Log in

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Studies on the Central-East of Iran—Kerman Region

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seismic hazard analysis of the earthquake-prone eastern of Iran—Kerman regions—has become more important due to its growing economic importance. Many cities in that region have experienced life and financial losses due to major earthquakes in recent years. Therefore, in this study, the goal was to estimate the seismic hazard curves and site-specific spectrums with probabilistic approaches for the Kerman region. The main faults in the region were identified, earthquake catalogues, declustered catalogues and seismic parameters were obtained. The earthquake parameters were calculated for active faults using the earthquake ground motion levels with several ground motion predicting (attenuation) models. The spectral acceleration coefficients were calculated and site-specific acceleration spectrum were depicted and compared. The findings showed that the peak ground acceleration values varied between 0.13 and 0.33 g for earthquakes, with a 10% probability of exceedance in 50-year period and 0.27–0.53 g for a probability of 2%. Seismic hazard curves were developed, this curve would help engineers in design of earthquake resistant structures for the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • 7, A (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10

  • Akkar S, Kale Ö, Yakut A, Ceken U (2018) Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3439–3463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST, Perkins D, Thenhaus P, Hanson S, Bender B (1982) Probabilistic estimates of maximum acceleration and velocity in rock in the contiguous United States (2331–1258)

  • Berberian M, Navai I (1977) Naghan (Chahar Mahal Bakhtiari-High Zagros, Iran) earthquake of 6 April 1977: a preliminary field report and a seismotectonic. Contribution to the seismotectonics of Iran (part II–III). In: Commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the pahlavi dynasty (39–40), 51

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(1):314–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candia G, Macedo J, Jaimes MA, Magna-Verdugo C (2019) A new state-of-the-art platform for probabilistic and deterministic seismic hazard assessment. Seismol Res Lett 90(6):2262–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley A, Jackson J (2006) Active tectonics of the Turkish‐Iranian plateau. Tectonics 25(6)

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das R, Wason H, Sharma ML (2011) Global regression relations for conversion of surface wave and body wave magnitudes to moment magnitude. Nat Hazards 59(2):801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das R, Wason H, Sharma ML (2013) General orthogonal regression relations between body-wave and moment magnitudes. Seismol Res Lett 84(2):219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhoudi G, Karig D (1977) Makran of Iran and Pakistan as an active arc system. Geology 5(11):664–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foyouzati A (2023) Analytical study on seismic strengthening of reinforced concrete frame equipped with steel dam** system with shear mechanism fuse. Asian J Civ Eng 25(1):1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00820-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foyouzati A, Rahimzadeh Rofooei F (2023) Seismic hazard assessment studies based on developed deterministic and probabilistic approaches for the central-east of Iran region. World J Eng. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-04-2023-0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foyouzati A, Khaloo A (2024a) Analytical study on behaviour of self-centered concrete walls using novel multi—objective artificial neural network. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

  • Foyouzati A, Khaloo A (2024b) Comprehensive analytical studies on seismic performance of concrete structures equipped with self-centered hybrid wall system in moderate to high seismic hazard zones. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01913-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foyouzati A, Khaloo A (2024c) Response prediction of self-centered concrete walls using artificial neural networks. Sustain Resil Infrastruct

  • Gardner J, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani M (2021) The geology of Iran: tectonic, magmatism and metamorphism. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock KM, Zhang P (1999) The GSHAP global seismic hazard map

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (Second paper). Bull Seismol Soc Am 46(2):105–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harirchian E, Lahmer T (2020) Improved rapid visual earthquake hazard safety evaluation of existing buildings using a type-2 fuzzy logic model. Appl Sci 10(7):2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harirchian E, Lahmer T, Buddhiraju S, Mohammad K, Mosavi A (2020) Earthquake safety assessment of buildings through rapid visual screening. Buildings 10(3):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessami K, Jamali F, Tabassi H (2003) Major active faults of Iran. IIEES, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • Işık E, Işık MF, Bülbül MA (2017) Web based evaluation of earthquake damages for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Struct 13(4):423–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J, Haines J, Holt W (1995) The accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia plate convergence in Iran. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100(B8):15205–15219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston AC (1996) Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—III. New madrid 1811–1812 Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755. Geophys J Int 126(2):314–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayabali K (2002) Modeling of seismic hazard for Turkey using the recent neotectonic data. Eng Geol 63(3–4):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klügel J-U (2008) Seismic hazard analysis—Quo Vadis? Earth Sci Rev 88(1–2):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsovos MD, Baka A, Vougioukas E (2003) Earthquake-resistant design of reinforced concrete structures: shortcomings of current methods. Struct J 100(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinitzsky EL (1995) Deterministic versus probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for critical structures. Eng Geol 40(1–2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrin A, Peresan A, Kronrod T, Vaccari F, Panza G (2017) Neo-deterministic seismic hazard assessment and earthquake occurrence rate. Eng Geol 229:95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (2001) Deterministic versus probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21(5):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (2008) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: early history. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(3):329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire R, Arabasz W (1990) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: Geotechnical an environmental geophysics: Volume I: review and tutorial. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 333–354

