Log in

An analytical modelling approach for overall torsional stiffness of rotate vector reducer

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analytical modelling for overall torsional stiffness of rotate vector (RV) reducer has been a meaningful research priority owing to its over-constrained and multi-crank actuation structural characteristics. This paper presents an analytical modelling approach for overall torsional stiffness of RV reducer. The approach starts from analysing stiffness topological relations among all components, in order to convert the stiffness modelling of entire machine into the stiffness calculation of several subsystems. Then, time-varying meshing information including contact points, contact pins, contact deformation, and multi-tooth mesh stiffness, are precisely identified with consideration of profile modification and loads. Subsequently, the nonlinear stiffness of turning-arm bearings and support bearings is calculated through the force analysis of crankshafts. On this basis, the overall torsional stiffness model of RV reducer is developed, which concerns various stiffness parameters of high-speed stage and low-speed stage. Furthermore, the sensitivities and influences of stiffness parameters on the overall torsional stiffness of RV reducer are systematically analysed. Finally, the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed model are validated by the physical prototype test. The outcomes of this paper are beneficial to the stiffness prediction and design of RV reducer according to its performance requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pham AD, Ahn HJ (2018) High precision reducers for industrial robots driving 4th industrial revolution: state of arts, analysis, design, performance evaluation and perspective. Int J Precis Eng Manufact Green Technol 5(4):519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0058-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang N, Wang ST, **e XD, Yuan X, Yang AD, Zhang J (2022) A vectorial modification methodology based on an efficient and accurate cycloid tooth profile model. Precis Eng 73:435–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang DJ, Kim YC, Hong EP, Kim GS (2021) Geometry design and dynamic analysis of a modified cycloid reducer with epitrochoid tooth profile. Mech Mach Theory 164:104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren ZY, Mao SM, Guo WC, Guo Z (2017) Tooth modification and dynamic performance of the cycloidal drive. Mech Syst Signal Pr 85:857–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin WS, Shih YP, Lee JJ (2014) Design of a two-stage cycloidal gear reducer with tooth modifications. Mech Mach Theory 79:184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang YH, Zhou GC, Chang L, Chen G (2021) A modelling approach for kinematic equivalent mechanism and rotational transmission error of RV reducer. Mech Mach Theory 163:104384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang J, Li CY, Zhang Y, Wang YH, Chen BK (2021) Transmission error analysis of cycloidal pinwheel meshing pair based on rolling-sliding contact. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 43(7):355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03074-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu KY, Shih YP, Lee JJ (2020) Kinematic error analysis of the rotor vector gear reducer with machining tolerances. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 42(11):566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02642-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun XX, Han L, Wang J (2019) Design and transmission error analysis of CBR reducer. ASME J Mech Des 141(8):082301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin KS, Chan KY, Lee JJ (2018) Kinematic error analysis and tolerance allocation of cycloidal gear reducers. Mech Mach Theory 124:73–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dion JL, Pawelski Z, Chianca V et al (2020) Theoretical and experimental study for an improved cycloid drive model. ASME J Appl Mech 87(1):011002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh CF, Fuentes-Aznar A (2019) Performance prediction method of cycloidal speed reducers. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 41(4):186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1690-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sensinger JW (2013) Efficiency of high-sensitivity gear trains, such as cycloid drives. ASME J Mech Des 135(7):071006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorla C, Davoli P, Rosa F, Longoni C, Chiozzi F, Samarani A (2008) Theoretical and experimental analysis of a cycloidal speed reducer. ASME J Mech Des 130(11):112604. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2978342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. **e YH, Xu LX, Deng YQ (2022) A dynamic approach for evaluating the moment rigidity and rotation precision of a bearing-planetary frame rotor system used in RV reducer. Mech Mach Theory 173:104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang YH, Chen C, Wang SY (2018) Response sensitivity to design parameters of RV reducer. Chin J Mech Eng 31(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-018-0249-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh CF, Jian WS (2016) The effect on dynamics of using various transmission designs for two-stage cycloidal speed reducers. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 230(4):665–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406215618984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh CF (2014) The effect on dynamics of using a new transmission design for eccentric speed reducers. Mech Mach Theory 80:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.04.020

