SpringerLink
Log in

A Business-Model Approach on Strategic Flexibility of Firms in a Shifting Value Chain: The Case of Coffee Processors in Amadeo and Silang, Cavite, Philippines

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Philippines’ coffee demand–supply gap is increasing and local value chain players are affected; however, these players have unequal capabilities to react. Using the business-model canvas, an exploratory case study of the coffee processors in the municipalities of Amadeo and Silang in Cavite Province was conducted to examine their market position amidst the changing industry landscape. The results showed that different business models have different priorities in response to the value chain shifts. Upstream players react toward being efficient in their operations, whereas downstream players work to be responsive in capturing market value. This suggests tailor-fit enabler interventions for different models. The study came up with this information from studying the business models’ activities, resources, partners, and customer segments. These variables can already reveal the firm’s priorities, strengths, and weaknesses. Nevertheless, further studies that determine relevant constructs or variables in analyzing businesses are recommended to segregate emerging silos of analysis for business models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(Source: PSA 2020)

Fig. 2

(Source: primary data)

Fig. 3

(Source: primary data)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A., & Banerji, K. (2003). Strategic flexibility and firm performance: the case of US based transnational corporations. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 4(1/2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspara, J., Lamberg, J., Laukia, A., & Tikkanen, H. (2013). Corporate business model transfromation and inter-organizational cognition: The case of Nokia. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 459–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., De Zan, G., & Pessot, E. (2017). Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities: A multiple case study. Journal of Business Research, 73, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. (2011). How to design a winning business model. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daidj, N. (2015). Develo** strategic business models and competitive advantage in the digital sector p170. Hershey PA: Business Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).

  • DaSilva, C., & Trkman, P. (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47(6), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, W., Feng, L., Zhao, X., & Lou, Y. (2020). Effects of supply chain competition on firms’ product sustainability strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275(124061), 124061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denicolai, S., & Previtali, P. (2020). Precision Medicine: Implications for value chains and business models in life sciences. In Technological forecasting and social change, 151(September 2019), 119767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119767.

  • DTI. (2017). The Philippines in the Coffee Global Value Chain. Policy Briefs (Series 2017-10). Department of Trade and Industry.

  • Dy, R. (2009). Food for thought. How agribusiness is feeding the world. Philippines: University of Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2006). Agricultural and food marketing management. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, G. T. C., Marcovitch, J., & de Queiroz, M. J. (2020). Understanding the constraints on success in Brazilian Amazon Production Chains. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(Suppl 1), S95–S104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2011). The CEO’s role in business model reinvention. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Y., Wang, X., Wu, Y. J., & He, P. (2018). How does the trust affect the topology of supply chain network and its resilience? An agent-based approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 116(July), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (2012). The business model innovation factory: How to stay relevant when the world is changing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khanmohammadi, E., Zandieh, M., & Tayebi, T. (2019). Drawing a strategy canvas using the fuzzy best–worst method. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorasani, S. T. (2018). A robust optimization model for supply chain in agile and flexible mode based on variables of uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(3), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, D., Ding, Y., Asian, S., & Paul, S. K. (2018). From supply chain integration to operational performance: The moderating effect of market uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(Suppl 1), S3–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massa, L., Tucci, C., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclndoe-Calder, T. (2012). Models of Agricultural Investment. Dublin 2, Ireland: The Irish Association of on-Governmental Development Organisations.

  • Miroshnychenko, I., Strobl, A., Matzler, K., & Massis, A. D. (2019). Absorptive capacity, strategic flexibility, and business model innovation: Empirical evidence from Italian SMEs. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. (2013). Business model for Indian retail sector: The Cafe Coffee Day case. IIMB Management Review, 25, 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Richardson, J., & Allen, J. (2006). Is the business model a useful strategic concept? Conceptual theoretical, and emperical insignts. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17, 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T., & Wood, S. (1991). Testing the survey method: Continuity and change in British industrial relations. Work, Employment & Society, 5(2), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa, R., & Werthner, H. (2011). Business models and business strategy—Phenomenon of explicitness. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 6, 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauhria, Y., Kulkarni, M. S., & Pandey, S. (2018). Development of strategic value chain framework for Indian car manufacturing industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 19(Suppl 1), S21–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M. P., & Russo, A. P. (2019). Analysis of business models innovation—A multiple case study. Innovation & Management Review, 16(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). He business model ontology—A proposition in a design science approach. Institut d’Informatique et Organisation (Dissertation 173). Switzerland: University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Pateli, A., & Giaglis, G. (2004). A research framework for analysing eBusiness models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCARRD. (2011). Exploring the opportunities towards competitiveness: Supply chain improvement of selected commodities in AFNR (Phase 1). Los Banos, Laguna: PCARRD-DOST—(Book Series No. 183/2011).

  • Philippine Statistics Authority (2020) Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries [Data File] Retrieved from https://openstat.psa.gov.ph/Database/Agriculture-Forestry-Fisheries

  • Poláková, J., Koláčková, G., & Tichá, I. (2015). Business model for Czech agribusiness. Cientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 46(3), 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, T. R., Morgan, R. M., & Morton, A. R. (2003). Efficient versus responsive supply chain choice: An empirical examination of influential factors. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(6), 430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, M. (2010). Business models on the web. Retrieved from Digital Enterprise: http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html. Date 20 accessed Oct 2020.

  • Ritter, T., & Lettl, C. (2018). The wider implications of business-model research. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalender, K., & Yadav, R. K. (2019). Strategic flexibility, manager personality, and firm performance: The case of Indian Automobile Industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S. K., Sushil, & Sharma, M. K. (2019). Managerial paradox toward flexibility: Emergent views using thematic analysis of literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(4), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Modgil, S., & Acharya, P. (2019). Assessment of supply chain flexibility using system dynamics modeling. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(Suppl 1), S39–S63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2015). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2018). Interpretive multi-criteria valuation of flexibility initiatives on direct value chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(9), 3720–3742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, P. (2016). The enabling environment for inclusive agribusiness in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 13(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. K. (2018). Airline categorisation by applying the business model canvas and clustering. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, A. R., Sassanelli, C., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020). Circular business models in the European manufacturing industry: A multiple case study analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, S., & Cotula, L. (2010). Making the most of agricultural investment: A survey of business models that provide opportunities for smallholders. London/Rome/Bern: IIED/FAO/IFAD/SDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrue, J. (2014). A critical investigation of the Osterwalder Business Model Canvas: An in-depth case study. In Belgian entrepreneurship research day, at Be-Ghent. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3488.8961.

  • Vorley, B., Lundy, M., & James, M. (2008, April). Business models for small farmers and SME’s. In Global agro-industries.

  • Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., & Ullrich, S. (2010). Strategic development of business models: Implications of the web 2.0 for creating value on the internet. Long Range Planning, 43, 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2010). The business model: Theoretical roots, recent developments and future research. Working paper No. 862. University of Navarra: IESSE Business School. Retrieved from http://www.bmcommunity.sitew.com/fs/Root/8jif5-AmitZottMassa.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2020.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business and Management, Visayas State University, Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines

    Gideon Niel D. Tan

Authors
  1. Gideon Niel D. Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon Niel D. Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all respondents involved in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, G.N.D. A Business-Model Approach on Strategic Flexibility of Firms in a Shifting Value Chain: The Case of Coffee Processors in Amadeo and Silang, Cavite, Philippines. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 22, 17–28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00255-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00255-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation