Log in

Alkalophilic bacterial co-cultures for the remediation of toxic pollutants in textile wastewater

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immense industrial growth contributed to tremendous pollution of the environment from a variety of sources. Bioremediation of different toxicants, such as heavy metals and dyes, is greatly appreciated for its cost-effective and environmentally friendly approach. The bacterial strains isolated from textile dye-contaminated soil samples were used in the study for the removal of the toxic pollutants. The bacterial strains were molecularly identified as E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii and Bacillus sp. B2022 using 16S rRNA sequencing. The preliminary batch study results of the bacterial co-cultures showed a maximum removal efficiency of 88.57 ± 0.005% on mixed dyes and 90.18 ± 0.005% on Cr (VI) respectively. The scale-up laboratory-sized batch reactor showed the results were the maximum removal percentage of 77.68 ± 0.005% with mixed dyes and 52.79 ± 0.005% on Cr (VI) observed for 6 days. The degraded metabolites analyzed by FT-IR revealed the presence of C-H, C = O, C-O, and C–Cl functional groups. The GC–MS study showed the presence of few metabolites such as decane, undecane, 2,4,6-trimethyl decane, butyl tetradecyl ester phthalic acid, and 2,6,10 trimethyl tetradecane. The integrated treatment approach of applying different techniques in a single platform is positively encouraged in the era of urbanization and industrialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be available by made on request.

References

  1. Abdul N, Sucharita S, Naidu S, Sudarshana V (2021) Chemosphere Nano-remediation of toxic heavy metal contamination: hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]. Chemosphere 266:129204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdullah MI, Öztürk A, Bayol E (2021) Biosorption of astrazon red dye by the bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sp strain 51ATA. Environ Earth Sci 80(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajaz M, Rehman A, Khan Z, Nisar MA, Hussain S (2019) Degradation of azo dyes by Alcaligenesaquatilis 3c and its potential use in the wastewater treatment. AMB Express 9(1).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0788-3

  4. Akshaya Vidhya T, Veena Gayathri K, Senthil Kumar P, Rangasamy G, Kathawala TM (2022) Treatment of mixed azo dyes in an aerobic sequential batch reactor and toxicity assessment using Vigna radiata. Int J Chem Eng. 1687-806X. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7083772

  5. Al-Ansari MM, Li Z, Masood A, Rajaselvam J (2022) Decolourization of azo dye using a batch bioreactor by an indigenous bacterium Enterobacter aerogenes ES014 from the waste water dye effluent and toxicity analysis. Environ Res 205:112189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Salihi S, Jasim AM, Fidalgo MM, **ng Y (2022) Removal of Congo red dyes from aqueous solutions by porous γ-alumina nanoshells. Chemosphere 286:131769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Tohamy R, Ali SS, Li F, Okasha KM, Mahmoud YAG, Elsamahy T, ..., Sun J (2022) A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 231:113160

  8. Ameenudeen S, Unnikrishnan S, Ramalingam K (2021) Statistical optimization for the efficacious degradation of reactive azo dyes using Acinetobacter baumannii JC359. J Environ Manage 279:111512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. APHA (2017) Standard method for examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benkhaya S, M’ rabet S, El Harfi A (2020) A review on classifications, recent synthesis and applications of textile dyes. Inorg Chem Commun 115:107891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.107891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bharagava RN, Mani S, Mulla SI, Saratale GD (2018) Degradation and decolourization potential of a ligninolytic enzyme producing Aeromonas hydrophila for crystal violet dye and its phytotoxicity evaluation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156:166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhattacharya A, Goyal N, Gupta A (2017) Degradation of azo dye methyl red by alkaliphilic, halotolerant Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis EMLA3: application in alkaline and salt-rich dyeing effluent treatment. Extremophiles 21(3):479–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-017-0918-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biju LM, Pooshana V, Kumar PS, Gayathri KV, Ansar S, Govindaraju S (2022) Treatment of textile wastewater containing mixed toxic azo dye and chromium (VI) BY haloalkaliphilic bacterial consortium. Chemosphere 287:132280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bindhu MR, Saranya P, Sheeba M, Vijilvani C, Re**iemon TS, Al-Mohaimeed AM, AbdelGawwad MR, Elshikh MS (2021) Functionalization of gold nanoparticles by β-cyclodextrin as a probe for the detection of heavy metals in water and photocatalytic degradation of textile dye. Environ Res 201:111628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R (2020) Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 6(9):e04691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chauhan MS, Rahul AK, Shekhar S, Kumar S (2022) Removal of heavy metal from wastewater using ion exchange with membrane filtration from Swarnamukhi river in Tirupati. Mater Today: Proc, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.280