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miao JC, Li CY, Du X, Chen BK (2022) Rotate vector reducer design using resnet-based model and integration of discretized optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 36(4):1889–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0326-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang YM, Li LS, Ji ST (2022) Influence of cycloid-pin gear design parameters on bearing capacity and optimized design. J Braz Soc Mech Sci 44(4):123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03426-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang MD, Zhang DQ, Cheng C, Han X (2021) Reliability-based design optimization for RV reducer with experimental constraint. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63(4):2047–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02781-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang YL, Qian QJ, Chen GD, ** SS, Chen Y (2017) Multi-objective optimization design of cycloid pin gear planetary reducer. Adv Mech Eng 9(9):1687814017720053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017720053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song WL, Yang X, Liu H, Gao XY, Lei YG, Cao JY (2023) A new method for calculating time-varying torsional stiffness of RV reducers with variable loads and tooth modifications. J Field Robot 40(6):1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang DW, Wang G, Huang T, Liu JY (2001) Dynamic formulation of RV reducer and analysis of structural parameters. Chin J Mech Eng 37(1):69–74 ((in Chinese))

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu JY, Matsumura S, Chen BK, Houjoh H (2012) Torsional stiffness calculation of double-envelo** cycloid drive. J Adv Mech Des Syst 6(1):2–14. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.6.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li ST (2014) Design and strength analysis methods of the trochoidal gear reducers. Mech Mach Theory 81:140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim KH, Lee CS, Ahn HJ (2010) Torsional rigidity of a cycloid drive considering finite bearing and hertz contact stiffness. In: ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences / Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, San Diego, CA, AUG 30-SEP 02.

  28. Kumar N, Kosse V, Oloyede A (2016) A new method to estimate effective elastic torsional compliance of single-stage cycloidal drives. Mech Mach Theory 105:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2016.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li X, Li CY, Wang YW, Bk C, Lim TC (2017) Analysis of a cycloid speed reducer considering tooth profile modification and clearance-fit output mechanism. ASME J Mech Des 139(3):033303. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li X, Chen BK, Wang YW, Lim TC (2018) Mesh stiffness calculation of cycloid-pin gear pair with tooth profile modification and eccentricity error. J Cent South Univ 25(7):1717–1731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-018-3863-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu LX (2019) A dynamic model to predict the number of pins to transmit load in a cycloidal reducer with assembling clearance. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 233(12):4247–4269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218809732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu LX, Chen BK, Li CY (2019) Dynamic modelling and contact analysis of bearing-cycloid-pinwheel transmission mechanisms used in joint rotate vector reducers. Mech Mach Theory 137:432–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.03.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu LX, Zhong JL, Li Y, Chang L (2023) Design and dynamic transmission error analysis of a new type of cycloidal-pin reducer with a rotatable output-pin mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 181:105218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.105218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang YC, Du XS, Zhu CC, Ni GX, Ullah N, Liu H (2019) Mesh stiffness analysis of beveloid gears for the rotating vector transmission. J Mech Sci Technol 33(8):3943–3953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0739-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xuan L, **e C, Guan TM, Lei L, Jiang H (2019) Research on dynamic modeling and simulation verification of a new type of FT pin-cycloid transmission. Proc IMechE Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 233(17):6276–6288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219861999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Park JS (2006) Stiffness and error analysis of the cycloid drive. PhD thesis, Seoul National University, South Korea

  37. Yang YH, Zhu LY, Chen ZY, Shen ZG (2015) Analysis of the characteristics of torsional stiffness of RV reducer. J Tian** Univ 48(2):111–118. https://doi.org/10.11784/tdxbz201309096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ahn HJ, Choi BM, Lee YH, Pham AD (2021) Impact analysis of tolerance and contact friction on a RV reducer using FE method. Int J Precis Eng Manufact 22(7):1285–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00537-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang RH, Zhou JX, Wei Z (2022) Study on transmission error and torsional stiffness of RV reducer under wear. J Mech Sci Technol 36(8):4067–4081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0727-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei B, Wang JX, Zhou GW, Yang RS, Zhou HJ, He T (2016) Mixed lubrication analysis of modified cycloidal gear used in the RV reducer. Proc IMechE Part J: J Eng Tribol 230(2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650115593301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang DCH, Blanche JG (1990) Design and application guidelines for cycloid drives with machining tolerances. Mech Mach Theory 25:487–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(90)90064-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hsieh CF (2014) Dynamics analysis of cycloidal speed reducers with pinwheel and nonpinwheel designs. ASME J Mech Des 136(9):091008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hsieh CF (2015) Traditional versus improved designs for cycloidal speed reducers with a small tooth difference: the effect on dynamics. Mech Mach Theory 86:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lankarani HM, Nikravesh PE (1990) A contact force model with hysteresis dam** for impact analysis of multibody systems. ASME J Mech Des 112:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2912617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dong XY, Deng JY, Chen JP (1996) Force analysis of RV transmission mechanism. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 30(5):65–70. https://doi.org/10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.1996.05.012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Meng YH, Wu CL, Ling LP (2007) Mathematical modeling of the transmission performance of 2K-H pin cycloid planetary mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 42(7):776–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris TA, Kotzalas MN (2006) Rolling Bearing Analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen C (2017) Research on Statics and Dynamics of RV Reducer. PhD thesis, Tian** University, China

