation