Abstract
Purpose of Review
To identify and summarize the characteristics and performance of published child abuse screening tools.
Recent Findings
Many victims of child abuse had been previously evaluated by a provider for injuries due to abuse but were not recognized as such at the time. Even in high-risk scenarios, providers do not always screen for child abuse.
Summary
Many screening tools have been developed, including ones embedded in electronic health records, that can prompt consideration for further child abuse evaluation as well as standardize the approach, leading to provider comfort and bias mitigation. Identifying child abuse earlier can lead to quicker intervention, reducing its morbidity and mortality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. Child Maltreatment 2020. 2022. Available from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/report/child-maltreatment-2020. Accessed 21 Nov 2022.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2022. Available from https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/child-abuse-and-neglect. Accessed 21 Nov 2022.
Flaherty EG, Perez-Rossello JM, Levine MA, Hennrikus WL, Christian CW, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, et al. Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2014;133(2):e477-89. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3793.
Anderst J, Carpenter SL, Abshire TC, Killough E. AAP Section on Hematology/Oncology, The American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The AAP Council on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation for bleeding disorders in suspected child abuse. Pediatrics. 2022;150(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-059276.
•• Christian CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1337-54. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0356. Current recommendations from the AAP for the evaluation of suspected child physical abuse.
Legano LA, Desch LW, Messner SA, Idzerda S, Flaherty EG. Counsel on Child Abuse and Neglect. Maltreatment of children with disabilities. Pediatrics. 2021;147(5). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-050920.
•• Escobar MA Jr, Wallenstein KG, Christison-Lagay ER, Naiditch JA, Petty JK. Child abuse and the pediatric surgeon: a position statement from the trauma committee, the board of governors and the membership of the american pediatric surgical association. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(7):1277–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.03.009. Current recommendations from the APSA on child abuse and the pediatric surgeon’s role.
• Deans KJ, Thackeray J, Askegard-Giesmann JR, Earley E, Groner JI, Minneci PC. Mortality increases with recurrent episodes of nonaccidental trauma in children. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(1):161–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3182984831. Retrospective study showing recurrent episodes of NAT imparts increased risk of death.
Crichton KG, Cooper JN, Minneci PC, Groner JI, Thackeray JD, Deans KJ. A national survey on the use of screening tools to detect physical child abuse. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32(8):815–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3916-z.
Delaplain PT, Guner YS, Rood CJ, Nahmias J. Non-accidental trauma in infants: a review of evidence-based strategies for diagnosis, management, and prevention. Curr Trauma Rep. 2022;8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-021-00221-1.
Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, Affourtit MJ, Scheewe DJ, van de Merwe MH, Vooijs-Moulaert AF, et al. Effects of systematic screening and detection of child abuse in emergency departments. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):457–64. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3527.
Sittig JS, Uiterwaal CS, Moons KG, Russel IM, Nievelstein RA, Nieuwenhuis EE, et al. Value of systematic detection of physical child abuse at emergency rooms: a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e010788. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010788.
Teeuw AH, Kraan RB, van Rijn RR, Bossuyt PM, Heymans HS. Screening for child abuse using a checklist and physical examinations in the emergency department led to the detection of more cases. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(2):300–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14495.
Stilwell L, Golonka M, Ankoma-Sey K, Yancy M, Kaplan S, Terrell L, et al. Electronic health record tools to identify child maltreatment: sco** literature review and key informant interviews. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(5):718–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.017.
Louwers EC, Korfage IJ, Affourtit MJ, Ruige M, van den Elzen AP, de Koning HJ, et al. Accuracy of a screening instrument to identify potential child abuse in emergency departments. Child Abuse Negl. 2014;38(7):1275–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.11.005.
Hoedeman F, Puiman PJ, van den Heuvel EAL, Affourtit MJ, Bakx R, Langendam MW, et al. A validated Screening instrument for Child Abuse and Neglect (SCAN) at the emergency department. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04635-0.
Shakil A, Day PG, Chu J, Woods SB, Bridges K. PedHITSS: A screening tool to detect childhood abuse in clinical settings. Fam Med. 2018;50(10):763–9. https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2018.778329.
• Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Lorenz DJ, Bertocci G, Fingarson AK, Makoroff K, et al. Validation of a clinical decision rule to predict abuse in young children based on bruising characteristics. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e215832. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5832. Prospective study refining a bruising clinical decision rule which helps indicate an early sign for potential risk for abuse.
Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Acker D, Webb T, Brenzel A, Lorenz DJ, et al. History, injury, and psychosocial risk factor commonalities among cases of fatal and near-fatal physical child abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;69:263–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.033.
Letson MM, Cooper JN, Deans KJ, Scribano PV, Makoroff KL, Feldman KW, et al. Prior opportunities to identify abuse in children with abusive head trauma. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;60:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.09.001.
Berger RP, Saladino RA, Fromkin J, Heineman E, Suresh S, McGinn T. Development of an electronic medical record–based child physical abuse alert system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(2):142–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx063.
Tiyyagura G, Asnes AG, Leventhal JM, Shapiro ED, Auerbach M, Teng W, et al. Development and validation of a natural language processing tool to identify injuries in infants associated with abuse. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(6):981–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.11.004.
Shahi N, Shahi AK, Phillips R, Shirek G, Lindberg DM, Moulton SL. Using deep learning and natural language processing models to detect child physical abuse. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(12):2326–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.007.
Berger RP, Fromkin J, Herman B, Pierce MC, Saladino RA, Flom L, et al. Validation of the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score for Abusive Head Trauma. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):e20153756. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3756.
Cowley LE, Morris CB, Maguire SA, Farewell DM, Kemp AM. Validation of a Prediction Tool for Abusive Head Trauma. Pediatrics. 2015;136(2):290–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3993.
Maguire SA, Kemp AM, Lumb RC, Farewell DM. Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: a pooled analysis. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):e550–64. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2949.
Cowley LE, Maguire S, Farewell DM, Quinn-Scoggins HD, Flynn MO, Kemp AM. Acceptability of the Predicting Abusive Head Trauma (PredAHT) clinical prediction tool: A qualitative study with child protection professionals. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;81:192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.022.
Cowley LE, Farewell DM, Kemp AM. Potential impact of the validated predicting abusive head trauma (PredAHT) clinical prediction tool: A clinical vignette study. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;86:184–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.09.017.
Pfeiffer H, Cowley LE, Kemp AM, Dalziel SR, Smith A, Cheek JA, et al. Validation of the PredAHT-2 prediction tool for abusive head trauma. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(3):119–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208893.
Hymel KP, Armijo-Garcia V, Foster R, Frazier TN, Stoiko M, Christie LM, et al. Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma. Pediatrics. 2014;134(6):e1537–44. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1329.
Pfeiffer H, Smith A, Kemp AM, Cowley LE, Cheek JA, Dalziel SR, et al. External validation of the PediBIRN clinical prediction rule for abusive head trauma. Pediatrics. 2018;141(5):e20173674. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3674.
•• Suresh S, Barata I, Feldstein D, Heineman E, Lindberg DM, Bimber T, et al. Clinical decision support for child abuse: recommendations from a consensus conference. J Pediatr. 2023;252:213-218.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.06.039. Current recommendations from the Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support consensus conference.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lowing, D., Brink, F.W., Groner, J.I. et al. Current Approaches to Screening for Child Physical Abuse and Abusive Head Trauma. Curr Trauma Rep 9, 91–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-023-00257-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-023-00257-5