Abstract
An empirical likelihood based test for comparing the incidence functions for multiple competing risks is proposed, without making any assumptions on the distribution of the failure times. The performance of the proposed method is assessed based on large number of simulations and compared with existing method. Simulation studies shows that the proposed method has comparable performance when there is no censoring and has better performance where there is heavy censoring. We applied our proposed method in a well known data set.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41096-020-00089-5/MediaObjects/41096_2020_89_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aly EAA, Kochar SC, McKeague IW (1998) Some tests for comparing cumulative incidence function and cause specific hazard frates. J Am Stat Assoc 89:994–999
Chen J, Variyath AM, Abraham B (2008) Adjusted empirical likelihood and its properties. J Comput Gr Stat 17:426–443
Crowder MJ (2001) Classical competing risks. Chapman and Hall, London
Davis TP, Lawrance AJ (1989) The likelihood for competing risks survival analysis. Scand J Stat 16:23–28
Dewan I, Kulathinal S (2007) On testing dependence between time to failure and cause of failure when causes of failure are missing. PLoS ONE 2(12):e1255
El Barmi H (2004) Inference for subsurvival functions under order restrictions. J Stat Plan Inference 11:145–165
Einmahl JH, McKeague IW (2003) Empirical likelihood based hypothesis testing. Bernoulli 9(2):267–290
El Barmi H, Kochar S (2002) Inference for sub-survival functions under order restricrions. J Indian Stat Assoc 40:85–103
El Barmi H, Mukerjee H (2006) Restricted estimation of the cumulative incidence functions corresponding to competing risks. Lecture notes-monograph series, pp 241–252
El Barmi H, Kochar S, Tsimikas J (2006) Likelihood ratio tests for and against ordering of the cumulative incidence functions in multiple competing risks and discrete mark variable models. J Stat Plan Inference 136(5):1588–1607
Hinds PA (1996) Reliability analysis and techniques for equipment management. MSc dissertation, City University, London, UK
Hoel DG (1972) A representation of mortality data by competing risks. Biometrics 28:475–488
Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York
Lawless JF (2003) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. Wiley, New York
Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval for a single functional. Biometrika 75:237–249
Owen AB (2001) Empirical likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York
Qin J, Lawless J (1994) Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann Stat 22:300–325
Sankaran PG, Nair NU, Sreedevi EP (2010) A quantile based test for comparing cumulative incidence functions. Stat Probab Lett 80:886–891
Sreedevi EP, Sankaran PG, Dhanavanthan P (2014) A nonparametric test for comparing cumulative incidence function of current status competing risks data. J Stat Theory Pract 8:743–759
Sun Y (2001) Generalized nonparametric test procedures for comparing multiple cause-specific hazard rate. J Nonparam Stat 13:171–207
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editor and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments and suggestions that substantially improved the overall quality of an earlier version of this paper. Dr. Variyath’s research was supported by a grant from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Dr. Sankaran’s research was supported by a grant from Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Variyath, A.M., Sankaran, P.G. Empirical Likelihood Based Test for Equality of Cumulative Incidence Functions. J Indian Soc Probab Stat 21, 427–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-020-00089-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-020-00089-5