Log in

Effect of shrinkage-controlled polymer-modified binders (SC-PMB) on the bond strength of repaired structural concrete

  • Practice-oriented paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concrete structures get damaged over time, due to being subjected to various environmental exposures, improper design, management, and poor material durability. Portland cement mortars have been used as a repair material; however, it is both uneconomical and not eco-friendly due to high embodied carbon. Recently, polymer-modified binders have gained interest for their application in the repair of concrete structures. This research investigated the effectiveness of shrinkage-controlled polymer-modified binders (SC-PMB) in improving the bond strength of repaired structural concrete. The efficiency of the SC-PMB was investigated by performing a splitting tensile strength test on a concrete specimen prepared at two different mix ratios, i.e., 1:2:4 and 1:1.5:3 with 0.55, 0.50, and 0.475 water–cement (w/c) ratio. The fractured concrete samples were repaired with cement mortar (CM), cement paste (CP), polymer mortar (PM), and polymer paste (PP). It was observed that structural concrete repaired with polymer binders (PM and PP) showed greater performance in improving bond strength in tension. Particularly, structural concrete repaired with PP presented > 100% higher bond strength values in tension compared to CP, PM and CM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

PC:

Portland cement

PMM:

Polymer-modified mortar

PMBs:

Polymer-modified binders

SC-PMB:

Shrinkage-controlled polymer-modified binders

w/c :

Water to cement ratio

CM:

Cement mortar

CP:

Cement paste

PM:

Polymer mortar

PP:

Polymer paste

BS:

Bond strength

References

  1. Monteiro PJ, Miller SA, Horvath A (2017) Towards sustainable concrete. Nat Mater 16(7):698–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prasad D, Pandey A, Kumar B (2021) Sustainable production of recycled concrete aggregates by lime treatment and mechanical abrasion for M40 grade concrete. Constr Build Mater 268:121119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Memon IA, Jhatial AA, Sohu S, Lakhiar MT, Khaskheli ZH (2018) Influence of fibre length on the behaviour of polypropylene fibre reinforced cement concrete. Civ Eng J 4(9):2124–2131. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-03091144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pakravan HR, Jamshidi M, Latifi M (2018) The effect of hydrophilic (polyvinyl alcohol) fiber content on the flexural behavior of engineered cementitious composites (ECC). J Text Inst 109(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2017.1329132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jhatial AA, Sohu S, Bhatti N, Lakhiar MT, Oad R (2018) Effect of steel fibres on the compressive and flexural strength of concrete. Int J Adv Appl Sci 5(10):16–21. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2018.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jhatial AA, Serdar M, Ye G (2020) Review on concrete under combined environmental actions and possibilities for application to alkali activated materials. Ponašanje betona pri kombiniranom djelovanju okoliša i mogućnosti primjene na alkalno-aktivirane materijale. https://doi.org/10.5592/CO/PhDSym.2020.09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey A, Kumar B (2019) Evaluation of water absorption and chloride ion penetration of rice straw ash and microsilica admixed pavement quality concrete. Heliyon 5(8):e02256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandey A, Kumar B (2019) Effects of rice straw ash and micro silica on mechanical properties of pavement quality concrete. J. Build. Eng. 26:100

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar R, Shafiq N, Kumar A, Jhatial AA (2021) Investigating embodied carbon, mechanical properties, and durability of high-performance concrete using ternary and quaternary blends of metakaolin, nano-silica, and fly ash. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13918-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaikh FUA (2018) Effect of cracking on corrosion of steel in concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 12(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0234-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teixeira OG, Geraldo RH, da Silva FG, Gonçalves JP, Camarini G (2019) Mortar type influence on mechanical performance of repaired reinforced concrete beams. Constr Build Mater 217:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weng T-L (2017) Evaluation of cementitious repair mortars modified with polymers. Adv Mech Eng 9(1):168781401668858. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016688584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ribeiro MCS, Ferreira AJM, Marques AT (2009) Effect of natural and artificial weathering on the long-term flexural performance of polymer mortars. Mech Compos Mater 45(5):515–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-009-9104-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang R, Zhang L (2015) Mechanism and durability of repair systems in polymer-modified cement mortars. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2015:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/594672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen DH, Won M (2015) Field performance with state-of-the-art patching repair material. Constr Build Mater 93:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ion I, BarrosoAguiar J, Angelescu N, Stanciu D (2013) Properties of polymer modified concrete in fresh and hardened state. Adv Mater Res 687:204–212. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.687.204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim MO (2020) Influence of polymer types on the mechanical properties of polymer-modified cement mortars. Appl Sci 10(3):1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Zahrani M, Maslehuddin M, Al-Dulaijan S, Ibrahim M (2003) Mechanical properties and durability characteristics of polymer- and cement-based repair materials. Cem Concr Compos 25(4–5):527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00092-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SK, Yang DS (2005) Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams with cementitious repair materials. Mater Struct 38(3):329–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thirumurugan S, Sivakumar A (2013) Synergistic interaction of polypropylene fibres in latex modified high strength concrete. Arch Civ Eng 59(3):321–335. https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2013-0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diamanti MV, Brenna A, Bolzoni F, Berra M, Pastore T, Ormellese M (2013) Effect of polymer modified cementitious coatings on water and chloride permeability in concrete. Constr Build Mater 49:720–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jo Y-K (2020) Adhesion in tension of polymer cement mortar by curing conditions using polymer dispersions as cement modifier. Constr Build Mater 242:118134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu H, Zhu M, Liu Z, Yin J (2015) Develo** a polymer-based crack repairing material using interpenetrate polymer network (IPN) technology. Constr Build Mater 84:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tokushige H, Kawakami M, Todate H, Doiuchi K (2000) Stress and deformation of concrete members repaired by polymer mortar. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 21:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yubin S, Huicai X, Wei D (2006) A new method of controlling shrinkage cracking in repaired concrete structures using an interface layer of carbon fiber reinforced cement mortar. Comput Mater Contin 3(2):49–54. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmc.2006.003.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karimaei M, Dabbaghi F, Sadeghi-Nik A, Dehestani M (2020) Mechanical performance of green concrete produced with untreated coal waste aggregates. Constr Build Mater 233:117264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pandey A, Kumar B (2020) A comprehensive investigation on application of microsilica and rice straw ash in rigid pavement. Constr Build Mater 252:119053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shafiq N, Kumar R, Zahid M, Tufail RF (2019) Effects of modified metakaolin using nano-silica on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Materials 12(14):2291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12142291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar R, MohdYaseen AYB, Shafiq N, Jalal A (2017) Influence of metakaolin, fly ash and nano silica on mechanical and durability properties of concrete. Key Eng Mater 744:8–14. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.744.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rahman MM, Jumat MZ, Hosen MA, Islam ABMS (2016) Effect of adhesive replacement with cement mortar on NSM strengthened RC Beam. Revista de la construcción 15(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-915X2016000100006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tahri W, Samet B, Pacheco-Torgal F, Aguiar J, Baklouti S (2018) Geopolymeric repair mortars based on a low reactive clay. In: Eco-efficient repair and rehabilitation of concrete infrastructures. Elsevier, pp 293–313

  32. Emmons PH, Vaysburd AM (1996) System concept in design and construction of durable concrete repairs. Constr Build Mater 10(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00065-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jhatial AA, Goh WI, Mastoi AK, Rahman AF, Kamaruddin S (2021) Thermo-mechanical properties and sustainability analysis of newly developed eco-friendly structural foamed concrete by reusing palm oil fuel ash and eggshell powder as supplementary cementitious materials. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13435-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pacheco-Torgal F, Jalali S, Labrincha J, John V (2013) Eco-efficient concrete. Woodhead Publishing

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Sang G, Zhu Y, Yang G (2016) Mechanical properties of high porosity cement-based foam materials modified by EVA. Constr Build Mater 112:648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yahia A (2011) Shear-thickening behavior of high-performance cement grouts—influencing mix-design parameters. Cem Concr Res 41(3):230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim H-J, Park J-Y, Suh H-W, Cho B-Y, Park W-J, Bae S-C (2019) Mechanical degradation and thermal decomposition of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) polymer-modified cement mortar (PCM) exposed to high-temperature. Sustainability 11(2):500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Susilorini RMIR, Rejeki VGS, Santosa B, Caresta FD, Putro MS (2018) Polymer modified mortar with bonding adhesive agent for column repairing in tidal flooding prone area. AIP Conf Proc 1977:030049. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. ASTM C150/C150M-20 (2020) Standard specification for Portland cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  40. ASTM C33/C33M, A. (2013) Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fospak. Expanmortar S. http://fospak.com/files/expanchem/group4/ExpanmortarS.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2020

  42. ASTM C192/C192M-19 (2019) Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  43. ASTM C230/C230M-20 (2020) Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  44. ASTM C496/C496M-17 (2017) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors highly acknowledge Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, for providing research facilities to conduct this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. RK: Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. SAA: Investigation, Data Analysis. AAJ: Writing - Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabinder Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Almani, S.A. et al. Effect of shrinkage-controlled polymer-modified binders (SC-PMB) on the bond strength of repaired structural concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 181 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00545-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00545-6

Keywords

Navigation