  17. dos Santos JM, Quináia SP, Felsner ML (2018) Fast and direct analysis of Cr, Cd and Pb in brown sugar by GF AAS. Food Chem 260:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fouda A, Hassan SED, Saied E, Hamza MF (2021) Photocatalytic degradation of real textile and tannery effluent using biosynthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs), heavy metal adsorption, phytotoxicity, and antimicrobial activity. J Environ Chem Eng 9(4):105346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. García R, Campos J, Cruz JA, Calderón ME, Raynal ME, Buitrón G (2016) Tip 19(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recqb.2016.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Govindwar SP, Kurade MB, Tamboli DP, Kabra AN, Kim PJ, Waghmode TR (2014) Decolorization and degradation of xenobiotic azo dye reactive yellow-84A and textile effluent by Galactomyces geotrichum. Chemosphere 109:234–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hanis KKA, Muhammad Nasri AR, Wan Farahiyah WK, MohdRabani MY (2020) Bacterial degradation of azo dye Congo red by Bacillus sp. J Phys: Conf Ser 1529(2).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/2/022048

  22. Haque M, Mosharaf MK, Marcus PK (2021) Novel bacterial biofilm consortia that degrade and detoxify the carcinogenic diazo dye Congo red. Arch Microbiol 203(2):643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasan MN, Islam S, Abedin MZ (2022) Performance evaluation of textile effluent treatment plant: Bangladesh perspective. Int J Eng Mater Manuf 7(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hitkari G, Chowdhary P, Kumar V, Singh S, Motghare A (2022) Potential of copper-zinc oxide nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of congo red dye. Clean Chem Eng 1:100003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosseini Koupaie E, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Hashemi SH (2013) Evaluation of integrated anaerobic/aerobic fixed-bed sequencing batch biofilm reactor for decolorization and biodegradation of azo dye acid red 18: comparison of using two types of packing media. Biores Technol 127:415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Islam MR, Mostafa MG (2020) Characterization of textile dyeing effluent and its treatment using polyaluminum chloride. Appl Water Sci 10(5):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamalasini J, Gayathri KV, Kumar PS, Rajalakshmi S (2021) An efficient lab-scale soil bioreactor for the removal of chromium (Cr) and arsenic (As) contaminated soil using co-culture. Int J Environ Anal Chem 103(10):2318–2337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1892664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kathawala TM, Gayathri KV, SenthilKumar P (2021) A performance comparison of an aerobic and an integrated anaerobic-aerobic biological reactor system for the effective treatment of textile waste water. Int J Chem Eng 1687–806X. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8894332

  29. Kim SA, Kamala-Kannan S, Oh SG, Cho M, Bae S, Oh BT (2016) Simultaneous removal of chromium(VI) and reactive black 5 using zeolite supported nano-scale zero-valent iron composite. Environ Earth Sci 75(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4855-z

  30. Kishor R, Saratale GD, Saratale RG, Ferreira LFR, Bilal M, Iqbal HM, Bharagava RN (2021) Efficient degradation and detoxification of methylene blue dye by a newly isolated ligninolytic enzyme producing bacterium Bacillus albus MW407057. Colloids Surf, B 206:111947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kit Y, Chang J (2020) Bioresource technology bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: recent advances and mechanisms. Bioresource Technol 303:122886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krishnamoorthy R, Jose PA, Ranjith M, Anandham R, Suganya K, Prabhakaran J, ..., Kumutha K (2018) Decolourisation and degradation of azo dyes by mixed fungal culture consisted of Dichotomomycescejpii MRCH 1–2 and Phomatropica MRCH 1–3. J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):588–595