  49. Yang YH, Shen ZG, Chen ZY, Zhu LY (2016) Test bench and testing method for torsional stiffness and backlash of reducers. Patent No. CN103776628B, China

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Editor and Reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments.

Funding

This research work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 52075363 and 51721003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Zilda de Castro Silveira.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

1.1 Calculation method of \({\text{ }}k_{{{\text{sp}}}}^{e}\)

The sun gear and planetary gears in the high-speed stage are involute gears, and the mesh stiffness between a single gear pair is calculated by [35]

$$\frac{1}{{k_{{{\text{sp}}}}^{{{\text{single}}}} }} = 0.04723 + \frac{0.15551}{{z_{{\text{s}}} }} + \frac{0.25791}{{z_{{\text{p}}} }} - 0.00635x_{{\text{s}}} - 0.11654\frac{{x_{{\text{s}}} }}{{z_{{\text{s}}} }} - 0.00193x_{{\text{p}}} - 0.24188\frac{{x_{{\text{p}}} }}{{z_{{\text{p}}} }} + 0.0529x_{{\text{s}}}^{{2}} + 0.00182x_{{\text{p}}}^{2}$$
(35)

The total mesh stiffness is expressed as

$$k_{{{\text{sp}}}} = \left( {0.75\varepsilon + 0.25} \right)k_{{{\text{sp}}}}^{{{\text{single}}}}$$
(36)

Thus, the equivalent torsional stiffness of the mesh stiffness between the sun gear and planetary gear is expressed as

$$k_{{{\text{sp}}}}^{e} = k_{{{\text{sp}}}} r_{{\text{s}}}^{{2}} i_{{\text{q}}}^{{2}}$$
(37)

where xs and xp represent the modification coefficient of sun gear and planetary gear, respectively; ε denotes the gear contact ratio; rs represents the radius of the sun gear base circle.

1.2 Calculation methods of \({\text{ }}k_{{{\text{s}}}}^{e}\) and \({\text{ }}k_{{{\text{a}}}}^{e}\)

The input shaft and crankshaft are divided into multiple shaft segments, so their torsional stiffness can be calculated by

$$\frac{1}{{k_{{\text{s}}} }} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_{{\text{s}}} }} {\frac{1}{{k_{{{\text{s}}i}} }}}$$
(38)
$$\frac{1}{{k_{{\text{a}}} }} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{n_{{\text{a}}} }} {\frac{1}{{k_{{{\text{a}}i}} }}}$$
(39)

where ns and na represent the numbers of the shaft segments of the input shaft and crankshaft, respectively.

The equivalent torsional stiffness of the both can be further expressed as

$$k_{{\text{s}}}^{e} = k_{{\text{s}}} i_{{\text{q}}}^{2}$$
(40)
$$k_{{\text{a}}}^{e} = k_{{\text{a}}} z_{{\text{c}}}^{{2}}$$
(41)

1.3 Calculation method of \({\text{ }}k_{{{\text{b}}}}^{e}\)

Referring to Fig. 5, the bending deformation of the crankshaft is expressed as

$$\delta_{{\text{b}}} = \delta_{{\text{q}}} - \delta_{{\text{H}}}$$
(42)

where δq and δH represent the bending deformation along the rotation direction caused by Fq and FH, respectively.

Then the equivalent torsional stiffness of the bending stiffness of the crankshaft can be expressed as

$$k_{{\text{b}}}^{e} = k_{{\text{b}}} r_{{\text{H}}}^{{2}}$$
(43)

Appendix 2

See Table 

Table 4 Test data

4.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, G., Yang, Y., Chang, L. et al. An analytical modelling approach for overall torsional stiffness of rotate vector reducer. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 46, 156 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04719-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-024-04719-y

Keywords

Navigation