  • Mirzaei N, Mengtan G, Yuntai C (1998) Seismic source regionalization for seismic zoning of Iran: major Seismotectonic Provinces. J Earthq Predict Res 7:465–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Moehle J, Deierlein GG (2004) A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In: Paper presented at the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Nath S, Thingbaijam K (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India. Seismol Res Lett 83(1):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilforoushan F, Masson F, Vernant P, Vigny C, Martinod J, Abbassi M, Tavakoli F (2003) GPS network monitors the Arabia-Eurasia collision deformation in Iran. J Geodesy 77(7):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1971) Seismo-tectonics of the Persian plateau, eastern Turkey, Caucasus, and Hindu-Kush regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61(2):317–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1972) Focal mechanism of earthquakes in Persia, Turkey, West Pakistan, and Afghanistan and plate tectonics of the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62(3):823–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi AA (1976) Seismotectonic provinces of Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66(4):1249–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Panza GF, Vaccari F, Cazzaro R (1999) Deterministic seismic hazard assessment. In: Vrancea earthquakes: tectonics, hazard and risk mitigation. Springer, pp 269–286

  • Parish S (1999) Uniform building code compliance manual: 1997 uniform building code. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing

  • Priestley K, Baker C, Jackson J (1994) Implications of earthquake focal mechanism data for the active tectonics of the South Caspian Basin and surrounding regions. Geophys J Int 118(1):111–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri ST, Malik OA (2021) Establishing site response-based micro-zonation by applying machine learning techniques on ambient noise data: a case study from Northern Potwar Region, Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 80:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri ST, Sajjad S, Sheikh R, Rehman K, Rafi Z, Nawaz B, Haider W (2015) Ambient noise measurements in Rawalpindi-Islamabad, twin cities of Pakistan: a step towards site response analysis to mitigate impact of natural hazard. Nat Hazards 78:1111–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri ST, Mirza MQ, Raja A, Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Hakimi MH, Ali SH, Khan MY (2023) Application of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment to understand the earthquake hazard in Attock City, Pakistan: a step towards linking hazards and sustainability. Sustainability 15(2):1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouhollahi R, Ghayamghamian M, Yaminifard F, Suhadolc P, Tatar M (2012) Source process and slip model of 2005 Dahuiyeh-Zarand earthquake (Iran) using inversion of near-field strong motion data. Geophys J Int 189(1):669–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadigh K, Chang C-Y, Egan J, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scordilis E (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. J Seismolog 10(2):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp J (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Microzonazion, Seattle

  • Stoecklin J (1968) Structural history and tectonics of Iran: a review. AAPG Bull 52(7):1229–1258

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebi M, Sivandi-Pour A, Esmaeili S, Soghrat MR, Safizadeh H, Ebrahimi E, Farsangi EN (2022) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard microzonation maps at the surface level for central-east Iran (Kerman region), using a hybrid site condition model. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 159:107354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talha Qadri S, Aminul Islam M, Shalaby M, Khattak KR, Sajjad S (2017) Characterizing site response in the Attock Basin, Pakistan, using microtremor measurement analysis. Arab J Geosci 10:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrhammer R (1986) Characteristics of northern and central California seismicity. Earthq Notes 57(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Jackson J (2004) Active tectonics and late Cenozoic strain distribution in central and eastern Iran. Tectonics 23(5)

  • Waseem M, Lateef A, Ahmad I, Khan S, Ahmed W (2019) Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan. J Seismolog 23:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakut A (2004) Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings. Eng Struct 26(10):1447–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Foyouzati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foyouzati, A. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment Studies on the Central-East of Iran—Kerman Region. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01428-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01428-3

Keywords

Navigation