Introduction

Alkali-activated aluminosilicate powders can be used to produce inorganic binders suitable to replace Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC): the resulting materials are known as “geopolymers.” Their use is generally accepted in many technological applications such as i. manufacturing of engineering structures [1,2,3,4,5]; ii. entrapment of industrial by products [6,7,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].

The present experimental investigation, which deals with the production of geopolymers containing waste OS, should take account of some additional reactive material carried into the geopolymeric process by the fine fraction of the waste during the geopolymerization process [38,39,40,41]. However, at this stage, it is not possible to evaluate which is their effective contribution on the feature of the resulting materials.

Starting Materials Properties

In this research, geopolymer plays as binder medium therefore the analysis of the starting materials used for geopolymerization as well as the resulted chemical and crystallographic composition of geopolymers are not reported in the present manuscript because they can be found in the previous papers [16, 22, 23, 30,31,32, 34, 36, 37, 42].

Figure 1 shows the PSD of the waste OS (either before and after their thermal treatment at 900 °C) used for the present research. It can be observed that the main part of the particles is concentrated between 250 and 500 μm thus confirming some information reported in the introduction which depicts their previous metallurgical application. It can be also observed that about 15 wt% of their total amount have size inferior to 250 μm, whereas another 10 wt% is greater than 500 μm. The presence of small particles find reasonable justification in the sand crumbling process after their metallurgical application, but before composites geopolymer production. Conversely, sand particles with size greater than 500 μm may be due to a certain level of agglomeration which occurs during steel casting. The thermal treatment at 900 °C slightly shifts the PSD of the as-received sands toward smaller values thus increasing the amount of small particles.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cumulative representation of particle size distribution of the as-received (plain line) thermally treated OS (dashed line)

It is, however, generally accepted that the complete reaction of solid reactants, in heterogeneous systems, as those related to the production of geopolymers, is extremely unusual and also fine powder particles do not fully react during geopolymerization [16, 36, 42]. For instance, Kuenzel et al. [42] demonstrated that the Argical 1200, which is the MK powder used in the present research, provides around 73 wt% of its total Al content, during geopolymerization. It is therefore reasonable to assume that less than 50% of the particles with size lower than 250 μm (i.e., 7 wt% of the total) present in the OS is involved in the reaction. Consequently, particles with size greater than 250 μm shall mainly behave as inert components during geopolymeric reaction. As a consequence of the above assumptions it is possible to re-calculate the Al2O3/Na2O + K2O ratio of Table 2 which is lowered to 1.04 in all compositions, whereas the Si/Al is 2.05 in the reference composition and rises to 2.18 in material with composition OB150 as is displayed in Table 3. Such values are suitable for the production of geopolymers with optimized mechanical performances [31, 32, 34, 37].

Table 3 Si/Al and Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O) ratios recalculated taking into account the non-total reactivity of the starting solid components (i.e., MK, OS)

Figure 2 displays the thermogravimetric trend between room temperature and 900 °C of the as-received OS. A significant weight loss (around 1.5% of the total OS amount) is first observed before 100 °C related to moisture evaporation, followed by an almost continuous additional 0.75% weight loss between 100 and 600 °C; thereafter another important weight loss (around 0.75%) due the combustion of carbonaceous compounds may be observed at higher temperatures.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the as-received OS

Figure 3 shows the appearance of OS before (above) and after (below) the thermal treatment of 1 h at 900 °C. The black color of the as-received OS is reasonably due to the presence of a thin layer of amorphous carbon which covers OS particles, whereas the brick colored thermal-treated OS reasonably depends on the presence of Fe2O3 oxidized phase.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Appearance of OS, before (left) and after (right) thermal treatment

Figure 4 is a SEM image, coupled with EDS results made on the as-received OS. As expected, the presence of carbon (4–12 wt%) is observed in all the particles examined. The authors of the present research are aware that carbon determination by the EDS analysis gives a semi-quantitative information, however, it confirms the presence on the surface of OS particles. In addition, it is to be highlighted the presence of Mg, Fe, Si, and O which are component elements of olivine, but also the one of Al, Na, K and Ca drawn in by bentonite.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM micrography and EDS results of the as-received OS

Figure 5 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-received (bottom) and thermally treated (top) OS. It may be observed that the former is substantially in line with the results obtained by other authors [43] and shows the presence of a great amount of olivine (PDF n° 01-088-1000), together with low quantities of vermiculite (~ 5% wt.) (PDF n° 01-074-1732), lizardite (~ 2% wt.) (PDF n° 00-050-1625), and silicon oxide (~ 1.5% wt.) (PDF n° 00-045-0111), whereas the latter highlights a great quantity of olivine, along with a limited amount of enstatite (~ 6% wt.) (PDF n° 01-073-1937), but vermiculite and lizardite are not observed. Enstatite appears as one consequence of the high-temperature treatment which causes reaction between some starting components leading also to the change in color of the starting OS. However, due to the small amount of vermiculite and lizardite (~ 7% wt.) in the as-received sands and that of enstatite (~ 6% wt.) in the thermally treated one, their influence has been assumed negligible on the development of material performances.

Fig. 5
figure 5

X-ray diffraction patterns of the as-received (bottom) and thermally treated (top) OS. Symbols are as follows: O = olivine, V = vermiculite, L = lizardite, S = silicon oxide, and E = enstatite

It may be also pointed out that X-ray diffraction analysis did not reveal the presence of bentonite and cornstarch neither in the as-received or in the thermally treated OS; such results have been confirmed by the FTIR investigation. It appears, therefore, reasonable to assume that the slight discrepancy of crystallographic structure observed in the two different OS should not play a relevant role on the preparation and properties of the resulting materials.

Pastes Workability

The slump flow tests led to build up Fig. 6 which shows that the addition of waste OS lowers geopolymeric pastes workability independently on the type of OS used. These expected results are in agreement with the decreasing H2O/total solid content ratio reported in Table 2. It can be, moreover, highlighted that low addition (i.e., compositions OB25 and OB50) lead to the production of pastes which show the same behavior in pastes containing either the as-received or thermal treated OS, whereas compositions containing greater quantities of thermally treated OS (i.e., OB75*, OB100*, OB125*, and OB150*) show better workability than those prepared using the as-received OS. This different behavior is reasonably due to the different PSD distribution of the two OS and to the presence of certain amount of residual cornstarch in the as-received product. In fact, this component is known to be often used during the production of organic pastes when a viscosity increase is required [44,45,46]; on the other hand, literature reports that the presence of a greater amount of fine particles often improves the workability of cement and/or geopolymeric pastes [41, 47,48,49,50].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Slump flow trend of pastes containing the as-received (plain line) and thermally treated (dashed line) OS. OB0 refers to the cake diameter of the reference composition (bare geopolymer). Error bars are also displayed

Mechanical Behavior

Figure 7a, b shows the trend of compressive strength (a) and water absorption (b) versus the amount of as-received (plain line) or thermally treated (dashed line) OS, respectively. The average compressive strength of the OS-free control material is 36 MPa. It may be observed that the strength of composites containing the as-received OS gradually decrease with increasing its addition (Fig. 7a), whereas the one of those containing thermally treated OS increase up to the composition OB75 thereafter it is observed a rapid decay. In parallel, Fig. 7b shows that water absorption of composites containing the as-received OS increase with its addition while the trend of samples containing thermally treated OS reach their minimum value in correspondence of composition OB75*. Compressive strength and water absorption are complementary investigations since water absorption is directly related to open porosity which directly affects strength; it may be therefore observed that the highest strength values fall at same composition where samples display the minimum water absorption. The above results may also be related to the H2O/total solid content ratio of the various compositions which in turns affects the pastes workability during samples production. Table 2 shows that such ratio is 0.48 in the reference composition and lowers to 0.24 in composition OB150, being 0.32 in composition OB75. It may be also assumed that low workability leads to the increase in the amount of air which may be entrapped during materials production. The present research demonstrates that a slump dimension around 140 mm may be assumed as limiting value; higher values lead to the production of materials with enhanced open porosity and lower strength, according to the previous researches [6, 10, 13, 23, 28, 29, 41].

Fig. 7
figure 7

a, b Trends of compressive strength (a) and water absorption (b) vs composition of materials made using the as-received (plain line) and thermally treated (dashed line) OS, respectively. Error bars are also displayed

Moreover, olivine particles behave as inert components within the geopolymer-based composite in this way limiting shrinkage during consolidation after pastes preparation. It is known that shrinkage often causes microcracks which limits the material’s mechanical performances. In order to optimize material’s mechanical performances it is therefore necessary to identify the amount of additional olivine which permits to balance good workability (during pastes production) and minimum shrinkage (during material’s consolidation), as it has been reported regarding geopolymer concrete materials [51,52,53]. The present investigation demonstrates that, in geopolymeric composites containing thermally treated coarse olivine sand, this limit falls to the composition OB75*.