  33. Krithika A, Gayathri KV, Kumar DT, Doss CGP (2021) Mixed azo dyes degradation by an intracellular azoreductase enzyme from alkaliphilic Bacillus subtilis: a molecular docking study. Arch Microbiol 203:3033–3044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lalnunhlimi S, Krishnaswamy V (2016) Decolorization of azo dyes (direct blue 151 and direct red 31) by moderately alkaliphilic bacterial consortium. Braz J Microbiol 47:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mathur M, Gola D, Panja R, Malik A, Ahammad SZ (2018) Performance evaluation of two Aspergillus spp for the decolourization of reactive dyes by bioaccumulation and biosorption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(1):345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miran W, Jang J, Nawaz M, Shahzad A, Lee DS (2018) Sulfate-reducing mixed communities with the ability to generate bioelectricity and degrade textile diazo dye in microbial fuel cells. J Hazard Mater 352:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Misal SA, Lingojwar DP, Shinde RM, Gawai KR (2011) Purification and characterization of azoreductase from alkaliphilic strain Bacillus badius. Process biochemistry 46(6):1264–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.02.013

  38. Mishra S, Maiti A (2019) Study of simultaneous bioremediation of mixed reactive dyes and Cr (VI) containing wastewater through designed experiments. Environ Monit Assess 191(12):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Montañez-Barragán B, Sanz-Martín JL, Gutiérrez-Macías P, Morato-Cerro A, Rodríguez Vázquez R, Barragán-Huerta BE (2020) Azo dyes decolorization under high alkalinity and salinity conditions by Halomonas sp in batch and packed bed reactor. Extremophiles 24(2):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moyo S, Makhanya BP, Zwane PE (2022) Use of bacterial isolates in the treatment of textile dye wastewater: a review. Heliyon 8(6):e09632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ogugbue CJ, Sawidis T (2011) Bioremediation and detoxification of synthetic wastewater containing triarylmethane dyes by Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from industrial effluent. Biotechnol Res Int 2011:1–11. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/967925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Oon YL, Ong SA, Ho LN, Wong YS, Dahalan FA, Oon YS. ... Thung WE (2020) Constructed wetland–microbial fuel cell for azo dyes degradation and energy recovery: Influence of molecular structure, kinetics, mechanisms and degradation pathways. Sci Total Environ 720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137370

  43. Oyetade JA, Machunda RL, Hilonga A (2022) Photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in textile wastewater by polyaniline composite catalyst-a review. Scientific African e01305(17):2468–2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01305

  44. Peng J, Kumar K, Gross M, Kunetz T, Wen Z (2020) Removal of total dissolved solids from wastewater using a revolving algal biofilm reactor. Water Environ Res 92(5):766–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pokharia A, Ahluwalia SS (2016) Biodecolorization and degradation of xenobiotic azo dye-basic red 46 by Staphylococcus epidermidis MTCC 10623. Int J Res Biosci 5(2):10–23

    Google Scholar 

  46. Prabhakar Y, Gupta A, Kaushik A (2022) Using indigenous bacterial isolate Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis for removal of azo dyes: a low-cost ecofriendly approach for bioremediation of textile wastewaters. Environ Dev Sustain 24(4):5344–5367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pratiwi R, Notodarmojo S, Helmy Q (2018) Decolourization of remazol black-5 textile dyes using moving bed bio-film reactor. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 106(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012089

  48. Priyanka JV, Rajalakshmi S, Kumar PS, Krishnaswamy VG, Al Farraj DA, Elshikh MS, Gawwad MRA (2022) Bioremediation of soil contaminated with toxic mixed reactive azo dyes by co-cultured cells of Enterobacter cloacae and Bacillus subtilis. Environ Res 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112136

