Abstract
The steady decline in secondary students’ achievement and interest in science and mathematics is an area of concern for governments, industry, and the education sector. Increasing student engagement in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines is a top priority if countries are to meet demands for STEM based expertise in the current and future workforce. Amongst strategies to address such concerns, peer mentoring programs have gained increased popularity. Although previous research shows that mentoring can be a successful strategy, the processes that underpin positive outcomes for participants remain largely underexplored. This paper responds to calls for research on mentoring processes linked to effectiveness in STEM peer mentoring programs. We explore the development of mentoring relationships in an online near peer mentoring program between university students and regional secondary school students. We analysed qualitative and quantitative data on mentors’ perceptions of relationship quality and mentee engagement, and their use of mentoring strategies, over a 9-week period. Implications for online mentoring are discussed, including a model to facilitate university-to-school mentoring to increase students’ engagement in STEM disciplines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akinla, O., Hagan, P., & Atiomo, W. (2018). A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(98), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1195-1.
Beaumont, T. J., Mannion, A. P., & Shen, B. O. (2012). From the campus to the cloud: the online peer assisted learning scheme. Journal of Peer Learning, 5(1), 20–31.
Bowling, B., Doyle, M., Taylor, J., & Antes, A. (2015). Professionalizing the role of peer leaders in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 16, 30–39.
Brennan, S. E., & Lockridge, C. B. (2006). Computer-mediated communication: A cognitive science approach. In K. Brown (Ed.), ELL2, encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 775–780). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd..
Capstick, S. (2004). Benefits and shortcomings of Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) in higher education: An appraisal by students. Paper presented at the peer assisted learning conference, Bournemoth University, January 2014. https://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/stuart-capstick.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.
Chidambaram, L. (1997). Relational developments in computer-supported groups. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 20(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/249476.
Commonwealth of Australia (2015). Vision for a science nation. Responding to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Australia's future. http://www.science.gov.au/scienceGov/news/Documents/VisionForAScienceNationRespondingToSTEMAustraliasFuture.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Cutucache, C. E., Luhr, J. L., Nelson, K. L., Grandgenett, N. F., & Tapprich, W. E. (2016). NE STEM 4U: An out-of-school time academic program to improve achievement of socioeconomically disadvantaged youth in STEM areas. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0037-0.
Dioso-Henson, L. (2012). The effect of reciprocal peer tutoring and non-reciprocal peer tutoring on the performance of students in college physics. Research in Education, 87(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.87.1.3.
Dubois, D. L., & Neville, H. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199705)25:3<227::AID-JCOP1>3.0.CO;2-T.
DuBois, D., Holloway, B., Valentine, J., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014628810714.
DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611414806.
Ebby, L. T., Butts, M. M., Durley, J., & Ragins, B. R. (2010). Are bad experiences stronger than good ones in mentoring relationships? Evidence from the protégé and mentor perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.02.010.
Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: new directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00044-7.
Feldhaus, C., & Bentrem, K. (2015). STEM mentoring and the use of the principles of adult mentoring inventory. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-11-2014-0039.
Garcia-Melgar, A., East, J., & Meyers, N. (2015). Hiding in plain sight: The ‘relationship’ in peer assisted learning in higher education. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Special Edition Academic Peer Learning. http://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/361. .
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Goldner, L., & Mayseless, O. (2009). The quality of mentoring relationships and mentoring success. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(10), 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9345-0.
Gregg, N., Wolfe, G., Jones, S., Todd, R., Moon, N., & Langston, C. (2016). STEM E-mentoring and community college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(1), 47–63.
Hizer, S. E., Schultz, P. W., & Bray, R. (2017). Supplemental instruction online: as effective as the traditional face-to-face model? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9655-z.
Karcher, M. J., Nakkula, M. J., & Harris, J. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: correspondence between mentors’ and mentees’ assessments of relationship quality. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1847-x.
Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/73153/ .
Leidenfrost, B., Strassnig, B., Schabmann, A., Spiel, C., & Carbon, C.-C. (2011). Peer mentoring styles and their contribution to academic success among mentees: a person-oriented study in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2011.597122.
Lockspeiser, T. M., O'Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Science Education Theory and Practice, 13(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9049-8.
Nelson, K., Sabel, J., Forbes, C., Grandgenett, N., Tapprich, W., & Cutucache, C. (2017). How do undergraduate STEM mentors reflect upon their mentoring experiences in an outreach program engaging K-8 youth? International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0057-4.
Newhouse, C. P. (2017). STEM the boredom: engage students in the Australian curriculum using ICT with problem-based learning and assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4.
Nora, A., & Crisp, G. (2007). Mentoring students: conceptualizing and validating the multi-dimensions of a support system. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 9(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.9.3.e.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2012). Strengthening education for innovation. https://www.oecd.org/sti/outlook/e-outlook/stipolicyprofiles/humanresources/strengtheningeducationforinnovation.htm.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Pluth, M. D., Boettcher, S. W., Nazin, G. V., Greenaway, A. L., & Hartle, M. D. (2015). Collaboration and near-peer mentoring as a platform for sustainable science education outreach. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(4), 625–630.
Rhodes, J. E., Reddy, R., Roffman, J., & Grossman, J. (2005). Promoting successful youth mentoring relationships: a preliminary screening questionnaire. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-005-1849-8.
Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., Keller, T. E., Liang, B., & Noam, G. (2006). A model for the influence of mentoring relationships on youth development. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(6), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20124.
Rhodes, J. E., Lowe, S. R., & Schwartz, S. E. O. (2011). Mentor relationships. Encyclopedia of Adolescence, 2, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-373951-3.00070-3.
Riese, H., Samara, A., & Lillejord, S. (2012). Peer relations in peer learning. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(5), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.605078.
Robnett, R. D., Nelson, P. A., Zurbriggen, E. L., Crosby, F. J., & Chemers, M. M. (2018). Research mentoring and scientist identity: Insights from undergraduates and their mentors. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20326.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of mentoring research: integration with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9233-3.
Schwartzman, R. (2013). Reviving a digital dinosaur: Text-only synchronous online chats and peer tutoring in communication centers. College Student Journal, 47(4), 653–667. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/157493/ .
Scogin, S. C. (2016). Identifying the factors leading to success: How an innovative science curriculum cultivates student motivation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9600-6.
Scogin, S. C., & Stuessy, C. L. (2015). Encouraging greater student inquiry engagement in science through motivational support by online scientist-mentors. Science Education, 99(2), 312–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21145.
Sharpe, R., Abrahams, I., & Fotou, N. (2018). Does paired mentoring work? A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1355783.
Sherman, S., & Camilli, G. (2014). Evaluation of an online mentoring program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(2), 107–119.
Shpigelman, C.-N., & Gill, C. J. (2013). The characteristics of unsuccessful e-mentoring relationships for youth with disabilities. Qualitative Health Research, 23(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312469115.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70.
Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Computers & Education, 69, 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.032.
Ten Cate, O., & Durning, S. (2007). Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701583816.
Ten Cate, O., van de Vorst, I., & van den Broek, S. (2012). Academic achievement of students tutored by near-peers. International Journal of Medical Education, 3, 6–13. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4f0c.9ed2.
Tenenbaum, L. S., Anderson, M. K., Jett, M., & Yourick, D. L. (2014). An innovative near-peer mentoring model for undergraduate and secondary students: STEM focus. Innovative Higher Education, 39(5), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9286-3.
Top**, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: a framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc1202_03.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3/. .
Ward, E. G., Thomas, E. E., & Disch, W. B. (2014). Mentor service themes emergent in a holistic, undergraduate peer-mentoring experience. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0058.
Zaniewski, A. M., & Reinholz, D. (2016). Increasing STEM success: a near-peer mentoring program in the physical sciences. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0043-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (La Trobe University Human Research Ethics committee, reference number S16–124) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 709 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Melgar, A., Meyers, N. STEM Near Peer Mentoring for Secondary School Students: a Case Study of University Mentors’ Experiences with Online Mentoring. Journal for STEM Educ Res 3, 19–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00024-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00024-9