SpringerLink
Log in

Biofouling Community Development on Commercial Cage Nets Submerged in a Cage Aquaculture Facility in the Red Sea

  • Published:
Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The colonization of biofouling organisms is a significant problem for the aquaculture installations which affect the economy of the fish farms and wellbeing of the cultured fish. In this study, the colonization of biofouling organisms on cage aquaculture nets submerged near to the existing floating cages was analysed for a period of one year from June 2017 to May 2018. Cage net panels were fitted onto an iron frame and submerged at 1 m depth near to existing aquaculture cages. The biofouling organisms found on the panels mainly consisted of macroalgae, bivalves, bryozoans, hydrozoans and ascidians. Some other epifauna like brittle stars, polychaetes, amphipods, crabs, gastropods were also occurred more occasionally on the nets. Recruitment of green algae and brown algae were observed from the first month of net panel exposure. Bivalves and ascidians were developed from the second month. Hydrozoans and bryozoans appeared on the nets after 7 months of panel deployment. Results also revealed that ascidians and bivalves were the dominant fouling organisms in most of the sampling months during this study period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarzua S, Jakubowski S (1995) Biotechnological investigation for the prevention of biofouling. I. Biological and biochemical principles for prevention of biofouling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 123:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almatar SM, Carpenter KE, Jackson R, Alhazeem SH, Alsaffar AH, Ghaffar ARA, Carpenter C (1993) Observations on the pearl oyster fishery of Kuwait. J Shellfish Res 12:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Balqadi AA, Salama AJ, Satheesh S (2018) Microfouling development on artificial substrates deployed in the Central Red Sea. Oceanologia 60:219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2017.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloecher N, Olsen Y, Guenther J (2013) Variability of biofouling communities on fish cage nets: a 1 year field study at a Norwegian salmon farm. Aquaculture 413-417:302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Belmar M, Escurriola A, Milisenda G, Fuentes VL, Piraino S (2019) Harmful fouling communities on fish farms in the SW Mediterranean Sea: composition, growth and reproductive periods. J Mar Sci Eng 7:288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7090288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite RA, McEvoy LA (2005) Marine bio-fouling on fish farms and its remediation. Adv Mar Biol 47:215–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard SG, Davis CV, Shumway SE (2013) Seasonal patterns of ascidian settlement at an aquaculture facility in the Damariscotta River, Maine. J Shellfish Res 32:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burridge L, Weis JS, Cabello F, Pizarro J, Bostick K (2010) Chemical use in salmon aquaculture: a review of current practices and possible environmental effects. Aquaculture 306:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bwathondi POJ, Ngoile MAK (1982) Bivalves fouling floating cages used in aquaculture. Indian J Mar Sci 11:283–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacabelos E, Olabarria C, Incera M, Troncoso JS (2010) Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 89:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camps M, Briand JF, Guentas-Dombrowsky L, Culioli G, Bazire A, Blache Y (2011) Antifouling activity of commercial biocides vs. natural and natural-derived products assessed by marine bacteria adhesion bioassay. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.02.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Liu Q, Zhuo W, Liu W, Li Z, Tang M (2018) The characteristic patterns of macrofaunal fouling assemblages in nearshore waters of the South China Sea. J Ocean Univ China 17:1142–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner R, Ham D, Bron J, Telfer T (2007) Qualitative assessment of initial biofouling on fish nets used in marine cage aquaculture. Aquac Res 38:660–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Camillo CG, Giordano G, Bo M, Betti F, Mori M, Puce S, Bavestrello G (2013) Seasonal patterns in the abundance of Ectopleura crocea (Cnidaria: hydrozoa) on a shipwreck in the northern Adriatic. Mar Ecol 34:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dürr S, Watson DI (2010) Biofouling and antifouling in aquaculture. In: Thomason JC (ed) Durr S. Biofouling, Wiley- Blackwell, pp 267–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CD, Kylee I, Pawlik A, Cross SF (2015) The effectiveness of several commercial antifouling treatments at reducing biofouling on fin fish aquaculture cages in British Columbia. Aquac Res 46:2225–2235. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitridge I, Dempster T, Guenther J, de Nys R (2012) The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: a review. Biofouling 28:649–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floerl O, Sunde LM, Bloecher N (2016) Potential environmental risks associated with biofouling management in salmon aquaculture. Aquacult Environ Interact 8:407–417. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM, Connell SD (2001) Orientation and position of substrata have large effects on epibiotic assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther J, Misimi E, Sunde LM (2010) The development of biofouling, particularly the hydroid Ectopleura larynx, on commercial salmon cage nets in mid-Norway. Aquaculture 300:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson SL, Lewis TE, Burke CM (1997) Biofouling of fish-cage netting: efficacy and problems of in situ cleaning. Aquaculture 152:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson SL, Burke CM, Bissett AP (2000) Biofouling of fish-cage netting: the efficacy of a silicone coating and the effect of netting colour. Aquaculture 184:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James RJ, Underwood AJ (1994) Influence of colour of substratum on recruitment of spirorbid tubeworms to different types of intertidal boulders. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr A, Cowling MJ, Beveridge CM, Smith MJ, Parr ACS, Head RM, Davenport J, Hodgkiess T (1998) The early stages of marine biofouling and its effect on two types of optical sensors. Environ Int 24:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehl MRA (2007) Mini review: hydrodynamics of larval settlement into fouling communities. Biofouling 23:357–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010701492250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lader P, Dempster T, Fredheim A, Jensen O (2008) Current induced net deformations in full-scale cages for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquac Eng 38:52–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Wang J, Liu W, Liu K, Zhang S, He X, Huang Y, Lin J, Mou J, Zheng C, Yan T (2017) Fouling community characteristics in subtropical coastal waters of the southwestern East China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin 36:70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1007-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magin CM, Cooper SP, Brennan AB (2010) Non-toxic antifouling strategies. Mater Non-toxic Antifoul Strat Today 13:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martell L, Bracale R, Carrion SA, Purcell JE, Lezzi M, Gravili C, Piraino S, Boero F (2018) Successional dynamics of marine fouling hydroids (Cnidaria: hydrozoa) at a finfish aquaculture facility in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS One 13:e0195352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed SZ, Yassien MH (2003) Population parameters of the pearl oyster Pinctada radiata (leach) in Qatari waters, Arabian gulf. Turkish J Zool 27:339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou M, Neofitou N, Skordas K, Castritsi-Catharios I, Tziantziou L (2014) Fish farming and anti-fouling paints: a potential source of cu and Zn in farmed fish. Aquacult Environ Interact 5:163–171. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nydam M, Stachowicz JJ (2007) Predator effects on fouling community development. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira DND, Christofoletti RA, Barreto RE (2015) Feeding behavior of a crab according to Cheliped number. PLoS One 10:e0145121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman RW, Whitlatch RB, Malatesta RJ (1992) Potential role of micro-predators in determining recruitment into a marine community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers MJ, Peterson CH, Summerson HC, Powers SP (2007) Macroalgal growth on bivalve aquaculture netting enhances nursery habitat for mobile invertebrates and juvenile fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:109–122. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps339109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez SR, Ojeda FP, Inestrosa NC (1993) Settlement of benthicmarine invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 97:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salama AJ, Satheesh S, Balqadi AA (2018a) Biofouling community development on nylon net panels submerged in the Central Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia. Cah Biol Mar 59:517–525. https://doi.org/10.21411/CBM.A.EA4208FE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salama AJ, Satheesh S, Balqadi AA (2018b) Development of biofouling communities on nylon net panels submerged in the Central Red Sea: effects of season and depth. Thalassas 34:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-017-0052-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satheesh S, Wesley SG (2008) Seasonal variability of fouling community recruitment in Kudankulam coastal waters, east coast India. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 79:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satheesh S, Wesley SG (2010) Biofilm development on acrylic coupons during the initial 24 hour period of submersion in a tropical coastal environment. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 39:28–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10009-010-0012-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satheesh S, Ba-akdah MA, Al-Sofyani AA (2016) Natural antifouling compound production by microbes associated with marine macroorganisms — a review. Electron J Biotechnol 21:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2016.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddik AA, Al-Sofyani AA, Ba-Akdah MA, Satheesh S (2019) Invertebrate recruitment on artificial substrates in the Red Sea: role of substrate type and orientation. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 99:741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor GT, Zheng D, Lee M, Troy PJ, Gyananath G, Sharma SK (1997) Influence of surface properties on accumulation of conditioning films and marine bacteria on substrata exposed to oligotrophic waters. Biofouling 11:31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOI (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) (1952) Marine fouling and its prevention. United States Naval Institute, Annapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wronski T (2010) The molluscan bio-fouling community on the Red Sea pearl oyster beds: (Mollusca: Pteriidae). Zool Middle East 51:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K (2004) Antifouling technology— past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coat 50:75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. G-447-150-38. The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge the DSR for technical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Mohammad Abdulaziz Ba-Akdah, Sathianeson Satheesh & Mohsen M. O. El-Sherbiny

Authors
  1. Mohammad Abdulaziz Ba-Akdah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sathianeson Satheesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsen M. O. El-Sherbiny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sathianeson Satheesh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ba-Akdah, M.A., Satheesh, S. & El-Sherbiny, M.M.O. Biofouling Community Development on Commercial Cage Nets Submerged in a Cage Aquaculture Facility in the Red Sea. Thalassas 36, 667–675 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00235-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00235-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation