Log in

Cyclic zinc capture and zeolite regeneration using a column method, mass transfer analysis of multi regenerated bed

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of wastewater and reuse of purified water in an industrial process can provide an alternative source of fresh water as well as reduce pollution load by discharging a lower quantity of wastewater. When adsorption is used for treatment, the regeneration of the used adsorbent may also account for a large portion of the operational cost and cause secondary pollution. This problem may be solved by cyclic repetition of adsorption/regeneration cycles using a column method. In this paper, a total of nine successive cycles of zinc capture and zeolite bed regeneration using a column method have been investigated. The derived form of the breakthrough curve was used for analysing mass transfer in the column. For that purpose, the Dose–response, the Thomas, the Bohart-Adams, the Yoon-Nelson and the Wolborska models were used for modelling the breakthrough curve by nonlinear regression analysis. Simulation results and mathematical similarities between the models were discussed. This is the first study that used derived form of Dose–response model to analyse the inflection points of the breakthrough curve and mass transfer during nine consecutive sorption-regeneration cycles of zinc ions on natural zeolite. Obtained peak shape rate profiles were analysed for all cycles. Optimal operation conditions were evaluated with respect to the inflection point, the model parameters, and the residence time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Ahmadi E, Yousefzadeh S, Mokammel A, Miri M, Ansari M, Arfaeinia H, Badi MY, Ghaffari HR, Rezaei S, Mahvi AH. Kinetic study and performance evaluation of an integrated two-phase fixed-film baffled bioreactor for bioenergy recovery from wastewater and bio-wasted sludge. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;121:109674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Eslamian S. Water reuse in industry: necessities and possibilities. Am J Eng Applied Sci. 2021;14(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2021.94.102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. New Trends in Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. In: Shah Maulin P, Rodriguez Couto S, Kumar V, editors. Elsevier; 1st edition. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04585-2.

  4. Joseph L, Jun BM, Flora JRV, Park CM, Yoon Y. Removal of heavy metals from water sources in the develo** world using low-cost materials: A review. Chemosphere. 2019;2019(229):142–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baskar AV, Bolan N, Hoang SA, Sooriyakumar P, Kumar M, Singh L, Jasemizad T, Padhye LP, Singh G, Vinu A, Sarkar B, Kirkham MB, Rinklebe J, Wang S, Wang H, Balasubramanian R, Siddique KHM. Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;822:153555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Phuengphai P, Singjanusong T, Kheangkhun N, Wattanakornsiri A. Removal of copper(II) from aqueous solution using chemically modified fruit peels as efficient low-cost biosorbents. Water Sci Eng. 2021;14(4):286–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2021.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hidayat AE, Moersidik SS, Adityosulindro S. Adsorption and desorption of zinc and copper in acid mine drainage onto synthesized zeolite from coal fly ash. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1811:012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chatterjee A, Abraham J. Desorption of heavy metals from metal loaded sorbents and e-wastes: A review. Biotechnol Lett. 2019;41(3):319–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-019-02650-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel H. Batch and continuous fixed bed adsorption of heavy metals removal using activated charcoal from neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72583-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel H. Fixed-bed column adsorption study: a comprehensive review. Appl Water Sci. 2019;9(45):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0927-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osifo PO, Neomagus HWJP, Everson RC, Webster A, vd Gun MA. The adsorption of copper in a packed-bed of chitosan beads: Modeling, multiple adsorption and regeneration. J Hazard Mater. 2009;167(1–3):1242–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Biswas S, Mishra U. Continuous Fixed-Bed Column Study and Adsorption Modeling: Removal of Lead Ion from Aqueous Solution by Charcoal Originated from Chemical Carbonization of Rubber Wood Sawdust. J Chem. 2015;907379:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/907379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Negrea A, Mihailescu M, Mosoarca G, Ciopec M, Duteanu N, Negrea P, Minzatu V. Estimation on Fixed-Bed Column Parameters of Breakthrough Behaviors for Gold Recovery by Adsorption onto Modified/Functionalized Amberlite XAD7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Satya A, Harimawan A, Haryani GS, Johir MAH, Nguyen LN, Nghiem LD, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Setiadi T. Fixed-bed adsorption performance and empirical modelingof cadmium removal using adsorbent prepared from the cyanobacterium Aphanothece sp cultivar. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;21:101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vukojević Medvidović N, Perić J, Trgo M. Column performance of lead removal from aqueous solutions by fixed bed of natural zeolite-clinoptilolite. Sep Purif Technol. 2006;49:237–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005.10.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tan KL, Hameed BH. Insight into the adsorption kinetics models for the removal of contaminants from aqueous solutions. J Taiwan Inst Chem E. 2017;74:25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoon YH, Nelson JH. Application of gas adsorption kinetics. I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984;45(8):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668491400197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin SH, Huang CY. Modeling of aqueous BTEX adsorption in column and multistage adsorbers. J Environ Eng. 2000;126:802–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:9(802).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vukojević Medvidović N, Perić J, Trgo M. Testing of breakthrough curves for removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions by natural zeolite-clinoptilolite according to the Clark kinetic equation. Sep Sci Technol. 2008;43:944–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390701870622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamdaoui O. Removal of copper (II) from aqueous phase by Purolite C100-MB cation exchange resin in a fixed bed columns: Modeling. J Hazard Matter. 2009;161:737–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aksu Z, Gonen F. Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curve. Process Biochem. 2004;39:599–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00132-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu Q, **e Y, Feng C, Zhang Z. Fractal-like kinetics of adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces in the fixed-bed column. Chem Eng J. 2019;358:1471–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu Q, **e Y, Zhang Z. Modification of breakthrough models in a continuous-flow fixed-bed column: mathematical characteristic of breakthrough curves and rate profile. Sep Purif Technol. 2020;238:116399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116399.

  24. Lee CG, Kim JH, Kang JK, Kim SB, Park SJ, Lee SH, Choi JW. Comparative analysis of fixed-bed sorption models using phosphate breakthrough curves in slag filter media. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;55:1795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.930698.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chu KH. Breakthrough curve analysis by simplistic models of fixed bed adsorption: in defence of the century-old Bohart-Adams model. Chem Eng J. 2020;380:122513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hendricks D. Water Treatment Unit Processes. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nuić I, Trgo M, Vukojević MN. The application of packed bed reactor theory to Pb and Zn uptake from the binary solution onto the fixed bed of natural zeolite. Chem Eng J. 2016;295:347–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yan G, Viraraghavan T, Chen M. A new model for heavy metals removal in a biosorption column. Adsorp Sci Technol. 2001;19:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1260/0263617011493953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Obiri-Nyarko F, Kwiatowska-Malina J, Malina G, Wolowiec K. Assessment of zeolite and composting-zeolite mixture as a permeable reactive materials for the removal of lead from a model acidic groundwater. J Cont Hydrol. 2020;229:103597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vera LM, Bermejo D, Uguna MF, Garcia N, Flores M, Gonzales E. Fixed bed column modelling of lead (II) and cadmium (II) ions biosorption on sugarcane bagasse. Environ Eng Res. 2019;24(1):31–7. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han R, Ding D, Xu Y, Zou W, Wang Y, Li Y, Zou L. Use of rice husk for the adsorption of congo red from aqueous solution in column mode. Biores Technol. 2008;99:2938–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bohart GS, Adams EQ. Some aspects of the behaviour of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J Am Chem Soc. 1920;42:523–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01448a018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan J, Xue Y, Long L, Hu X. Adsorptive removal of As(V) by crawfish shell biochar: batch and column test. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:34674–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3384-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolborska A, Pustelnik P. A simplified method for determination of the break-through time of an adsorbent layer. Water Res. 1996;30:2643–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00166-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sag Y, Aktay Y. Application of equilibrium and mass transfer models to dynamic removal of Cr(VI) ions by Chitin in packed column reactor. Process Biochem. 2001;36:1187–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00150-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nuić I, Trgo M, Perić J, Vukojević MN. Analysis of breakthrough curves of Pb and Zn sorption from binary solutions on natural clinoptilolite. Micropor Mesopor Mat. 2013;167:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.04.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ugrina M, Vukojević Medvidović N, Daković A. Characterization and environmental application of iron-modified zeolite from the Zlatokop deposit. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;53:3557–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.873743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodrigues AE. Chemical engineering and environmental challenges: Cyclic adsorption/reaction technologies: Materials and process together! J Enviro Chem Eng. 2020;8:103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the institutional funds of the Faculty of Chemistry and Technology University of Split.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nediljka Vukojević Medvidović: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing-original draft, Methodology; Supervision, Writing -review & editing.

Sandra Svilović: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Supervision, Writing -review & editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nediljka Vukojević Medvidović.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors agreed to publish the data in this journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vukojević Medvidović, N., Svilović, S. Cyclic zinc capture and zeolite regeneration using a column method, mass transfer analysis of multi regenerated bed. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 21, 333–353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00861-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00861-2

Keywords

Navigation