  49. Rajashekarappa KK, Mahadevan GD, Neelagund SE, Sathynarayana M, Vijaya D, Mulla SI (2022) Decolorization of amaranth RI and fast red E azo dyes by thermophilic Geobacillus thermoleovorans KNG 112. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 97(2):482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Riaz T, Zeeshan R, Zarif F, Ilyas K, Muhammad N, Safi SZ, Rahim A, Rizvi SAA, Rehman IU (2018) FTIR analysis of natural and synthetic collagen. Appl Spectrosc Rev 53(9):703–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2018.1426595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rima SAJ, Paul GK, Islam S, Akhtar-E-Ekram M, Zaman S, Saleh MA, Uddin MS (2022) Efficacy of Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. in textile dye degradation: a combined study on molecular identification, growth optimization, and comparative degradation. J Hazard Mater Lett 3:100068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharma K, Pandit S, Thapa BS, Pant M (2022) Biodegradation of Congo red using co-culture anode inoculum in a microbial fuel cell. Catalysts 12(10):1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sharma P, Singh SP, Parakh SK, Tong YW (2022) Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction. Bioengineered 13(3):4923–4938. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2037273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, Pandey A, Ngo HH, Guo W, Ng HY, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered 12(1):70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1863034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Singh AL, Chaudhary S, Kumar S, Kumar A, Singh A, Yadav A (2022) Biodegradation of Reactive Yellow-145 azo dye using bacterial consortium: a deterministic analysis based on degradable metabolite, phytotoxicity and genotoxicity study. Chemosphere 300:134504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sivasubramani K, Ganesh P, Sivagurunathan P, Kolan**athan K, Raman H (2021) Biodegradation potential of an estuarine bacterium Bacillus megaterium PNS 15 against an azo dye, Reactive Blue 194. J Appl Biol Biotechnol 9(4):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sonwani RK, Swain G, Giri BS, Singh RS, Rai BN (2020) BiodegradationofCongoreddyeinamovingbedbiofilmreactor:performanceevaluation and kinetic modeling. Biores Technol 302:122811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vaity RS, Verma JK (2011) Portland pozzolana cement in India with respect to total chromium and hexavalent chromium content. Adv Cem Res 23(3):145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vishani DB, Shrivastav A (2022) Enzymatic decolorization and degradation of azo dyes. Dev Wastewater Treat Res Process pp 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85657-7.00020-1

  60. Volarić A, Svirčev Z, Tamindžija D, Radnović D (2021) Microbial bioremediation of heavy metals. Hemijskaindustrija 75(2):103–115

    Google Scholar 

  61. Win TT, Swe TM, Ei HH, Win NN, Swe KK, Nandar W, Fu P (2021) An evaluation into the biosorption and biodegradation of azo dyes by indigenous siderophores-producing bacteria immobilized in chitosan. Biodegradation 32(6):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yadav R, Chundawat TS, Surolia PK, Vaya D (2022) Photocatalytic degradation of textile dyes using β-CD-CuO/ZnO nanocomposite. J Phys Chem Solids 165:110691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang J, Zhang Y, Wang S, Li S, Wang Y, Wang S, Li H (2020) Biodegradation of crystal violet mediated by CotA from Bacillusamyloliquefaciens. J Biosci Bioeng 130(4):347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2016) Shallow pond systems planted with Lemna minor treating azo dyes. Ecol Eng 94:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yu L, Zhang XY, Tang QW, Li J, **e T, Liu C, Cao MY, Zhang RC, Wang S, Hu JM, Qiao WC, Li WW, Ruan HH (2015) Decolorization characteristics of a newly isolated salt-tolerant Bacillus sp. strain and its application for azo dye-containing wastewater in immobilized form. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:9277–9287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank DST-FIST, Stella Maris College (Autonomous), Chennai, IIT Madras and VIT, Vellore for their assistance in the experimental analysis. We are also obliged to Tamil Nadu State council for Science and Technology, Chennai, for the financial aid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Anisha Susan Johnson: investigation, methodology, and writing — original draft. Leena Merlin Biju: investigation, resources, and formal analysis. P. Senthil Kumar, K. Veena Gayathri: conceptualization, validation, and supervision. Gayathri Rangasamy, C.S. Poorva: formal analysis; data curation; validation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to P. Senthil Kumar or K. Veena Gayathri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies involving animal or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 953 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, A.S., Biju, L.M., Kumar, P.S. et al. Alkalophilic bacterial co-cultures for the remediation of toxic pollutants in textile wastewater. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04549-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04549-3

Keywords

Navigation