Abstract
Research shows that motivation is a critical precursor to students’ science achievement. However, research on the topic yields ambiguous results in different cultural contexts. While the positive association between motivation and science achievement has been evidenced universally, the relatively predictive effect and strength of different motivational factors in different cultures need additional examination. To tease the potential discrepancy apart and explore different student motivational factors including self-concept, intrinsic value, utility value, and sense of relatedness, this study examines grade 8 students from the U.S. (N = 14,290) and Singapore (N = 6113) by using the International Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) data. The results suggest that the U.S. student self-concept in science learning is the strongest and most significant predictor of their science achievement. In Singapore, students perceived utility value in science learning has the strongest and most significant association with their science achievement. Explanations of the differences as well as the implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Neitzel, C. (2019). Multiple points of access for supporting interest in science. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 312–352). Cambridge University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
Berry, R. (2011). Educational assessment in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 49–61). Springer.
Biggs, J. (1998). Learning from the Confucian heritage: So size doesn’t matter? International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 723-738.
Birger, F., Lee, S. K., & Goh, C. B. (2008). Toward a better future: Education and training for economic development in Singapore since 1965. World Bank Publications.
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Anmarkrud, Ø., Strømsø, H. I., & Brandmo, C. (2014). Modeling relations between students’ justification for knowing beliefs in science, motivation for understanding what they read in science, and science achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 1–12.
Cairns, D., & Dickson, M. (2021). Exploring the relations of gender, science dispositions and science achievement on STEM career aspirations for adolescents in public schools in the UAE. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(2), 153–165.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980.
Chang, Y. (2015). Science motivation across Asian countries: Links among future-oriented motivation, self-efficacy, task values, and achievement outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 247–258.
Chen, Z., & Liu, Y. (2019). The different style of lifelong learning in China and the USA based on influencing motivations and factors. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 13–25.
Chin, J. M. C., Lin, H. C., & Chen, C. W. (2020). Homework and learning achievements: How much homework is enough? Educational Studies, 48, 1–16.
Chua, B. H. (1997). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore (Vol. 9). Psychology Press.
Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 365–369.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.
Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2015). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (p. 13.1-13.62). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90.
Gregory, K., & Clarke, M. (2003). High-stakes assessment in England and Singapore. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 66–74.
Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L. (2018). The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM. Science Education, 102(4), 744–770.
Jen, T. H., Lee, C. D., Chien, C. L., Hsu, Y. S., & Chen, K. M. (2013). Perceived social relationships and science learning outcomes for Taiwanese eighth graders: Structural equation modeling with a complex sampling consideration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 575–600.
Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry learning in the Singaporean context: Factors affecting student interest in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2596–2618.
Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Pearson Education.
Kim, M., Tan, A. L., & Talaue, F. T. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum change in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 289–311.
King, R. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38.
Lam, S. M., & Zhou, Y. (2021). SES-achievement gaps in East Asia: Evidence from PISA 2003–2018. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31, 1–20.
LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hooper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015 (p. 3.1-3.37). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Lewis, R. W., & Farkas, G. (2017). Using an opportunity-propensity framework to estimate individual-, classroom-, and school-level predictors of middle school science achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 185–197.
Lin, T. J., Tan, A. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A cross-cultural comparison of Singaporean and Taiwanese eighth graders’ science learning self-efficacy from a multi-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1083–1109.
Liou, P. Y. (2017). Profiles of adolescents’ motivational beliefs in science learning and science achievement in 26 countries: Results from TIMSS 2011 data. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 83–96.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., & Hooper, M. (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston College.
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(3), 289–310.
Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Irnidayanti, Y., & van de Grift, W. (2016). Autonomous motivation in the Indonesian classroom: Relationship with teacher support through the lens of self-determination theory. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 441–451.
Mikami, A. Y., Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A., & Allen, J. P. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2341–2354.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
Ng, P. T. (2008). Educational reform in Singapore: From quantity to quality. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(1), 5–15.
Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2015). Young children’s motivation for learning science. Research in early childhood science education (pp. 7–34). Springer.
Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315.
Perše, T. V., Kozina, A., & Leban, T. R. (2011). Negative school factors and their influence on math and science achievement in TIMSS 2003. Educational Studies, 37(3), 265–276.
Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school: Trends and predictors. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336–346.
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Expectancy-value theory and its relevance for student motivation and learning. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 617–644). Cambridge University Press.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 142–151.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Routledge.
Stapleton, L. M., McNeish, D. M., & Yang, J. S. (2016). Multilevel and single-level models for measured and latent variables when data are clustered. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 317–330.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when develo** and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296.
Tan, C. (2005). Driven by pragmatism: Issues and challenges in an ability-driven education. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Sha** Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, learning nation (pp. 5–21). Prentice-Hall.
Tan, K. H. K. (2011). Assessment reform in Singapore—Enduring, sustainable or threshold? In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 75–88). Springer.
Towndrow, P. A., Silver, R. E., & Albright, J. (2010). Setting expectations for educational innovations. Journal of Educational Change, 11(4), 425–455.
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89.
Wang, C. L., & Liou, P. Y. (2017). Students’ motivational beliefs in science learning, school motivational contexts, and science achievement in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 898–917.
Wang, M. T., & Fredricks, J. A. (2014). The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development, 85(2), 722–737.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662.
Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2017). Peer and teacher supports in relation to motivation and effort: A multi-level study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 32–45.
**ao, Y., Cai, Y., Ge, Q., & Yang, Y. (2022). The potential of using formative assessment to enhance academic achievement in the Confucian-heritage culture: A comparison between Hong Kong and Shanghai. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00702-0
Yu, B., & Downing, K. (2012). Determinants of international students’ adaptation: Examining effects of integrative motivation, instrumental motivation and second language proficiency. Educational Studies, 38(4), 457–471.
Yu, F. Y., Wu, W. S., & Huang, H. C. (2018). Promoting middle school students’ learning motivation and academic emotions via student-created feedback for online student-created multiple-choice questions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 395–408.
Zhang, F., & Bae, C. L. (2020). Motivational factors that influence student science achievement: A systematic literature review of TIMSS studies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17), 2921–2944.
Zhang, F., Bae, C. L., & Broda, M. (2021). Science self-concept, relatedness, and teaching quality: A multilevel approach to examining factors that predict science achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–27.
Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., & **ong, X. B. (2021). Does relatedness matter for online self-regulated learning to promote perceived learning gains and satisfaction? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 205–215.
Zhou, Y., Fan, X., Wei, X., & Tai, R. H. (2017). Gender gap among high achievers in math and implications for STEM pipeline. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(5), 259–269.
Funding
This research was funded by Young Scholars Project Fund at the Open University of China (No. Q21A0015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F., Xu, Y. & Chen, CC. Motivational factors and science achievement among students from the U.S. and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 33, 361–371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00734-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00734-0