The poor behavior of materials containing the as-received waste OS are yet to be explained. Figures 8a, b are two photographs made by the stereoscopic optical microscope of the section obtained from samples with compositions OB125 and OB125*, respectively (namely samples containing same amount of the as-received or thermally treated OS). It can be observed that each image shows the fractureless matrix surrounding olivine particles as well as the presence of rounded holes caused by the air entrapped during materials production; it may be, however, observed that the holes of materials prepared using the as-received olivine are of greater size with respect to those prepared with thermally treated OS. The difference of their open macroporosity partially justifies the different mechanical performances of the two sets of materials.

Fig. 8
figure 8

a, b Stereoscopic microscope images acquired on an internal section of geopolymers with compositions OB125 (a) and OB125* (b)

Microstructural Features

ATR-FTIR spectra of samples with compositions OB125 (containing the as-received olivine) and OB125* (containing thermal treated olivine) are shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

ATR-FTIR spectra collected on OB125 (black) and OB125* (red) (Color figure online)

The analysis of the fingerprint region (circled in blue) shows that the two spectra have overlap** morphologies. This suggests that the two samples have similar chemical composition. The disappearance of the numbered peaks in the OB125* spectrum is due to the calcination process. From their attribution, highlighted in Table 4, it is possible to verify that they arise from chemical bonds such as –OH, –CHx, and –CO. Each of them being removed by a high-temperature treatment [54,55,56], thus confirming the presence of carbonaceous compounds in geopolymeric composites containing untreated olivine sand.

Table 4 FTIR bands assignation of Fig. 9

X-ray investigation made on the same samples as above did not give evidence of any contribution to the reaction by the added OS and therefore they are not reported.

Figures 10a, b are SEM micrographs (back scattering mode) which detail the interface between olivine particles and geopolymeric matrix in each material above described. It may be observed that the former shows a strong delamination, whereas the latter appears well bonded. The possibility of strong delamination due to the presence of carbon thin films coating the dispersed phase has been documented by the literature regarding other composites systems [57,58,59,60,61].

Fig. 10
figure 10

a, b SEM micrographs (back scattering mode) detailing the interface between olivine particles and geopolymeric matrix in samples with the compositions OB125 (a) and OB125* (b)

The fractures in the geopolymeric matrix, which are also clearly visible, are reasonably due to the intrinsic features of geopolymeric materials. In fact, it is generally accepted that geopolymeric composites could often contain some microcracks caused by shrinkage during consolidation or sample preparation. The microcracks often appear in SEM investigations rather than from the optical one due to higher magnification.

The strong delamination, which is observed in samples made using the as-received OS, justifies their high water absorption as well as their poor mechanical performance. As concluding remarks it may be stated that the use of thermally treated waste OS could lead to the production of well-performing materials, whereas the as-received OS does not.

Final Remarks

The authors of the present research are aware that, even in a contest of circular economy, a thermal treatment at 900 °C is not costless and would discourage the recycling of waste OS by the production of geopolymers. With this in mind, authors suggest to avoid the use of binders containing organic components which could be the source of pyrolysis and consequently of free carbon during the casting of liquid metals. Conversely, some experimental parameters described in the present research, though easy in laboratory experiments, could find a difficult practical application. In particular, it is generally accepted that geopolymers could be hardened at room temperature as it has been clearly reported in the literature [62,63,64,65] thus avoiding the cost of the thermal treatment at 60 °C. In addition, the distilled water, which has been used in the present research, could be replaced by less expensive water types, for the production of sodium hydroxide solution, therefore limiting the final cost of the resulting product [66, 67].

Conclusions

Several geopolymers containing also different amounts of waste OS were prepared mixing metakaolin, a commercial sodium silicate solution and an 8 M sodium hydroxide solution. OS was added either in the as-received form and after a thermal treatment at 900 °C in order to remove most of the carbonaceous compounds therein contained due to the partial pyrolysis of the organic additives used for molds preparation before liquid metal casting.

The modified slump flow test showed that materials with composition OB75 showed the best workability, in this way, enabling optimization of the maximum amount of waste OS which was possibly added to the blank geopolymer matrix without changing its original absolute amount of water.

Samples containing the as-received OS displayed poor mechanical compressive strength due to the presence of a thin layer of carbonaceous compounds on the surface of OS particles which caused delamination and therefore additional porosity in the geopolymeric matrix composite.

Materials containing thermally treated OS showed compressive strength mostly better than that of the geopolymeric matrix alone. In detail, materials with composition OB75* showed the best overall behavior due to the good workability of the starting paste which led to the production of hardened samples having minimized residual porosity.